1 |
♠AK8
♥Q972
♦AKT52
♣K
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 6♦ 6♥ 3♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦1 ♥1 ♠4 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
980 6.00 0.00 6♥ S 6 1-Schultz-Coles vs 1-Ames-Weiland
490 5.00 1.00 3N S 6 5-Hirschfeld-Adelson vs 2-Quiros-Rankin
480 2.50 3.50 4♥ S 6 3-Calise-Calise vs 5-Packer-Lowe
480 2.50 3.50 4♥ S 6 6-Robertson-Newman vs 4-Eisen-Pientka
480 2.50 3.50 4♥ S 6 7-Harrington-Beuchel vs 6-Smith-Smith
480 2.50 3.50 4♥ N 6 2-Marsh-Spanier vs 3-Lederman-O'Connell
150 0.00 6.00 3♦ N 5 4-Einck-Martenson vs 7-Hunt-Nair
|
2 |
♠KQT532
♥T9
♦KQ6
♣J9
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 5♥ 5♠ 1NT ♣5 |
EW: 2♣ ♦6 ♥1 ♠1 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
680 5.00 1.00 4♠ N 6 2-Marsh-Spanier vs 3-Lederman-O'Connell
680 5.00 1.00 4♠ N 6 6-Robertson-Newman vs 4-Eisen-Pientka
680 5.00 1.00 5♥ S 6 4-Einck-Martenson vs 7-Hunt-Nair
650 2.00 4.00 5♠ N 5 3-Calise-Calise vs 5-Packer-Lowe
650 2.00 4.00 5♠ N 5 7-Harrington-Beuchel vs 6-Smith-Smith
650 2.00 4.00 4♠ N 5 5-Hirschfeld-Adelson vs 2-Quiros-Rankin
200 0.00 6.00 3♠ N 5 1-Schultz-Coles vs 1-Ames-Weiland
|
3 |
♠A2
♥JT6
♦T962
♣J987
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦5 ♥4 ♠2 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 2♦ 3♥ 5♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 5.50 0.50 3♠ E 4 2-Marsh-Spanier vs 3-Lederman-O'Connell
170 5.50 0.50 2♠ E 4 7-Harrington-Beuchel vs 6-Smith-Smith
620 3.50 2.50 4♠ E 4 5-Hirschfeld-Adelson vs 2-Quiros-Rankin
620 3.50 2.50 4♠ E 4 6-Robertson-Newman vs 4-Eisen-Pientka
650 1.00 5.00 4♠ E 5 1-Schultz-Coles vs 1-Ames-Weiland
650 1.00 5.00 4♠ E 5 3-Calise-Calise vs 5-Packer-Lowe
650 1.00 5.00 4♠ E 5 4-Einck-Martenson vs 7-Hunt-Nair
|
4 |
♠7
♥83
♦T6532
♣J8654
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ ♥0 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 6♥ 6♠ 2NT ♣6 ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 6.00 0.00 2♥ E 5 1-Schultz-Coles vs 1-Ames-Weiland
650 3.50 2.50 4♠ E 5 2-Marsh-Spanier vs 3-Lederman-O'Connell
650 3.50 2.50 4♥ E 5 4-Einck-Martenson vs 7-Hunt-Nair
650 3.50 2.50 4♥ E 5 5-Hirschfeld-Adelson vs 2-Quiros-Rankin
650 3.50 2.50 4♥ E 5 7-Harrington-Beuchel vs 6-Smith-Smith
680 0.50 5.50 4♥ E 6 3-Calise-Calise vs 5-Packer-Lowe
680 0.50 5.50 4♥ E 6 6-Robertson-Newman vs 4-Eisen-Pientka
|
5 |
♠J732
♥AKT972
♦T8
♣T
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦4 ♥5 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 3♦ 1♥ 2♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 5.50 0.50 5♣ W -2 3-Calise-Calise vs 4-Eisen-Pientka
100 5.50 0.50 5♣ W -2 7-Harrington-Beuchel vs 5-Packer-Lowe
50 4.00 2.00 3N E -1 4-Einck-Martenson vs 6-Smith-Smith
110 3.00 3.00 3♣ E 3 6-Robertson-Newman vs 3-Lederman-O'Connell
