1 |
♠J2
♥K642
♦AJ954
♣65
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦5 ♥6 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 1♥ 2♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 4.00 0.00 3N E -3 6-Rosnick-Rosnick vs 5-Nair-Berlin
100 3.00 1.00 3N E -2 4-Emmerman-Emmerman vs 1-LaCroix-Gibson
50 2.00 2.00 3N W -1 10-Rankin-Rankin vs 8-Hunt-Osborne
400 0.50 3.50 3N E 3 7-Jacobozzi-Zack vs 3-Packer-Lowe
400 0.50 3.50 3N E 3 9-Hunter-Sanders vs 2-Divakaruni-Nelson
|
2 |
♠QJ3
♥KT8
♦6
♣AT7532
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1NT ♦4 ♥5 ♠6 |
EW: 2♦ 2♥ 1♠ ♣3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 4.00 0.00 4♥ E -3 4-Emmerman-Emmerman vs 1-LaCroix-Gibson
50 2.00 2.00 1N E -1 10-Rankin-Rankin vs 8-Hunt-Osborne
50 2.00 2.00 3♥ E -1 7-Jacobozzi-Zack vs 3-Packer-Lowe
50 2.00 2.00 2♦ W -1 9-Hunter-Sanders vs 2-Divakaruni-Nelson
90 0.00 4.00 2♦ W 2 6-Rosnick-Rosnick vs 5-Nair-Berlin
|
3 |
♠AT42
♥AQ3
♦Q64
♣Q63
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦3 ♥5 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 4♦ 1♥ 3♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 4.00 0.00 3N E -2 9-Hunter-Sanders vs 2-Divakaruni-Nelson
100 2.50 1.50 3N E -1 10-Rankin-Rankin vs 8-Hunt-Osborne
100 2.50 1.50 2N E -1 6-Rosnick-Rosnick vs 5-Nair-Berlin
110 1.00 3.00 3♦ W 3 4-Emmerman-Emmerman vs 1-LaCroix-Gibson
600 0.00 4.00 3N E 3 7-Jacobozzi-Zack vs 3-Packer-Lowe
|
4 |
♠J754
♥AK64
♦KJ87
♣K
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 2♠ ♣4 ♥4 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 3♥ 2NT ♦5 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 4.00 0.00 2♠ S 3 8-Hunt-Osborne vs 4-Emmerman-Emmerman
110 3.00 1.00 2♠ N 2 1-LaCroix-Gibson vs 3-Packer-Lowe
100 2.00 2.00 4♣ E -1 5-Nair-Berlin vs 2-Divakaruni-Nelson
100 1.00 3.00 3♦ N -1 7-Jacobozzi-Zack vs 6-Rosnick-Rosnick
110 0.00 4.00 2♥ W 2 10-Rankin-Rankin vs 9-Hunter-Sanders
|
5 |
♠AJ
♥54
♦Q742
♣KT732
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦5 ♥2 ♠2 NT4 |
EW: 2♦ 4♥ 4♠ 1NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 4.00 0.00 3N E -2 5-Nair-Berlin vs 2-Divakaruni-Nelson
50 3.00 1.00 5♠ E -1 8-Hunt-Osborne vs 4-Emmerman-Emmerman
170 2.00 2.00 3♠ E 4 10-Rankin-Rankin vs 9-Hunter-Sanders
200 1.00 3.00 2♠ E 5 7-Jacobozzi-Zack vs 6-Rosnick-Rosnick
450 0.00 4.00 4♥ W 5 1-LaCroix-Gibson vs 3-Packer-Lowe
|
6 |
♠-
♥863
♦K62
♣KQT9843
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦0 ♥3 ♠1 NT0 |
EW: 1♣ 6/7♦ 3♥ 6♠ 7NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 4.00 0.00 4♣ N -3 7-Jacobozzi-Zack vs 6-Rosnick-Rosnick
