1 |
♠QT87
♥J52
♦KT7
♣642
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦6 ♥5 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 1♥ 1♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 2.00 0.00 2♠ E -2 2-Berlin-Nair vs 4-Hunt-Osborne
90 1.00 1.00 1N S 1 3-Rehfeldt-Wellek vs 5-Coles-Schultz
100 0.00 2.00 2♦ S -2 6-Zack-Kaiser vs 1-Bender-Hautem
|
2 |
♠K5
♥KJT874
♦964
♣J7
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♥ ♣5 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 1♠ 2NT ♦5 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 1.50 0.50 3♦ S 3 2-Berlin-Nair vs 4-Hunt-Osborne
110 1.50 0.50 3♦ S 3 3-Rehfeldt-Wellek vs 5-Coles-Schultz
100 0.00 2.00 2♥ N -1 6-Zack-Kaiser vs 1-Bender-Hautem
|
3 |
♠AK74
♥J8
♦754
♣K532
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 6♦ 6♥ 4♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦1 ♥1 ♠3 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
990 2.00 0.00 6N N 6 2-Berlin-Nair vs 4-Hunt-Osborne
980 1.00 1.00 6♥ S 6 6-Zack-Kaiser vs 1-Bender-Hautem
50 0.00 2.00 6♥ S -1 3-Rehfeldt-Wellek vs 5-Coles-Schultz
|
4 |
♠AQ6
♥T98
♦AT9
♣T874
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 3♥ 2♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦5 ♥4 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
400 2.00 0.00 2♠ W -4 3-Rehfeldt-Wellek vs 5-Coles-Schultz
PASS 1.00 1.00 Pass Out 6-Zack-Kaiser vs 1-Bender-Hautem
100 0.00 2.00 2♣ S -1 2-Berlin-Nair vs 4-Hunt-Osborne
|
5 |
♠K93
♥932
♦KJ75
♣T64
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦3 ♥4 ♠3/2 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 3♦ 2♥ 4♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 1.50 0.50 3N E -1 2-Berlin-Nair vs 4-Hunt-Osborne
50 1.50 0.50 3N E -1 6-Zack-Kaiser vs 1-Bender-Hautem
430 0.00 2.00 3N E 4 3-Rehfeldt-Wellek vs 5-Coles-Schultz
|
6 |
♠9852
♥9765
♦3
♣Q983
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 6♠ ♣4 ♥6 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 1♥ ♦3 ♠1 NT6/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
480 2.00 0.00 4♠ S 6 5-Coles-Schultz vs 1-Bender-Hautem
450 0.50 1.50 4♠ S 5 3-Rehfeldt-Wellek vs 4-Hunt-Osborne
450 0.50 1.50 4♠ S 5 6-Zack-Kaiser vs 2-Berlin-Nair
|
7 |
♠AQ7543
♥T754
♦AQT
♣-
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/2♣ 4/3♥ 4♠ 3NT ♦5 |
EW: 2♦ ♣5 ♥4/3 ♠2/3 NT4/3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
620 2.00 0.00 4♠ N 4 6-Zack-Kaiser vs 2-Berlin-Nair
100 1.00 1.00 4♠ N -1 3-Rehfeldt-Wellek vs 4-Hunt-Osborne
200 0.00 2.00 6♠ N -2 5-Coles-Schultz vs 1-Bender-Hautem
|
8 |
♠A842
♥K
♦J962
♣QJT8
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ 3♥ 1♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦4 ♥4 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
420 2.00 0.00 4♥ S 4 5-Coles-Schultz vs 1-Bender-Hautem
150 1.00 1.00 2N N 3 6-Zack-Kaiser vs 2-Berlin-Nair
100 0.00 2.00 1N* E -1 3-Rehfeldt-Wellek vs 4-Hunt-Osborne
|
9 |
♠AK72
♥Q5
♦A863
♣J93
