1 |
♠64
♥KJ63
♦T432
♣J98
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣0 ♦3 ♥4 ♠0 NT0 |
EW: 4♣ 4♦ 2♥ 5♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
450 2.50 0.50 4♠ E 5 1-Healy-Ruck vs 1-Bishop-Bishop
450 2.50 0.50 4♠ E 5 4-Farkas-Sax vs 4-Mattingly-Mattingly
480 0.50 2.50 4♠ E 6 2-Jones-Beckvall vs 3-Laybourne-Buri
480 0.50 2.50 4♠ E 6 3-Ermel-Weintraub vs 2-Sailer-Berger
|
2 |
♠J4
♥53
♦KQ862
♣8432
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣4 ♥2 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 3♥ 2♠ 2NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 3.00 0.00 4♥ E -1 1-Healy-Ruck vs 1-Bishop-Bishop
100 2.00 1.00 2N S -1 3-Ermel-Weintraub vs 2-Sailer-Berger
200 1.00 2.00 2♥ E 5 4-Farkas-Sax vs 4-Mattingly-Mattingly
400 0.00 3.00 3N S -4 2-Jones-Beckvall vs 3-Laybourne-Buri
|
3 |
♠Q873
♥97
♦KT82
♣AJ3
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 3♠ 1NT ♣6 ♥6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦5 ♥6 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 3.00 0.00 3♠ N 3 4-Farkas-Sax vs 4-Mattingly-Mattingly
110 2.00 1.00 2♠ N 2 3-Ermel-Weintraub vs 2-Sailer-Berger
90 1.00 2.00 2♦ S 2 2-Jones-Beckvall vs 3-Laybourne-Buri
PASS 0.00 3.00 Pass Out 1-Healy-Ruck vs 1-Bishop-Bishop
|
4 |
♠KT9864
♥AKQ87
♦6
♣6
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 5♥ 6♠ 1NT ♣4 |
EW: 2♣ ♦5 ♥2 ♠0 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
680 1.50 1.50 4♠ N 6 1-Healy-Ruck vs 1-Bishop-Bishop
680 1.50 1.50 4♠ N 6 2-Jones-Beckvall vs 3-Laybourne-Buri
680 1.50 1.50 4♠ N 6 3-Ermel-Weintraub vs 2-Sailer-Berger
680 1.50 1.50 4♠ N 6 4-Farkas-Sax vs 4-Mattingly-Mattingly
|
5 |
♠K52
♥QJ53
♦94
♣8653
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ ♣2 ♦3 ♠1 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 4♦ 5♠ ♥4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 3.00 0.00 4♥* S -1 3-Ermel-Weintraub vs 2-Sailer-Berger
450 1.00 2.00 5♠ W 5 4-Farkas-Sax vs 4-Mattingly-Mattingly
450 1.00 2.00 4♠ W 5 1-Healy-Ruck vs 1-Bishop-Bishop
450 1.00 2.00 4♠ W 5 2-Jones-Beckvall vs 3-Laybourne-Buri
|
6 |
♠AQJ2
♥K53
♦Q4
♣JT95
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 5♦ 3♥ 5♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦1 ♥4 ♠2 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
490 2.50 0.50 3N S 6 2-Jones-Beckvall vs 3-Laybourne-Buri
490 2.50 0.50 3N S 6 3-Ermel-Weintraub vs 2-Sailer-Berger
460 1.00 2.00 3N N 5 1-Healy-Ruck vs 1-Bishop-Bishop
400 0.00 3.00 3N S 3 4-Farkas-Sax vs 4-Mattingly-Mattingly
|
7 |
♠AJ96
♥Q432
♦Q9
♣K84
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ 5♥ 5♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦6 ♥2 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
650 2.50 0.50 4♥ S 5 2-Jones-Beckvall vs 2-Sailer-Berger
650 2.50 0.50 4♥ S 5 3-Ermel-Weintraub vs 1-Bishop-Bishop
620 0.50 2.50 4♠ S 4 4-Farkas-Sax vs 3-Laybourne-Buri
620 0.50 2.50 4♥ S 4 1-Healy-Ruck vs 4-Mattingly-Mattingly
|
8 |
♠A2
♥AT94
♦43
♣KT873
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♥ 4♠ 3NT ♦6 |
EW: ♣4 ♦6 ♥5 ♠2/3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 3.00 0.00 2♠ S 4 3-Ermel-Weintraub vs 1-Bishop-Bishop
140 2.00 1.00 3♠ S 3 4-Farkas-Sax vs 3-Laybourne-Buri
110 1.00 2.00 2♠ S 2 1-Healy-Ruck vs 4-Mattingly-Mattingly
100 0.00 3.00 4♠ S -2 2-Jones-Beckvall vs 2-Sailer-Berger
|
9 |
♠Q752
♥6
♦A964
♣Q862
