1 |
♠QT
♥93
♦AKJT872
♣95
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ ♣2/3 ♥2/3 ♠2 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 3♥ 4♠ ♦5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 4.00 0.00 3♠ E 3 5-Marshall-Shreves vs 4-Brugger-Burns
170 3.00 1.00 3♠ E 4 1-Jones-Beckvall vs 1-Winicour-Winicour
200 2.00 2.00 3♠ E 5 3-Claymon-Claymon vs 5-Mattingly-Mattingly
420 1.00 3.00 4♠ E 4 4-Healey-Ruck vs 2-Jones-Addy
450 0.00 4.00 4♠ E 5 2-Glassman-Buri vs 3-Weintraub-Ermel
|
2 |
♠Q76
♥AJ9
♦AJ82
♣AK7
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ 5♥ 2♠ 5/4NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦3 ♥2 ♠5 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
650 3.00 1.00 4♥ S 5 1-Jones-Beckvall vs 1-Winicour-Winicour
650 3.00 1.00 4♥ S 5 4-Healey-Ruck vs 2-Jones-Addy
650 3.00 1.00 4♥ S 5 5-Marshall-Shreves vs 4-Brugger-Burns
620 0.50 3.50 4♥ S 4 2-Glassman-Buri vs 3-Weintraub-Ermel
620 0.50 3.50 4♥ S 4 3-Claymon-Claymon vs 5-Mattingly-Mattingly
|
3 |
♠762
♥J9
♦QT75
♣7642
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦3 ♥4 ♠6 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 4♦ 3/1♥ 1♠ 4/3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 4.00 0.00 3N W -1 2-Glassman-Buri vs 3-Weintraub-Ermel
100 3.00 1.00 3♥ S -2 5-Marshall-Shreves vs 4-Brugger-Burns
150 2.00 2.00 3♠ S -3 3-Claymon-Claymon vs 5-Mattingly-Mattingly
210 1.00 3.00 2N E 5 4-Healey-Ruck vs 2-Jones-Addy
630 0.00 4.00 3N E 4 1-Jones-Beckvall vs 1-Winicour-Winicour
|
4 |
♠AJ9
♥T6542
♦K542
♣2
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 1♥ ♣6 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 3♠ -/1NT ♣6 ♦3 ♥6 NT6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.50 0.50 1N W -1 5-Marshall-Shreves vs 4-Brugger-Burns
100 3.50 0.50 3♠ W -1 2-Glassman-Buri vs 3-Weintraub-Ermel
140 2.00 2.00 2♠ W 3 4-Healey-Ruck vs 2-Jones-Addy
170 0.50 3.50 2♠ W 4 1-Jones-Beckvall vs 1-Winicour-Winicour
170 0.50 3.50 2♠ W 4 3-Claymon-Claymon vs 5-Mattingly-Mattingly
|
5 |
♠AKQ9
♥J94
♦K94
♣A43
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ ♣4 ♥6 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 1♥ 1♠ -/1NT ♦3/4 NT6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
120 3.50 0.50 1N N 2 4-Healey-Ruck vs 2-Jones-Addy
120 3.50 0.50 1N N 2 5-Marshall-Shreves vs 4-Brugger-Burns
100 1.50 2.50 1N N -1 3-Claymon-Claymon vs 5-Mattingly-Mattingly
100 1.50 2.50 3♦ S -1 2-Glassman-Buri vs 3-Weintraub-Ermel
400 0.00 4.00 3N N -4 1-Jones-Beckvall vs 1-Winicour-Winicour
|
6 |
♠95
♥J93
♦QJT875
♣QT
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣0 ♦6 ♥4 ♠0 NT0 |
EW: 7♣ 1♦ 3♥ 7♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
620 4.00 0.00 5♣ W 6 2-Glassman-Buri vs 2-Jones-Addy
680 3.00 1.00 4♠ E 6 4-Healey-Ruck vs 1-Winicour-Winicour
710 1.50 2.50 4♠ E 7 1-Jones-Beckvall vs 5-Mattingly-Mattingly
710 1.50 2.50 4♠ E 7 3-Claymon-Claymon vs 4-Brugger-Burns
1430 0.00 4.00 6♠ E 6 5-Marshall-Shreves vs 3-Weintraub-Ermel
|
7 |
♠Q942
♥762
♦K
♣AQJ76