400 1.00 5.00 3N E 3 1-Schultz-Coles vs 7-Hunt-Nair
400 1.00 5.00 3N E 3 2-Marsh-Spanier vs 2-Quiros-Rankin
400 1.00 5.00 3N E 3 5-Hirschfeld-Adelson vs 1-Ames-Weiland
|
6 |
♠K5432
♥T
♦QT963
♣QJ
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣2 ♥4 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 4♣ 3♥ 2♠ 2NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
300 6.00 0.00 3N W -3 3-Calise-Calise vs 4-Eisen-Pientka
200 4.50 1.50 3N W -2 1-Schultz-Coles vs 7-Hunt-Nair
200 4.50 1.50 3N W -2 6-Robertson-Newman vs 3-Lederman-O'Connell
110 2.50 3.50 2♠ E 2 5-Hirschfeld-Adelson vs 1-Ames-Weiland
110 2.50 3.50 2♥ W 2 4-Einck-Martenson vs 6-Smith-Smith
140 1.00 5.00 3♠ E 3 7-Harrington-Beuchel vs 5-Packer-Lowe
300 0.00 6.00 1♠* N -2 2-Marsh-Spanier vs 2-Quiros-Rankin
|
7 |
♠AQJ96
♥K72
♦K3
♣976
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦5 ♥5 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 2♦ 2♥ 1♠ 2/1NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 6.00 0.00 2♣ N 3 6-Robertson-Newman vs 3-Lederman-O'Connell
80 4.50 1.50 1♠ N 1 4-Einck-Martenson vs 6-Smith-Smith
80 4.50 1.50 1♠ N 1 5-Hirschfeld-Adelson vs 1-Ames-Weiland
90 3.00 3.00 1N E 1 2-Marsh-Spanier vs 2-Quiros-Rankin
100 1.50 4.50 1N S -1 1-Schultz-Coles vs 7-Hunt-Nair
100 1.50 4.50 2♣ N -1 7-Harrington-Beuchel vs 5-Packer-Lowe
300 0.00 6.00 2♣ N -3 3-Calise-Calise vs 4-Eisen-Pientka
|
8 |
♠J73
♥KQ63
♦J7543
♣9
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦5 ♥6 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 1♥ 1NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 5.50 0.50 2♠ S -1 3-Calise-Calise vs 4-Eisen-Pientka
50 5.50 0.50 3♣ N -1 5-Hirschfeld-Adelson vs 1-Ames-Weiland
100 2.50 3.50 2♠ S -2 1-Schultz-Coles vs 7-Hunt-Nair
100 2.50 3.50 2♠ S -2 7-Harrington-Beuchel vs 5-Packer-Lowe
100 2.50 3.50 2♠ N -2 2-Marsh-Spanier vs 2-Quiros-Rankin
100 2.50 3.50 2♥ N -2 4-Einck-Martenson vs 6-Smith-Smith
120 0.00 6.00 1N E 2 6-Robertson-Newman vs 3-Lederman-O'Connell
|
9 |
♠A973
♥T8762
♦62
♣A2
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ 3/2♥ 2/1♠ 4NT ♣5 |
EW: 2♣ ♦1 ♥4 ♠5 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
800 6.00 0.00 5♣* E -3 5-Hirschfeld-Adelson vs 7-Hunt-Nair
650 5.00 1.00 5♦* S 6 7-Harrington-Beuchel vs 4-Eisen-Pientka
420 4.00 2.00 5♦ S 6 2-Marsh-Spanier vs 1-Ames-Weiland
170 2.00 4.00 4♦ S 6 3-Calise-Calise vs 3-Lederman-O'Connell
170 2.00 4.00 4♦ S 6 6-Robertson-Newman vs 2-Quiros-Rankin
170 2.00 4.00 3♦ S 6 1-Schultz-Coles vs 6-Smith-Smith
150 0.00 6.00 4♦ S 5 4-Einck-Martenson vs 5-Packer-Lowe
|
10 |
♠AK4
♥6532
♦JT98
♣KJ
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 1♠ -/1NT ♣4 ♥4 NT6/7 |
EW: 3♣ 2/1♥ ♦4 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 6.00 0.00 2♠ S 3 7-Harrington-Beuchel vs 4-Eisen-Pientka