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♠ ♦6 ♥3/4 NT5 |
EW: 1♦ 3♥ 2NT ♣5 ♠3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 2.50 0.50 4♥ W -1 4-Farkas-Sax vs 3-Laybourne-Buri
100 2.50 0.50 3♥ W -1 3-Ermel-Weintraub vs 1-Bishop-Bishop
140 1.00 2.00 2♥ W 3 2-Jones-Beckvall vs 2-Sailer-Berger
170 0.00 3.00 3♥ W 4 1-Healy-Ruck vs 4-Mattingly-Mattingly
|
10 |
♠9
♥J5
♦AKT852
♣AJT4
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 6♦ 3/4♥ 1♠ 5/6NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦1 ♥3 ♠6 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
690 3.00 0.00 3N S 6 4-Farkas-Sax vs 3-Laybourne-Buri
660 2.00 1.00 3N S 5 3-Ermel-Weintraub vs 1-Bishop-Bishop
630 1.00 2.00 3N S 4 1-Healy-Ruck vs 4-Mattingly-Mattingly
150 0.00 3.00 2♦ N 5 2-Jones-Beckvall vs 2-Sailer-Berger
|
11 |
♠5
♥QJ2
♦AQ765
♣AT82
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ 3NT ♣6 ♥6 ♠6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♠ ♦2 ♥6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
400 1.50 1.50 5♦ S 5 1-Healy-Ruck vs 4-Mattingly-Mattingly
400 1.50 1.50 5♦ S 5 2-Jones-Beckvall vs 2-Sailer-Berger
400 1.50 1.50 5♦ S 5 3-Ermel-Weintraub vs 1-Bishop-Bishop
400 1.50 1.50 5♦ S 5 4-Farkas-Sax vs 3-Laybourne-Buri
|
12 |
♠872
♥-
♦AQT652
♣JT97
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ ♥4 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 2♥ 3♠ 2NT ♣4 ♦4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 3.00 0.00 3♦ N 3 1-Healy-Ruck vs 4-Mattingly-Mattingly
50 2.00 1.00 4♠ W -1 3-Ermel-Weintraub vs 1-Bishop-Bishop
140 0.50 2.50 2♠ W 3 4-Farkas-Sax vs 3-Laybourne-Buri
140 0.50 2.50 3♥ W 3 2-Jones-Beckvall vs 2-Sailer-Berger
|
13 |
♠Q7
♥QJ642
♦875
♣JT9
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♥ ♦5 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 1♦ 1NT ♣4 ♥5 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 3.00 0.00 3♣ S 3 3-Ermel-Weintraub vs 4-Mattingly-Mattingly
100 2.00 1.00 3♣ S -1 4-Farkas-Sax vs 2-Sailer-Berger
300 1.00 2.00 5♣ S -3 1-Healy-Ruck vs 3-Laybourne-Buri
500 0.00 3.00 3N N -5 2-Jones-Beckvall vs 1-Bishop-Bishop
|
14 |
♠QJ42
♥AJT4
♦K7
♣K62
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 5♦ 1♥ 2♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣3/4 ♦2 ♥5 ♠4 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
480 3.00 0.00 2♦* S 5 3-Ermel-Weintraub vs 4-Mattingly-Mattingly
430 2.00 1.00 3N N 4 4-Farkas-Sax vs 2-Sailer-Berger
150 1.00 2.00 3♦ S 5 1-Healy-Ruck vs 3-Laybourne-Buri
110 0.00 3.00 3♦ S 3 2-Jones-Beckvall vs 1-Bishop-Bishop
|
15 |
♠AT83
♥A9654
♦Q2
♣64
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2/3♥ 5♠ 2/3NT ♦5 |
EW: 1♦ ♣4 ♥4 ♠2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
650 3.00 0.00 4♠ N 5 3-Ermel-Weintraub vs 4-Mattingly-Mattingly
620 2.00 1.00 4♠ S 4 2-Jones-Beckvall vs 1-Bishop-Bishop
90 1.00 2.00 2♣ S 2 1-Healy-Ruck vs 3-Laybourne-Buri
100 0.00 3.00 4♠ S -1 4-Farkas-Sax vs 2-Sailer-Berger
|
16 |
♠AK5
♥72
♦QJ42
♣QJ75
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣5 ♦4 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 4♠ 4NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
90 3.00 0.00 1N W 1 2-Jones-Beckvall vs 1-Bishop-Bishop
150 2.00 1.00 2N W 3 1-Healy-Ruck vs 3-Laybourne-Buri
180 1.00 2.00 2N W 4 4-Farkas-Sax vs 2-Sailer-Berger
600 0.00 3.00 3N W 3 3-Ermel-Weintraub vs 4-Mattingly-Mattingly
|
17 |
♠842
♥J654
♦8532
♣54
