1 |
♠A82
♥T854
♦AJ942
♣5
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ 2/3♥ ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 2♠ ♣5/4 ♦4 ♥4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 2.00 0.00 3♣ S 3 2-Farnham-Beckvall vs 3-Sax-Farkas
100 1.00 1.00 4♠ E -2 3-Glassman-Loupus vs 2-Laybourne-Buri
100 0.00 2.00 3N N -2 1-Weiland-Wareham vs 1-Penn-Michaud
|
2 |
♠AJ2
♥KQ9764
♦J87
♣6
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♥ ♣5 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 1/2♣ 1♠ 1NT ♦6 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 1.50 0.50 3♥ N 3 1-Weiland-Wareham vs 1-Penn-Michaud
140 1.50 0.50 2♥ N 3 3-Glassman-Loupus vs 2-Laybourne-Buri
110 0.00 2.00 2♥ N 2 2-Farnham-Beckvall vs 3-Sax-Farkas
|
3 |
♠K9742
♥A8
♦J
♣KT853
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 2♦ 5♥ 5♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦5 ♥2 ♠1 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
400 2.00 0.00 3N N 3 1-Weiland-Wareham vs 1-Penn-Michaud
170 1.00 1.00 3♠ N 4 2-Farnham-Beckvall vs 3-Sax-Farkas
140 0.00 2.00 3♠ N 3 3-Glassman-Loupus vs 2-Laybourne-Buri
|
4 |
♠K97
♥KT9862
♦K753
♣-
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 2♥ 1NT ♣5 ♠6/5 |
EW: 2♣ 1/2♠ ♦4 ♥4/5 NT5/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 2.00 0.00 3♣ E -2 3-Glassman-Loupus vs 2-Laybourne-Buri
90 1.00 1.00 1N S 1 2-Farnham-Beckvall vs 3-Sax-Farkas
100 0.00 2.00 2♥ N -1 1-Weiland-Wareham vs 1-Penn-Michaud
|
5 |
♠954
♥Q82
♦Q87
♣AKT7
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦6 ♥3 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 1/-♦ 3♥ 1♠ 2NT ♦7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 2.00 0.00 4♥ W -2 1-Weiland-Wareham vs 1-Penn-Michaud
110 0.50 1.50 2♥ W 2 2-Farnham-Beckvall vs 3-Sax-Farkas
110 0.50 1.50 2♥ W 2 3-Glassman-Loupus vs 2-Laybourne-Buri
|
6 |
♠7
♥A753
♦A9763
♣AJ6
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♠ ♣5 ♦4 ♥3 NT3 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 3♥ 4NT ♠3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
420 2.00 0.00 4♠ S 4 1-Weiland-Wareham vs 1-Penn-Michaud
200 1.00 1.00 3♠ S 5 2-Farnham-Beckvall vs 3-Sax-Farkas
140 0.00 2.00 3♠ S 3 3-Glassman-Loupus vs 2-Laybourne-Buri
|
7 |
♠643
♥Q954
♦K
♣KJ932
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦3 ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 4♦ 3♥ 3♠ 2/3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 2.00 0.00 3N E -2 1-Weiland-Wareham vs 1-Penn-Michaud
110 1.00 1.00 2♠ E 2 2-Farnham-Beckvall vs 3-Sax-Farkas
600 0.00 2.00 3N W 3 3-Glassman-Loupus vs 2-Laybourne-Buri
|
8 |
♠A63
♥AT953
♦J98
♣65
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4/5♣ 5♥ 4/5NT ♦4 ♠5/4 |
EW: 1♦ 2/1♠ ♣2/1 ♥1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
420 2.00 0.00 4♥ N 4 1-Weiland-Wareham vs 1-Penn-Michaud
140 1.00 1.00 3♥ S 3 2-Farnham-Beckvall vs 3-Sax-Farkas
