1 |
♠A
♥T654
♦T83
♣AK864
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 5♦ 5/6♥ 6NT ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣4 ♦2/1 ♥1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
480 3.00 0.00 5♥ S 6 4-Weintraub-Ermel vs 3-Sax-Farkas
450 2.00 1.00 4♥ S 5 3-Schrader-Johansen vs 4-Giancola-Bruggensmith
300 1.00 2.00 4♠* W -2 2-Robbins-McAdams vs 2-Burns-Goldberg
150 0.00 3.00 4♠ W -3 1-Guerin-Beckvall vs 1-Sailer-Berger
|
2 |
♠K75
♥JT864
♦T9
♣985
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣4 ♦5 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ 1♠ 2/1NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 2.00 1.00 1N E -1 2-Robbins-McAdams vs 2-Burns-Goldberg
50 2.00 1.00 3♦ E -1 4-Weintraub-Ermel vs 3-Sax-Farkas
50 2.00 1.00 2♦ E -1 1-Guerin-Beckvall vs 1-Sailer-Berger
130 0.00 3.00 2♦ E 4 3-Schrader-Johansen vs 4-Giancola-Bruggensmith
|
3 |
♠AJT865
♥Q2
♦K63
♣94
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6/5♣ 6/5♠ 6/5NT ♦6 ♥5 |
EW: 1♦ 2♥ ♣0 ♠0 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
400 2.50 0.50 5♣ S 5 1-Guerin-Beckvall vs 1-Sailer-Berger
400 2.50 0.50 5♣ S 5 2-Robbins-McAdams vs 2-Burns-Goldberg
190 0.50 2.50 3♣ S 7 3-Schrader-Johansen vs 4-Giancola-Bruggensmith
190 0.50 2.50 3♣ S 7 4-Weintraub-Ermel vs 3-Sax-Farkas
|
4 |
♠A875
♥AK4
♦KT942
♣4
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 4♠ ♣6 ♥5 NT5 |
EW: 2♥ ♣6 ♦4/5 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 3.00 0.00 4♥ E -2 1-Guerin-Beckvall vs 1-Sailer-Berger
170 2.00 1.00 3♠ N 4 4-Weintraub-Ermel vs 3-Sax-Farkas
110 1.00 2.00 1♥ E 2 2-Robbins-McAdams vs 2-Burns-Goldberg
730 0.00 3.00 3♥* E 3 3-Schrader-Johansen vs 4-Giancola-Bruggensmith
|
5 |
♠J542
♥AK95
♦83
♣J54
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣1 ♦0 ♥6 NT4 |
EW: 5♣ 7♦ 2NT ♥6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 3.00 0.00 2♠ S 2 1-Guerin-Beckvall vs 1-Sailer-Berger
150 2.00 1.00 3♣ E 5 2-Robbins-McAdams vs 2-Burns-Goldberg
200 0.50 2.50 4♠ S -2 4-Weintraub-Ermel vs 3-Sax-Farkas
200 0.50 2.50 3♠ S -2 3-Schrader-Johansen vs 4-Giancola-Bruggensmith
|
6 |
♠AJ3
♥9532
♦KJ82
♣T2
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦3 ♥2 ♠3 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 4♦ 5♥ 3♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 3.00 0.00 5♦ E -2 3-Schrader-Johansen vs 4-Giancola-Bruggensmith
630 2.00 1.00 3N E 4 4-Weintraub-Ermel vs 3-Sax-Farkas
660 0.50 2.50 3N E 5 1-Guerin-Beckvall vs 1-Sailer-Berger
660 0.50 2.50 3N E 5 2-Robbins-McAdams vs 2-Burns-Goldberg
|
7 |
♠K943
♥AJ62
♦-
♣J9652
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3/2♥ 2♠ ♦1 NT1 |
EW: 6♦ 5NT ♣5 ♥4 ♠4/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 3.00 0.00 4♦ E 5 3-Schrader-Johansen vs 3-Sax-Farkas
600 2.00 1.00 5♦ E 5 4-Weintraub-Ermel vs 2-Burns-Goldberg
620 0.50 2.50 5♦ E 6 1-Guerin-Beckvall vs 4-Giancola-Bruggensmith
620 0.50 2.50 5♦ E 6 2-Robbins-McAdams vs 1-Sailer-Berger
|
8 |
♠AJ7
♥98654
♦-
♣J8754
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 7♣ 2♦ 7♥ 2♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣0 ♦5 ♥0 ♠5 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
450 3.00 0.00 4♥ N 5 2-Robbins-McAdams vs 1-Sailer-Berger
170 2.00 1.00 3♣ N 6 4-Weintraub-Ermel vs 2-Burns-Goldberg
100 1.00 2.00 2♠ W -2 1-Guerin-Beckvall vs 4-Giancola-Bruggensmith
50 0.00 3.00 2♦ S -1 3-Schrader-Johansen vs 3-Sax-Farkas
