1 |
♠T3
♥4
♦KQ9865
♣K942
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/3♣ 4♦ 3NT ♥5 ♠3 |
EW: 2♥ 3♠ ♣3 ♦2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
400 3.00 0.00 5♦ N 5 4-Rubin-Kepes vs 3-Eilers-Day
130 2.00 1.00 4♦ S 4 1-Beckvall-Jones vs 1-Farnham-Laybourne
50 1.00 2.00 5♦ N -1 2-Campbell-Moore vs 2-Giancola-Bruggensmith
100 0.00 3.00 5♦* N -1 3-Weinstein-Weinstein vs 4-Belton-Snider
|
2 |
♠J5
♥Q93
♦4
♣AT98432
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ -/1NT ♦4 ♥4 ♠4 NT6/7 |
EW: 3♦ 3♥ 3♠ ♣5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 3.00 0.00 2N W -4 1-Beckvall-Jones vs 1-Farnham-Laybourne
150 2.00 1.00 2N W -3 3-Weinstein-Weinstein vs 4-Belton-Snider
100 1.00 2.00 2N W -2 2-Campbell-Moore vs 2-Giancola-Bruggensmith
50 0.00 3.00 2N W -1 4-Rubin-Kepes vs 3-Eilers-Day
|
3 |
♠975
♥KQJ87
♦KQ98
♣A
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 6♦ 7♥ 1♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦1 ♥0 ♠6 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
1010 3.00 0.00 6♥ N 7 4-Rubin-Kepes vs 3-Eilers-Day
510 2.00 1.00 4♥ N 7 2-Campbell-Moore vs 2-Giancola-Bruggensmith
480 0.50 2.50 4♥ N 6 1-Beckvall-Jones vs 1-Farnham-Laybourne
480 0.50 2.50 4♥ N 6 3-Weinstein-Weinstein vs 4-Belton-Snider
|
4 |
♠AQ8
♥Q
♦JT64
♣96543
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦5 ♥3 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 1♦ 4/3♥ 1♠ 1NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 3.00 0.00 3N W -2 3-Weinstein-Weinstein vs 4-Belton-Snider
100 2.00 1.00 4♥ W -1 1-Beckvall-Jones vs 1-Farnham-Laybourne
600 1.00 2.00 3N W 3 4-Rubin-Kepes vs 3-Eilers-Day
620 0.00 3.00 4♥ W 4 2-Campbell-Moore vs 2-Giancola-Bruggensmith
|
5 |
♠KQT72
♥QT652
♦QJ
♣5
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ ♣1 ♦4 ♥4 NT2 |
EW: 6♣ 2♦ 3♥ 5NT ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 3.00 0.00 3N E -1 1-Beckvall-Jones vs 1-Farnham-Laybourne
110 2.00 1.00 3♣ E 3 4-Rubin-Kepes vs 3-Eilers-Day
210 1.00 2.00 2N E 5 3-Weinstein-Weinstein vs 4-Belton-Snider
430 0.00 3.00 3N E 4 2-Campbell-Moore vs 2-Giancola-Bruggensmith
|
6 |
♠876
♥KQ9742
♦63
♣AT
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♥ 1NT ♦6 ♠5/4 |
EW: 2♠ ♣5 ♦6 ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 3.00 0.00 4♠* E -1 2-Campbell-Moore vs 2-Giancola-Bruggensmith
100 1.50 1.50 4♠ E -1 3-Weinstein-Weinstein vs 4-Belton-Snider
100 1.50 1.50 3♠ E -1 4-Rubin-Kepes vs 3-Eilers-Day
620 0.00 3.00 4♠ E 4 1-Beckvall-Jones vs 1-Farnham-Laybourne
|
7 |
♠975
♥KQT96
♦KJ7
♣J7
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣1 ♦2 ♠1 NT2 |
EW: 6♣ 4♦ 5♠ 2NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 2.50 0.50 3♥ N -1 4-Rubin-Kepes vs 2-Giancola-Bruggensmith
100 2.50 0.50 2♥ N -1 2-Campbell-Moore vs 1-Farnham-Laybourne
200 1.00 2.00 2♠ E 5 3-Weinstein-Weinstein vs 3-Eilers-Day
600 0.00 3.00 5♣ W 5 1-Beckvall-Jones vs 4-Belton-Snider
|
8 |
♠T6
♥76
♦AK96
♣KQ943
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ 1NT ♥5 ♠5 |
EW: 2♥ 2♠ ♣5 ♦5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
120 3.00 0.00 1N S 2 1-Beckvall-Jones vs 4-Belton-Snider
110 2.00 1.00 2♣ N 3 2-Campbell-Moore vs 1-Farnham-Laybourne
50 1.00 2.00 3♣ N -1 4-Rubin-Kepes vs 2-Giancola-Bruggensmith
100 0.00 3.00 3♣ N -2 3-Weinstein-Weinstein vs 3-Eilers-Day
|
9 |
♠AJ876
♥T43
♦AK7
♣T7
