1 |
♠43
♥K853
♦QJT85
♣K4
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 4♦ 1/2NT ♥6 ♠5/6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣6 ♦3 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
430 4.00 0.00 3N S 4 10-Nelson-Leonard vs 8-Hilzendeger-Bender
400 3.00 1.00 3N S 3 6-Hooker-Nachman vs 5-Marsh-Spanier
130 2.00 2.00 3♦ S 4 9-Banucci-Banucci vs 2-Robertson-Newman
120 0.50 3.50 2N S 2 4-Sandler-Beuchel vs 1-Sidhu-Blacik
120 0.50 3.50 2N S 2 7-Schultz-Gitter vs 3-Kohler-Buchler
|
2 |
♠9
♥JT92
♦654
♣T9876
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2/3 ♦0 ♥1 ♠2 NT0 |
EW: 4♣ 7♦ 6♥ 5♠ 7NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
460 4.00 0.00 3N W 5 9-Banucci-Banucci vs 2-Robertson-Newman
490 2.00 2.00 3N W 6 6-Hooker-Nachman vs 5-Marsh-Spanier
490 2.00 2.00 3N W 6 7-Schultz-Gitter vs 3-Kohler-Buchler
490 2.00 2.00 3N E 6 4-Sandler-Beuchel vs 1-Sidhu-Blacik
990 0.00 4.00 6N E 6 10-Nelson-Leonard vs 8-Hilzendeger-Bender
|
3 |
♠AQ73
♥AKQ2
♦5
♣J984
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♦ 4♥ 2♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦1 ♥1 ♠4 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
520 3.00 1.00 3N N 7 6-Hooker-Nachman vs 5-Marsh-Spanier
520 3.00 1.00 3N N 7 9-Banucci-Banucci vs 2-Robertson-Newman
520 3.00 1.00 3N N 7 10-Nelson-Leonard vs 8-Hilzendeger-Bender
490 0.50 3.50 3N S 6 7-Schultz-Gitter vs 3-Kohler-Buchler
490 0.50 3.50 3N N 6 4-Sandler-Beuchel vs 1-Sidhu-Blacik
|
4 |
♠42
♥T52
♦K87543
♣76
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ ♣4 ♥6 ♠3 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 1♥ 4♠ 2NT ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 4.00 0.00 3N E -1 8-Hilzendeger-Bender vs 4-Sandler-Beuchel
620 1.50 2.50 4♠ W 4 1-Sidhu-Blacik vs 3-Kohler-Buchler
620 1.50 2.50 4♠ W 4 7-Schultz-Gitter vs 6-Hooker-Nachman
620 1.50 2.50 4♠ E 4 5-Marsh-Spanier vs 2-Robertson-Newman
620 1.50 2.50 4♠ E 4 10-Nelson-Leonard vs 9-Banucci-Banucci
|
5 |
♠AQT852
♥4
♦642
♣T92
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 2♠ 1NT ♣3 ♥2 |
EW: 4♣ 4♥ ♦5 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 4.00 0.00 5♥ E -1 7-Schultz-Gitter vs 6-Hooker-Nachman
200 2.50 1.50 4♠ N -2 10-Nelson-Leonard vs 9-Banucci-Banucci
200 2.50 1.50 3♥ E 5 1-Sidhu-Blacik vs 3-Kohler-Buchler
420 0.50 3.50 4♥ E 4 5-Marsh-Spanier vs 2-Robertson-Newman
420 0.50 3.50 4♥ E 4 8-Hilzendeger-Bender vs 4-Sandler-Beuchel
|
6 |
♠A54
♥KQT5
♦652
♣AT3
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 4♥ 3♠ 3NT ♣5/6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦5 ♥3 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
420 4.00 0.00 4♥ N 4 1-Sidhu-Blacik vs 3-Kohler-Buchler
140 2.50 1.50 2♠ S 3 10-Nelson-Leonard vs 9-Banucci-Banucci
140 2.50 1.50 3♥ S 3 8-Hilzendeger-Bender vs 4-Sandler-Beuchel
50 0.50 3.50 4♥ N -1 5-Marsh-Spanier vs 2-Robertson-Newman
50 0.50 3.50 4♥ N -1 7-Schultz-Gitter vs 6-Hooker-Nachman
|
7 |
♠A985
♥KJ3
♦QJ2
♣J96
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦4 ♥6 ♠3 NT6 |
EW: 3♦ 4♠ ♣5 ♥6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 4.00 0.00 2♥ W -1 9-Banucci-Banucci vs 5-Marsh-Spanier
170 2.00 2.00 3♠ E 4 8-Hilzendeger-Bender vs 7-Schultz-Gitter
170 2.00 2.00 2♠ E 4 2-Robertson-Newman vs 4-Sandler-Beuchel
170 2.00 2.00 2♠ E 4 6-Hooker-Nachman vs 3-Kohler-Buchler
