1 |
♠82
♥54
♦KQT974
♣743
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ ♣3 ♥2 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 4/2♣ 5/4♥ 2♠ 2NT ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 3.00 0.00 2♦ N -1 4-Kalman-Legrand vs 2-Zeitlin-Zeitlin
200 1.50 1.50 3♥ W 5 1-Goldberg-St Louis vs 1-Beckvall-Fisher
200 1.50 1.50 3♥ E 5 2-Nia-Glaser vs 3-Barber-Pietrafesa
420 0.00 3.00 4♥ E 4 5-Laybourne-Buri vs 4-Smith-Smith
|
2 |
♠KQ
♥KT85
♦64
♣Q9876
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♥ 1NT ♦6 ♠5 |
EW: 2♠ ♣5 ♦6 ♥3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 2.50 0.50 3♥ N 3 2-Nia-Glaser vs 3-Barber-Pietrafesa
140 2.50 0.50 2♥ S 3 4-Kalman-Legrand vs 2-Zeitlin-Zeitlin
100 1.00 2.00 1♣ W -2 5-Laybourne-Buri vs 4-Smith-Smith
100 0.00 3.00 3♥ N -1 1-Goldberg-St Louis vs 1-Beckvall-Fisher
|
3 |
♠KJ542
♥-
♦JT9742
♣A3
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 6♦ 4♠ 4NT ♥4 |
EW: 3♥ ♣2 ♦1 ♠3 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
400 3.00 0.00 3N S 3 5-Laybourne-Buri vs 4-Smith-Smith
110 2.00 1.00 3♣ N 3 1-Goldberg-St Louis vs 1-Beckvall-Fisher
50 0.50 2.50 4♠ S -1 4-Kalman-Legrand vs 2-Zeitlin-Zeitlin
50 0.50 2.50 5♦ N -1 2-Nia-Glaser vs 3-Barber-Pietrafesa
|
4 |
♠632
♥-
♦AJT98
♣Q9873
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 1NT ♥6/5 ♠6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣4 ♦5 ♠5/6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 3.00 0.00 1N N 3 3-Daigneault-Max vs 4-Smith-Smith
120 2.00 1.00 2N S 2 2-Nia-Glaser vs 2-Zeitlin-Zeitlin
100 1.00 2.00 2N E -1 4-Kalman-Legrand vs 1-Beckvall-Fisher
200 0.00 3.00 1N N -2 5-Laybourne-Buri vs 3-Barber-Pietrafesa
|
5 |
♠AQJ2
♥K84
♦84
♣KT87
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♠ 2NT ♦5 ♥5 |
EW: 1♦ 1♥ ♣2/3 ♠3/4 NT3/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 3.00 0.00 2♥ E -3 4-Kalman-Legrand vs 1-Beckvall-Fisher
130 2.00 1.00 3♣ N 4 3-Daigneault-Max vs 4-Smith-Smith
50 1.00 2.00 2♦ E -1 5-Laybourne-Buri vs 3-Barber-Pietrafesa
200 0.00 3.00 2♠ N -2 2-Nia-Glaser vs 2-Zeitlin-Zeitlin
|
6 |
♠A92
♥J92
♦7
♣AQJ865
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ ♥5 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 1♥ -/1♠ ♣6 ♦4 ♠6/7 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 3.00 0.00 3♥ W -2 2-Nia-Glaser vs 2-Zeitlin-Zeitlin
110 2.00 1.00 2♦ S 3 5-Laybourne-Buri vs 3-Barber-Pietrafesa
100 1.00 2.00 3♣ N -2 3-Daigneault-Max vs 4-Smith-Smith
140 0.00 3.00 2♥ W 3 4-Kalman-Legrand vs 1-Beckvall-Fisher
|
7 |
♠863
♥3
♦KT92
♣AT763
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦4 ♥1 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 3♣ 3♦ 6♥ 6♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 3.00 0.00 6♥ W -2 2-Nia-Glaser vs 1-Beckvall-Fisher
650 2.00 1.00 5♥ W 5 1-Goldberg-St Louis vs 4-Smith-Smith
660 1.00 2.00 3N W 5 3-Daigneault-Max vs 3-Barber-Pietrafesa
680 0.00 3.00 4♥ W 6 5-Laybourne-Buri vs 2-Zeitlin-Zeitlin
|
8 |
♠873
♥AKT843
♦653
♣6
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♥ ♦3 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 3♦ ♣1 ♥1 ♠6 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 3.00 0.00 4♣ S 6 2-Nia-Glaser vs 1-Beckvall-Fisher