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♦ 3♥ 2♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦4 ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
400 1.50 0.50 3N N 3 3-Rehfeldt-Wellek vs 4-Hunt-Osborne
400 1.50 0.50 3N N 3 5-Coles-Schultz vs 1-Bender-Hautem
90 0.00 2.00 2♦ N 2 6-Zack-Kaiser vs 2-Berlin-Nair
|
10 |
♠53
♥A
♦QJT97
♣AQ965
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ 2NT ♥4/5 ♠6 |
EW: 2♥ 1♠ ♣5 ♦4 NT4/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 1.50 0.50 4♥ E -2 3-Rehfeldt-Wellek vs 4-Hunt-Osborne
200 1.50 0.50 4♥ E -2 5-Coles-Schultz vs 1-Bender-Hautem
100 0.00 2.00 4♥ E -1 6-Zack-Kaiser vs 2-Berlin-Nair
|
11 |
♠8654
♥J52
♦95
♣QJ94
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♠ ♣3 ♦2 ♥1 NT5 |
EW: 4/3♣ 4♦ 6♥ ♠3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
300 2.00 0.00 6♠* S -2 4-Hunt-Osborne vs 5-Coles-Schultz
480 1.00 1.00 5♥ W 6 6-Zack-Kaiser vs 3-Rehfeldt-Wellek
980 0.00 2.00 6♥ E 6 1-Bender-Hautem vs 2-Berlin-Nair
|
12 |
♠J62
♥AKQT42
♦T83
♣8
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣6 ♦5 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 2♦ 3♠ 2NT ♣6 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 2.00 0.00 2♠ E 3 1-Bender-Hautem vs 2-Berlin-Nair
300 1.00 1.00 4♥ N -3 4-Hunt-Osborne vs 5-Coles-Schultz
800 0.00 2.00 3♥* N -3 6-Zack-Kaiser vs 3-Rehfeldt-Wellek
|
13 |
♠AK8
♥A73
♦Q3
♣KT942
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♥ ♦5 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 2♦ 1♠ ♣3 ♥3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 1.50 0.50 3♥ N 4 4-Hunt-Osborne vs 5-Coles-Schultz
170 1.50 0.50 2♥ N 4 6-Zack-Kaiser vs 3-Rehfeldt-Wellek
140 0.00 2.00 3♥ N 3 1-Bender-Hautem vs 2-Berlin-Nair
|
14 |
♠KT963
♥K96
♦87
♣J82
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 4♠ ♣6 ♥5 NT6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣6 ♦2 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
130 2.00 0.00 4♦ S 4 1-Bender-Hautem vs 2-Berlin-Nair
50 0.50 1.50 4♠ N -1 4-Hunt-Osborne vs 5-Coles-Schultz
50 0.50 1.50 4♠ N -1 6-Zack-Kaiser vs 3-Rehfeldt-Wellek
|
15 |
♠965
♥43
♦A8
♣KJT743
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♥ ♦4/3 ♠3 NT6 |
EW: 2♦ 3♠ ♣6 ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 2.00 0.00 2♥ S 2 1-Bender-Hautem vs 2-Berlin-Nair
100 1.00 1.00 4♠ E -2 6-Zack-Kaiser vs 3-Rehfeldt-Wellek
170 0.00 2.00 3♠ E 4 4-Hunt-Osborne vs 5-Coles-Schultz
|
16 |
♠Q873
♥4
♦J742
♣Q974
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 2♠ 1NT ♣6 ♥5 |
EW: 1♣ 2♥ ♦4 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 2.00 0.00 2♥ E -2 6-Zack-Kaiser vs 4-Hunt-Osborne
100 0.50 1.50 2♥ E -1 1-Bender-Hautem vs 3-Rehfeldt-Wellek
100 0.50 1.50 2♥ E -1 5-Coles-Schultz vs 2-Berlin-Nair
|
17 |
♠T8
♥Q987
♦KT874
♣AJ
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3/2♣ 3♦ 2♥ 2♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦4 ♥5 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
