1 |
♠J74
♥75
♦AKT63
♣AQ2
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 5♠ 1NT ♣5 ♥5 |
EW: 2♣ 2♥ ♦3 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 2.50 1.50 4♠ S 5 ♥A 3-Zimmerman-Renfroe vs 4-D'Amico-Hodes
450 2.50 1.50 4♠ S 5 ♦J 1-Urben-Hawley vs 1-Johnson-Beckvall
450 2.50 1.50 4♠ S 5 ♣9 5-Sapiro-Fox vs 3-Fordon-Sentner
450 2.50 1.50 4♠ S 5 ♣7 4-Goldstein-Clark vs 6-Thirkhill-Lucas
420 0.00 4.00 4♠ S 4 ♦J 6-Jacobson-Bigley vs 5-Lederman-O'Connell
|
2 |
♠QJ
♥632
♦KT742
♣QT6
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦3 ♥2 ♠3 NT2 |
EW: 4♣ 4♦ 5♥ 4♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 3.50 0.50 3N W 3 ♦4 1-Urben-Hawley vs 1-Johnson-Beckvall
400 3.50 0.50 3N W 3 ♦4 3-Zimmerman-Renfroe vs 4-D'Amico-Hodes
430 1.00 3.00 3N W 4 ♦4 4-Goldstein-Clark vs 6-Thirkhill-Lucas
430 1.00 3.00 3N W 4 ♦4 5-Sapiro-Fox vs 3-Fordon-Sentner
430 1.00 3.00 3N E 4 ♠3 6-Jacobson-Bigley vs 5-Lederman-O'Connell
|
3 |
♠984
♥KJ3
♦J32
♣QJ85
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♥ ♦5 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 2♦ 2♠ 1NT ♣5 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.50 0.50 3♠ W -1 ♣5 5-Sapiro-Fox vs 3-Fordon-Sentner
100 3.50 0.50 2♠ E -1 ♥6 3-Zimmerman-Renfroe vs 4-D'Amico-Hodes
90 2.00 2.00 2♦ E 2 ♥3 4-Goldstein-Clark vs 6-Thirkhill-Lucas
150 1.00 3.00 1N N -3 ♦4 6-Jacobson-Bigley vs 5-Lederman-O'Connell
300 0.00 4.00 4♣* S -2 ♠Q 1-Urben-Hawley vs 1-Johnson-Beckvall
|
4 |
♠Q64
♥5
♦AKJT54
♣763
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣5 ♥0 ♠0 NT0 |
EW: 1♣ 6♥ 6♠ 1NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 3.50 0.50 4♠ W 5 ♦A 4-Goldstein-Clark vs 6-Thirkhill-Lucas
650 3.50 0.50 4♥ E 5 ♦3 1-Urben-Hawley vs 1-Johnson-Beckvall
680 1.50 2.50 5♠ W 6 ♦A 3-Zimmerman-Renfroe vs 4-D'Amico-Hodes
680 1.50 2.50 4♥ E 6 ♦3 5-Sapiro-Fox vs 3-Fordon-Sentner
1430 0.00 4.00 6♥ E 6 ♣5 6-Jacobson-Bigley vs 5-Lederman-O'Connell
|
5 |
♠2
♥JT8
♦92
♣KJT9853
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1/2♥ ♦5 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 1♦ 1♠ ♣2 ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 3♠ E -1 ♣2 3-Zimmerman-Renfroe vs 4-D'Amico-Hodes
90 3.00 1.00 2♦ W 2 ♠2 6-Jacobson-Bigley vs 5-Lederman-O'Connell
110 2.00 2.00 3♦ W 3 ♠2 5-Sapiro-Fox vs 3-Fordon-Sentner
300 1.00 3.00 3N S -3 ♦K 1-Urben-Hawley vs 1-Johnson-Beckvall
500 0.00 4.00 3N S -5 ♦K 4-Goldstein-Clark vs 6-Thirkhill-Lucas
|
6 |
♠6
♥K965
♦9862
♣AKQ5
