1 |
♠K632
♥KJ9
♦962
♣K85
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/-♦ ♣3 ♦7/6 ♥4 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 3/2♥ 1♠ 3/2NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 3.00 0.00 1N W 1 ♠2 2-Sperl-Webster vs 2-Randol-Lindsay
110 2.00 1.00 3♣ E 3 ♦K 1-Cayne-Gilburne vs 1-Bergman-Miller
120 0.50 2.50 1N W 2 ♠6 3-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 4-Olgin-Rothman
120 0.50 2.50 1N W 2 ♠2 4-Segal-Saferstein vs 3-Beckvall-Rasmussen
|
2 |
♠965
♥AJ9
♦Q9
♣Q9862
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♥ ♦3 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 4♦ 3/4♠ 3NT ♣4 ♥4/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.00 0.00 3♦ E 3 ♣J 1-Cayne-Gilburne vs 1-Bergman-Miller
130 1.50 1.50 3♦ E 4 ♥5 2-Sperl-Webster vs 2-Randol-Lindsay
130 1.50 1.50 2♦ E 4 ♥4 3-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 4-Olgin-Rothman
400 0.00 3.00 3N W 3 ♣6 4-Segal-Saferstein vs 3-Beckvall-Rasmussen
|
3 |
♠T832
♥J74
♦874
♣KJ7
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦3 ♥3 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 4♦ 3♥ 5♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 2.50 0.50 3N E 4 ♦5 2-Sperl-Webster vs 2-Randol-Lindsay
630 2.50 0.50 3N E 4 ♦2 1-Cayne-Gilburne vs 1-Bergman-Miller
660 0.50 2.50 3N W 5 ♥J 3-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 4-Olgin-Rothman
660 0.50 2.50 3N E 5 ♦2 4-Segal-Saferstein vs 3-Beckvall-Rasmussen
|
4 |
♠764
♥76
♦AQT
♣AJ753
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 3♥ 2♠ 4NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣1 ♥3 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.00 0.00 2♥ S 4 ♠K 1-Cayne-Gilburne vs 1-Bergman-Miller
140 2.00 1.00 2♥ S 3 ♠K 4-Segal-Saferstein vs 3-Beckvall-Rasmussen
130 1.00 2.00 3♣ N 4 ♠9 3-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 4-Olgin-Rothman
110 0.00 3.00 2♥ S 2 ♠K 2-Sperl-Webster vs 2-Randol-Lindsay
|
5 |
♠6
♥AJT95
♦AQT865
♣T
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 4♥ 2NT ♣5 ♠3/4 |
EW: 1♣ 3♠ ♦3 ♥3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 4♠* E -1 ♦K 1-Cayne-Gilburne vs 1-Bergman-Miller
100 2.00 1.00 3N S -1 ♠5 4-Segal-Saferstein vs 3-Beckvall-Rasmussen
140 1.00 2.00 3♠ E 3 ♦K 3-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 4-Olgin-Rothman
200 0.00 3.00 4♥ N -2 ♦K 2-Sperl-Webster vs 2-Randol-Lindsay
|
6 |
♠2
♥AQ8765
♦AQJ6
♣76
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/2♣ 4/5♦ 4♥ ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 4♠ ♣5 ♦2 ♥3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 2.00 1.00 4♥ N 4 ♠T 4-Segal-Saferstein vs 3-Beckvall-Rasmussen
420 2.00 1.00 4♥ N 4 ♠8 2-Sperl-Webster vs 2-Randol-Lindsay
420 2.00 1.00 4♥ N 4 ♠6 1-Cayne-Gilburne vs 1-Bergman-Miller
50 0.00 3.00 5♦ S -1 ♠A 3-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 4-Olgin-Rothman
|
7 |
♠K3
♥T53
♦JT94
♣AT83
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦6 ♥5 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 2♥ 2♠ 3NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.00 0.00 3N E -2 ♦4 4-Segal-Saferstein vs 2-Randol-Lindsay
100 1.50 1.50 3N E -1 ♦7 3-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 3-Beckvall-Rasmussen
100 1.50 1.50 3N E -1 ♦3 1-Cayne-Gilburne vs 4-Olgin-Rothman
150 0.00 3.00 2N E 3 ♠6 2-Sperl-Webster vs 1-Bergman-Miller
|
8 |
♠J9842
♥972
♦AJ6
♣72
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣2 ♦3 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 5♣ 2♦ 1♠ 3NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.00 0.00 1♥ S 2 ♦K 1-Cayne-Gilburne vs 4-Olgin-Rothman
50 1.50 1.50 2♥ S -1 ♦K 2-Sperl-Webster vs 1-Bergman-Miller
50 1.50 1.50 2♥ S -1 ♦K 4-Segal-Saferstein vs 2-Randol-Lindsay
100 0.00 3.00 3♥ S -2 ♦K 3-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 3-Beckvall-Rasmussen
