1 |
♠KT65
♥AQ4
♦K654
♣Q8
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♠ 1NT ♣3/2 ♥4 |
EW: 4♣ 2♥ ♦5 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 1.50 0.50 3♠ S -1 ♦A 2-Bakst-Max vs 2-Finnegan-Beckvall
50 1.50 0.50 2♠ N -1 ♦9 1-Simon-Spector vs 1-Barber-Rasmussen
100 0.00 2.00 2♠ S -2 ♣A 3-Nia-Glaser vs 4-Baker-Allyn
|
2 |
♠Q2
♥3
♦KT8653
♣8432
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦5 ♥6 ♠5 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ 1♥ 4NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 2.00 0.00 2♥ S -3 ♠A 2-Bakst-Max vs 2-Finnegan-Beckvall
430 0.50 1.50 3N W 4 ♦5 3-Nia-Glaser vs 4-Baker-Allyn
430 0.50 1.50 3N W 4 ♦3 1-Simon-Spector vs 1-Barber-Rasmussen
|
3 |
♠QT5
♥J6
♦QJ632
♣AT3
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 2♠ ♣3 ♥3 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 3♥ 2NT ♦4 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 2.00 0.00 4♠ S 4 ♥K 2-Bakst-Max vs 2-Finnegan-Beckvall
140 1.00 1.00 3♥ W 3 ♠5 3-Nia-Glaser vs 4-Baker-Allyn
620 0.00 2.00 4♥ W 4 ♦Q 1-Simon-Spector vs 1-Barber-Rasmussen
|
4 |
♠K9874
♥JT532
♦J
♣92
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 2♠ ♣4 ♦4 NT6 |
EW: 3/2♣ 3/2♦ 1/-NT ♥4 ♠5 NT7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 2N E -2 ♥8 1-Simon-Spector vs 4-Baker-Allyn
100 0.50 1.50 2N E -1 ♣Q 2-Bakst-Max vs 1-Barber-Rasmussen
100 0.50 1.50 3♦ E -1 ♠J 3-Nia-Glaser vs 3-Goldberg-St Louis
|
5 |
♠J843
♥K8
♦KQ4
♣9642
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/1♣ 1NT ♦2 ♥4 ♠4 |
EW: 5♦ 3♥ 2♠ ♣4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 2.00 0.00 3♣ S 4 ♦8 3-Nia-Glaser vs 3-Goldberg-St Louis
100 1.00 1.00 4♣ S -1 ♦8 2-Bakst-Max vs 1-Barber-Rasmussen
140 0.00 2.00 3♥ W 3 ♦K 1-Simon-Spector vs 4-Baker-Allyn
|
6 |
♠AKQ7
♥A
♦AK52
♣8762
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ 2♥ 3♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦2 ♥3 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 1.75 0.25 3N N 4 ♦3 3-Nia-Glaser vs 3-Goldberg-St Louis
140 0.25 1.75 1♠ N 3 ♦3 2-Bakst-Max vs 1-Barber-Rasmussen
|
7 |
♠AQ974
♥542
♦A752
♣8
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 2♠ ♣4 ♥5 NT5 |
EW: 2/3♣ 1/2♥ ♦3 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 2.00 0.00 3♥ E -3 ♠J 3-Nia-Glaser vs 2-Finnegan-Beckvall
140 1.00 1.00 3♥ E 3 ♦3 1-Simon-Spector vs 3-Goldberg-St Louis
200 0.00 2.00 2♠ N -2 ♣J 2-Bakst-Max vs 4-Baker-Allyn
|
8 |
♠KQ95
♥T
♦JT
♣QT6532
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♠ ♦2 ♥2 NT5 |
EW: 3♦ 5♥ 2NT ♣5 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 0.00 2♠ S -1 ♥8 1-Simon-Spector vs 3-Goldberg-St Louis
420 1.00 1.00 4♥ W 4 ♠K 2-Bakst-Max vs 4-Baker-Allyn
450 0.00 2.00 4♥ W 5 ♠K 3-Nia-Glaser vs 2-Finnegan-Beckvall
|
9 |
♠A3
♥KJ72
♦T763
♣A54
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ ♣3 ♥6 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 1♥ 3♠ 2NT ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 1.50 0.50 2N W -2 ♠3 1-Simon-Spector vs 3-Goldberg-St Louis
200 1.50 0.50 4♠ E -2 ♣9 3-Nia-Glaser vs 2-Finnegan-Beckvall
650 0.00 2.00 4♠ W 5 ♥2 2-Bakst-Max vs 4-Baker-Allyn
|
10 |
♠KT2
♥KJT
♦A43
♣AQ74
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 4♦ 2♥ 4/3♠ 5/4NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦3 ♥5 ♠3 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 2.00 0.00 3N N 3 ♥2 1-Simon-Spector vs 2-Finnegan-Beckvall
210 1.00 1.00 1N N 5 ♦2 3-Nia-Glaser vs 1-Barber-Rasmussen
100 0.00 2.00 3N N -1 ♦5 2-Bakst-Max vs 3-Goldberg-St Louis
|
11 |
♠AQ63
♥KT95
♦865
♣A3
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 2♥ 1♠ ♣6/5 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦4 ♥4 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 2.00 0.00 4♥ N 5 ♦A 1-Simon-Spector vs 2-Finnegan-Beckvall
130 1.00 1.00 4♦ S 4 ♣9 2-Bakst-Max vs 3-Goldberg-St Louis
90 0.00 2.00 2♦ S 2 ♣9 3-Nia-Glaser vs 1-Barber-Rasmussen
|
12 |
♠KJ93
♥8
♦842
♣KJ854
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♦ 1♠ 2NT ♥5 |
EW: 2♥ ♣3 ♦4 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 1♠ W -2 ♥8 2-Bakst-Max vs 3-Goldberg-St Louis
110 0.50 1.50 2♥ E 2 ♠7 3-Nia-Glaser vs 1-Barber-Rasmussen
110 0.50 1.50 2♥ E 2 ♦3 1-Simon-Spector vs 2-Finnegan-Beckvall
|