1 |
♠K3
♥K862
♦Q94
♣Q763
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1♥ 1♠ 3NT ♦4 |
EW: 3♦ ♣3 ♥5 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 1.75 0.25 3N E -4 1-Giga-Giga vs 1-Giga-Armell
AVE AVE 1.00 1.00 2-Schrader-Ash vs 3-Pont-Pont
50 0.25 1.75 4♥ N -1 3-Wilson-Wilson vs 2-Dagnealle-Novick
|
2 |
♠A
♥KT32
♦T82
♣KQT95
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ 2♥ 1NT ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣5 ♦6/5 ♥5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
120 1.75 0.25 1N N 2 1-Giga-Giga vs 1-Giga-Armell
AVE AVE 1.00 1.00 2-Schrader-Ash vs 3-Pont-Pont
90 0.25 1.75 2♣ N 2 3-Wilson-Wilson vs 2-Dagnealle-Novick
|
3 |
♠J4
♥Q4
♦AQJ8762
♣A6
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 1♥ 3NT ♣5 ♠5 |
EW: 1♣ 2♠ ♦3 ♥5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
460 1.75 0.25 3N S 5 3-Wilson-Wilson vs 2-Dagnealle-Novick
AVE AVE 1.00 1.00 2-Schrader-Ash vs 3-Pont-Pont
430 0.25 1.75 3N N 4 1-Giga-Giga vs 1-Giga-Armell
|
4 |
♠AQ953
♥9865
♦KJ
♣K8
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 1♥ 3♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦6 ♥6 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 1.75 0.25 2♠ N 3 1-Giga-Giga vs 1-Giga-Armell
AVE AVE 1.00 1.00 2-Schrader-Ash vs 3-Pont-Pont
110 0.25 1.75 2♠ N 2 3-Wilson-Wilson vs 2-Dagnealle-Novick
|
5 |
♠87
♥A87
♦T94
♣KQ432
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1/2♦ 2♥ 5/6♠ 3/6NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦5 ♥5 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
600 1.75 0.25 3N N 3 1-Giga-Giga vs 3-Pont-Pont
AVE AVE 1.00 1.00 3-Wilson-Wilson vs 1-Giga-Armell
170 0.25 1.75 2♠ S 4 2-Schrader-Ash vs 2-Dagnealle-Novick
|
6 |
♠T95
♥T952
♦98
♣T764
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣0 ♦3 ♠0 NT0 |
EW: 6♣ 4♦ 6♠ 6NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
1430 1.00 1.00 6♠ E 6 1-Giga-Giga vs 3-Pont-Pont
1430 1.00 1.00 6♠ E 6 2-Schrader-Ash vs 2-Dagnealle-Novick
AVE AVE 1.00 1.00 3-Wilson-Wilson vs 1-Giga-Armell
|
7 |
♠JT864
♥QJ93
♦T9
♣74
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣3 ♦3 ♥4 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 4♦ 3♥ 3NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
600 1.75 0.25 3N E 3 1-Giga-Giga vs 3-Pont-Pont
AVE AVE 1.00 1.00 3-Wilson-Wilson vs 1-Giga-Armell
630 0.25 1.75 3N W 4 2-Schrader-Ash vs 2-Dagnealle-Novick
|
8 |
♠T9
♥Q654
♦A742
♣KJ3
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ 4♥ ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 3♠ ♣4 ♦3 ♥3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 1.75 0.25 3♥ N 4 1-Giga-Giga vs 3-Pont-Pont
AVE AVE 1.00 1.00 3-Wilson-Wilson vs 1-Giga-Armell
100 0.25 1.75 1♦ W -2 2-Schrader-Ash vs 2-Dagnealle-Novick
|
9 |
♠J5
♥T7432
♦J732
♣92
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ ♣4 ♦6 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 1/-♠ 1/-NT ♦6 ♥5 ♠7/6 NT7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 1.00 1.00 1N S -1 3-Wilson-Wilson vs 3-Pont-Pont
50 1.00 1.00 2♠ S -1 2-Schrader-Ash vs 1-Giga-Armell
AVE AVE 1.00 1.00 1-Giga-Giga vs 2-Dagnealle-Novick
|
10 |
♠J8
♥A965
♦753
♣AQ82
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 1♥ 2♠ 1/-NT ♣5 NT7/6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦5 ♥5 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 1.75 0.25 1N E -1 3-Wilson-Wilson vs 3-Pont-Pont
AVE AVE 1.00 1.00 1-Giga-Giga vs 2-Dagnealle-Novick
100 0.25 1.75 1N N -1 2-Schrader-Ash vs 1-Giga-Armell
|
11 |
♠AJ2
♥K943
♦J82
♣QJ3
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/-♣ 1♥ ♣7/6 ♦6/5 ♠5/4 NT6/5 |
EW: 1♦ 2♠ 1NT ♣6 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 1.75 0.25 2♠ W -1 3-Wilson-Wilson vs 3-Pont-Pont
AVE AVE 1.00 1.00 1-Giga-Giga vs 2-Dagnealle-Novick
50 0.25 1.75 2♥ S -1 2-Schrader-Ash vs 1-Giga-Armell
|
12 |
♠AJT9
♥QT92
♦-
♣AKJ92
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♦ 6♥ 2♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣2/3 ♦5 ♥1 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
650 1.75 0.25 4♥ S 5 3-Wilson-Wilson vs 3-Pont-Pont
AVE AVE 1.00 1.00 1-Giga-Giga vs 2-Dagnealle-Novick
620 0.25 1.75 4♥ S 4 2-Schrader-Ash vs 1-Giga-Armell
|