1 |
♠AKQ842
♥AJ
♦J84
♣43
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 4♠ 1NT ♦3 ♥5 |
EW: 3♦ 2/1♥ ♣5/4 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.88 0.13 4♦ E -2 6-Jones-Zanelli vs 5-Burns-Kalman
50 1.38 2.63 1N N -1 3-Daigneault-Max vs 4-Barber-Pietrafesa
50 1.38 2.63 3♠ N -1 1-Smith-Smith vs 1-Goldberg-St Louis
50 1.38 2.63 3♠ N -1 5-Zeitlin-Zeitlin vs 3-Loeb-McClean
|
2 |
♠2
♥Q762
♦Q865
♣A742
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♦ 2♥ 2NT ♠5/6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣5 ♦4 ♥4 NT5/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
130 3.88 0.13 3♦ S 4 1-Smith-Smith vs 1-Goldberg-St Louis
90 2.63 1.38 1N S 1 5-Zeitlin-Zeitlin vs 3-Loeb-McClean
50 1.38 2.63 2♠ W -1 6-Jones-Zanelli vs 5-Burns-Kalman
100 0.13 3.88 3N S -1 3-Daigneault-Max vs 4-Barber-Pietrafesa
|
3 |
♠Q7432
♥32
♦QT4
♣T73
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦1 ♥6 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 4♣ 4♦ 4♠ 1NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.88 0.13 4♣ W -1 3-Daigneault-Max vs 4-Barber-Pietrafesa
130 2.63 1.38 3♣ W 4 5-Zeitlin-Zeitlin vs 3-Loeb-McClean
210 1.38 2.63 2N W 5 1-Smith-Smith vs 1-Goldberg-St Louis
720 0.13 3.88 3N E 7 6-Jones-Zanelli vs 5-Burns-Kalman
|
4 |
♠AT62
♥82
♦987
♣T852
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ ♥2 ♠4 NT3 |
EW: 5♥ 2♠ 2NT ♣4 ♦3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
620 3.88 0.13 4♥ W 4 2-Kuller-Beckvall vs 2-Tuttle-Prendergast
650 1.38 2.63 5♥ W 5 5-Zeitlin-Zeitlin vs 1-Goldberg-St Louis
650 1.38 2.63 4♥ W 5 4-Nia-Glaser vs 5-Burns-Kalman
650 1.38 2.63 4♥ W 5 6-Jones-Zanelli vs 4-Barber-Pietrafesa
|
5 |
♠Q96
♥QT76
♦J64
♣762
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣4 ♦6 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ 3♠ 2NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
80 3.88 0.13 1♥ N 1 2-Kuller-Beckvall vs 2-Tuttle-Prendergast
90 2.63 1.38 1N E 1 6-Jones-Zanelli vs 4-Barber-Pietrafesa
100 1.38 2.63 2♥ N -1 4-Nia-Glaser vs 5-Burns-Kalman
150 0.13 3.88 1N E 3 5-Zeitlin-Zeitlin vs 1-Goldberg-St Louis
|
6 |
♠KJ984
♥T852
♦-
♣QJ43
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦0 ♥1 ♠3 NT0 |
EW: 3♣ 7♦ 6♥ 3♠ 7NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
660 3.88 0.13 3N E 5 6-Jones-Zanelli vs 4-Barber-Pietrafesa
680 2.63 1.38 4♥ E 6 5-Zeitlin-Zeitlin vs 1-Goldberg-St Louis
720 0.75 3.25 3N E 7 2-Kuller-Beckvall vs 2-Tuttle-Prendergast
720 0.75 3.25 3N E 7 4-Nia-Glaser vs 5-Burns-Kalman
|
7 |
♠86
♥T972
♦AT
♣AK985
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♥ 1♠ 1NT ♦5 |
EW: 1♦ ♣3 ♥2 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
620 3.25 0.75 4♥ S 4 2-Kuller-Beckvall vs 1-Goldberg-St Louis
620 3.25 0.75 4♥ S 4 3-Daigneault-Max vs 3-Loeb-McClean
110 1.38 2.63 2♦ E 3 6-Jones-Zanelli vs 2-Tuttle-Prendergast
200 0.13 3.88 4♥ S -2 1-Smith-Smith vs 5-Burns-Kalman
|
8 |
♠QT2
♥J
♦AKT763
♣K96
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 3♠ ♣2 ♥2 NT3 |
EW: 5♣ 5♥ 1/2NT ♦3 ♠3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 3.88 0.13 2♠ S 4 3-Daigneault-Max vs 3-Loeb-McClean
130 2.63 1.38 3♦ N 4 2-Kuller-Beckvall vs 1-Goldberg-St Louis
170 1.38 2.63 1♥ E 4 1-Smith-Smith vs 5-Burns-Kalman
420 0.13 3.88 4♥ E 4 6-Jones-Zanelli vs 2-Tuttle-Prendergast
|
9 |
♠Q5
♥JT96
♦AK43
♣843
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ ♣6 ♦4 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 3♠ 1NT ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 2.63 1.38 2♠ W 2 1-Smith-Smith vs 5-Burns-Kalman
110 2.63 1.38 2♠ W 2 2-Kuller-Beckvall vs 1-Goldberg-St Louis
110 2.63 1.38 2♦ E 3 3-Daigneault-Max vs 3-Loeb-McClean
140 0.13 3.88 2♠ W 3 6-Jones-Zanelli vs 2-Tuttle-Prendergast
|
10 |
♠QT6
♥K5
♦QJT84
♣A82
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4/3♦ 5♠ 4/1NT ♣4 ♥4 |