|
9 |
♠4
♥T54
♦AKT76
♣QJ43
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♦ 1♥ 2/3NT ♠5 |
EW: 1♠ ♣3 ♦3 ♥6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 2.50 0.50 3♠ W -2 3-Schrader-Johansen vs 3-Sax-Farkas
200 2.50 0.50 3♥ E -2 4-Weintraub-Ermel vs 2-Burns-Goldberg
110 0.50 2.50 3♣ S 3 1-Guerin-Beckvall vs 4-Giancola-Bruggensmith
110 0.50 2.50 3♣ S 3 2-Robbins-McAdams vs 1-Sailer-Berger
|
10 |
♠Q954
♥J976
♦T762
♣K
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦4 ♥4 ♠4 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 3♦ 3♥ 3♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 2.50 0.50 3N E -1 3-Schrader-Johansen vs 3-Sax-Farkas
100 2.50 0.50 3♣ E -1 4-Weintraub-Ermel vs 2-Burns-Goldberg
120 1.00 2.00 2N E 2 1-Guerin-Beckvall vs 4-Giancola-Bruggensmith
150 0.00 3.00 2N E 3 2-Robbins-McAdams vs 1-Sailer-Berger
|
11 |
♠A72
♥T6
♦832
♣JT642
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦2 ♥4 ♠4 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 4♦ 3♥ 2♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 3.00 0.00 3N W -1 2-Robbins-McAdams vs 1-Sailer-Berger
180 2.00 1.00 2N W 4 1-Guerin-Beckvall vs 4-Giancola-Bruggensmith
400 1.00 2.00 3N W 3 3-Schrader-Johansen vs 3-Sax-Farkas
430 0.00 3.00 3N W 4 4-Weintraub-Ermel vs 2-Burns-Goldberg
|
12 |
♠K7632
♥K9
♦AQ
♣Q854
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♥ 2NT ♦6 ♠5 |
EW: 1♠ ♣3 ♦6 ♥3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 2.50 0.50 2N N 3 1-Guerin-Beckvall vs 4-Giancola-Bruggensmith
150 2.50 0.50 2N N 3 2-Robbins-McAdams vs 1-Sailer-Berger
140 1.00 2.00 3♥ S 3 3-Schrader-Johansen vs 3-Sax-Farkas
200 0.00 3.00 4♣ S -2 4-Weintraub-Ermel vs 2-Burns-Goldberg
|
13 |
♠AQT83
♥JT53
♦-
♣KT84
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦2 ♥5 ♠5 NT2 |
EW: 3/4♣ 5♦ 1/2♥ 1♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
130 3.00 0.00 4♦ E 4 1-Guerin-Beckvall vs 3-Sax-Farkas
150 2.00 1.00 3♦ W 5 3-Schrader-Johansen vs 2-Burns-Goldberg
690 1.00 2.00 5N W 6 2-Robbins-McAdams vs 4-Giancola-Bruggensmith
1100 0.00 3.00 4♥* S -4 4-Weintraub-Ermel vs 1-Sailer-Berger
|
14 |
♠T63
♥7653
♦KQ94
♣87
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 2♥ 1♠ 2NT ♣5 |
EW: 1♣ ♦5 ♥5 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 3.00 0.00 2♥ S 2 3-Schrader-Johansen vs 2-Burns-Goldberg
90 2.00 1.00 1N S 1 4-Weintraub-Ermel vs 1-Sailer-Berger
70 1.00 2.00 1♦ S 1 1-Guerin-Beckvall vs 3-Sax-Farkas
50 0.00 3.00 2♠ S -1 2-Robbins-McAdams vs 4-Giancola-Bruggensmith
|
15 |
♠872
♥63
♦T65
♣JT962
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 2♠ 2NT ♣6 ♥6 |
EW: 1♣ 1/-♥ ♦4/3 ♥7/6 ♠5/4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
130 3.00 0.00 3♦ S 4 2-Robbins-McAdams vs 4-Giancola-Bruggensmith
200 1.50 1.50 4♦ N -2 4-Weintraub-Ermel vs 1-Sailer-Berger
200 1.50 1.50 2♣ S -2 1-Guerin-Beckvall vs 3-Sax-Farkas
300 0.00 3.00 2♣ S -3 3-Schrader-Johansen vs 2-Burns-Goldberg
|
16 |
♠K6
♥AK82
♦JT54
♣853
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/2♣ 1♦ 1♥ 4♠ 2/4NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦5 ♥5 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 2.00 1.00 2♠ S 5 1-Guerin-Beckvall vs 3-Sax-Farkas
200 2.00 1.00 2♠ S 5 2-Robbins-McAdams vs 4-Giancola-Bruggensmith
200 2.00 1.00 2♠ S 5 4-Weintraub-Ermel vs 1-Sailer-Berger
170 0.00 3.00 3♠ S 4 3-Schrader-Johansen vs 2-Burns-Goldberg
|
17 |
♠K7
♥KQ862