620 2.50 1.50 4♠ E 4 8-Hunt-Osborne vs 4-Emmerman-Emmerman
620 2.50 1.50 4♠ E 4 10-Rankin-Rankin vs 9-Hunter-Sanders
650 1.00 3.00 4♠ E 5 1-LaCroix-Gibson vs 3-Packer-Lowe
800 0.00 4.00 4♥* S -4 5-Nair-Berlin vs 2-Divakaruni-Nelson
|
7 |
♠J9
♥AKJT9
♦AKJ3
♣42
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 2♥ ♣1 ♠4 NT3 |
EW: 5♣ 2♠ ♦5 ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 3.50 0.50 6♣* W -1 10-Rankin-Rankin vs 1-LaCroix-Gibson
200 3.50 0.50 5♣* W -1 9-Hunter-Sanders vs 5-Nair-Berlin
170 2.00 2.00 3♥ N 4 8-Hunt-Osborne vs 7-Jacobozzi-Zack
100 1.00 3.00 4♣ W -1 2-Divakaruni-Nelson vs 4-Emmerman-Emmerman
130 0.00 4.00 3♣ W 4 6-Rosnick-Rosnick vs 3-Packer-Lowe
|
8 |
♠832
♥Q6432
♦AJ93
♣J
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♠ ♣4 ♥6 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ ♦6 ♥6 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 4.00 0.00 3♠ S 3 10-Rankin-Rankin vs 1-LaCroix-Gibson
50 3.00 1.00 4♣ E -1 9-Hunter-Sanders vs 5-Nair-Berlin
PASS 2.00 2.00 Pass Out 6-Rosnick-Rosnick vs 3-Packer-Lowe
110 1.00 3.00 2♣ W 3 2-Divakaruni-Nelson vs 4-Emmerman-Emmerman
130 0.00 4.00 3♣ W 4 8-Hunt-Osborne vs 7-Jacobozzi-Zack
|
9 |
♠KJ72
♥T5
♦K93
♣JT72
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1/-♥ ♣5 ♥7/6 ♠3/2 NT6/4 |
EW: 1♣ 4♠ 1NT ♦5 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 4.00 0.00 4♠ E -1 8-Hunt-Osborne vs 7-Jacobozzi-Zack
100 3.00 1.00 3♦ S -2 10-Rankin-Rankin vs 1-LaCroix-Gibson
620 2.00 2.00 4♠ E 4 9-Hunter-Sanders vs 5-Nair-Berlin
650 1.00 3.00 4♠ E 5 6-Rosnick-Rosnick vs 3-Packer-Lowe
790 0.00 4.00 4♠* E 4 2-Divakaruni-Nelson vs 4-Emmerman-Emmerman
|
10 |
♠K5
♥KQ54
♦QJT83
♣A5
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ 4♥ 2NT ♠6 |
EW: ♣4 ♦3 ♥3 ♠6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
650 3.50 0.50 4♥ S 5 7-Jacobozzi-Zack vs 4-Emmerman-Emmerman
650 3.50 0.50 4♥ N 5 10-Rankin-Rankin vs 2-Divakaruni-Nelson
620 2.00 2.00 4♥ N 4 3-Packer-Lowe vs 5-Nair-Berlin
200 1.00 3.00 3♠ W -2 9-Hunter-Sanders vs 8-Hunt-Osborne
170 0.00 4.00 2♥ S 4 1-LaCroix-Gibson vs 6-Rosnick-Rosnick
|
11 |
♠JT98
♥Q8
♦J3
♣KQJ72
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ 1♥ 1♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦6 ♥5 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 3.50 0.50 1N S 3 3-Packer-Lowe vs 5-Nair-Berlin
150 3.50 0.50 1N S 3 9-Hunter-Sanders vs 8-Hunt-Osborne
120 1.50 2.50 1N S 2 7-Jacobozzi-Zack vs 4-Emmerman-Emmerman
120 1.50 2.50 1N S 2 10-Rankin-Rankin vs 2-Divakaruni-Nelson