110 4.00 2.00 1♠ S 2 2-Marsh-Spanier vs 1-Ames-Weiland
110 4.00 2.00 1♠ S 2 5-Hirschfeld-Adelson vs 7-Hunt-Nair
110 4.00 2.00 3♦ N 3 3-Calise-Calise vs 3-Lederman-O'Connell
80 2.00 4.00 1♠ S 1 6-Robertson-Newman vs 2-Quiros-Rankin
130 1.00 5.00 3♣ W 4 4-Einck-Martenson vs 5-Packer-Lowe
200 0.00 6.00 4♦ N -2 1-Schultz-Coles vs 6-Smith-Smith
|
11 |
♠AT6
♥KT32
♦T6
♣T875
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣4 ♦3 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 3♦ 3♠ 1NT ♥6/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 6.00 0.00 3N W -4 4-Einck-Martenson vs 5-Packer-Lowe
150 4.00 2.00 3N E -3 1-Schultz-Coles vs 6-Smith-Smith
150 4.00 2.00 3N E -3 6-Robertson-Newman vs 2-Quiros-Rankin
150 4.00 2.00 2N W -3 7-Harrington-Beuchel vs 4-Eisen-Pientka
110 1.50 4.50 2♠ E 2 2-Marsh-Spanier vs 1-Ames-Weiland
110 1.50 4.50 3♦ E 3 3-Calise-Calise vs 3-Lederman-O'Connell
430 0.00 6.00 3N E 4 5-Hirschfeld-Adelson vs 7-Hunt-Nair
|
12 |
♠AJT4
♥K2
♦932
♣AT97
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♠ 3NT ♦5 ♥5 |
EW: 2♥ ♣3 ♦6 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 4.50 1.50 3♠ S 3 1-Schultz-Coles vs 6-Smith-Smith
140 4.50 1.50 3♠ N 3 3-Calise-Calise vs 3-Lederman-O'Connell
140 4.50 1.50 3♠ N 3 6-Robertson-Newman vs 2-Quiros-Rankin
140 4.50 1.50 3♠ N 3 7-Harrington-Beuchel vs 4-Eisen-Pientka
100 2.00 4.00 4♣ N -1 4-Einck-Martenson vs 5-Packer-Lowe
110 0.50 5.50 2♥ E 2 2-Marsh-Spanier vs 1-Ames-Weiland
110 0.50 5.50 2♥ E 2 5-Hirschfeld-Adelson vs 7-Hunt-Nair
|
13 |
♠A5
♥KQJ82
♦JT9
♣AK5
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 6♥ 4♠ 1NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣6 ♥0 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
1430 6.00 0.00 6♥ N 6 7-Harrington-Beuchel vs 3-Lederman-O'Connell
680 2.50 3.50 5♥ N 6 3-Calise-Calise vs 2-Quiros-Rankin
680 2.50 3.50 5♥ N 6 6-Robertson-Newman vs 1-Ames-Weiland
680 2.50 3.50 4♥ N 6 1-Schultz-Coles vs 5-Packer-Lowe
680 2.50 3.50 4♥ N 6 2-Marsh-Spanier vs 7-Hunt-Nair
680 2.50 3.50 4♥ N 6 4-Einck-Martenson vs 4-Eisen-Pientka
680 2.50 3.50 4♥ N 6 5-Hirschfeld-Adelson vs 6-Smith-Smith
|
14 |
♠K2
♥JT3
♦KJ653
♣872
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6/5 ♦5 ♥1 ♠0 NT1 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 5♥ 5♠ 4/2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
420 5.00 1.00 4♠ E 4 3-Calise-Calise vs 2-Quiros-Rankin
420 5.00 1.00 4♠ E 4 4-Einck-Martenson vs 4-Eisen-Pientka
420 5.00 1.00 4♠ E 4 6-Robertson-Newman vs 1-Ames-Weiland
480 2.00 4.00 4♠ E 6 2-Marsh-Spanier vs 7-Hunt-Nair
480 2.00 4.00 4♠ E 6 5-Hirschfeld-Adelson vs 6-Smith-Smith
480 2.00 4.00 4♠ E 6 7-Harrington-Beuchel vs 3-Lederman-O'Connell
510 0.00 6.00 4♠ E 7 1-Schultz-Coles vs 5-Packer-Lowe
|
15 |
♠JT
♥QT7653
♦KQ96