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦3 ♥3 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 4♦ 3/4♥ 4♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
120 4.00 0.00 2N E 2 5-Marshall-Shreves vs 3-Weintraub-Ermel
140 3.00 1.00 2♥ E 3 4-Healey-Ruck vs 1-Winicour-Winicour
600 2.00 2.00 3N E 3 1-Jones-Beckvall vs 5-Mattingly-Mattingly
620 1.00 3.00 4♠ W 4 2-Glassman-Buri vs 2-Jones-Addy
630 0.00 4.00 3N W 4 3-Claymon-Claymon vs 4-Brugger-Burns
|
8 |
♠JT762
♥JT84
♦J
♣T84
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣4 ♦6 ♥6 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 1NT ♦6 ♥6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 4.00 0.00 3N W -3 1-Jones-Beckvall vs 5-Mattingly-Mattingly
50 2.50 1.50 3N W -1 4-Healey-Ruck vs 1-Winicour-Winicour
50 2.50 1.50 2N W -1 5-Marshall-Shreves vs 3-Weintraub-Ermel
110 1.00 3.00 3♣ E 3 2-Glassman-Buri vs 2-Jones-Addy
120 0.00 4.00 1N W 2 3-Claymon-Claymon vs 4-Brugger-Burns
|
9 |
♠6432
♥97
♦KQ72
♣A92
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 5♦ 5♥ 2♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦2 ♥2/1 ♠5 NT2/1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
430 4.00 0.00 3N S 4 5-Marshall-Shreves vs 3-Weintraub-Ermel
300 3.00 1.00 2♠ W -3 1-Jones-Beckvall vs 5-Mattingly-Mattingly
200 2.00 2.00 1♠ W -2 3-Claymon-Claymon vs 4-Brugger-Burns
170 1.00 3.00 3♥ S 4 4-Healey-Ruck vs 1-Winicour-Winicour
90 0.00 4.00 2♣ S 2 2-Glassman-Buri vs 2-Jones-Addy
|
10 |
♠JT98
♥KQ76
♦AJ4
♣T4
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 1NT ♣5 ♦4 ♠6 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ 1♠ ♥6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 4.00 0.00 2N W -2 4-Healey-Ruck vs 1-Winicour-Winicour
100 3.00 1.00 3♣ W -1 5-Marshall-Shreves vs 3-Weintraub-Ermel
80 2.00 2.00 1♠ W 1 2-Glassman-Buri vs 2-Jones-Addy
110 1.00 3.00 2♠ W 2 1-Jones-Beckvall vs 5-Mattingly-Mattingly
200 0.00 4.00 2♥ S -2 3-Claymon-Claymon vs 4-Brugger-Burns
|
11 |
♠T43
♥J865
♦K2
♣QT82
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦1 ♥4 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 5♣ 6♦ 3♥ 6♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
130 4.00 0.00 4♣ W 4 3-Claymon-Claymon vs 3-Weintraub-Ermel
170 3.00 1.00 2♠ E 4 1-Jones-Beckvall vs 4-Brugger-Burns
400 2.00 2.00 3N W 3 5-Marshall-Shreves vs 2-Jones-Addy
430 1.00 3.00 3N W 4 4-Healey-Ruck vs 5-Mattingly-Mattingly
490 0.00 4.00 3N W 6 2-Glassman-Buri vs 1-Winicour-Winicour
|
12 |
♠QJT2
♥Q4
♦AQT2
♣JT4
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦5 ♥2 ♠6 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 2♦ 5♥ 1♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 4.00 0.00 3♣ E 3 3-Claymon-Claymon vs 3-Weintraub-Ermel
130 2.50 1.50 3♣ E 4 2-Glassman-Buri vs 1-Winicour-Winicour
130 2.50 1.50 3♣ E 4 5-Marshall-Shreves vs 2-Jones-Addy
140 1.00 3.00 2♥ W 3 4-Healey-Ruck vs 5-Mattingly-Mattingly
200 0.00 4.00 2♠ S -2 1-Jones-Beckvall vs 4-Brugger-Burns
|
13 |
♠82
♥AQJ75
♦Q2
♣A964
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ ♦4 ♥6 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 2♦ 3♠ ♣4 ♥6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 4.00 0.00 2♠ E -1 2-Glassman-Buri vs 1-Winicour-Winicour