300 0.00 4.00 3♣ S -3 10-Nelson-Leonard vs 1-Sidhu-Blacik
|
8 |
♠QT52
♥QJ74
♦8
♣J652
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♥ ♦6 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣5 ♥4 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 3.50 0.50 3♥ N 4 10-Nelson-Leonard vs 1-Sidhu-Blacik
170 3.50 0.50 1♥ N 4 2-Robertson-Newman vs 4-Sandler-Beuchel
100 2.00 2.00 2N W -2 8-Hilzendeger-Bender vs 7-Schultz-Gitter
50 1.00 3.00 1N N -1 9-Banucci-Banucci vs 5-Marsh-Spanier
110 0.00 4.00 2♠ E 2 6-Hooker-Nachman vs 3-Kohler-Buchler
|
9 |
♠AK932
♥KQ8
♦K542
♣Q
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3/2♦ ♣0 ♥4 ♠6 NT3 |
EW: 5♣ 2♥ 4NT ♦4 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 4.00 0.00 4♥ E -2 8-Hilzendeger-Bender vs 7-Schultz-Gitter
50 3.00 1.00 4♦ N -1 2-Robertson-Newman vs 4-Sandler-Beuchel
140 1.50 2.50 3♥ E 3 10-Nelson-Leonard vs 1-Sidhu-Blacik
140 1.50 2.50 2♥ E 3 6-Hooker-Nachman vs 3-Kohler-Buchler
150 0.00 4.00 3♣ W 5 9-Banucci-Banucci vs 5-Marsh-Spanier
|
10 |
♠J7
♥J72
♦AT64
♣AK96
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 4♦ 4♠ 2NT ♥5 |
EW: 1♥ ♣2 ♦3 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
690 4.00 0.00 3N N 6 10-Nelson-Leonard vs 2-Robertson-Newman
650 3.00 1.00 4♠ S 5 1-Sidhu-Blacik vs 6-Hooker-Nachman
620 2.00 2.00 4♠ S 4 3-Kohler-Buchler vs 5-Marsh-Spanier
200 1.00 3.00 3♥* E -1 9-Banucci-Banucci vs 8-Hilzendeger-Bender
100 0.00 4.00 3N N -1 7-Schultz-Gitter vs 4-Sandler-Beuchel
|
11 |
♠4
♥QT9
♦J874
♣KQJ52
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦3 ♥3 ♠5/4 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ 3♥ 2♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 3.50 0.50 3N E -1 1-Sidhu-Blacik vs 6-Hooker-Nachman
50 3.50 0.50 3N E -1 3-Kohler-Buchler vs 5-Marsh-Spanier
420 1.00 3.00 4♥ W 4 7-Schultz-Gitter vs 4-Sandler-Beuchel
420 1.00 3.00 4♥ W 4 9-Banucci-Banucci vs 8-Hilzendeger-Bender
420 1.00 3.00 4♥ W 4 10-Nelson-Leonard vs 2-Robertson-Newman
|
12 |
♠T4
♥JT85
♦972
♣K863
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ 4♥ 4♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣4/3 ♦6 ♥3 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
630 3.00 1.00 3N S 4 3-Kohler-Buchler vs 5-Marsh-Spanier
630 3.00 1.00 3N S 4 7-Schultz-Gitter vs 4-Sandler-Beuchel
630 3.00 1.00 3N N 4 9-Banucci-Banucci vs 8-Hilzendeger-Bender
600 1.00 3.00 3N S 3 1-Sidhu-Blacik vs 6-Hooker-Nachman
140 0.00 4.00 2♥ N 3 10-Nelson-Leonard vs 2-Robertson-Newman
|
13 |
♠KQ6
♥64
♦863
♣J9842
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦5 ♥2 ♠6 NT2 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 5♥ 2NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 4.00 0.00 3♥ W 5 2-Robertson-Newman vs 7-Schultz-Gitter
650 1.50 2.50 4♥ W 5 1-Sidhu-Blacik vs 9-Banucci-Banucci
650 1.50 2.50 4♥ W 5 4-Sandler-Beuchel vs 6-Hooker-Nachman
650 1.50 2.50 4♥ W 5 8-Hilzendeger-Bender vs 5-Marsh-Spanier
650 1.50 2.50 4♥ W 5 10-Nelson-Leonard vs 3-Kohler-Buchler
|
14 |
♠6432
♥QJ52
♦J
♣K875
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦2 ♥3 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 5♣ 4♦ 3♥ 6♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
420 4.00 0.00 4♠ W 4 10-Nelson-Leonard vs 3-Kohler-Buchler
480 2.50 1.50 4♠ W 6 2-Robertson-Newman vs 7-Schultz-Gitter