♣9
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ ♣6 ♦4/3 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 3♦ 2♠ 1NT ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 5.50 0.50 3♥ N 3 2-Marsh-Spanier vs 7-Hunt-Nair
140 5.50 0.50 3♥ N 3 6-Robertson-Newman vs 1-Ames-Weiland
110 4.00 2.00 2♥ N 2 5-Hirschfeld-Adelson vs 6-Smith-Smith
110 3.00 3.00 3♦ E 3 4-Einck-Martenson vs 4-Eisen-Pientka
170 2.00 4.00 2♠ W 4 1-Schultz-Coles vs 5-Packer-Lowe
200 0.50 5.50 4♥ N -2 3-Calise-Calise vs 2-Quiros-Rankin
200 0.50 5.50 4♥* N -1 7-Harrington-Beuchel vs 3-Lederman-O'Connell
|
16 |
♠A2
♥82
♦K843
♣AKJ98
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 7♣ 6♦ 4♥ 6♠ 7NT |
EW: ♣0 ♦1 ♥3 ♠1 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
990 6.00 0.00 6N S 6 3-Calise-Calise vs 2-Quiros-Rankin
520 5.00 1.00 3N S 7 4-Einck-Martenson vs 4-Eisen-Pientka
490 3.00 3.00 4N N 6 7-Harrington-Beuchel vs 3-Lederman-O'Connell
490 3.00 3.00 3N S 6 6-Robertson-Newman vs 1-Ames-Weiland
490 3.00 3.00 3N N 6 2-Marsh-Spanier vs 7-Hunt-Nair
480 1.00 5.00 4♠ S 6 5-Hirschfeld-Adelson vs 6-Smith-Smith
450 0.00 6.00 4♠ S 5 1-Schultz-Coles vs 5-Packer-Lowe
|
17 |
♠32
♥K832
♦AKT
♣J765
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♥ ♦5 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 1/2♦ 2♠ -/1NT ♣6 ♥5/6 NT6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 6.00 0.00 2♠ E -1 3-Calise-Calise vs 1-Ames-Weiland
100 4.50 1.50 3♥ S -2 5-Hirschfeld-Adelson vs 5-Packer-Lowe
100 4.50 1.50 3♥ S -2 6-Robertson-Newman vs 7-Hunt-Nair
110 2.00 4.00 2♠ E 2 1-Schultz-Coles vs 4-Eisen-Pientka
110 2.00 4.00 2♠ E 2 2-Marsh-Spanier vs 6-Smith-Smith
110 2.00 4.00 2♠ E 2 7-Harrington-Beuchel vs 2-Quiros-Rankin
140 0.00 6.00 2♠ E 3 4-Einck-Martenson vs 3-Lederman-O'Connell
|
18 |
♠T82
♥864
♦JT
♣K9732
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♥ 2♠ ♦3 NT6 |
EW: 3♦ ♣5 ♥3 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
730 6.00 0.00 3♥* S 3 5-Hirschfeld-Adelson vs 5-Packer-Lowe
50 4.50 1.50 5♦ W -1 4-Einck-Martenson vs 3-Lederman-O'Connell
50 4.50 1.50 4♦ E -1 1-Schultz-Coles vs 4-Eisen-Pientka
100 3.00 3.00 4♥ S -1 3-Calise-Calise vs 1-Ames-Weiland
130 1.50 4.50 3♦ W 4 2-Marsh-Spanier vs 6-Smith-Smith
130 1.50 4.50 3♦ W 4 7-Harrington-Beuchel vs 2-Quiros-Rankin
200 0.00 6.00 4♥* S -1 6-Robertson-Newman vs 7-Hunt-Nair
|
19 |
♠JT64
♥T975
♦73
♣KT5
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ -/1NT ♦4 ♥6 ♠6 NT6/7 |
EW: 2♦ 1♠ ♣5 ♥6 NT6/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
300 6.00 0.00 2♣ W -3 6-Robertson-Newman vs 7-Hunt-Nair
200 5.00 1.00 2♠ W -2 5-Hirschfeld-Adelson vs 5-Packer-Lowe
150 4.00 2.00 1N S 3 2-Marsh-Spanier vs 6-Smith-Smith
100 2.50 3.50 2♠ W -1 3-Calise-Calise vs 1-Ames-Weiland
100 2.50 3.50 2♠ W -1 7-Harrington-Beuchel vs 2-Quiros-Rankin
