| 1 |
♠AKQ9
♥73
♦8652
♣964
|
Dlr: North
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♣ 4♦ 2♥ 3♠ 3NT |
| EW: ♣3 ♦3 ♥5 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 1.50 0.50 3N W -1 2-Bakst-Max vs 3-Kalman-Back
50 1.50 0.50 2N E -1 3-Chittenden-Chittenden vs 2-Barber-Daigneault
400 0.00 2.00 3N W 3 1-Gerber-Prendergast vs 1-Beckvall-Fisher
|
| 2 |
♠T6
♥A42
♦KT752
♣653
|
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♦ 2♠ 1NT ♣5 ♥5 |
| EW: 1♣ 1♥ ♦4 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
660 1.50 0.50 3N S 5 1-Gerber-Prendergast vs 1-Beckvall-Fisher
660 1.50 0.50 3N S 5 3-Chittenden-Chittenden vs 2-Barber-Daigneault
100 0.00 2.00 3♠ N -1 2-Bakst-Max vs 3-Kalman-Back
|
| 3 |
♠K532
♥643
♦843
♣AJ7
|
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♥ ♣4 ♦4 ♠3 NT3 |
| EW: 2♣ 3♦ 4♠ 2NT ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 2.00 0.00 2♦ W -2 3-Chittenden-Chittenden vs 2-Barber-Daigneault
90 1.00 1.00 2♣ E 2 1-Gerber-Prendergast vs 1-Beckvall-Fisher
250 0.00 2.00 4♠ N -5 2-Bakst-Max vs 3-Kalman-Back
|
| 4 |
♠K6
♥AK832
♦K963
♣Q2
|
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 4♦ 4♥ 1♠ 4NT |
| EW: ♣6 ♦3 ♥3 ♠6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 2.00 0.00 1N E -1 2-Bakst-Max vs 3-Kalman-Back
90 0.50 1.50 1N E 1 1-Gerber-Prendergast vs 1-Beckvall-Fisher
90 0.50 1.50 1♦ E 2 3-Chittenden-Chittenden vs 2-Barber-Daigneault
|
| 5 |
♠KJT
♥Q954
♦KQJ73
♣8
|
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ 1NT ♣6 ♥6 ♠5 |
| EW: 1♥ 1♠ ♣6 ♦6 NT5/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 2.00 0.00 1N N 3 3-Chittenden-Chittenden vs 2-Barber-Daigneault
90 1.00 1.00 1N N 1 2-Bakst-Max vs 3-Kalman-Back
130 0.00 2.00 2♦ W 4 1-Gerber-Prendergast vs 1-Beckvall-Fisher
|
| 6 |
♠J87
♥652
♦JT97
♣Q72
|
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣1 ♦3 ♥6 ♠2 NT2 |
| EW: 6♣ 3♦ 1♥ 5♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
90 1.75 0.25 2♣ N 2 2-Bakst-Max vs 3-Kalman-Back
170 0.25 1.75 3♠ W 4 1-Gerber-Prendergast vs 1-Beckvall-Fisher
|
| 7 |
♠Q52
♥T84
♦AT7
♣9763
|
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 1♦ 1♥ 3NT ♠5 |
| EW: 1♠ ♣3 ♦6 ♥6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
120 2.00 0.00 2N W 2 2-Bakst-Max vs 2-Barber-Daigneault
600 1.00 1.00 3N W 3 1-Gerber-Prendergast vs 3-Kalman-Back
630 0.00 2.00 3N W 4 3-Chittenden-Chittenden vs 1-Beckvall-Fisher
|
| 8 |
♠5
♥AJT82
♦K75
♣J654
|
Dlr: West
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ -/1♥ ♦4 ♥6/7 ♠4 NT5 |
| EW: 3♦ 3♠ 1NT ♣4 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 2.00 0.00 3♠ E 4 1-Gerber-Prendergast vs 3-Kalman-Back
200 1.00 1.00 1♠ E 5 2-Bakst-Max vs 2-Barber-Daigneault
450 0.00 2.00 4♠ E 5 3-Chittenden-Chittenden vs 1-Beckvall-Fisher
|
| 9 |
♠QJ9732
♥A53
♦A43
♣8
|
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♦ 2♠ ♣3 ♥4 NT4 |
| EW: 3♣ 2♥ ♦3 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 2.00 0.00 3♠ N -1 2-Bakst-Max vs 2-Barber-Daigneault
100 0.50 1.50 4♠ N -2 1-Gerber-Prendergast vs 3-Kalman-Back
100 0.50 1.50 3♠ N -2 3-Chittenden-Chittenden vs 1-Beckvall-Fisher
|
| 10 |
♠KJ6
♥K
♦K8754
♣AJ53
|
Dlr: East
Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♣ 5♥ 1♠ 3NT ♦6 |
| EW: ♣2 ♦6 ♥2 ♠5/4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 2.00 0.00 2♣ W -1 1-Gerber-Prendergast vs 3-Kalman-Back
90 0.50 1.50 2♣ W 2 2-Bakst-Max vs 2-Barber-Daigneault
90 0.50 1.50 2♣ W 2 3-Chittenden-Chittenden vs 1-Beckvall-Fisher
|
| 11 |
♠K86543
♥KT8
♦2
♣KQJ
|
Dlr: South
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5♣ 3♦ 5♠ 5NT ♥6 |
| EW: ♣2 ♦4 ♥6 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 1.50 0.50 2♥ E 4 1-Gerber-Prendergast vs 3-Kalman-Back
170 1.50 0.50 2♥ E 4 2-Bakst-Max vs 2-Barber-Daigneault
420 0.00 2.00 4♥ E 4 3-Chittenden-Chittenden vs 1-Beckvall-Fisher
|
| 12 |
♠T7
♥QJ76
♦Q9642
♣A8
|
Dlr: West
Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣1 ♦6 ♥4 ♠1 NT1 |
| EW: 4♣ 1♦ 2♥ 5♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
680 1.75 0.25 4♠ S 6 3-Chittenden-Chittenden vs 1-Beckvall-Fisher
650 0.25 1.75 4♠ S 5 1-Gerber-Prendergast vs 3-Kalman-Back
|
| 13 |
♠T3
♥Q2
♦JT6542
♣Q87
|
Dlr: North
Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♥ ♣5 ♦6 ♠3 NT4 |
| EW: 4♠ ♣6 ♦6 ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
620 1.50 0.50 4♠ E 4 2-Bakst-Max vs 1-Beckvall-Fisher
620 1.50 0.50 4♠ E 4 3-Chittenden-Chittenden vs 3-Kalman-Back
630 0.00 2.00 3N E 4 1-Gerber-Prendergast vs 2-Barber-Daigneault
|
| 14 |
♠643
♥J2
♦AT6
♣AT732
|
Dlr: East
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣5 ♦4 ♥5 ♠4 NT4 |
| EW: 1/2♣ 3♦ 1♥ 3♠ 2/3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 2.00 0.00 3♣ S 3 3-Chittenden-Chittenden vs 3-Kalman-Back
100 0.50 1.50 3N S -2 1-Gerber-Prendergast vs 2-Barber-Daigneault
100 0.50 1.50 3N N -2 2-Bakst-Max vs 1-Beckvall-Fisher
|
| 15 |
♠KT53
♥9
♦J7
♣Q98762
|
Dlr: South
Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 1♠ ♦6 ♥5 NT6 |
| EW: -/1♦ 2♥ 1NT ♣5 ♦6/7 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 2.00 0.00 3N E -1 2-Bakst-Max vs 1-Beckvall-Fisher
110 1.00 1.00 3♦ W 3 1-Gerber-Prendergast vs 2-Barber-Daigneault
430 0.00 2.00 3N E 4 3-Chittenden-Chittenden vs 3-Kalman-Back
|
| 16 |
♠T9542
♥9862
♦Q7
♣84
|
Dlr: West
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣0 ♦4 ♥2 ♠5 NT2 |
| EW: 6♣ 3♦ 5♥ 2♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 2.00 0.00 2♦ N 5 1-Gerber-Prendergast vs 2-Barber-Daigneault
130 1.00 1.00 3♦ N 4 3-Chittenden-Chittenden vs 3-Kalman-Back
110 0.00 2.00 2♦ N 3 2-Bakst-Max vs 1-Beckvall-Fisher
|
| 17 |
♠AK76
♥KQ985
♦K3
♣96
|
Dlr: North
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 5♦ 5♥ 5♠ 2NT |
| EW: ♣6 ♦0 ♥0 ♠0 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 1.00 1.00 4♠ W -1 2-Bakst-Max vs 1-Beckvall-Fisher
50 1.00 1.00 3♠ W -1 1-Gerber-Prendergast vs 2-Barber-Daigneault
50 1.00 1.00 3♥ E -1 3-Chittenden-Chittenden vs 3-Kalman-Back
|
| 18 |
♠AKQJ73
♥32
♦J2
♣842
|
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♦ 1♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣5 |
| EW: 2♣ ♦1 ♥6 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
130 2.00 0.00 4♦ N 4 3-Chittenden-Chittenden vs 3-Kalman-Back
100 0.50 1.50 4♠ S -1 1-Gerber-Prendergast vs 2-Barber-Daigneault
100 0.50 1.50 3♦ N -1 2-Bakst-Max vs 1-Beckvall-Fisher
|