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♦ 4♥ 2♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦3 ♥3 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
430 3.00 0.00 3N N 4 1-Beckvall-Jones vs 4-Belton-Snider
150 2.00 1.00 2N N 3 3-Weinstein-Weinstein vs 3-Eilers-Day
50 0.50 2.50 4N N -1 2-Campbell-Moore vs 1-Farnham-Laybourne
50 0.50 2.50 4♥ S -1 4-Rubin-Kepes vs 2-Giancola-Bruggensmith
|
10 |
♠K62
♥6
♦AT943
♣AJT2
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♦ 2♠ 4NT ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣4 ♦3 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
180 3.00 0.00 1N S 4 4-Rubin-Kepes vs 2-Giancola-Bruggensmith
PASS 2.00 1.00 Pass Out 1-Beckvall-Jones vs 4-Belton-Snider
100 0.50 2.50 3N S -1 2-Campbell-Moore vs 1-Farnham-Laybourne
100 0.50 2.50 2♦ N -1 3-Weinstein-Weinstein vs 3-Eilers-Day
|
11 |
♠J742
♥Q8
♦KQ94
♣964
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♦ 1♥ ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 3♠ 2NT ♣5 ♦4 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.00 0.00 2N E -2 2-Campbell-Moore vs 1-Farnham-Laybourne
50 2.00 1.00 4♠ E -1 3-Weinstein-Weinstein vs 3-Eilers-Day
50 1.00 2.00 3♥ S -1 4-Rubin-Kepes vs 2-Giancola-Bruggensmith
140 0.00 3.00 2♠ E 3 1-Beckvall-Jones vs 4-Belton-Snider
|
12 |
♠K965
♥986543
♦T
♣A6
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦1 ♥6 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 5♦ 2♠ 2/3NT ♣6 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 3.00 0.00 5♦ E -1 1-Beckvall-Jones vs 4-Belton-Snider
100 2.00 1.00 2♥ N -1 2-Campbell-Moore vs 1-Farnham-Laybourne
150 1.00 2.00 4♦ E 5 4-Rubin-Kepes vs 2-Giancola-Bruggensmith
400 0.00 3.00 5♦ E 5 3-Weinstein-Weinstein vs 3-Eilers-Day
|
13 |
♠Q5
♥975
♦9876
♣KQT3
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦3 ♥2 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ 4♥ 3/4♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.00 0.00 2♦ W -1 4-Rubin-Kepes vs 1-Farnham-Laybourne
90 2.00 1.00 2♦ W 2 3-Weinstein-Weinstein vs 2-Giancola-Bruggensmith
110 1.00 2.00 2♦ W 3 1-Beckvall-Jones vs 3-Eilers-Day
150 0.00 3.00 2N E 3 2-Campbell-Moore vs 4-Belton-Snider
|
14 |
♠T982
♥72
♦QT95
♣JT9
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦3 ♥2 ♠4 NT3 |
EW: 4♦ 5/4♥ 3♠ 3NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 3.00 0.00 4♥ E -1 1-Beckvall-Jones vs 3-Eilers-Day
170 2.00 1.00 3♥ E 4 3-Weinstein-Weinstein vs 2-Giancola-Bruggensmith
420 1.00 2.00 4♥ E 4 2-Campbell-Moore vs 4-Belton-Snider
430 0.00 3.00 3N W 4 4-Rubin-Kepes vs 1-Farnham-Laybourne
|
15 |
♠843
♥763
♦AQ75
♣AJ2
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 2♥ 1NT ♦6 ♠4 |
EW: 1/-♦ 2♠ ♣2 ♦7/6 ♥5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.00 0.00 4♠ E -2 2-Campbell-Moore vs 4-Belton-Snider
50 1.50 1.50 4♠ E -1 3-Weinstein-Weinstein vs 2-Giancola-Bruggensmith
50 1.50 1.50 3♠ E -1 4-Rubin-Kepes vs 1-Farnham-Laybourne
170 0.00 3.00 3♠ E 4 1-Beckvall-Jones vs 3-Eilers-Day
|
16 |
♠K5
♥KQ3
♦K8
♣KT6532
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦2 ♥2 ♠4/3 NT3 |
EW: 4♦ 4/5♥ 3♠ 3NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.00 0.00 3♣ N -2 1-Beckvall-Jones vs 3-Eilers-Day
150 2.00 1.00 4♣ N -3 4-Rubin-Kepes vs 1-Farnham-Laybourne
200 1.00 2.00 3♥ E 5 3-Weinstein-Weinstein vs 2-Giancola-Bruggensmith
650 0.00 3.00 4♥ W 5 2-Campbell-Moore vs 4-Belton-Snider
|
17 |
♠98
♥9765
♦Q4
♣KQ543