50 0.00 4.00 3♣ N -1 1-LaCroix-Gibson vs 6-Rosnick-Rosnick
|
12 |
♠2
♥K876
♦KT543
♣A73
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 2♥ 1NT ♣6 ♠4 |
EW: 1♣ 3♠ ♦3 ♥4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 4.00 0.00 4♠ E -1 7-Jacobozzi-Zack vs 4-Emmerman-Emmerman
110 3.00 1.00 2♠ E 2 3-Packer-Lowe vs 5-Nair-Berlin
140 1.00 3.00 3♠ E 3 1-LaCroix-Gibson vs 6-Rosnick-Rosnick
140 1.00 3.00 3♠ E 3 10-Rankin-Rankin vs 2-Divakaruni-Nelson
140 1.00 3.00 2♠ E 3 9-Hunter-Sanders vs 8-Hunt-Osborne
|
13 |
♠JT4
♥2
♦AQJ975
♣J65
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♦ 1NT ♥6 ♠4 |
EW: 1♥ 3/2♠ ♣6/3 ♦3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 4.00 0.00 3♠ W -2 2-Divakaruni-Nelson vs 7-Jacobozzi-Zack
110 3.00 1.00 3♦ N 3 4-Emmerman-Emmerman vs 6-Rosnick-Rosnick
110 2.00 2.00 2♠ W 2 8-Hunt-Osborne vs 5-Nair-Berlin
140 1.00 3.00 2♠ W 3 1-LaCroix-Gibson vs 9-Hunter-Sanders
170 0.00 4.00 3♠ W 4 10-Rankin-Rankin vs 3-Packer-Lowe
|
14 |
♠A
♥94
♦Q98763
♣AQ83
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 6♦ 2♥ 4♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦1 ♥5 ♠3 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
1100 4.00 0.00 4♥* E -5 10-Rankin-Rankin vs 3-Packer-Lowe
430 3.00 1.00 3N S 4 4-Emmerman-Emmerman vs 6-Rosnick-Rosnick
420 2.00 2.00 5♦ N 6 8-Hunt-Osborne vs 5-Nair-Berlin
110 1.00 3.00 2♠ S 2 1-LaCroix-Gibson vs 9-Hunter-Sanders
100 0.00 4.00 4♠ S -2 2-Divakaruni-Nelson vs 7-Jacobozzi-Zack
|
15 |
♠KJ63
♥T6
♦764
♣9653
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦1 ♥1 ♠2 NT1 |
EW: 6♦ 6♥ 5♠ 1NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
420 4.00 0.00 4♥ W 4 4-Emmerman-Emmerman vs 6-Rosnick-Rosnick
480 1.50 2.50 4♥ W 6 1-LaCroix-Gibson vs 9-Hunter-Sanders
480 1.50 2.50 4♥ W 6 2-Divakaruni-Nelson vs 7-Jacobozzi-Zack
480 1.50 2.50 4♥ W 6 8-Hunt-Osborne vs 5-Nair-Berlin
480 1.50 2.50 4♥ W 6 10-Rankin-Rankin vs 3-Packer-Lowe
|
16 |
♠53
♥AQJ652
♦532
♣AJ
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣6 ♦4 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 1♠ 1NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 4.00 0.00 2N W -2 10-Rankin-Rankin vs 4-Emmerman-Emmerman
100 3.00 1.00 3♦ W -1 3-Packer-Lowe vs 8-Hunt-Osborne
80 2.00 2.00 1♥ N 1 9-Hunter-Sanders vs 6-Rosnick-Rosnick
50 0.50 3.50 2♥ N -1 2-Divakaruni-Nelson vs 1-LaCroix-Gibson
50 0.50 3.50 2♥ N -1 5-Nair-Berlin vs 7-Jacobozzi-Zack
|
17 |
♠97
♥KJ54
♦3
♣QJ8643
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦1 ♥5 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 6♦ 2♥ 4♠ 4NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