♦985
♣965
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦3 ♥5 ♠5 NT3 |
EW: 5♣ 4♦ 2♥ 2♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 3.00 0.00 3♠ E -1 4-Weintraub-Ermel vs 1-Sailer-Berger
150 2.00 1.00 2N E 3 1-Guerin-Beckvall vs 3-Sax-Farkas
180 1.00 2.00 2N E 4 3-Schrader-Johansen vs 2-Burns-Goldberg
400 0.00 3.00 3N E 3 2-Robbins-McAdams vs 4-Giancola-Bruggensmith
|
18 |
♠K5
♥AQT2
♦K65
♣KQ92
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ 3♥ 4♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦5 ♥3 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
790 3.00 0.00 4♠* S 4 4-Weintraub-Ermel vs 1-Sailer-Berger
100 2.00 1.00 4♠ S -1 3-Schrader-Johansen vs 2-Burns-Goldberg
200 0.50 2.50 3N N -2 1-Guerin-Beckvall vs 3-Sax-Farkas
200 0.50 2.50 4♠ N -2 2-Robbins-McAdams vs 4-Giancola-Bruggensmith
|
19 |
♠Q64
♥J2
♦AJ5
♣KJT75
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣6 ♥2 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 4♥ 3♠ 2/3NT ♣6 ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.00 0.00 4♥ W -1 2-Robbins-McAdams vs 3-Sax-Farkas
100 2.00 1.00 3♦ S -2 3-Schrader-Johansen vs 1-Sailer-Berger
170 1.00 2.00 2♥ W 4 4-Weintraub-Ermel vs 4-Giancola-Bruggensmith
650 0.00 3.00 4♥ W 5 1-Guerin-Beckvall vs 2-Burns-Goldberg
|
20 |
♠QJ843
♥T5
♦KQ98
♣82
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/2♦ 1♥ 4♠ 1NT ♣4 |
EW: 3♣ ♦5 ♥6 ♠2 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 2.50 0.50 3♠ S 4 3-Schrader-Johansen vs 1-Sailer-Berger
170 2.50 0.50 1♠ N 4 1-Guerin-Beckvall vs 2-Burns-Goldberg
140 0.50 2.50 2♠ S 3 4-Weintraub-Ermel vs 4-Giancola-Bruggensmith
140 0.50 2.50 2♠ N 3 2-Robbins-McAdams vs 3-Sax-Farkas
|
21 |
♠3
♥KQT86
♦AT8
♣K764
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 4♦ 5♥ 2/3♠ 3/4NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦2 ♥2 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
680 3.00 0.00 4♥ N 6 1-Guerin-Beckvall vs 2-Burns-Goldberg
650 2.00 1.00 4♥ N 5 4-Weintraub-Ermel vs 4-Giancola-Bruggensmith
100 0.50 2.50 4♥ N -1 2-Robbins-McAdams vs 3-Sax-Farkas
100 0.50 2.50 4♥ N -1 3-Schrader-Johansen vs 1-Sailer-Berger
|
22 |
♠K932
♥T62
♦83
♣K976
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣6/5 ♦0 ♠1 NT0 |
EW: 1♣ 7♦ 5♠ 7NT ♥6/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
300 3.00 0.00 5♥* S -2 3-Schrader-Johansen vs 1-Sailer-Berger
620 1.00 2.00 5♦ E 6 1-Guerin-Beckvall vs 2-Burns-Goldberg
620 1.00 2.00 5♦ E 6 2-Robbins-McAdams vs 3-Sax-Farkas
620 1.00 2.00 5♦ E 6 4-Weintraub-Ermel vs 4-Giancola-Bruggensmith
|
23 |
♠KJ863
♥Q9
♦K73
♣A74
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1NT ♦4 ♥4 ♠6 |
EW: 1♦ 2♥ 1♠ ♣5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 3.00 0.00 3♣ S 3 2-Robbins-McAdams vs 3-Sax-Farkas
140 1.50 1.50 3♥ E 3 1-Guerin-Beckvall vs 2-Burns-Goldberg
140 1.50 1.50 3♥ E 3 4-Weintraub-Ermel vs 4-Giancola-Bruggensmith
300 0.00 3.00 2♠ N -3 3-Schrader-Johansen vs 1-Sailer-Berger
|
24 |
♠QJ82
♥JT9
♦QJ2
♣Q74
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦1 ♥2 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 6♣ 5/6♦ 4/5♥ 5♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 3.00 0.00 2N E 3 1-Guerin-Beckvall vs 2-Burns-Goldberg
400 2.00 1.00 3N W 3 2-Robbins-McAdams vs 3-Sax-Farkas
430 0.50 2.50 3N E 4 3-Schrader-Johansen vs 1-Sailer-Berger
430 0.50 2.50 3N E 4 4-Weintraub-Ermel vs 4-Giancola-Bruggensmith
|