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦5 ♥1 ♠0 NT1 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 5♥ 7♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
230 3.00 0.00 3♠ E 6 4-Rubin-Kepes vs 1-Farnham-Laybourne
510 1.00 2.00 4♠ W 7 3-Weinstein-Weinstein vs 2-Giancola-Bruggensmith
510 1.00 2.00 4♠ E 7 1-Beckvall-Jones vs 3-Eilers-Day
510 1.00 2.00 4♠ E 7 2-Campbell-Moore vs 4-Belton-Snider
|
18 |
♠652
♥832
♦AQT52
♣T3
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦6 ♥5 ♠3 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ 1♥ 3♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.00 0.00 2N W -2 2-Campbell-Moore vs 4-Belton-Snider
50 1.50 1.50 2N E -1 1-Beckvall-Jones vs 3-Eilers-Day
50 1.50 1.50 3♠ W -1 3-Weinstein-Weinstein vs 2-Giancola-Bruggensmith
130 0.00 3.00 2♣ E 4 4-Rubin-Kepes vs 1-Farnham-Laybourne
|
19 |
♠J872
♥K98432
♦K2
♣J
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 2♠ ♣3 ♦3 NT5 |
EW: 4♣ 4♦ 1NT ♥6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 3.00 0.00 2♥ N -1 1-Beckvall-Jones vs 2-Giancola-Bruggensmith
100 1.50 1.50 3♥ N -2 2-Campbell-Moore vs 3-Eilers-Day
100 1.50 1.50 3♥ N -2 4-Rubin-Kepes vs 4-Belton-Snider
110 0.00 3.00 2♣ E 3 3-Weinstein-Weinstein vs 1-Farnham-Laybourne
|
20 |
♠QJ4
♥AQJ
♦JT9863
♣Q
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣2/1 ♥6/5 ♠4 NT2 |
EW: 4♣ 1♥ 3♠ 3NT ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 2.00 1.00 1N N -1 1-Beckvall-Jones vs 2-Giancola-Bruggensmith
100 2.00 1.00 3♦ N -1 4-Rubin-Kepes vs 4-Belton-Snider
100 2.00 1.00 2♦ N -1 2-Campbell-Moore vs 3-Eilers-Day
120 0.00 3.00 1N W 2 3-Weinstein-Weinstein vs 1-Farnham-Laybourne
|
21 |
♠J2
♥Q986
♦985
♣AK65
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♥ 1♠ 3NT ♣5 ♦4 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ ♥1 ♠6/5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
620 1.50 1.50 4♥ S 4 1-Beckvall-Jones vs 2-Giancola-Bruggensmith
620 1.50 1.50 4♥ S 4 2-Campbell-Moore vs 3-Eilers-Day
620 1.50 1.50 4♥ S 4 3-Weinstein-Weinstein vs 1-Farnham-Laybourne
620 1.50 1.50 4♥ S 4 4-Rubin-Kepes vs 4-Belton-Snider
|
22 |
♠QJ875
♥A632
♦T43
♣6
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3/4 ♦4 ♥3 ♠5 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 2♦ 4♥ 2♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 3.00 0.00 2♥ W 4 3-Weinstein-Weinstein vs 1-Farnham-Laybourne
630 1.00 2.00 3N W 4 1-Beckvall-Jones vs 2-Giancola-Bruggensmith
630 1.00 2.00 3N W 4 2-Campbell-Moore vs 3-Eilers-Day
630 1.00 2.00 3N W 4 4-Rubin-Kepes vs 4-Belton-Snider
|
23 |
♠93
♥AJT
♦JT64
♣QJ97
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ -/1NT ♥5 ♠3 NT6/7 |
EW: 2♥ 3♠ ♣5 ♦4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
130 2.50 0.50 2♦ S 4 1-Beckvall-Jones vs 2-Giancola-Bruggensmith
130 2.50 0.50 2♦ S 4 2-Campbell-Moore vs 3-Eilers-Day
110 0.50 2.50 3♦ S 3 4-Rubin-Kepes vs 4-Belton-Snider
110 0.50 2.50 2♦ S 3 3-Weinstein-Weinstein vs 1-Farnham-Laybourne
|
24 |
♠Q95
♥QJ5432
♦87
♣A8
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦4 ♥6 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 1♦ -/1♠ 2NT ♣6 ♥6 ♠6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.00 0.00 3♥ N -2 2-Campbell-Moore vs 3-Eilers-Day
150 1.50 1.50 1N W 3 3-Weinstein-Weinstein vs 1-Farnham-Laybourne
150 1.50 1.50 1N W 3 4-Rubin-Kepes vs 4-Belton-Snider
500 0.00 3.00 2♥* N -3 1-Beckvall-Jones vs 2-Giancola-Bruggensmith
|