100 1.00 5.00 3♣ S -2 1-Schultz-Coles vs 4-Eisen-Pientka
110 0.00 6.00 2♦ E 3 4-Einck-Martenson vs 3-Lederman-O'Connell
|
20 |
♠5
♥AK9
♦QJ9543
♣AT6
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 4♦ 1♥ 2/1♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦3 ♥6 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
630 5.50 0.50 3N S 4 5-Hirschfeld-Adelson vs 5-Packer-Lowe
630 5.50 0.50 3N N 4 2-Marsh-Spanier vs 6-Smith-Smith
600 4.00 2.00 3N N 3 6-Robertson-Newman vs 7-Hunt-Nair
130 3.00 3.00 2♦ N 4 4-Einck-Martenson vs 3-Lederman-O'Connell
100 1.00 5.00 3N S -1 3-Calise-Calise vs 1-Ames-Weiland
100 1.00 5.00 3N N -1 1-Schultz-Coles vs 4-Eisen-Pientka
100 1.00 5.00 3N N -1 7-Harrington-Beuchel vs 2-Quiros-Rankin
|
21 |
♠A982
♥A9
♦AK3
♣AJ65
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/-♣ 3♦ 2♥ 4♠ 3/2NT ♣7/6 |
EW: ♣6 ♦4 ♥5 ♠2/3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 4.50 1.50 4♠ N -1 1-Schultz-Coles vs 3-Lederman-O'Connell
100 4.50 1.50 4♠ N -1 4-Einck-Martenson vs 2-Quiros-Rankin
100 4.50 1.50 4♠ N -1 5-Hirschfeld-Adelson vs 4-Eisen-Pientka
100 4.50 1.50 4♠ N -1 6-Robertson-Newman vs 6-Smith-Smith
200 1.50 4.50 4N N -2 7-Harrington-Beuchel vs 1-Ames-Weiland
200 1.50 4.50 4♠ N -2 2-Marsh-Spanier vs 5-Packer-Lowe
400 0.00 6.00 4♥ N -4 3-Calise-Calise vs 7-Hunt-Nair
|
22 |
♠K7
♥985
♦832
♣T7532
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦5 ♥2 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ 4♥ 4/3♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 6.00 0.00 4♥ E -2 6-Robertson-Newman vs 6-Smith-Smith
100 5.00 1.00 4♥ E -1 1-Schultz-Coles vs 3-Lederman-O'Connell
600 4.00 2.00 3N E 3 7-Harrington-Beuchel vs 1-Ames-Weiland
620 3.00 3.00 4♥ E 4 5-Hirschfeld-Adelson vs 4-Eisen-Pientka
630 2.00 4.00 3N E 4 2-Marsh-Spanier vs 5-Packer-Lowe
650 1.00 5.00 4♥ E 5 4-Einck-Martenson vs 2-Quiros-Rankin
680 0.00 6.00 4♥ E 6 3-Calise-Calise vs 7-Hunt-Nair
|
23 |
♠JT7
♥A62
♦QT5
♣J975
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ 1♥ 2♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦5 ♥6 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
120 4.50 1.50 2N S 2 2-Marsh-Spanier vs 5-Packer-Lowe
120 4.50 1.50 1N S 2 5-Hirschfeld-Adelson vs 4-Eisen-Pientka
120 4.50 1.50 1N S 2 6-Robertson-Newman vs 6-Smith-Smith
120 4.50 1.50 1N S 2 7-Harrington-Beuchel vs 1-Ames-Weiland
100 1.50 4.50 3N S -1 1-Schultz-Coles vs 3-Lederman-O'Connell
100 1.50 4.50 3N N -1 4-Einck-Martenson vs 2-Quiros-Rankin
120 0.00 6.00 1N S 2 3-Calise-Calise vs 7-Hunt-Nair
|
24 |
♠K963
♥AKQT
♦Q3
♣532
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣4 ♥5 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 2♥ 2♠ 2NT ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 6.00 0.00 2♦ S 3 5-Hirschfeld-Adelson vs 4-Eisen-Pientka
