1 |
♠J4
♥AQ843
♦T6
♣AK74
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 4♥ 2♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦5 ♥2 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 4.00 0.00 4♥ N 5 ♣3 5-Wexler-Alford vs 5-Kovach-Delugish
200 3.00 1.00 3♥ N 5 ♦5 1-Laybourne-Delugish vs 1-Fortenberry-Fortenberry
170 1.00 3.00 3♥ N 4 ♦A 2-Petrytus-Phaneuf vs 2-Barbour-O'Connell
170 1.00 3.00 3♥ N 4 ♦A 3-Guttman-Guttman vs 3-Tsikalas-Catt
170 1.00 3.00 2♥ N 4 ♦Q 4-Naughton-Robillard vs 4-Shimokubo-Lee
|
2 |
♠52
♥T87
♦K7
♣AJT962
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦4 ♥3 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 2♦ 4♥ 1/2♠ 3NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 3♥ E -1 ♠5 3-Guttman-Guttman vs 3-Tsikalas-Catt
400 3.00 1.00 3N W 3 ♠5 4-Naughton-Robillard vs 4-Shimokubo-Lee
420 1.00 3.00 4♥ W 4 ♣A 5-Wexler-Alford vs 5-Kovach-Delugish
420 1.00 3.00 4♥ W 4 ♣J 2-Petrytus-Phaneuf vs 2-Barbour-O'Connell
420 1.00 3.00 4♥ E 4 ♣J 1-Laybourne-Delugish vs 1-Fortenberry-Fortenberry
|
3 |
♠QT65
♥432
♦J975
♣T8
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 2♠ ♣2 ♥2 NT3 |
EW: 5♣ 5♥ 2/1NT ♦4 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 3♥ E 5 ♠5 5-Wexler-Alford vs 5-Kovach-Delugish
620 2.50 1.50 4♥ W 4 ♦5 1-Laybourne-Delugish vs 1-Fortenberry-Fortenberry
620 2.50 1.50 4♥ W 4 ♣T 4-Naughton-Robillard vs 4-Shimokubo-Lee
650 0.50 3.50 4♥ W 5 ♠5 2-Petrytus-Phaneuf vs 2-Barbour-O'Connell
650 0.50 3.50 4♥ E 5 ♠5 3-Guttman-Guttman vs 3-Tsikalas-Catt
|
4 |
♠AQT5
♥Q972
♦953
♣T9
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♥ 4♠ 1NT ♣4 ♦4 |
EW: 3♣ 3♦ ♥3 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 2.50 1.50 3♠ S 4 ♣8 4-Naughton-Robillard vs 3-Tsikalas-Catt
170 2.50 1.50 2♠ S 4 ♣A 1-Laybourne-Delugish vs 5-Kovach-Delugish
170 2.50 1.50 2♠ S 4 ♣A 2-Petrytus-Phaneuf vs 1-Fortenberry-Fortenberry
170 2.50 1.50 2♠ N 4 ♣A 3-Guttman-Guttman vs 2-Barbour-O'Connell
110 0.00 4.00 2♥ S 2 ♥2 5-Wexler-Alford vs 4-Shimokubo-Lee
|
5 |
♠QJ9
♥KQ763
♦KJ8
♣Q4
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 1♠ ♣3 ♦4 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 2♦ 2NT ♥5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 3♥ N -1 ♣A 5-Wexler-Alford vs 4-Shimokubo-Lee
110 2.50 1.50 3♣ E 3 ♥A 4-Naughton-Robillard vs 3-Tsikalas-Catt
110 2.50 1.50 2♣ E 3 ♥A 3-Guttman-Guttman vs 2-Barbour-O'Connell
130 0.50 3.50 3♣ E 4 ♥A 1-Laybourne-Delugish vs 5-Kovach-Delugish
130 0.50 3.50 3♣ E 4 ♥2 2-Petrytus-Phaneuf vs 1-Fortenberry-Fortenberry
|
6 |
♠843
♥QJ2
♦J974
♣A43
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦1 ♥0 ♠0 NT0 |
EW: 5♦ 5♥ 6♠ ♣6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 3.50 0.50 5♠ W 5 ♦4 4-Naughton-Robillard vs 3-Tsikalas-Catt
650 3.50 0.50 4♠ W 5 ♥Q 2-Petrytus-Phaneuf vs 1-Fortenberry-Fortenberry
680 1.50 2.50 4♠ W 6 ♣A 5-Wexler-Alford vs 4-Shimokubo-Lee