400 4.00 0.00 5♦ E 5 2-Divakaruni-Nelson vs 1-LaCroix-Gibson
420 2.50 1.50 4♠ W 4 10-Rankin-Rankin vs 4-Emmerman-Emmerman
420 2.50 1.50 5♦ E 6 9-Hunter-Sanders vs 6-Rosnick-Rosnick
430 1.00 3.00 3N E 4 5-Nair-Berlin vs 7-Jacobozzi-Zack
460 0.00 4.00 3N E 5 3-Packer-Lowe vs 8-Hunt-Osborne
|
18 |
♠KQJ
♥43
♦T52
♣KQT65
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ -/1♦ 1/-♥ 2♠ 3NT ♦6/7 ♥7/6 |
EW: ♣4 ♦6 ♥6 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
500 4.00 0.00 3♥* E -3 5-Nair-Berlin vs 7-Jacobozzi-Zack
150 2.50 1.50 2N N 3 3-Packer-Lowe vs 8-Hunt-Osborne
150 2.50 1.50 2♣ W -3 10-Rankin-Rankin vs 4-Emmerman-Emmerman
PASS 1.00 3.00 Pass Out 9-Hunter-Sanders vs 6-Rosnick-Rosnick
100 0.00 4.00 3N S -1 2-Divakaruni-Nelson vs 1-LaCroix-Gibson
|
19 |
♠J7543
♥KJ
♦A87632
♣-
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 3♥ ♣1 ♠6 NT1 |
EW: 5♣ 1♠ 1NT ♦3 ♥3/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 4.00 0.00 3N W -2 6-Rosnick-Rosnick vs 8-Hunt-Osborne
100 3.00 1.00 6♣ E -1 10-Rankin-Rankin vs 5-Nair-Berlin
170 2.00 2.00 4♣ E 6 3-Packer-Lowe vs 2-Divakaruni-Nelson
600 1.00 3.00 5♣ W 5 1-LaCroix-Gibson vs 7-Jacobozzi-Zack
620 0.00 4.00 5♣ E 6 4-Emmerman-Emmerman vs 9-Hunter-Sanders
|
20 |
♠AQJT8
♥KQ5
♦J7
♣874
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣0 ♦0 ♥6 NT0 |
EW: 5♣ 5♦ 2NT ♥6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 4.00 0.00 4♠ N -2 6-Rosnick-Rosnick vs 8-Hunt-Osborne
600 3.00 1.00 5♦ W 5 1-LaCroix-Gibson vs 7-Jacobozzi-Zack
640 1.50 2.50 5♦ W 7 10-Rankin-Rankin vs 5-Nair-Berlin
640 1.50 2.50 5♦ E 7 4-Emmerman-Emmerman vs 9-Hunter-Sanders
800 0.00 4.00 5♥* S -3 3-Packer-Lowe vs 2-Divakaruni-Nelson
|
21 |
♠A97
♥5
♦AJT976
♣872
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 5♦ ♥4 ♠3 NT5 |
EW: 2♥ 3♠ ♣3 ♦2 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 4.00 0.00 4♥ W -1 4-Emmerman-Emmerman vs 9-Hunter-Sanders
140 3.00 1.00 3♠ W 3 3-Packer-Lowe vs 2-Divakaruni-Nelson
170 2.00 2.00 2♠ E 4 6-Rosnick-Rosnick vs 8-Hunt-Osborne
420 0.50 3.50 4♠ W 4 1-LaCroix-Gibson vs 7-Jacobozzi-Zack
420 0.50 3.50 4♠ E 4 10-Rankin-Rankin vs 5-Nair-Berlin
|
22 |
♠AKQ864
♥AT94
♦32
♣4
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 3♥ 4♠ 3NT ♣5 |
EW: 2♣ ♦4 ♥3 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
450 2.50 1.50 5♠ N 5 2-Divakaruni-Nelson vs 8-Hunt-Osborne
450 2.50 1.50 5♠ N 5 5-Nair-Berlin vs 1-LaCroix-Gibson
450 2.50 1.50 4♠ N 5 4-Emmerman-Emmerman vs 3-Packer-Lowe
450 2.50 1.50 4♠ N 5 10-Rankin-Rankin vs 6-Rosnick-Rosnick