140 2.00 1.00 3♥ N 3 5-Laybourne-Buri vs 2-Zeitlin-Zeitlin
100 1.00 2.00 3♠ W -2 3-Daigneault-Max vs 3-Barber-Pietrafesa
100 0.00 3.00 3♣ S -2 1-Goldberg-St Louis vs 4-Smith-Smith
|
9 |
♠QJ97
♥KJ9
♦QJT853
♣-
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣1 ♥1 ♠3 NT1 |
EW: 6♣ 6♥ 4♠ 3NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.00 0.00 2♥ E -1 1-Goldberg-St Louis vs 4-Smith-Smith
100 2.00 1.00 4♦ N -2 3-Daigneault-Max vs 3-Barber-Pietrafesa
130 1.00 2.00 3♣ E 4 5-Laybourne-Buri vs 2-Zeitlin-Zeitlin
600 0.00 3.00 5♣ E 5 2-Nia-Glaser vs 1-Beckvall-Fisher
|
10 |
♠9754
♥AJT96
♦96
♣AJ
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣3 ♥6 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 1♥ 2/3♠ 1/2NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 2.50 0.50 3N W -2 1-Goldberg-St Louis vs 3-Barber-Pietrafesa
200 2.50 0.50 3N W -2 5-Laybourne-Buri vs 1-Beckvall-Fisher
180 0.50 2.50 2N W 4 3-Daigneault-Max vs 2-Zeitlin-Zeitlin
180 0.50 2.50 2N W 4 4-Kalman-Legrand vs 4-Smith-Smith
|
11 |
♠AJ8
♥T865
♦QJ97
♣K5
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 2♥ 1♠ 2NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦4 ♥5 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 3.00 0.00 1N W -1 5-Laybourne-Buri vs 1-Beckvall-Fisher
PASS 1.50 1.50 Pass Out 3-Daigneault-Max vs 2-Zeitlin-Zeitlin
PASS 1.50 1.50 Pass Out 4-Kalman-Legrand vs 4-Smith-Smith
90 0.00 3.00 2♣ E 2 1-Goldberg-St Louis vs 3-Barber-Pietrafesa
|
12 |
♠-
♥QJ932
♦972
♣JT542
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♥ ♦2 ♠1 NT2 |
EW: 3♦ 5♠ 2NT ♣5 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 3.00 0.00 3♠ E 4 3-Daigneault-Max vs 2-Zeitlin-Zeitlin
450 1.00 2.00 4♠ E 5 1-Goldberg-St Louis vs 3-Barber-Pietrafesa
450 1.00 2.00 4♠ E 5 4-Kalman-Legrand vs 4-Smith-Smith
450 1.00 2.00 4♠ E 5 5-Laybourne-Buri vs 1-Beckvall-Fisher
|
13 |
♠9642
♥-
♦87653
♣AQT9
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5/4♦ 5♠ ♣6/5 ♥2 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 5♥ ♦2 ♠1 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
680 2.50 0.50 4♠ S 6 2-Nia-Glaser vs 4-Smith-Smith
680 2.50 0.50 4♠ S 6 3-Daigneault-Max vs 1-Beckvall-Fisher
620 1.00 2.00 4♠ S 4 1-Goldberg-St Louis vs 2-Zeitlin-Zeitlin
850 0.00 3.00 5♥* W 5 4-Kalman-Legrand vs 3-Barber-Pietrafesa
|
14 |
♠87652
♥Q42
♦T943
♣5
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 2♠ ♣4 ♦5 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 2♦ ♥4 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
500 3.00 0.00 6♣* W -3 4-Kalman-Legrand vs 3-Barber-Pietrafesa
50 1.50 1.50 4♣ W -1 2-Nia-Glaser vs 4-Smith-Smith
50 1.50 1.50 4♣ W -1 3-Daigneault-Max vs 1-Beckvall-Fisher
110 0.00 3.00 3♣ W 3 1-Goldberg-St Louis vs 2-Zeitlin-Zeitlin
|
15 |
♠AT7
♥T32
♦A96
♣K753
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/1♣ 1♦ 2♠ 1NT ♥5 |
EW: 1♥ ♣5 ♦6/5 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 3.00 0.00 4♥ W -3 1-Goldberg-St Louis vs 2-Zeitlin-Zeitlin
100 2.00 1.00 1♠ E -2 2-Nia-Glaser vs 4-Smith-Smith
120 1.00 2.00 1N W 2 3-Daigneault-Max vs 1-Beckvall-Fisher
140 0.00 3.00 3♥ W 3 4-Kalman-Legrand vs 3-Barber-Pietrafesa
|