680 1.50 2.50 4♠ W 6 ♣2 1-Laybourne-Delugish vs 5-Kovach-Delugish
710 0.00 4.00 4♠ E 7 ♦4 3-Guttman-Guttman vs 2-Barbour-O'Connell
|
7 |
♠AQ32
♥T54
♦Q86
♣T92
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/2♥ ♣6 ♦2/3 ♠2 NT5 |
EW: 1/-♣ 4♦ 4♠ 1/-NT ♣7/6 ♥5/4 NT7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.00 0.00 2♥ S 4 ♦5 5-Wexler-Alford vs 3-Tsikalas-Catt
140 3.00 1.00 2♥ N 3 ♦K 3-Guttman-Guttman vs 1-Fortenberry-Fortenberry
100 2.00 2.00 3♥ S -1 ♦A 2-Petrytus-Phaneuf vs 5-Kovach-Delugish
200 1.00 3.00 4♥ S -2 ♦A 1-Laybourne-Delugish vs 4-Shimokubo-Lee
300 0.00 4.00 3♥ S -3 ♦A 4-Naughton-Robillard vs 2-Barbour-O'Connell
|
8 |
♠KT763
♥AKQ7
♦AT5
♣2
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 7♣ 3♦ 6♥ 4♠ 7NT |
EW: ♣0 ♦4 ♥1 ♠3 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
520 4.00 0.00 3N N 7 ♦6 3-Guttman-Guttman vs 1-Fortenberry-Fortenberry
420 2.50 1.50 5♣ S 6 ♦K 2-Petrytus-Phaneuf vs 5-Kovach-Delugish
420 2.50 1.50 5♣ S 6 ♦4 1-Laybourne-Delugish vs 4-Shimokubo-Lee
50 1.00 3.00 5♣ S -1 ♥T 5-Wexler-Alford vs 3-Tsikalas-Catt
100 0.00 4.00 3♠* N -1 ♦2 4-Naughton-Robillard vs 2-Barbour-O'Connell
|
9 |
♠AQ2
♥AJ984
♦A4
♣AJ3
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 4♥ 3NT ♦6 ♠6 |
EW: 1♦ 1♠ ♣5 ♥3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 3.50 0.50 4♥ N 4 ♠5 1-Laybourne-Delugish vs 4-Shimokubo-Lee
420 3.50 0.50 4♥ N 4 ♠5 3-Guttman-Guttman vs 1-Fortenberry-Fortenberry
200 2.00 2.00 3♥ N 5 ♠5 4-Naughton-Robillard vs 2-Barbour-O'Connell
50 0.50 3.50 4♥ N -1 ♦9 2-Petrytus-Phaneuf vs 5-Kovach-Delugish
50 0.50 3.50 4♥ N -1 ♦2 5-Wexler-Alford vs 3-Tsikalas-Catt
|
10 |
♠T974
♥732
♦762
♣K74
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣4 ♦2 ♥2 NT2 |
EW: 2/1♣ 4♦ 5♥ 4/3NT ♠6/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 3♥ E -1 ♠4 3-Guttman-Guttman vs 5-Kovach-Delugish
170 3.00 1.00 3♥ W 4 ♠4 1-Laybourne-Delugish vs 3-Tsikalas-Catt
620 1.00 3.00 4♥ W 4 ♠T 4-Naughton-Robillard vs 1-Fortenberry-Fortenberry
620 1.00 3.00 4♥ W 4 ♠4 2-Petrytus-Phaneuf vs 4-Shimokubo-Lee
620 1.00 3.00 4♥ W 4 ♠2 5-Wexler-Alford vs 2-Barbour-O'Connell
|
11 |
♠J
♥KQ9872
♦Q8
♣A832
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ ♣6 ♦4 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 3♦ 3♠ 2NT ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 3.88 0.13 4♠* E -2 ♥2 5-Wexler-Alford vs 2-Barbour-O'Connell
50 2.63 1.38 2♥ N -1 ♦2 4-Naughton-Robillard vs 1-Fortenberry-Fortenberry
100 1.38 2.63 3♥ N -2 ♦J 2-Petrytus-Phaneuf vs 4-Shimokubo-Lee
110 0.13 3.88 2♠ E 2 ♥4 3-Guttman-Guttman vs 5-Kovach-Delugish
|
12 |
♠42
♥JT84
♦K643
♣Q86
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦4 ♥5 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 3♦ 2♥ 4♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 2.60 2.20 3N W 3 ♦3 2-Petrytus-Phaneuf vs 4-Shimokubo-Lee
430 2.20 2.60 3N W 4 ♠2 5-Wexler-Alford vs 2-Barbour-O'Connell
|