480 2.50 1.50 4♠ W 6 4-Sandler-Beuchel vs 6-Hooker-Nachman
490 1.00 3.00 3N W 6 1-Sidhu-Blacik vs 9-Banucci-Banucci
980 0.00 4.00 6♠ W 6 8-Hilzendeger-Bender vs 5-Marsh-Spanier
|
15 |
♠Q
♥KQT93
♦AQJ
♣7642
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 6♦ 6♥ 6NT ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣4 ♦1 ♥1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
680 3.00 1.00 4♥ S 6 1-Sidhu-Blacik vs 9-Banucci-Banucci
680 3.00 1.00 4♥ S 6 2-Robertson-Newman vs 7-Schultz-Gitter
680 3.00 1.00 4♥ S 6 10-Nelson-Leonard vs 3-Kohler-Buchler
620 1.00 3.00 4♥ S 4 8-Hilzendeger-Bender vs 5-Marsh-Spanier
170 0.00 4.00 2♥ N 4 4-Sandler-Beuchel vs 6-Hooker-Nachman
|
16 |
♠Q987653
♥K6
♦8
♣A62
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ 3/4♥ 3♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦5 ♥3 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 3.50 0.50 3♠ N 3 5-Marsh-Spanier vs 7-Schultz-Gitter
140 3.50 0.50 2♠ N 3 10-Nelson-Leonard vs 4-Sandler-Beuchel
110 2.00 2.00 2♠ N 2 3-Kohler-Buchler vs 8-Hilzendeger-Bender
50 0.50 3.50 3♠ N -1 2-Robertson-Newman vs 1-Sidhu-Blacik
50 0.50 3.50 3♠ N -1 9-Banucci-Banucci vs 6-Hooker-Nachman
|
17 |
♠J754
♥J986
♦K6
♣J53
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♥ ♦5 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 1♦ 1♠ ♣4 ♥4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
420 4.00 0.00 4♥ N 4 10-Nelson-Leonard vs 4-Sandler-Beuchel
150 3.00 1.00 1N N 3 9-Banucci-Banucci vs 6-Hooker-Nachman
140 1.50 2.50 3♥ N 3 3-Kohler-Buchler vs 8-Hilzendeger-Bender
140 1.50 2.50 3♥ N 3 5-Marsh-Spanier vs 7-Schultz-Gitter
50 0.00 4.00 4♥ N -1 2-Robertson-Newman vs 1-Sidhu-Blacik
|
18 |
♠KQJT2
♥JT6
♦984
♣96
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ ♣6 ♦6 ♥6 NT6 |
EW: 1/-♣ 1♦ 1♥ 1/-NT ♣7/6 ♠5 NT7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 4.00 0.00 2♥ W -2 2-Robertson-Newman vs 1-Sidhu-Blacik
90 3.00 1.00 1N E 1 9-Banucci-Banucci vs 6-Hooker-Nachman
100 2.00 2.00 3♣ S -1 5-Marsh-Spanier vs 7-Schultz-Gitter
200 0.50 3.50 3♣ S -2 3-Kohler-Buchler vs 8-Hilzendeger-Bender
200 0.50 3.50 3♣ S -2 10-Nelson-Leonard vs 4-Sandler-Beuchel
|
19 |
♠KQJ86
♥7
♦A3
♣AKJ73
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 4♦ 2♥ 5♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦2 ♥4 ♠2 NT2/3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
460 4.00 0.00 3N N 5 1-Sidhu-Blacik vs 7-Schultz-Gitter
430 3.00 1.00 3N N 4 10-Nelson-Leonard vs 5-Marsh-Spanier
200 2.00 2.00 2♠ N 5 3-Kohler-Buchler vs 2-Robertson-Newman
170 1.00 3.00 2♠ N 4 4-Sandler-Beuchel vs 9-Banucci-Banucci
50 0.00 4.00 4♠ N -1 6-Hooker-Nachman vs 8-Hilzendeger-Bender
|
20 |
♠743
♥Q92
♦Q732
♣Q32
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ ♥6 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 1♥ 2♠ ♣5 ♦5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 4.00 0.00 2♠ W 2 3-Kohler-Buchler vs 2-Robertson-Newman
140 3.00 1.00 3♠ W 3 1-Sidhu-Blacik vs 7-Schultz-Gitter
170 1.00 3.00 3♠ W 4 10-Nelson-Leonard vs 5-Marsh-Spanier
170 1.00 3.00 2♠ W 4 4-Sandler-Beuchel vs 9-Banucci-Banucci
170 1.00 3.00 2♠ W 4 6-Hooker-Nachman vs 8-Hilzendeger-Bender
|
21 |
♠KT82
♥JT
♦73
♣K8632
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 1♠ ♣4 ♦2 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 5♦ 2NT ♥4 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