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 5♦ 3♥ 3♠ 3/4NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦2 ♥4 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 3.50 0.50 3N N 4 ♥3 6-Jacobson-Bigley vs 4-D'Amico-Hodes
430 3.50 0.50 3N N 4 ♣9 4-Goldstein-Clark vs 5-Lederman-O'Connell
400 2.00 2.00 3N N 3 ♣9 5-Sapiro-Fox vs 1-Johnson-Beckvall
50 1.00 3.00 3N N -1 ♣4 2-Urben-Gilburne vs 2-Banucci-Banucci
100 0.00 4.00 3N N -2 ♣4 1-Urben-Hawley vs 6-Thirkhill-Lucas
|
7 |
♠J52
♥QJ72
♦K3
♣QJT9
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♥ ♦5 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 2♦ 2♠ ♣4 ♥4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 2.50 1.50 4♥ S 4 ♠A 1-Urben-Hawley vs 6-Thirkhill-Lucas
620 2.50 1.50 4♥ S 4 ♠A 2-Urben-Gilburne vs 2-Banucci-Banucci
620 2.50 1.50 4♥ S 4 ♠A 5-Sapiro-Fox vs 1-Johnson-Beckvall
620 2.50 1.50 4♥ S 4 ♦9 4-Goldstein-Clark vs 5-Lederman-O'Connell
140 0.00 4.00 3♥ S 3 ♦9 6-Jacobson-Bigley vs 4-D'Amico-Hodes
|
8 |
♠94
♥Q97
♦QJ763
♣T93
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣4 ♥5 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 2♥ 3♠ 1NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 2N E -1 ♦4 2-Urben-Gilburne vs 2-Banucci-Banucci
140 2.00 2.00 2♠ E 3 ♦4 1-Urben-Hawley vs 6-Thirkhill-Lucas
140 2.00 2.00 2♠ E 3 ♦2 4-Goldstein-Clark vs 5-Lederman-O'Connell
140 2.00 2.00 2♠ E 3 ♦2 5-Sapiro-Fox vs 1-Johnson-Beckvall
800 0.00 4.00 5♦* S -4 ♣A 6-Jacobson-Bigley vs 4-D'Amico-Hodes
|
9 |
♠KT8653
♥QJ73
♦-
♣764
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♥ 1♠ ♣3 NT2 |
EW: 2♣ 5NT ♦6 ♥4 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.50 0.50 5♣ W -2 ♥Q 1-Urben-Hawley vs 6-Thirkhill-Lucas
200 3.50 0.50 4♣ W -2 ♠6 4-Goldstein-Clark vs 5-Lederman-O'Connell
50 2.00 2.00 3♠ N -1 ♥5 5-Sapiro-Fox vs 1-Johnson-Beckvall
100 1.00 3.00 4♠ N -2 ♣Q 2-Urben-Gilburne vs 2-Banucci-Banucci
110 0.00 4.00 3♣ W 3 ♣7 6-Jacobson-Bigley vs 4-D'Amico-Hodes
|
10 |
♠Q9765
♥KJT75
♦4
♣T9
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♥ ♦4 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 3/2♦ 2/3♠ 2NT ♣6 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
500 4.00 0.00 4♠* W -2 ♦4 1-Urben-Hawley vs 6-Thirkhill-Lucas
400 3.00 1.00 4♠ W -4 ♦4 6-Jacobson-Bigley vs 4-D'Amico-Hodes
200 2.00 2.00 4♠ W -2 ♦4 5-Sapiro-Fox vs 1-Johnson-Beckvall
100 1.00 3.00 4♠ W -1 ♥7 2-Urben-Gilburne vs 2-Banucci-Banucci
790 0.00 4.00 4♠* E 4 ♦4 4-Goldstein-Clark vs 5-Lederman-O'Connell
|
11 |
♠Q8732
♥A74
♦K3
