1 |
♠84
♥K
♦T87654
♣J654
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ ♥2 ♠2 NT4 |
EW: 5♥ 5♠ 1NT ♣6 ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 2.00 0.00 1N N 3 3-Kalman-Legrand vs 2-Lederman-Farnham
130 1.00 1.00 3♣ N 4 2-Chittenden-Chittenden vs 3-Barber-Pietrafesa
120 0.00 2.00 2N N 2 1-St Louis-Goldberg vs 1-Beckvall-Fisher
|
2 |
♠A76
♥KQ65432
♦3
♣72
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ ♣6 ♦6 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 3♠ 1NT ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
680 2.00 0.00 4♥ S 6 3-Kalman-Legrand vs 2-Lederman-Farnham
650 1.00 1.00 4♥ S 5 2-Chittenden-Chittenden vs 3-Barber-Pietrafesa
200 0.00 2.00 2♥ N 5 1-St Louis-Goldberg vs 1-Beckvall-Fisher
|
3 |
♠A654
♥AK2
♦Q83
♣843
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ 2♠ 2NT ♥5 |
EW: 2♥ ♣5 ♦5 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
400 2.00 0.00 5♦ S 5 1-St Louis-Goldberg vs 1-Beckvall-Fisher
50 0.50 1.50 4♥ N -1 2-Chittenden-Chittenden vs 3-Barber-Pietrafesa
50 0.50 1.50 4♥ N -1 3-Kalman-Legrand vs 2-Lederman-Farnham
|
4 |
♠-
♥AK975
♦K9852
♣A95
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 4♠ ♣5 ♦6 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ -/1♦ -/1NT ♦6/7 ♥4 ♠3 NT6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 1.00 1.00 3♠ S 3 1-St Louis-Goldberg vs 1-Beckvall-Fisher
140 1.00 1.00 3♠ S 3 3-Kalman-Legrand vs 2-Lederman-Farnham
140 1.00 1.00 2♠ S 3 2-Chittenden-Chittenden vs 3-Barber-Pietrafesa
|
5 |
♠A72
♥AJ8653
♦AQ9
♣8
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 1♥ 2/3♠ 2NT ♣4/6 |
EW: ♣6 ♦2 ♥6 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
660 1.75 0.25 3N S 5 2-Chittenden-Chittenden vs 3-Barber-Pietrafesa
210 0.25 1.75 1N S 5 1-St Louis-Goldberg vs 1-Beckvall-Fisher
|
6 |
♠AQJ8
♥Q92
♦A9643
♣7
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ 1♥ 4/3♠ 1NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦4 ♥4/5 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
190 1.50 0.50 3♦ S 7 2-Chittenden-Chittenden vs 2-Lederman-Farnham
190 1.50 0.50 3♦ S 7 3-Kalman-Legrand vs 1-Beckvall-Fisher
170 0.00 2.00 2♥ S 4 1-St Louis-Goldberg vs 3-Barber-Pietrafesa
|
7 |
♠3
♥KT976
♦A
♣JT7654
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♠ 3NT ♣5 ♦3 ♥5 |
EW: 1♣ 3♦ 2♥ ♠3 NT3/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 2.00 0.00 4♥ E -1 2-Chittenden-Chittenden vs 2-Lederman-Farnham
170 0.50 1.50 2♥ E 4 1-St Louis-Goldberg vs 3-Barber-Pietrafesa
170 0.50 1.50 2♥ E 4 3-Kalman-Legrand vs 1-Beckvall-Fisher
|
8 |
♠QT2
♥J75
♦KJ7
♣QT32
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 1♦ 5♠ 1NT ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣2 ♦5 ♠2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
420 2.00 0.00 4♠ N 4 2-Chittenden-Chittenden vs 2-Lederman-Farnham
50 1.00 1.00 4♠ N -1 3-Kalman-Legrand vs 1-Beckvall-Fisher
150 0.00 2.00 3♦ W 5 1-St Louis-Goldberg vs 3-Barber-Pietrafesa
|
9 |
♠KJ75
♥J875
♦QJT93
♣-
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♠ ♣4 ♦5 ♥5 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 2♦ 2♥ 2NT ♠3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
400 2.00 0.00 5♦ S 5 1-St Louis-Goldberg vs 3-Barber-Pietrafesa
170 1.00 1.00 1♦ S 6 3-Kalman-Legrand vs 1-Beckvall-Fisher
150 0.00 2.00 4♦ N 5 2-Chittenden-Chittenden vs 2-Lederman-Farnham
|
10 |
♠T542
♥K73
♦J95
♣AJ2
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ 1♠ ♥3 NT6 |
EW: 4♥ ♣4 ♦6 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 2.00 0.00 3N E -2 3-Kalman-Legrand vs 1-Beckvall-Fisher
100 0.50 1.50 6N E -1 1-St Louis-Goldberg vs 3-Barber-Pietrafesa
100 0.50 1.50 3N W -1 2-Chittenden-Chittenden vs 2-Lederman-Farnham
|
11 |
♠93
♥KQ
♦98532
♣AQJ7
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 4♦ 1♠ 2NT ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣4 ♦3 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 1.00 1.00 3♥ E 3 1-St Louis-Goldberg vs 2-Lederman-Farnham
140 1.00 1.00 3♥ E 3 2-Chittenden-Chittenden vs 1-Beckvall-Fisher
140 1.00 1.00 2♥ E 3 3-Kalman-Legrand vs 3-Barber-Pietrafesa
|
12 |
♠Q3
♥JT6
♦K76
♣J7654
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣6/5 ♥4 ♠2 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 3♥ 5♠ ♦6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
490 1.75 0.00 3N E 6 3-Kalman-Legrand vs 3-Barber-Pietrafesa
AVE 990 1.00 1.00 6N E 6 1-St Louis-Goldberg vs 2-Lederman-Farnham
1020 0.25 2.00 6N W 7 2-Chittenden-Chittenden vs 1-Beckvall-Fisher
|
13 |
♠T8
♥K95
♦K962
♣J984
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 1♠ 2NT ♥5 |
EW: 2♥ ♣6 ♦5 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 2.00 0.00 4♠ W -1 1-St Louis-Goldberg vs 2-Lederman-Farnham
170 1.00 1.00 3♠ W 4 3-Kalman-Legrand vs 3-Barber-Pietrafesa
620 0.00 2.00 4♠ W 4 2-Chittenden-Chittenden vs 1-Beckvall-Fisher
|
14 |
♠KJ984
♥JT
♦52
♣K862
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ ♣6 ♦3 ♥5 NT5 |
EW: 4♦ 2♥ 1NT ♣6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 2.00 0.00 4♣ S -1 2-Chittenden-Chittenden vs 1-Beckvall-Fisher
170 1.00 1.00 3♠ W 4 3-Kalman-Legrand vs 3-Barber-Pietrafesa
200 0.00 2.00 3♠ W 5 1-St Louis-Goldberg vs 2-Lederman-Farnham
|
15 |
♠Q853
♥J9765
♦Q
♣J73
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦4 ♥5/4 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ 2♥ 2♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
400 1.00 1.00 3N W 3 1-St Louis-Goldberg vs 2-Lederman-Farnham
400 1.00 1.00 3N W 3 2-Chittenden-Chittenden vs 1-Beckvall-Fisher
400 1.00 1.00 3N W 3 3-Kalman-Legrand vs 3-Barber-Pietrafesa
|