130 0.00 2.00 3♣ S 4 3-Glassman-Loupus vs 2-Laybourne-Buri
|
9 |
♠AT852
♥973
♦KT3
♣K6
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦1 ♥1 ♠3 NT2 |
EW: 2♣ 6♦ 6♥ 4♠ 4/5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
600 1.50 0.50 3N E 3 1-Weiland-Wareham vs 3-Sax-Farkas
600 1.50 0.50 3N E 3 3-Glassman-Loupus vs 1-Penn-Michaud
630 0.00 2.00 3N E 4 2-Farnham-Beckvall vs 2-Laybourne-Buri
|
10 |
♠AJ754
♥84
♦KJT94
♣4
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1/2♦ 2♠ 2NT ♥5 |
EW: 1♥ ♣5 ♦4 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 2.00 0.00 3♣ S -1 3-Glassman-Loupus vs 1-Penn-Michaud
200 0.50 1.50 3♣ S -2 1-Weiland-Wareham vs 3-Sax-Farkas
200 0.50 1.50 3♣ S -2 2-Farnham-Beckvall vs 2-Laybourne-Buri
|
11 |
♠A7543
♥J862
♦92
♣85
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 3♥ 1NT ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣6 ♦6 ♥4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
120 2.00 0.00 2N S 2 3-Glassman-Loupus vs 1-Penn-Michaud
50 1.00 1.00 2♠ W -1 2-Farnham-Beckvall vs 2-Laybourne-Buri
50 0.00 2.00 4♥ N -1 1-Weiland-Wareham vs 3-Sax-Farkas
|
12 |
♠Q
♥QJ984
♦QT7
♣QT32
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ -/1♦ 2♥ ♦6/7 ♠3 NT6 |
EW: 3♠ 1NT ♣6 ♦6 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 2.00 0.00 2♥ N 3 1-Weiland-Wareham vs 3-Sax-Farkas
170 1.00 1.00 2♠ E 4 2-Farnham-Beckvall vs 2-Laybourne-Buri
200 0.00 2.00 2♦ S -2 3-Glassman-Loupus vs 1-Penn-Michaud
|
13 |
♠T742
♥-
♦AT73
♣96432
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♠ ♦5/6 ♥2 NT3/4 |
EW: 1♦ 5♥ 3NT ♣5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
620 1.00 1.00 4♥ W 4 1-Weiland-Wareham vs 3-Sax-Farkas
620 1.00 1.00 4♥ W 4 3-Glassman-Loupus vs 1-Penn-Michaud
620 1.00 1.00 4♥ E 4 2-Farnham-Beckvall vs 2-Laybourne-Buri
|
14 |
♠876
♥QJ9
♦954
♣AK76
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ ♣4 ♦3 ♥3 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 4♦ 4♥ 3NT ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 2.00 0.00 3♠ S -1 1-Weiland-Wareham vs 3-Sax-Farkas
100 0.50 1.50 4♠ S -2 2-Farnham-Beckvall vs 2-Laybourne-Buri
100 0.50 1.50 3♠ S -2 3-Glassman-Loupus vs 1-Penn-Michaud
|
15 |
♠QJ5
♥KQ982
♦T3
♣965
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ ♣4 ♦4 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 1♠ ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
PASS 1.50 0.50 Pass Out 1-Weiland-Wareham vs 3-Sax-Farkas
PASS 1.50 0.50 Pass Out 3-Glassman-Loupus vs 1-Penn-Michaud
100 0.00 2.00 2♥ N -1 2-Farnham-Beckvall vs 2-Laybourne-Buri
|
16 |
♠-
♥Q764
♦JT8
♣AJ7653
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ ♦5 ♥6 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣3 ♦6 ♥6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
180 2.00 0.00 1N N 4 1-Weiland-Wareham vs 3-Sax-Farkas
90 1.00 1.00 2♣ N 2 3-Glassman-Loupus vs 1-Penn-Michaud
100 0.00 2.00 1N N -2 2-Farnham-Beckvall vs 2-Laybourne-Buri
|
17 |
♠AQ32
♥A75
♦A986