♣KT3
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 7♦ 2♥ 7♠ 7NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦0 ♥5 ♠0 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1010 4.00 0.00 6♠ S 7 ♣Q 1-Urben-Hawley vs 5-Lederman-O'Connell
510 1.50 2.50 4♠ S 7 ♥J 3-Zimmerman-Renfroe vs 3-Fordon-Sentner
510 1.50 2.50 4♠ S 7 ♦4 5-Sapiro-Fox vs 6-Thirkhill-Lucas
510 1.50 2.50 4♠ S 7 ♣Q 6-Jacobson-Bigley vs 2-Banucci-Banucci
510 1.50 2.50 4♠ N 7 ♥J 2-Urben-Gilburne vs 1-Johnson-Beckvall
|
12 |
♠KQ532
♥7
♦J
♣AQ9864
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♥ 5♠ ♦4 NT5 |
EW: 2♦ 1NT ♣3 ♥4 ♠2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 5♦ W -2 ♥7 5-Sapiro-Fox vs 6-Thirkhill-Lucas
50 3.00 1.00 4♦ W -1 ♠K 6-Jacobson-Bigley vs 2-Banucci-Banucci
100 2.00 2.00 5♠ N -1 ♦3 2-Urben-Gilburne vs 1-Johnson-Beckvall
200 0.50 3.50 5♠ N -2 ♦K 3-Zimmerman-Renfroe vs 3-Fordon-Sentner
200 0.50 3.50 4♠ N -2 ♥K 1-Urben-Hawley vs 5-Lederman-O'Connell
|
13 |
♠J873
♥652
♦AJ86
♣64
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 2♥ 2♠ 1NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦6 ♥5/4 ♠5/4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 4.00 0.00 2♥ W -3 ♣6 3-Zimmerman-Renfroe vs 3-Fordon-Sentner
110 3.00 1.00 1♠ N 2 ♣2 1-Urben-Hawley vs 5-Lederman-O'Connell
100 1.50 2.50 2♣ S -1 ♥3 2-Urben-Gilburne vs 1-Johnson-Beckvall
100 1.50 2.50 2♣ S -1 ♦3 5-Sapiro-Fox vs 6-Thirkhill-Lucas
200 0.00 4.00 2♥ S -2 ♦3 6-Jacobson-Bigley vs 2-Banucci-Banucci
|
14 |
♠K9
♥J9
♦AKT962
♣KJ3
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/2♣ 2♦ -/1♠ 1/-NT ♥6 ♠6/7 NT7/6 |
EW: -/1♥ -/1NT ♣5 ♦4/5 ♥6/7 ♠6 NT6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.50 0.50 3♥ W -2 ♦A 1-Urben-Hawley vs 5-Lederman-O'Connell
100 3.50 0.50 3♥ W -2 ♦A 2-Urben-Gilburne vs 1-Johnson-Beckvall
50 2.00 2.00 3♥ W -1 ♦A 6-Jacobson-Bigley vs 2-Banucci-Banucci
100 1.00 3.00 4♦ N -2 ♥6 5-Sapiro-Fox vs 6-Thirkhill-Lucas
140 0.00 4.00 3♥ W 3 ♦A 3-Zimmerman-Renfroe vs 3-Fordon-Sentner
|
15 |
♠K
♥J8542
♦J762
♣863
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♥ ♦2 ♠0 NT2 |
EW: 5♦ 6♠ 5/4NT ♣6/5 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 4.00 0.00 4♠ W 5 ♥J 2-Urben-Gilburne vs 1-Johnson-Beckvall
480 2.50 1.50 4♠ W 6 ♥8 1-Urben-Hawley vs 5-Lederman-O'Connell
480 2.50 1.50 4♠ W 6 ♣3 3-Zimmerman-Renfroe vs 3-Fordon-Sentner
510 1.00 3.00 4♠ W 7 ♣8 6-Jacobson-Bigley vs 2-Banucci-Banucci
980 0.00 4.00 6♠ E 6 ♣K 5-Sapiro-Fox vs 6-Thirkhill-Lucas
|
16 |
