1 |
♠AQ7
♥AK942
♦J973
♣5
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 1/2♥ 1/2♠ 1NT ♣4/6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦3 ♥5 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
460 4.00 0.00 3N N 5 6-Jacobson-Jones vs 5-Smith-Smith
150 3.00 1.00 3♦ S 5 5-Perla-Araghi vs 3-Barber-Pietrafesa
110 1.50 2.50 3♦ N 3 1-Kuller-Finkle vs 1-Beckvall-Fisher
110 1.50 2.50 2♦ N 3 3-Daigneault-Kalman vs 4-Burns-Shostack
50 0.00 4.00 3♦ S -1 4-Nia-Glaser vs 6-Walker-Prendergast
|
2 |
♠AQJT53
♥KQ3
♦95
♣84
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣1 ♦2 ♥5 NT5 |
EW: 6♣ 4♦ 2♥ 1NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.50 0.50 3♠ N -1 1-Kuller-Finkle vs 1-Beckvall-Fisher
100 3.50 0.50 2♠ N -1 3-Daigneault-Kalman vs 4-Burns-Shostack
130 1.00 3.00 3♦ E 4 4-Nia-Glaser vs 6-Walker-Prendergast
130 1.00 3.00 2♦ E 4 5-Perla-Araghi vs 3-Barber-Pietrafesa
130 1.00 3.00 2♦ E 4 6-Jacobson-Jones vs 5-Smith-Smith
|
3 |
♠-
♥T9543
♦A74
♣KT872
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ 1♥ ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 2♠ ♣5 ♦6 ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 3.50 0.50 4♠ E -2 1-Kuller-Finkle vs 1-Beckvall-Fisher
200 3.50 0.50 2♠ E -2 6-Jacobson-Jones vs 5-Smith-Smith
100 2.00 2.00 2♠ E -1 5-Perla-Araghi vs 3-Barber-Pietrafesa
140 1.00 3.00 2♠ E 3 3-Daigneault-Kalman vs 4-Burns-Shostack
620 0.00 4.00 4♠ E 4 4-Nia-Glaser vs 6-Walker-Prendergast
|
4 |
♠J843
♥AK95
♦7643
♣9
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♥ 2♠ 1NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣4/3 ♥4 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 3.50 0.50 2♠ E -2 4-Nia-Glaser vs 5-Smith-Smith
200 3.50 0.50 2♥ W -2 1-Kuller-Finkle vs 6-Walker-Prendergast
90 2.00 2.00 2♦ E 2 5-Perla-Araghi vs 1-Beckvall-Fisher
200 0.50 3.50 2♥ N -2 6-Jacobson-Jones vs 4-Burns-Shostack
200 0.50 3.50 3♣ S -2 2-Farnham-Max vs 2-Goldberg-St Louis
|
5 |
♠92
♥AK97
♦962
♣AJ87
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♦ 4♥ 3♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦4 ♥3 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
180 4.00 0.00 2N S 4 2-Farnham-Max vs 2-Goldberg-St Louis
170 3.00 1.00 1♥ N 4 6-Jacobson-Jones vs 4-Burns-Shostack
140 2.00 2.00 2♥ N 3 4-Nia-Glaser vs 5-Smith-Smith
130 1.00 3.00 2♣ N 4 5-Perla-Araghi vs 1-Beckvall-Fisher
120 0.00 4.00 2N S 2 1-Kuller-Finkle vs 6-Walker-Prendergast
|
6 |
♠KJ763
♥T652
♦J
♣A42
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♠ ♣2 ♦2 ♥3 NT5 |
EW: 4♣ 4♦ 3♥ ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
420 3.50 0.50 4♠ S 4 2-Farnham-Max vs 2-Goldberg-St Louis
420 3.50 0.50 4♠ S 4 6-Jacobson-Jones vs 4-Burns-Shostack
200 2.00 2.00 4♥* E -1 1-Kuller-Finkle vs 6-Walker-Prendergast
600 0.50 3.50 5♦ W 5 4-Nia-Glaser vs 5-Smith-Smith
600 0.50 3.50 5♦ W 5 5-Perla-Araghi vs 1-Beckvall-Fisher
|
7 |
♠83
♥964
♦Q982
♣QT86
