1 |
♠AK4
♥T73
♦K742
♣KJ2
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣6 ♦6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ ♥4 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 1.50 0.50 2♠ S 3 ♣A 2-Guttman-Guttman vs 2-Shimokubo-Lee
140 1.50 0.50 2♠ S 3 ♣2 1-Lederman-Delugish vs 1-Petrytus-Phaneuf
100 0.00 2.00 4♣ W -2 ♥T 3-Farnham-Laybourne vs 3-Catt-Alford
|
2 |
♠9732
♥K62
♦QJ6
♣QJ9
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣3 ♥2 ♠3 NT4/2 |
EW: 4/3♣ 5♥ 3♠ ♦5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 0.00 2N E -1 ♦5 2-Guttman-Guttman vs 2-Shimokubo-Lee
140 1.00 1.00 3♥ W 3 ♦6 3-Farnham-Laybourne vs 3-Catt-Alford
200 0.00 2.00 2♥ W 5 ♦Q 1-Lederman-Delugish vs 1-Petrytus-Phaneuf
|
3 |
♠J32
♥A
♦KQJ954
♣K76
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 5♦ 2♥ 5♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦2 ♥5 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 2.00 0.00 4♠ S 6 ♠4 3-Farnham-Laybourne vs 3-Catt-Alford
420 1.00 1.00 4♠ S 4 ♥2 1-Lederman-Delugish vs 1-Petrytus-Phaneuf
170 0.00 2.00 2♠ N 4 ♥3 2-Guttman-Guttman vs 2-Shimokubo-Lee
|
4 |
♠8654
♥K2
♦K972
♣T43
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣5 ♦5 ♥3 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 4♥ 2NT ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 2.00 0.00 2♥ W 4 ♠8 3-Farnham-Laybourne vs 3-Catt-Alford
620 1.00 1.00 4♥ W 4 ♦7 1-Lederman-Delugish vs 1-Petrytus-Phaneuf
650 0.00 2.00 4♥ E 5 ♠6 2-Guttman-Guttman vs 2-Shimokubo-Lee
|
5 |
♠A854
♥Q96
♦QJ9
♣A85
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 4♥ 5♠ 3NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣5 ♥3 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 2.00 0.00 4♠ N 5 ♣J 1-Lederman-Delugish vs 3-Catt-Alford
630 1.00 1.00 3N N 4 ♣6 3-Farnham-Laybourne vs 2-Shimokubo-Lee
620 0.00 2.00 4♠ N 4 ♦3 2-Guttman-Guttman vs 1-Petrytus-Phaneuf
|
6 |
♠T7632
♥AJ63
♦J4
♣T7
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣3 ♦6 ♠5 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 2/1♠ 3NT ♦6 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 2.00 0.00 3N E -3 ♦T 3-Farnham-Laybourne vs 2-Shimokubo-Lee
130 1.00 1.00 3♣ E 4 ♦8 2-Guttman-Guttman vs 1-Petrytus-Phaneuf
630 0.00 2.00 3N E 4 ♠3 1-Lederman-Delugish vs 3-Catt-Alford
|
7 |
♠J8732
♥A53
♦9
♣AK64
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♥ 3♠ 1NT ♦6 |
EW: ♣3 ♦6 ♥3 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 2.00 0.00 4♥ N 4 ♠4 2-Guttman-Guttman vs 1-Petrytus-Phaneuf
170 1.00 1.00 2♥ S 4 ♠6 1-Lederman-Delugish vs 3-Catt-Alford
200 0.00 2.00 4♥ N -2 ♦3 3-Farnham-Laybourne vs 2-Shimokubo-Lee
|
8 |
♠AT2
♥J43
♦8532
♣T72
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣4 ♦6 ♥5 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 1NT ♦6 ♥6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 1.50 0.50 2♥ E -1 ♠9 3-Farnham-Laybourne vs 2-Shimokubo-Lee
50 1.50 0.50 2♣ E -1 ♠2 1-Lederman-Delugish vs 3-Catt-Alford
110 0.00 2.00 2♣ E 3 ♦2 2-Guttman-Guttman vs 1-Petrytus-Phaneuf
|
10 |
♠5
♥JT9
♦7654
♣AQT94
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦6 ♥3 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 1/2♣ 1♦ 3♥ 4♠ 3/4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 4♠ S -1 ♣6 1-Lederman-Delugish vs 2-Shimokubo-Lee
170 1.00 1.00 2♠ E 4 ♦7 2-Guttman-Guttman vs 3-Catt-Alford
600 0.00 2.00 3N E 3 ♦3 3-Farnham-Laybourne vs 1-Petrytus-Phaneuf
|