♠KT97632
♥T82
♦T7
♣3
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦2 ♥0 ♠5 NT1 |
EW: 4♣ 5♦ 7♥ 2♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 6♥ E -2 ♠4 1-Urben-Hawley vs 3-Fordon-Sentner
650 2.50 1.50 4♥ E 5 ♠4 2-Urben-Gilburne vs 6-Thirkhill-Lucas
650 2.50 1.50 4♥ E 5 ♠4 3-Zimmerman-Renfroe vs 2-Banucci-Banucci
680 1.00 3.00 4♥ E 6 ♦Q 6-Jacobson-Bigley vs 1-Johnson-Beckvall
690 0.00 4.00 3N W 6 ♠7 4-Goldstein-Clark vs 4-D'Amico-Hodes
|
17 |
♠AQ4
♥A
♦A853
♣AQT65
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 6♦ 1♥ 2♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦1 ♥6 ♠4 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
920 3.50 0.50 6♦ S 6 ♥J 3-Zimmerman-Renfroe vs 2-Banucci-Banucci
920 3.50 0.50 6♣ N 6 ♥2 1-Urben-Hawley vs 3-Fordon-Sentner
460 2.00 2.00 3N N 5 ♥4 6-Jacobson-Bigley vs 1-Johnson-Beckvall
150 1.00 3.00 1♣ N 5 ♥3 2-Urben-Gilburne vs 6-Thirkhill-Lucas
140 0.00 4.00 1♠ N 3 ♥2 4-Goldstein-Clark vs 4-D'Amico-Hodes
|
18 |
♠32
♥K73
♦AK743
♣AKT
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♦ 2/1♥ 1♠ 3/1NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦3 ♥5 ♠6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 4.00 0.00 3N N 3 ♥8 3-Zimmerman-Renfroe vs 2-Banucci-Banucci
150 2.50 1.50 4♦ N 5 ♥A 4-Goldstein-Clark vs 4-D'Amico-Hodes
150 2.50 1.50 3♦ N 5 ♥A 2-Urben-Gilburne vs 6-Thirkhill-Lucas
100 0.50 3.50 3N N -1 ♥7 1-Urben-Hawley vs 3-Fordon-Sentner
100 0.50 3.50 4♦ N -1 ♠J 6-Jacobson-Bigley vs 1-Johnson-Beckvall
|
19 |
♠J975
♥A3
♦T976
♣763
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 1♠ ♣5 ♥5 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 2♥ 1NT ♦5 ♠6/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 3N E -1 ♦Q 6-Jacobson-Bigley vs 1-Johnson-Beckvall
100 2.50 1.50 3♠ N -2 ♦A 4-Goldstein-Clark vs 4-D'Amico-Hodes
100 2.50 1.50 2♠ N -2 ♦A 1-Urben-Hawley vs 3-Fordon-Sentner
300 1.00 3.00 3♠* N -2 ♦A 3-Zimmerman-Renfroe vs 2-Banucci-Banucci
600 0.00 4.00 3N E 3 ♠4 2-Urben-Gilburne vs 6-Thirkhill-Lucas
|
20 |
♠J5
♥AQT6
♦AQ432
♣K3
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 5♦ 6♥ 2♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦2 ♥1 ♠5 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
690 4.00 0.00 3N S 6 ♣6 2-Urben-Gilburne vs 6-Thirkhill-Lucas
680 2.00 2.00 4♥ S 6 ♣6 4-Goldstein-Clark vs 4-D'Amico-Hodes
680 2.00 2.00 4♥ N 6 ♦J 1-Urben-Hawley vs 3-Fordon-Sentner
680 2.00 2.00 4♥ N 6 ♦J 3-Zimmerman-Renfroe vs 2-Banucci-Banucci