|
9 |
♠Q853
♥T6
♦QJ5
♣T532
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♥ 1♠ ♦6 NT6 |
EW: ♣6 ♦6 ♥6 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 3.00 0.00 2♠ W -3 ♥6 2-Sperl-Webster vs 1-Bergman-Miller
110 1.50 1.50 2♥ S 2 ♠A 1-Cayne-Gilburne vs 4-Olgin-Rothman
110 1.50 1.50 2♥ S 2 ♣J 3-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 3-Beckvall-Rasmussen
90 0.00 3.00 1N S 1 ♠4 4-Segal-Saferstein vs 2-Randol-Lindsay
|
10 |
♠T42
♥QT96
♦QT973
♣6
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦3 ♥5 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 1/-♣ 2/1♦ 2/-♥ 2/1♠ 2/1NT ♣7/6 ♥8/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
800 3.00 0.00 5♦* E -3 ♣A 1-Cayne-Gilburne vs 4-Olgin-Rothman
200 2.00 1.00 3N W -2 ♣6 3-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 3-Beckvall-Rasmussen
600 0.50 2.50 3N E 3 ♣K 4-Segal-Saferstein vs 2-Randol-Lindsay
600 0.50 2.50 3N E 3 ♣8 2-Sperl-Webster vs 1-Bergman-Miller
|
11 |
♠87
♥AJT74
♦A76
♣T64
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦4 ♥6 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ 1♥ 3♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 2N E -2 ♣7 4-Segal-Saferstein vs 2-Randol-Lindsay
90 2.00 1.00 2♣ E 2 ♥9 3-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 3-Beckvall-Rasmussen
100 1.00 2.00 2♥ N -2 ♠A 1-Cayne-Gilburne vs 4-Olgin-Rothman
120 0.00 3.00 2N E 2 ♠3 2-Sperl-Webster vs 1-Bergman-Miller
|
12 |
♠J75
♥AK7
♦832
♣QT86
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣3 ♦3 ♠4/3 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 4♦ 3♠ ♥6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 2N E -2 ♥8 3-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 3-Beckvall-Rasmussen
50 1.50 1.50 1N E -1 ♥5 2-Sperl-Webster vs 1-Bergman-Miller
50 1.50 1.50 3♠ W -1 ♥A 1-Cayne-Gilburne vs 4-Olgin-Rothman
170 0.00 3.00 2♠ W 4 ♥K 4-Segal-Saferstein vs 2-Randol-Lindsay
|
13 |
♠AQT8
♥A82
♦65
♣Q742
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♠ 2NT ♣4 ♦6 ♥5 |
EW: 1♣ 2♥ ♦6 ♠1 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1430 3.00 0.00 6♠ S 6 ♠4 1-Cayne-Gilburne vs 3-Beckvall-Rasmussen
680 1.00 2.00 4♠ S 6 ♥J 4-Segal-Saferstein vs 1-Bergman-Miller
680 1.00 2.00 4♠ S 6 ♥5 3-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 2-Randol-Lindsay
680 1.00 2.00 4♠ S 6 ♦2 2-Sperl-Webster vs 4-Olgin-Rothman
|
14 |
♠T
♥JT74
♦AT984
♣A94
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 3♥ ♣3 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 3♠ 1NT ♦5 ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.50 0.50 4♠ E -1 ♣6 1-Cayne-Gilburne vs 3-Beckvall-Rasmussen
50 2.50 0.50 4♠ E -1 ♣6 4-Segal-Saferstein vs 1-Bergman-Miller
140 1.00 2.00 2♠ W 3 ♥J 2-Sperl-Webster vs 4-Olgin-Rothman
400 0.00 3.00 3N E 3 ♥6 3-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 2-Randol-Lindsay
|
15 |
♠A6
♥AKQJ4
♦86
♣T742
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ 3♥ 2♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦6 ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.00 0.00 2♥ E -4 ♠Q 4-Segal-Saferstein vs 1-Bergman-Miller
140 2.00 1.00 2♥ N 3 ♦2 2-Sperl-Webster vs 4-Olgin-Rothman
110 0.50 2.50 2♥ N 2 ♦T 1-Cayne-Gilburne vs 3-Beckvall-Rasmussen
110 0.50 2.50 2♥ N 2 ♦T 3-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 2-Randol-Lindsay
|
16 |
♠A52
♥J75
♦A8743
♣T4
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♦ 5♠ 2NT ♥5 |
EW: 1♥ ♣3 ♦4 ♠2 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 3.00 0.00 4♠ S 5 ♦Q 4-Segal-Saferstein vs 1-Bergman-Miller
420 2.00 1.00 4♠ S 4 ♦5 2-Sperl-Webster vs 4-Olgin-Rothman
170 0.50 2.50 3♠ S 4 ♥A 3-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 2-Randol-Lindsay
170 0.50 2.50 3♠ S 4 ♥T 1-Cayne-Gilburne vs 3-Beckvall-Rasmussen
|
17 |
♠AK932
♥65