400 2.00 0.00 3N S 3 1-Bender-Hautem vs 3-Rehfeldt-Wellek
50 1.00 1.00 3N S -1 5-Coles-Schultz vs 2-Berlin-Nair
100 0.00 2.00 3N S -2 6-Zack-Kaiser vs 4-Hunt-Osborne
|
18 |
♠A85
♥T765
♦96
♣J973
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦3 ♥2 ♠5 NT2 |
EW: 4♣ 3♦ 5♥ 1♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
420 2.00 0.00 4♥ E 4 6-Zack-Kaiser vs 4-Hunt-Osborne
450 1.00 1.00 4♥ E 5 1-Bender-Hautem vs 3-Rehfeldt-Wellek
460 0.00 2.00 3N W 5 5-Coles-Schultz vs 2-Berlin-Nair
|
19 |
♠J
♥KQ87643
♦T32
♣43
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ ♣0 ♦0 ♠2 NT0 |
EW: 6♣ 6♦ 4♠ ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 2.00 0.00 4♠ S -1 6-Zack-Kaiser vs 4-Hunt-Osborne
500 1.00 1.00 5♥* N -3 1-Bender-Hautem vs 3-Rehfeldt-Wellek
1370 0.00 2.00 6♣ W 6 5-Coles-Schultz vs 2-Berlin-Nair
|
20 |
♠T653
♥A53
♦KT
♣KJ94
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♠ 1NT ♦4 ♥4 |
EW: 3♦ 3♥ ♣4 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 2.00 0.00 3♠ S 3 6-Zack-Kaiser vs 4-Hunt-Osborne
140 0.50 1.50 2♥ W 3 1-Bender-Hautem vs 3-Rehfeldt-Wellek
140 0.50 1.50 2♥ W 3 5-Coles-Schultz vs 2-Berlin-Nair
|
21 |
♠Q6
♥K976
♦8543
♣AJ6
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 4♦ 1♥ 3/2♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦3 ♥6 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
130 2.00 0.00 3♦ S 4 6-Zack-Kaiser vs 5-Coles-Schultz
90 1.00 1.00 1N N 1 4-Hunt-Osborne vs 1-Bender-Hautem
50 0.00 2.00 1♥ W -1 2-Berlin-Nair vs 3-Rehfeldt-Wellek
|
22 |
♠643
♥6543
♦AK8
♣A76
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣3 ♥6 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 4♠ 1NT ♦6 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 2.00 0.00 4♠ E -1 6-Zack-Kaiser vs 5-Coles-Schultz
620 0.50 1.50 4♠ E 4 2-Berlin-Nair vs 3-Rehfeldt-Wellek
620 0.50 1.50 4♠ E 4 4-Hunt-Osborne vs 1-Bender-Hautem
|
23 |
♠KT93
♥KJT32
♦983
♣T
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/3♣ 5♦ 4♥ 3♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦2 ♥3 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
660 2.00 0.00 3N S 5 6-Zack-Kaiser vs 5-Coles-Schultz
630 1.00 1.00 3N S 4 2-Berlin-Nair vs 3-Rehfeldt-Wellek
600 0.00 2.00 3N S 3 4-Hunt-Osborne vs 1-Bender-Hautem
|
24 |
♠AKQ732
♥AT4
♦7
♣872
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 5♦ 2♥ 3/4♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦2 ♥4 ♠3 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
460 2.00 0.00 3N S 5 2-Berlin-Nair vs 3-Rehfeldt-Wellek
430 1.00 1.00 3N S 4 4-Hunt-Osborne vs 1-Bender-Hautem
50 0.00 2.00 4♠ N -1 6-Zack-Kaiser vs 5-Coles-Schultz
|
25 |
♠A42
♥K9874
♦2
♣Q864
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦5 ♥5 ♠4 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 2♦ 1♥ 2♠ 3/4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
630 1.50 0.50 3N W 4 2-Berlin-Nair vs 3-Rehfeldt-Wellek
630 1.50 0.50 3N W 4 4-Hunt-Osborne vs 1-Bender-Hautem
660 0.00 2.00 3N W 5 6-Zack-Kaiser vs 5-Coles-Schultz
|