660 0.00 4.00 3N N 5 ♣2 6-Jacobson-Bigley vs 1-Johnson-Beckvall
|
21 |
♠A976
♥JT62
♦A7
♣Q72
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣3 ♦4 ♥5 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 3♦ 2♥ 3NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 5♣ E -3 ♠J 5-Sapiro-Fox vs 5-Lederman-O'Connell
50 2.50 1.50 3N E -1 ♠2 2-Urben-Gilburne vs 4-D'Amico-Hodes
50 2.50 1.50 2N W -1 ♠6 3-Zimmerman-Renfroe vs 1-Johnson-Beckvall
110 1.00 3.00 3♦ E 3 ♠2 4-Goldstein-Clark vs 3-Fordon-Sentner
180 0.00 4.00 1N W 4 ♠7 1-Urben-Hawley vs 2-Banucci-Banucci
|
22 |
♠J54
♥AJT2
♦K985
♣Q8
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 4♥ 2♠ 3NT ♣6 |
EW: ♣6 ♦6 ♥3 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 4.00 0.00 4♥ S 6 ♠T 4-Goldstein-Clark vs 3-Fordon-Sentner
450 2.50 1.50 4♥ S 5 ♠T 3-Zimmerman-Renfroe vs 1-Johnson-Beckvall
450 2.50 1.50 4♥ S 5 ♠4 1-Urben-Hawley vs 2-Banucci-Banucci
420 0.50 3.50 4♥ S 4 ♠T 5-Sapiro-Fox vs 5-Lederman-O'Connell
420 0.50 3.50 4♥ S 4 ♣2 2-Urben-Gilburne vs 4-D'Amico-Hodes
|
23 |
♠AJ952
♥J96
♦J7
♣QJ4
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ 1♥ 4♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦4 ♥6 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 4.00 0.00 4♠ N 5 ♥3 3-Zimmerman-Renfroe vs 1-Johnson-Beckvall
620 3.00 1.00 4♠ N 4 ♣3 1-Urben-Hawley vs 2-Banucci-Banucci
100 1.50 2.50 3N S -1 ♣8 4-Goldstein-Clark vs 3-Fordon-Sentner
100 1.50 2.50 4♠ N -1 ♥8 5-Sapiro-Fox vs 5-Lederman-O'Connell
200 0.00 4.00 3N N -2 ♥3 2-Urben-Gilburne vs 4-D'Amico-Hodes
|
24 |
♠QT
♥J53
♦KQT76
♣A65
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦6 ♥4 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 3♥ 1♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.50 1.50 3♥ W 3 ♦K 2-Urben-Gilburne vs 4-D'Amico-Hodes
140 2.50 1.50 3♥ W 3 ♦K 3-Zimmerman-Renfroe vs 1-Johnson-Beckvall
140 2.50 1.50 3♥ W 3 ♦K 4-Goldstein-Clark vs 3-Fordon-Sentner
140 2.50 1.50 3♥ W 3 ♦K 5-Sapiro-Fox vs 5-Lederman-O'Connell
420 0.00 4.00 4♥ W 4 ♦K 1-Urben-Hawley vs 2-Banucci-Banucci
|
25 |
♠J3
♥K8732
♦2
♣AQJ98
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♥ ♦4 ♠4/5 NT5 |
EW: 2♦ 2♠ 1NT ♣4 ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 4.00 0.00 4♦ E -3 ♥A 3-Zimmerman-Renfroe vs 1-Johnson-Beckvall
50 3.00 1.00 3♥ N -1 ♦4 1-Urben-Hawley vs 2-Banucci-Banucci
100 2.00 2.00 3♥ N -2 ♦5 5-Sapiro-Fox vs 5-Lederman-O'Connell
120 1.00 3.00 1N W 2 ♣8 2-Urben-Gilburne vs 4-D'Amico-Hodes
150 0.00 4.00 3♥ N -3 ♦3 4-Goldstein-Clark vs 3-Fordon-Sentner