90 2.50 1.50 2♦ W 2 1-Jones-Beckvall vs 4-Brugger-Burns
90 2.50 1.50 2♦ W 2 5-Marshall-Shreves vs 2-Jones-Addy
200 1.00 3.00 3♣ S -2 4-Healey-Ruck vs 5-Mattingly-Mattingly
400 0.00 4.00 3♥ N -4 3-Claymon-Claymon vs 3-Weintraub-Ermel
|
14 |
♠65
♥76
♦AJT76
♣KT43
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦5 ♥1 ♠0 NT1 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ 6♥ 6♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
450 4.00 0.00 4♥ W 5 5-Marshall-Shreves vs 2-Jones-Addy
480 2.00 2.00 5♠ E 6 3-Claymon-Claymon vs 3-Weintraub-Ermel
480 2.00 2.00 5♥ W 6 2-Glassman-Buri vs 1-Winicour-Winicour
480 2.00 2.00 4♥ W 6 1-Jones-Beckvall vs 4-Brugger-Burns
980 0.00 4.00 6♥ W 6 4-Healey-Ruck vs 5-Mattingly-Mattingly
|
15 |
♠J85
♥Q86
♦AQ62
♣T32
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦4 ♥2 ♠0 NT1 |
EW: 4♣ 2♦ 3/4♥ 5/6♠ 5/6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
450 3.00 1.00 4♠ E 5 1-Jones-Beckvall vs 4-Brugger-Burns
450 3.00 1.00 4♠ E 5 4-Healey-Ruck vs 5-Mattingly-Mattingly
450 3.00 1.00 4♠ E 5 5-Marshall-Shreves vs 2-Jones-Addy
460 1.00 3.00 4N W 5 2-Glassman-Buri vs 1-Winicour-Winicour
480 0.00 4.00 4♠ E 6 3-Claymon-Claymon vs 3-Weintraub-Ermel
|
16 |
♠KQ97
♥T9
♦8762
♣875
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦6 ♥4 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 4♣ 1♦ 3♥ 3♠ 2/1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
300 4.00 0.00 3N W -3 4-Healey-Ruck vs 4-Brugger-Burns
100 3.00 1.00 4♠ E -1 1-Jones-Beckvall vs 3-Weintraub-Ermel
120 2.00 2.00 2N W 2 2-Glassman-Buri vs 5-Mattingly-Mattingly
140 1.00 3.00 3♠ E 3 3-Claymon-Claymon vs 2-Jones-Addy
170 0.00 4.00 2♠ E 4 5-Marshall-Shreves vs 1-Winicour-Winicour
|
17 |
♠KQT82
♥73
♦Q
♣AQ976
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦3 ♥5 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 3♦ 1♥ 1♠ 3NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.50 0.50 3♥ S -2 2-Glassman-Buri vs 5-Mattingly-Mattingly
100 3.50 0.50 2♥ S -2 1-Jones-Beckvall vs 3-Weintraub-Ermel
150 1.50 2.50 3N S -3 5-Marshall-Shreves vs 1-Winicour-Winicour
150 1.50 2.50 2N E 3 3-Claymon-Claymon vs 2-Jones-Addy
200 0.00 4.00 4♥ S -4 4-Healey-Ruck vs 4-Brugger-Burns
|
18 |
♠865
♥AJ
♦T5
♣K87532
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♥ ♦5/6 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 1♠ ♣4/5 ♦6 ♥6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 4.00 0.00 2♥ S 2 3-Claymon-Claymon vs 2-Jones-Addy
100 3.00 1.00 3♦ W -2 1-Jones-Beckvall vs 3-Weintraub-Ermel
150 1.50 2.50 1N W 3 2-Glassman-Buri vs 5-Mattingly-Mattingly
150 1.50 2.50 1N W 3 5-Marshall-Shreves vs 1-Winicour-Winicour
200 0.00 4.00 2♥ S -2 4-Healey-Ruck vs 4-Brugger-Burns
|
19 |
♠AT87
♥KT2
♦KJ872
♣4
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♥ 1♠ 1/-NT ♣6/5 NT7/6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦6 ♥6 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
90 3.50 0.50 2♦ N 2 3-Claymon-Claymon vs 2-Jones-Addy
90 3.50 0.50 2♦ N 2 4-Healey-Ruck vs 4-Brugger-Burns