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦3 ♥5 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 3♦ 2♥ 5/4♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 2.00 1.00 3♠ W 4 3-Ermel-Weintraub vs 4-Mattingly-Mattingly
170 2.00 1.00 1♠ W 4 2-Jones-Beckvall vs 1-Bishop-Bishop
170 2.00 1.00 1♠ W 4 4-Farkas-Sax vs 2-Sailer-Berger
200 0.00 3.00 1♠ W 5 1-Healy-Ruck vs 3-Laybourne-Buri
|
18 |
♠AQ74
♥K32
♦AT873
♣2
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ 1/2♥ 1♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣4/5 ♦4 ♥5 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.00 0.00 1N W -2 2-Jones-Beckvall vs 1-Bishop-Bishop
100 1.50 1.50 2N S -1 1-Healy-Ruck vs 3-Laybourne-Buri
100 1.50 1.50 2♠ N -1 3-Ermel-Weintraub vs 4-Mattingly-Mattingly
300 0.00 3.00 3N N -3 4-Farkas-Sax vs 2-Sailer-Berger
|
19 |
♠A5
♥T8
♦AJT5
♣J7642
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2/1♦ 1♥ 1♠ 1NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦5 ♥6 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 2.50 0.50 3N E -2 1-Healy-Ruck vs 2-Sailer-Berger
200 2.50 0.50 2N W -2 3-Ermel-Weintraub vs 3-Laybourne-Buri
90 1.00 2.00 1N W 1 4-Farkas-Sax vs 1-Bishop-Bishop
120 0.00 3.00 2N W 2 2-Jones-Beckvall vs 4-Mattingly-Mattingly
|
20 |
♠32
♥JT63
♦KJT74
♣T6
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦4 ♥6 ♠3 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 2♦ 1/-♥ 4♠ 5/4NT ♥7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 2.50 0.50 1N E 3 2-Jones-Beckvall vs 4-Mattingly-Mattingly
150 2.50 0.50 3♣ E 5 3-Ermel-Weintraub vs 3-Laybourne-Buri
170 1.00 2.00 3♣ E 6 4-Farkas-Sax vs 1-Bishop-Bishop
630 0.00 3.00 3N E 4 1-Healy-Ruck vs 2-Sailer-Berger
|
21 |
♠AK
♥93
♦AT53
♣K8762
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5/4♣ 4♦ 1♥ 3NT ♠5 |
EW: 2♠ ♣2 ♦3 ♥6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
600 3.00 0.00 5♣ N 5 3-Ermel-Weintraub vs 3-Laybourne-Buri
130 2.00 1.00 3♣ S 4 1-Healy-Ruck vs 2-Sailer-Berger
50 1.00 2.00 3♠ E -1 4-Farkas-Sax vs 1-Bishop-Bishop
200 0.00 3.00 5♣ N -2 2-Jones-Beckvall vs 4-Mattingly-Mattingly
|
22 |
♠9763
♥AT642
♦T8
♣74
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦4 ♥4 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 4/3♣ 3♦ 2♥ 3/4♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 2.00 1.00 3♥ E -1 1-Healy-Ruck vs 2-Sailer-Berger
100 2.00 1.00 2♥ E -1 3-Ermel-Weintraub vs 3-Laybourne-Buri
100 2.00 1.00 5♣ E -1 4-Farkas-Sax vs 1-Bishop-Bishop
600 0.00 3.00 3N E 3 2-Jones-Beckvall vs 4-Mattingly-Mattingly
|
23 |
♠872
♥A842
♦KJ73
♣76
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ ♣5 ♦4 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 2♠ ♥4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 3.00 0.00 2♥ S 3 2-Jones-Beckvall vs 4-Mattingly-Mattingly
100 1.50 1.50 4♥ S -1 3-Ermel-Weintraub vs 3-Laybourne-Buri
100 1.50 1.50 2♥ S -1 4-Farkas-Sax vs 1-Bishop-Bishop
120 0.00 3.00 1N E 2 1-Healy-Ruck vs 2-Sailer-Berger
|
24 |
♠J875
♥Q
♦-
♣AQJ98632
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦2 ♥1 ♠6 NT3 |
EW: 5♦ 4/5♥ -/4NT ♣3/4 ♠5/6 NT5/10 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 3.00 0.00 5♥ W -1 2-Jones-Beckvall vs 4-Mattingly-Mattingly
150 2.00 1.00 4♦ E 5 3-Ermel-Weintraub vs 3-Laybourne-Buri
450 0.50 2.50 5♥ W 5 4-Farkas-Sax vs 1-Bishop-Bishop
450 0.50 2.50 4♥ W 5 1-Healy-Ruck vs 2-Sailer-Berger
|