♦K42
♣AQT
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♦ 2♠ 2NT ♥5 |
EW: 2♥ ♣5 ♦4 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 3.00 0.00 3N N 4 ♣3 2-Sperl-Webster vs 4-Olgin-Rothman
210 2.00 1.00 1N S 5 ♦5 1-Cayne-Gilburne vs 3-Beckvall-Rasmussen
140 1.00 2.00 2♠ N 3 ♦A 4-Segal-Saferstein vs 1-Bergman-Miller
120 0.00 3.00 2N S 2 ♥4 3-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 2-Randol-Lindsay
|
18 |
♠Q96
♥A73
♦QJ942
♣63
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5/6♣ 5/6♦ 1♠ 3NT ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣1 ♦1 ♠6 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 2.50 0.50 3N N 5 ♠J 2-Sperl-Webster vs 4-Olgin-Rothman
660 2.50 0.50 3N N 5 ♠4 4-Segal-Saferstein vs 1-Bergman-Miller
620 1.00 2.00 5♣ S 6 ♥K 1-Cayne-Gilburne vs 3-Beckvall-Rasmussen
170 0.00 3.00 3♣ S 6 ♥3 3-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 2-Randol-Lindsay
|
19 |
♠Q92
♥A53
♦T9854
♣84
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣6 ♥5 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 2♥ 3♠ 1NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 2.50 0.50 1N N 1 ♦6 1-Cayne-Gilburne vs 2-Randol-Lindsay
90 2.50 0.50 1N N 1 ♦6 4-Segal-Saferstein vs 4-Olgin-Rothman
50 1.00 2.00 2♣ S -1 ♠J 3-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 1-Bergman-Miller
150 0.00 3.00 2♣ S -3 ♦7 2-Sperl-Webster vs 3-Beckvall-Rasmussen
|
20 |
♠T43
♥AJ73
♦43
♣T976
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ ♣6 ♦3 ♠3 NT6 |
EW: 1/-♣ 4♦ 2♠ ♣7/5 ♥5/4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 3.00 0.00 3N E -6 ♥4 4-Segal-Saferstein vs 4-Olgin-Rothman
100 1.50 1.50 2♠ W -1 ♥A 1-Cayne-Gilburne vs 2-Randol-Lindsay
100 1.50 1.50 4♦ E -1 ♥4 3-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 1-Bergman-Miller
130 0.00 3.00 3♦ E 4 ♥T 2-Sperl-Webster vs 3-Beckvall-Rasmussen
|
21 |
♠75
♥AT96
♦AQ7
♣Q632
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♠ ♣6 ♥6 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♥ 1NT ♦6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
PASS 3.00 0.00 Pass Out 3-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 1-Bergman-Miller
200 1.50 1.50 2N N -2 ♦6 1-Cayne-Gilburne vs 2-Randol-Lindsay
200 1.50 1.50 1N N -2 ♦T 2-Sperl-Webster vs 3-Beckvall-Rasmussen
300 0.00 3.00 2N N -3 ♦6 4-Segal-Saferstein vs 4-Olgin-Rothman
|
22 |
♠AQ4
♥AT874
♦T5
♣A97
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♦ 5♥ 3♠ 4/5NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦3 ♥2 ♠4 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 3.00 0.00 4♥ N 4 ♣Q 2-Sperl-Webster vs 3-Beckvall-Rasmussen
140 2.00 1.00 3♥ N 3 ♦9 4-Segal-Saferstein vs 4-Olgin-Rothman
50 0.50 2.50 4♥ N -1 ♣Q 1-Cayne-Gilburne vs 2-Randol-Lindsay
50 0.50 2.50 4♥ N -1 ♣Q 3-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 1-Bergman-Miller
|
23 |
♠AK43
♥Q872
♦Q2
♣K42
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2/1♦ 1♥ 1♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦5 ♥6 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 3.00 0.00 1N S 1 ♦3 2-Sperl-Webster vs 3-Beckvall-Rasmussen
100 1.50 1.50 3N S -1 ♥4 1-Cayne-Gilburne vs 2-Randol-Lindsay
100 1.50 1.50 3N N -1 ♦7 4-Segal-Saferstein vs 4-Olgin-Rothman
200 0.00 3.00 2♦ S -2 ♣2 3-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 1-Bergman-Miller
|
24 |
♠KT762
♥QT94
♦T43
♣Q
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 4♥ 1♠ ♣4 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 1NT ♦3 ♥3 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 3.00 0.00 4♥ S 4 ♣A 4-Segal-Saferstein vs 4-Olgin-Rothman
200 2.00 1.00 3♥ S 5 ♦K 3-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 1-Bergman-Miller
170 1.00 2.00 3♥ S 4 ♠3 1-Cayne-Gilburne vs 2-Randol-Lindsay
140 0.00 3.00 2♥ S 3 ♦5 2-Sperl-Webster vs 3-Beckvall-Rasmussen
|