50 1.50 2.50 2♠ N -1 1-Jones-Beckvall vs 3-Weintraub-Ermel
50 1.50 2.50 2♠ N -1 2-Glassman-Buri vs 5-Mattingly-Mattingly
100 0.00 4.00 2N N -2 5-Marshall-Shreves vs 1-Winicour-Winicour
|
20 |
♠Q4
♥JT52
♦Q5
♣QJ932
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦6 ♥4 ♠1 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 2♥ 6♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
230 4.00 0.00 3♠ W 6 2-Glassman-Buri vs 5-Mattingly-Mattingly
650 2.50 1.50 4♠ W 5 1-Jones-Beckvall vs 3-Weintraub-Ermel
650 2.50 1.50 4♠ W 5 4-Healey-Ruck vs 4-Brugger-Burns
680 0.50 3.50 4♠ W 6 3-Claymon-Claymon vs 2-Jones-Addy
680 0.50 3.50 4♠ W 6 5-Marshall-Shreves vs 1-Winicour-Winicour
|
21 |
♠A6
♥K54
♦JT98
♣J632
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦3 ♥2 ♠3 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 4♦ 5♥ 4♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
90 4.00 0.00 1N E 1 2-Glassman-Buri vs 4-Brugger-Burns
130 3.00 1.00 2♣ W 4 4-Healey-Ruck vs 3-Weintraub-Ermel
180 2.00 2.00 2N W 4 1-Jones-Beckvall vs 2-Jones-Addy
400 1.00 3.00 3N W 3 3-Claymon-Claymon vs 1-Winicour-Winicour
460 0.00 4.00 3N W 5 5-Marshall-Shreves vs 5-Mattingly-Mattingly
|
22 |
♠AJT2
♥K8652
♦3
♣A43
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♥ 4♠ ♦4 NT6 |
EW: 3♦ 1NT ♣4/5 ♥4 ♠3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 4.00 0.00 2♥ N 2 5-Marshall-Shreves vs 5-Mattingly-Mattingly
50 2.00 2.00 3♥ N -1 2-Glassman-Buri vs 4-Brugger-Burns
50 2.00 2.00 2♥ N -1 1-Jones-Beckvall vs 2-Jones-Addy
50 2.00 2.00 2♥ N -1 3-Claymon-Claymon vs 1-Winicour-Winicour
100 0.00 4.00 2♥ N -2 4-Healey-Ruck vs 3-Weintraub-Ermel
|
23 |
♠AT863
♥9
♦AKJ6
♣QJT
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ 4♠ 2NT ♣5 ♥6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♥ ♦1 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
800 4.00 0.00 4♥* E -3 5-Marshall-Shreves vs 5-Mattingly-Mattingly
200 3.00 1.00 4♣ W -2 4-Healey-Ruck vs 3-Weintraub-Ermel
140 2.00 2.00 2♠ N 3 3-Claymon-Claymon vs 1-Winicour-Winicour
100 1.00 3.00 3♣ E -1 1-Jones-Beckvall vs 2-Jones-Addy
100 0.00 4.00 4♠ N -1 2-Glassman-Buri vs 4-Brugger-Burns
|
24 |
♠T864
♥A52
♦J64
♣JT7
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/1♣ 1♦ 1♠ 2NT ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣5 ♦6 ♠6/5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
120 4.00 0.00 2N S 2 1-Jones-Beckvall vs 2-Jones-Addy
90 3.00 1.00 1N S 1 2-Glassman-Buri vs 4-Brugger-Burns
50 2.00 2.00 2♥ W -1 3-Claymon-Claymon vs 1-Winicour-Winicour
50 0.50 3.50 1N S -1 5-Marshall-Shreves vs 5-Mattingly-Mattingly
50 0.50 3.50 2♦ S -1 4-Healey-Ruck vs 3-Weintraub-Ermel
|
25 |
♠T876
♥43
♦85
♣KQT32
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1NT ♦3 ♥3 ♠6 |
EW: 3♦ 3♥ ♣5 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
180 4.00 0.00 2♣* S 2 1-Jones-Beckvall vs 2-Jones-Addy
50 3.00 1.00 3♣ S -1 2-Glassman-Buri vs 4-Brugger-Burns
130 2.00 2.00 4♦ W 4 5-Marshall-Shreves vs 5-Mattingly-Mattingly
170 0.50 3.50 2♥ W 4 4-Healey-Ruck vs 3-Weintraub-Ermel
170 0.50 3.50 2♥ E 4 3-Claymon-Claymon vs 1-Winicour-Winicour
|