50 5.00 1.00 3♠ W -1 6-Robertson-Newman vs 6-Smith-Smith
50 3.50 2.50 2N N -1 3-Calise-Calise vs 7-Hunt-Nair
50 3.50 2.50 2♦ S -1 2-Marsh-Spanier vs 5-Packer-Lowe
100 2.00 4.00 2♠ N -2 1-Schultz-Coles vs 3-Lederman-O'Connell
110 0.50 5.50 2♠ W 2 7-Harrington-Beuchel vs 1-Ames-Weiland
110 0.50 5.50 2♥ E 2 4-Einck-Martenson vs 2-Quiros-Rankin
|
25 |
♠JT85
♥A
♦AT42
♣JT72
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2/3♠ ♣5/6 ♥4 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 2♥ 2NT ♦6 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 6.00 0.00 3♣ E -2 7-Harrington-Beuchel vs 7-Hunt-Nair
100 5.00 1.00 3♥ E -1 5-Hirschfeld-Adelson vs 3-Lederman-O'Connell
90 4.00 2.00 2♣ W 2 3-Calise-Calise vs 6-Smith-Smith
110 2.00 4.00 2♥ E 2 1-Schultz-Coles vs 2-Quiros-Rankin
110 2.00 4.00 2♥ E 2 6-Robertson-Newman vs 5-Packer-Lowe
110 2.00 4.00 3♣ W 3 4-Einck-Martenson vs 1-Ames-Weiland
670 0.00 6.00 2♥* E 2 2-Marsh-Spanier vs 4-Eisen-Pientka
|
26 |
♠94
♥K42
♦J876
♣AJT7
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/1♥ 2♠ ♣5 ♦3 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 4♦ 2NT ♥5 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 6.00 0.00 4♦* E -1 5-Hirschfeld-Adelson vs 3-Lederman-O'Connell
100 5.00 1.00 3♣ W -1 7-Harrington-Beuchel vs 7-Hunt-Nair
100 3.50 2.50 3♥ N -1 1-Schultz-Coles vs 2-Quiros-Rankin
100 3.50 2.50 3♥ N -1 2-Marsh-Spanier vs 4-Eisen-Pientka
130 2.00 4.00 2♦ E 4 4-Einck-Martenson vs 1-Ames-Weiland
150 1.00 5.00 2N E 3 3-Calise-Calise vs 6-Smith-Smith
630 0.00 6.00 3N E 4 6-Robertson-Newman vs 5-Packer-Lowe
|
27 |
♠T87
♥74
♦87
♣AQ9875
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦4 ♥4 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 3♦ 3♥ 2♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 5.00 1.00 2N W -1 3-Calise-Calise vs 6-Smith-Smith
50 5.00 1.00 2N E -1 4-Einck-Martenson vs 1-Ames-Weiland
50 5.00 1.00 3♦ E -1 5-Hirschfeld-Adelson vs 3-Lederman-O'Connell
110 3.00 3.00 2♦ E 3 1-Schultz-Coles vs 2-Quiros-Rankin
120 2.00 4.00 1N E 2 2-Marsh-Spanier vs 4-Eisen-Pientka
150 1.00 5.00 2N W 3 7-Harrington-Beuchel vs 7-Hunt-Nair
400 0.00 6.00 3N E 3 6-Robertson-Newman vs 5-Packer-Lowe
|
28 |
♠9743
♥QJT6
♦64
♣765
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4/5 ♦5 ♥4 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 3♥ 4♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 5.50 0.50 3N E -2 2-Marsh-Spanier vs 4-Eisen-Pientka
100 5.50 0.50 3N E -2 4-Einck-Martenson vs 1-Ames-Weiland
50 3.50 2.50 3N E -1 6-Robertson-Newman vs 5-Packer-Lowe
50 3.50 2.50 3N E -1 7-Harrington-Beuchel vs 7-Hunt-Nair
110 1.50 4.50 2♥ W 2 3-Calise-Calise vs 6-Smith-Smith
110 1.50 4.50 2♥ W 2 5-Hirschfeld-Adelson vs 3-Lederman-O'Connell
150 0.00 6.00 2N E 3 1-Schultz-Coles vs 2-Quiros-Rankin
|