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦4 ♥4 ♠1 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 3♦ 3♥ 6♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
650 4.00 0.00 4♠ W 5 6-Jacobson-Jones vs 2-Goldberg-St Louis
680 3.00 1.00 5♠ W 6 1-Kuller-Finkle vs 5-Smith-Smith
710 2.00 2.00 4♠ W 7 3-Daigneault-Kalman vs 3-Barber-Pietrafesa
1430 1.00 3.00 6♠ W 6 2-Farnham-Max vs 1-Beckvall-Fisher
1460 0.00 4.00 6♠ W 7 5-Perla-Araghi vs 6-Walker-Prendergast
|
8 |
♠T5
♥7
♦AKQ9832
♣A43
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 7♦ 4♥ 6♠ 7NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦0 ♥2 ♠1 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
490 4.00 0.00 5N S 6 3-Daigneault-Kalman vs 3-Barber-Pietrafesa
480 3.00 1.00 4♠ S 6 6-Jacobson-Jones vs 2-Goldberg-St Louis
460 2.00 2.00 3N N 5 2-Farnham-Max vs 1-Beckvall-Fisher
440 1.00 3.00 5♦ N 7 1-Kuller-Finkle vs 5-Smith-Smith
200 0.00 4.00 2♠ S 5 5-Perla-Araghi vs 6-Walker-Prendergast
|
9 |
♠A8
♥AKT32
♦643
♣Q76
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ ♣3 ♦3 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 4♣ 4♦ 3♠ ♥4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
420 4.00 0.00 4♥ N 4 3-Daigneault-Kalman vs 3-Barber-Pietrafesa
140 3.00 1.00 2♥ N 3 2-Farnham-Max vs 1-Beckvall-Fisher
100 2.00 2.00 3♠ E -1 1-Kuller-Finkle vs 5-Smith-Smith
50 1.00 3.00 4♥ N -1 6-Jacobson-Jones vs 2-Goldberg-St Louis
130 0.00 4.00 3♦ W 4 5-Perla-Araghi vs 6-Walker-Prendergast
|
10 |
♠QJ83
♥QJ863
♦52
♣84
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 5♥ 4♠ 2NT ♦6 |
EW: 1/-♦ ♣2 ♦7/6 ♥1 ♠3/1 NT4/1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
650 4.00 0.00 4♥ N 5 4-Nia-Glaser vs 4-Burns-Shostack
620 3.00 1.00 4♥ N 4 6-Jacobson-Jones vs 1-Beckvall-Fisher
130 2.00 2.00 4♣ S 4 3-Daigneault-Kalman vs 2-Goldberg-St Louis
100 1.00 3.00 4♥ N -1 1-Kuller-Finkle vs 3-Barber-Pietrafesa
200 0.00 4.00 2N S -2 2-Farnham-Max vs 6-Walker-Prendergast
|
11 |
♠AKQ
♥943
♦984
♣9654
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2/1♦ 4♥ 3♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣6/5 ♦5 ♥3/2 ♠4 NT3/2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
500 4.00 0.00 2♣* W -3 6-Jacobson-Jones vs 1-Beckvall-Fisher
450 2.50 1.50 4♥ S 5 3-Daigneault-Kalman vs 2-Goldberg-St Louis
450 2.50 1.50 4♥ S 5 4-Nia-Glaser vs 4-Burns-Shostack
140 1.00 3.00 3♥ S 3 1-Kuller-Finkle vs 3-Barber-Pietrafesa
50 0.00 4.00 4♥ S -1 2-Farnham-Max vs 6-Walker-Prendergast
|
12 |
♠Q52
♥AJ
♦J974
♣K864
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 2/1NT ♣2 ♦2 ♠4/3 |
EW: 5♣ 5♦ 3♠ ♥4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
300 4.00 0.00 5♦* W -2 3-Daigneault-Kalman vs 2-Goldberg-St Louis
100 2.50 1.50 4♥ S -1 4-Nia-Glaser vs 4-Burns-Shostack
100 2.50 1.50 4♥ S -1 6-Jacobson-Jones vs 1-Beckvall-Fisher
140 1.00 3.00 3♠ E 3 2-Farnham-Max vs 6-Walker-Prendergast