170 0.00 4.00 3♠ N 4 7-Jacobozzi-Zack vs 9-Hunter-Sanders
|
23 |
♠AJT4
♥AQ7
♦KQT
♣JT2
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 2♥ 3♠ 1NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦6 ♥5 ♠4 NT4/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 4.00 0.00 1N N 3 5-Nair-Berlin vs 1-LaCroix-Gibson
140 3.00 1.00 2♠ N 3 10-Rankin-Rankin vs 6-Rosnick-Rosnick
120 1.00 3.00 1N N 2 2-Divakaruni-Nelson vs 8-Hunt-Osborne
120 1.00 3.00 1N N 2 4-Emmerman-Emmerman vs 3-Packer-Lowe
120 1.00 3.00 1N N 2 7-Jacobozzi-Zack vs 9-Hunter-Sanders
|
24 |
♠A975
♥A96
♦A73
♣Q92
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 5♦ 3♥ 4♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦2 ♥4 ♠3/2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
460 4.00 0.00 3N S 5 5-Nair-Berlin vs 1-LaCroix-Gibson
430 3.00 1.00 3N S 4 10-Rankin-Rankin vs 6-Rosnick-Rosnick
150 2.00 2.00 2♦ N 5 2-Divakaruni-Nelson vs 8-Hunt-Osborne
50 0.50 3.50 3N S -1 4-Emmerman-Emmerman vs 3-Packer-Lowe
50 0.50 3.50 3N S -1 7-Jacobozzi-Zack vs 9-Hunter-Sanders
|
25 |
♠62
♥T74
♦J873
♣J854
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5/6 ♦5/6 ♥3/4 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 3♥ 2♠ 3/2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.50 0.50 1N S -2 3-Packer-Lowe vs 9-Hunter-Sanders
100 3.50 0.50 1N S -2 6-Rosnick-Rosnick vs 2-Divakaruni-Nelson
140 1.50 2.50 2♥ W 3 8-Hunt-Osborne vs 1-LaCroix-Gibson
140 1.50 2.50 2♥ W 3 10-Rankin-Rankin vs 7-Jacobozzi-Zack
500 0.00 4.00 1N* S -3 5-Nair-Berlin vs 4-Emmerman-Emmerman
|
26 |
♠KQJ762
♥832
♦AT
♣J5
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♠ 2NT ♦6 ♥6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣5 ♥6 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 4.00 0.00 2♠ N 4 5-Nair-Berlin vs 4-Emmerman-Emmerman
140 2.00 2.00 2♠ N 3 3-Packer-Lowe vs 9-Hunter-Sanders
140 2.00 2.00 2♠ N 3 8-Hunt-Osborne vs 1-LaCroix-Gibson
140 2.00 2.00 2♠ N 3 10-Rankin-Rankin vs 7-Jacobozzi-Zack
90 0.00 4.00 2♦ E 2 6-Rosnick-Rosnick vs 2-Divakaruni-Nelson
|
27 |
♠832
♥QJ4
♦A5
♣AK852
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 5/6♦ 5♥ 4♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦1 ♥2 ♠3 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
490 2.50 1.50 4N N 6 3-Packer-Lowe vs 9-Hunter-Sanders
490 2.50 1.50 3N S 6 5-Nair-Berlin vs 4-Emmerman-Emmerman
490 2.50 1.50 3N S 6 8-Hunt-Osborne vs 1-LaCroix-Gibson
490 2.50 1.50 3N S 6 10-Rankin-Rankin vs 7-Jacobozzi-Zack
430 0.00 4.00 3N S 4 6-Rosnick-Rosnick vs 2-Divakaruni-Nelson
|