|
26 |
♠K9865
♥J3
♦3
♣J9643
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ 1♠ ♥5 NT5 |
EW: 1♥ 1NT ♣5 ♦6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.50 0.50 3♦ S -1 ♥K 3-Zimmerman-Renfroe vs 5-Lederman-O'Connell
100 3.50 0.50 3♦ S -1 ♥K 5-Sapiro-Fox vs 4-D'Amico-Hodes
200 2.00 2.00 2♦ S -2 ♣2 4-Goldstein-Clark vs 2-Banucci-Banucci
300 0.50 3.50 3♦ S -3 ♥K 2-Urben-Gilburne vs 3-Fordon-Sentner
300 0.50 3.50 3♦ S -3 ♥K 6-Jacobson-Bigley vs 6-Thirkhill-Lucas
|
27 |
♠43
♥Q974
♦AQ6
♣KT96
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 1♠ ♣6 ♦5 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 1NT ♥6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
800 4.00 0.00 5♣* W -4 ♠3 2-Urben-Gilburne vs 3-Fordon-Sentner
100 3.00 1.00 2N W -2 ♥4 4-Goldstein-Clark vs 2-Banucci-Banucci
50 1.00 3.00 3N W -1 ♠4 3-Zimmerman-Renfroe vs 5-Lederman-O'Connell
50 1.00 3.00 1N W -1 ♣6 5-Sapiro-Fox vs 4-D'Amico-Hodes
50 1.00 3.00 1♣ W -1 ♠4 6-Jacobson-Bigley vs 6-Thirkhill-Lucas
|
28 |
♠QT94
♥A32
♦K43
♣K84
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣5 ♦5 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 2♠ 1NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.00 1.00 1N W -1 ♥2 3-Zimmerman-Renfroe vs 5-Lederman-O'Connell
50 3.00 1.00 3♠ E -1 ♥6 4-Goldstein-Clark vs 2-Banucci-Banucci
50 3.00 1.00 2♠ E -1 ♦2 5-Sapiro-Fox vs 4-D'Amico-Hodes
80 1.00 3.00 1♠ E 1 ♥T 6-Jacobson-Bigley vs 6-Thirkhill-Lucas
110 0.00 4.00 1♠ E 2 ♦9 2-Urben-Gilburne vs 3-Fordon-Sentner
|
29 |
♠K985
♥83
♦64
♣JT954
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♥ 2/3♠ ♦5 NT6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣5 ♥6 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 3.50 0.50 1N S 1 ♥3 4-Goldstein-Clark vs 2-Banucci-Banucci
90 3.50 0.50 1N S 1 ♥2 3-Zimmerman-Renfroe vs 5-Lederman-O'Connell
70 2.00 2.00 1♦ S 1 ♣6 6-Jacobson-Bigley vs 6-Thirkhill-Lucas
100 0.50 3.50 1N S -1 ♦7 2-Urben-Gilburne vs 3-Fordon-Sentner
100 0.50 3.50 1♦ S -1 ♣3 5-Sapiro-Fox vs 4-D'Amico-Hodes
|
30 |
♠JT93
♥K752
♦54
♣843
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 1♥ 1♠ 1NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦6/5 ♥6 ♠6/5 NT6/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.88 0.13 2♠ W -1 ♥2 4-Goldstein-Clark vs 2-Banucci-Banucci
50 2.00 2.00 2N S -1 ♣2 5-Sapiro-Fox vs 4-D'Amico-Hodes
50 2.00 2.00 2♦ S -1 ♥T 2-Urben-Gilburne vs 3-Fordon-Sentner
100 0.13 3.88 2N S -2 ♣6 3-Zimmerman-Renfroe vs 5-Lederman-O'Connell
|