670 4.00 0.00 2♥* S 2 10-Nelson-Leonard vs 5-Marsh-Spanier
100 3.00 1.00 3♠ N -1 4-Sandler-Beuchel vs 9-Banucci-Banucci
130 2.00 2.00 4♦ E 4 1-Sidhu-Blacik vs 7-Schultz-Gitter
150 1.00 3.00 4♦ E 5 3-Kohler-Buchler vs 2-Robertson-Newman
200 0.00 4.00 3♠ N -2 6-Hooker-Nachman vs 8-Hilzendeger-Bender
|
22 |
♠J9543
♥AJ2
♦T2
♣AT8
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1/2♦ 2♥ 3♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦5 ♥4 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
430 3.50 0.50 3N S 4 7-Schultz-Gitter vs 9-Banucci-Banucci
430 3.50 0.50 3N S 4 10-Nelson-Leonard vs 6-Hooker-Nachman
400 2.00 2.00 3N S 3 4-Sandler-Beuchel vs 3-Kohler-Buchler
300 1.00 3.00 2♠ W -3 5-Marsh-Spanier vs 1-Sidhu-Blacik
50 0.00 4.00 3N S -1 2-Robertson-Newman vs 8-Hilzendeger-Bender
|
23 |
♠2
♥T2
♦AJ965
♣Q8642
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦5 ♥3 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 2/1♦ 2♥ 1♠ 3NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 4.00 0.00 2♠ S -1 7-Schultz-Gitter vs 9-Banucci-Banucci
140 3.00 1.00 3♥ E 3 10-Nelson-Leonard vs 6-Hooker-Nachman
200 1.50 2.50 2♠ S -2 4-Sandler-Beuchel vs 3-Kohler-Buchler
200 1.50 2.50 2♠ S -2 5-Marsh-Spanier vs 1-Sidhu-Blacik
620 0.00 4.00 4♥ W 4 2-Robertson-Newman vs 8-Hilzendeger-Bender
|
24 |
♠AQ943
♥Q53
♦KQ87
♣Q
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 3♥ 1♠ 1NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦4 ♥4 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 2.50 1.50 2♦ N 3 2-Robertson-Newman vs 8-Hilzendeger-Bender
110 2.50 1.50 2♦ N 3 5-Marsh-Spanier vs 1-Sidhu-Blacik
110 2.50 1.50 2♦ N 3 7-Schultz-Gitter vs 9-Banucci-Banucci
110 2.50 1.50 2♦ N 3 10-Nelson-Leonard vs 6-Hooker-Nachman
90 0.00 4.00 2♦ N 2 4-Sandler-Beuchel vs 3-Kohler-Buchler
|
25 |
♠K865
♥AQT2
♦A54
♣K8
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♦ 4♥ 6♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦3 ♥3 ♠1 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
480 3.50 0.50 4♠ N 6 5-Marsh-Spanier vs 4-Sandler-Beuchel
480 3.50 0.50 4♠ N 6 10-Nelson-Leonard vs 7-Schultz-Gitter
460 2.00 2.00 3N N 5 3-Kohler-Buchler vs 9-Banucci-Banucci
450 1.00 3.00 4♠ N 5 8-Hilzendeger-Bender vs 1-Sidhu-Blacik
400 0.00 4.00 3N N 3 6-Hooker-Nachman vs 2-Robertson-Newman
|
26 |
♠KT
♥T843
♦AQ92
♣A75
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦3 ♥6 ♠5 NT5/4 |
EW: 1♣ 3♦ 2♠ 2NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 4.00 0.00 3N E -2 8-Hilzendeger-Bender vs 1-Sidhu-Blacik
200 3.00 1.00 2♥ S -2 6-Hooker-Nachman vs 2-Robertson-Newman
300 2.00 2.00 2♥ S -3 5-Marsh-Spanier vs 4-Sandler-Beuchel
600 1.00 3.00 3N E 3 10-Nelson-Leonard vs 7-Schultz-Gitter
710 0.00 4.00 4♦* E 4 3-Kohler-Buchler vs 9-Banucci-Banucci
|
27 |
♠K65
♥KQJ
♦KT842
♣J8
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣4 ♥3 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 3♥ 1♠ 1NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.50 0.50 3N E -2 10-Nelson-Leonard vs 7-Schultz-Gitter
100 3.50 0.50 4♥ E -2 3-Kohler-Buchler vs 9-Banucci-Banucci
50 2.00 2.00 1♠ S -1 5-Marsh-Spanier vs 4-Sandler-Beuchel
100 1.00 3.00 1N S -2 6-Hooker-Nachman vs 2-Robertson-Newman
170 0.00 4.00 3♥ E 4 8-Hilzendeger-Bender vs 1-Sidhu-Blacik
|