EW: 2♣ 3♥ ♦2 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
650 3.88 0.13 4♠ S 5 1-Smith-Smith vs 3-Loeb-McClean
620 1.38 2.63 4♠ S 4 3-Daigneault-Max vs 2-Tuttle-Prendergast
620 1.38 2.63 4♠ S 4 4-Nia-Glaser vs 4-Barber-Pietrafesa
620 1.38 2.63 4♠ S 4 6-Jones-Zanelli vs 1-Goldberg-St Louis
|
11 |
♠A42
♥AKT2
♦A94
♣Q65
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ 3♥ 2♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦4 ♥4 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
400 3.88 0.13 3N N 3 4-Nia-Glaser vs 4-Barber-Pietrafesa
140 2.63 1.38 2♠ S 3 6-Jones-Zanelli vs 1-Goldberg-St Louis
110 1.38 2.63 2♥ N 2 1-Smith-Smith vs 3-Loeb-McClean
50 0.13 3.88 3N N -1 3-Daigneault-Max vs 2-Tuttle-Prendergast
|
12 |
♠K42
♥6
♦Q93
♣JT8754
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 4/5♦ 4♠ 1NT ♥5 |
EW: 2♥ ♣1 ♦2 ♠2 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
620 3.88 0.13 5♣ N 6 6-Jones-Zanelli vs 1-Goldberg-St Louis
150 2.63 1.38 4♥ W -3 1-Smith-Smith vs 3-Loeb-McClean
50 1.38 2.63 3♥ W -1 4-Nia-Glaser vs 4-Barber-Pietrafesa
100 0.13 3.88 1♦ S -1 3-Daigneault-Max vs 2-Tuttle-Prendergast
|
13 |
♠AQ
♥654
♦KT96
♣Q543
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ 2NT ♥6 ♠6 |
EW: 1♥ 1♠ ♣4 ♦5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 4.00 0.00 2N N 3 4-Nia-Glaser vs 3-Loeb-McClean
100 1.50 2.50 2♠ W -1 2-Kuller-Beckvall vs 4-Barber-Pietrafesa
100 1.50 2.50 2♠ W -1 3-Daigneault-Max vs 1-Goldberg-St Louis
100 1.50 2.50 2♠ W -1 5-Zeitlin-Zeitlin vs 5-Burns-Kalman
100 1.50 2.50 2♠ E -1 1-Smith-Smith vs 2-Tuttle-Prendergast
|
14 |
♠4
♥QT86
♦KQJT
♣9863
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♥ ♦6 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 1♦ 3♠ 1NT ♣3 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
130 4.00 0.00 4♣ S 4 4-Nia-Glaser vs 3-Loeb-McClean
50 2.50 1.50 4♠ E -1 2-Kuller-Beckvall vs 4-Barber-Pietrafesa
50 2.50 1.50 4♠ E -1 5-Zeitlin-Zeitlin vs 5-Burns-Kalman
140 0.50 3.50 3♠ W 3 1-Smith-Smith vs 2-Tuttle-Prendergast
140 0.50 3.50 3♠ E 3 3-Daigneault-Max vs 1-Goldberg-St Louis
|
15 |
♠Q42
♥97543
♦Q73
♣T7
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦5 ♥5 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 2♦ 1♥ 5♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 4.00 0.00 3N W -1 2-Kuller-Beckvall vs 4-Barber-Pietrafesa
420 3.00 1.00 4♠ W 4 3-Daigneault-Max vs 1-Goldberg-St Louis
430 2.00 2.00 3N E 4 1-Smith-Smith vs 2-Tuttle-Prendergast
450 0.50 3.50 5♠ W 5 5-Zeitlin-Zeitlin vs 5-Burns-Kalman
450 0.50 3.50 4♠ E 5 4-Nia-Glaser vs 3-Loeb-McClean
|
16 |
♠954
♥J865
♦QJ4
♣984
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣3 ♥5 ♠3 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 2♥ 3♠ ♦6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 3.88 0.13 2♣ E 3 3-Daigneault-Max vs 5-Burns-Kalman
140 2.63 1.38 2♠ W 3 2-Kuller-Beckvall vs 3-Loeb-McClean
170 0.75 3.25 3♠ W 4 5-Zeitlin-Zeitlin vs 4-Barber-Pietrafesa
170 0.75 3.25 2♠ W 4 4-Nia-Glaser vs 2-Tuttle-Prendergast
|
17 |
♠65
♥AQ96
♦Q654
♣T95
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 3♥ ♣1 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 3♣ 3♠ ♦4 ♥3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 3.88 0.13 3♥ N 3 2-Kuller-Beckvall vs 3-Loeb-McClean
50 2.00 2.00 4♠ W -1 3-Daigneault-Max vs 5-Burns-Kalman
50 2.00 2.00 4♠ W -1 5-Zeitlin-Zeitlin vs 4-Barber-Pietrafesa
450 0.13 3.88 4♠ W 5 4-Nia-Glaser vs 2-Tuttle-Prendergast
|
18 |
♠QT983
♥62
♦AKQT
♣J8
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ ♣5 ♥6 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 1♥ ♦3 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
120 3.67 0.33 1N S 2 5-Zeitlin-Zeitlin vs 4-Barber-Pietrafesa
110 2.00 2.00 2♦ N 3 2-Kuller-Beckvall vs 3-Loeb-McClean
50 0.33 3.67 1N E -1 4-Nia-Glaser vs 2-Tuttle-Prendergast
|