510 0.00 4.00 4♦* W 4 1-Kuller-Finkle vs 3-Barber-Pietrafesa
|
13 |
♠5
♥86543
♦AT83
♣QJ8
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 4♥ 2♠ ♣6 NT6 |
EW: ♣6 ♦6 ♥3 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
300 4.00 0.00 3♦ W -3 4-Nia-Glaser vs 3-Barber-Pietrafesa
200 3.00 1.00 3♥ N 5 1-Kuller-Finkle vs 2-Goldberg-St Louis
110 2.00 2.00 2♠ S 2 3-Daigneault-Kalman vs 1-Beckvall-Fisher
100 0.50 3.50 2♠ S -1 5-Perla-Araghi vs 5-Smith-Smith
100 0.50 3.50 3♥ N -1 2-Farnham-Max vs 4-Burns-Shostack
|
14 |
♠J2
♥974
♦AT83
♣J873
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ ♣5 ♦6 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 3♠ 1NT ♦6 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 4.00 0.00 3♥ S -2 2-Farnham-Max vs 4-Burns-Shostack
110 3.00 1.00 2♠ E 2 1-Kuller-Finkle vs 2-Goldberg-St Louis
140 1.00 3.00 3♠ E 3 3-Daigneault-Kalman vs 1-Beckvall-Fisher
140 1.00 3.00 2♠ E 3 4-Nia-Glaser vs 3-Barber-Pietrafesa
140 1.00 3.00 2♠ E 3 5-Perla-Araghi vs 5-Smith-Smith
|
15 |
♠AJ9852
♥AQJ65
♦9
♣8
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♥ 3♠ ♣6 ♦4 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 3♦ 1NT ♥2 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 3.00 1.00 3♠ N 4 4-Nia-Glaser vs 3-Barber-Pietrafesa
170 3.00 1.00 3♥ N 4 1-Kuller-Finkle vs 2-Goldberg-St Louis
170 3.00 1.00 2♥ N 4 5-Perla-Araghi vs 5-Smith-Smith
140 1.00 3.00 3♠ N 3 2-Farnham-Max vs 4-Burns-Shostack
150 0.00 4.00 3♦ W 5 3-Daigneault-Kalman vs 1-Beckvall-Fisher
|
16 |
♠32
♥KT872
♦K8
♣T973
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦2 ♥2 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 1♣ 5♦ 5♥ 6♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
620 4.00 0.00 4♠ W 4 3-Daigneault-Kalman vs 5-Smith-Smith
650 2.50 1.50 4♠ W 5 2-Farnham-Max vs 3-Barber-Pietrafesa
650 2.50 1.50 4♥ E 5 4-Nia-Glaser vs 2-Goldberg-St Louis
680 1.00 3.00 4♠ W 6 5-Perla-Araghi vs 4-Burns-Shostack
690 0.00 4.00 3N E 6 6-Jacobson-Jones vs 6-Walker-Prendergast
|
17 |
♠QT8763
♥KT3
♦752
♣9
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣1 ♦0 ♠6 NT1 |
EW: 6♣ 6♦ 1♠ 5NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 4.00 0.00 3♥ S -2 5-Perla-Araghi vs 4-Burns-Shostack
150 3.00 1.00 4♠ N -3 4-Nia-Glaser vs 2-Goldberg-St Louis
170 2.00 2.00 3♣ E 6 6-Jacobson-Jones vs 6-Walker-Prendergast
430 1.00 3.00 3N W 4 2-Farnham-Max vs 3-Barber-Pietrafesa
460 0.00 4.00 3N W 5 3-Daigneault-Kalman vs 5-Smith-Smith
|
18 |
♠A6
♥AK64
♦52
♣KQT98
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♥ 5♠ 3NT ♦6 |
EW: ♣2 ♦6 ♥4/5 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 4.00 0.00 3♠ S 5 6-Jacobson-Jones vs 6-Walker-Prendergast
140 3.00 1.00 3♠ S 3 2-Farnham-Max vs 3-Barber-Pietrafesa
110 100 2.00 3.00 3♣ N 3 3-Daigneault-Kalman vs 5-Smith-Smith
100 0.50 3.00 4♠ S -1 4-Nia-Glaser vs 2-Goldberg-St Louis
100 0.50 3.00 4♠ S -1 5-Perla-Araghi vs 4-Burns-Shostack
|