♣52
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 4♠ ♣4 ♥6 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 1♥ ♦3 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
450 2.00 0.00 4♠ S 5 2-Farnham-Beckvall vs 1-Penn-Michaud
420 1.00 1.00 4♠ S 4 1-Weiland-Wareham vs 2-Laybourne-Buri
100 0.00 2.00 5♦ N -2 3-Glassman-Loupus vs 3-Sax-Farkas
|
18 |
♠3
♥AQT983
♦Q63
♣832
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♥ 1NT ♦3 ♠3 |
EW: 2♦ 4♠ ♣4 ♥4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 2.00 0.00 2♥ N 3 3-Glassman-Loupus vs 3-Sax-Farkas
140 0.50 1.50 3♠ W 3 2-Farnham-Beckvall vs 1-Penn-Michaud
140 0.50 1.50 3♠ E 3 1-Weiland-Wareham vs 2-Laybourne-Buri
|
19 |
♠642
♥A32
♦Q75
♣A985
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/3♣ 2/3♦ 1/2♥ 1/2♠ 2/3NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦4 ♥5 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
400 1.50 0.50 3N S 3 1-Weiland-Wareham vs 2-Laybourne-Buri
400 1.50 0.50 3N S 3 2-Farnham-Beckvall vs 1-Penn-Michaud
50 0.00 2.00 3N S -1 3-Glassman-Loupus vs 3-Sax-Farkas
|
20 |
♠864
♥74
♦J2
♣AQT872
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ ♦6 ♥6 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 1♦ 4♠ -/1NT ♣4/3 ♥6 NT4/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 1.00 1.00 3♠ E 4 1-Weiland-Wareham vs 2-Laybourne-Buri
170 1.00 1.00 3♠ E 4 2-Farnham-Beckvall vs 1-Penn-Michaud
170 1.00 1.00 2♠ E 4 3-Glassman-Loupus vs 3-Sax-Farkas
|
21 |
♠A854
♥A8
♦AJ974
♣92
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/3♦ 1/2♥ 2♠ ♣4 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ ♦4 ♥5 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 2.00 0.00 2♠ E -4 1-Weiland-Wareham vs 2-Laybourne-Buri
110 1.00 1.00 2♥ S 2 3-Glassman-Loupus vs 3-Sax-Farkas
100 0.00 2.00 2♠ N -1 2-Farnham-Beckvall vs 1-Penn-Michaud
|
22 |
♠KT763
♥T865
♦AJ
♣54
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 1♠ ♣3 ♦4 NT6 |
EW: 4♣ 3♦ ♥4 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
300 2.00 0.00 2♠ W -3 1-Weiland-Wareham vs 2-Laybourne-Buri
140 1.00 1.00 2♥ S 3 2-Farnham-Beckvall vs 1-Penn-Michaud
120 0.00 2.00 2N E 2 3-Glassman-Loupus vs 3-Sax-Farkas
|
23 |
♠J
♥KT543
♦T8764
♣42
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 3♥ 1♠ 1NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦6 ♥4 ♠6/5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 2.00 0.00 1♠ S 2 1-Weiland-Wareham vs 2-Laybourne-Buri
90 0.50 1.50 1N E 1 2-Farnham-Beckvall vs 1-Penn-Michaud
90 0.50 1.50 2♦ W 2 3-Glassman-Loupus vs 3-Sax-Farkas
|
24 |
♠98
♥QJT82
♦JT2
♣T86
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣6 ♦3 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 3♦ 3♠ 1NT ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 1.50 0.50 3N S -1 1-Weiland-Wareham vs 2-Laybourne-Buri
50 1.50 0.50 3♥ N -1 3-Glassman-Loupus vs 3-Sax-Farkas
100 0.00 2.00 3♥ N -2 2-Farnham-Beckvall vs 1-Penn-Michaud
|