1 |
♠K2
♥AK74
♦J82
♣AT53
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♥ 2♠ 1NT ♦6 |
EW: -/1♦ ♣4 ♦6/7 ♥3 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 2.00 0.00 3♥ N 3 6-Bailey-Johansen vs 1-Belton-Snider
50 1.00 1.00 4♥ N -1 2-Sailer-Berger vs 4-Weintraub-Ermel
150 0.00 2.00 3N N -3 3-Healey-Ruck vs 5-Jones-Beckvall
|
2 |
♠K75
♥AKJ953
♦QT7
♣4
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 7♦ 7♥ 2♠ 7NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦0 ♥0 ♠5 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
680 2.00 0.00 4♥ N 6 3-Healey-Ruck vs 5-Jones-Beckvall
640 1.00 1.00 5♦ S 7 2-Sailer-Berger vs 4-Weintraub-Ermel
170 0.00 2.00 2♥ N 4 6-Bailey-Johansen vs 1-Belton-Snider
|
3 |
♠T765
♥QJ976
♦9
♣KQ6
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦3 ♥6 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 4/3♦ 1♠ 1NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 2.00 0.00 2♦ W 3 2-Sailer-Berger vs 4-Weintraub-Ermel
130 0.50 1.50 3♦ W 4 3-Healey-Ruck vs 5-Jones-Beckvall
130 0.50 1.50 3♦ W 4 6-Bailey-Johansen vs 1-Belton-Snider
|
4 |
♠Q9
♥63
♦963
♣AKT954
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦3 ♥6 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 3♦ 1♥ 1♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 2.00 0.00 2♦ W 3 2-Sailer-Berger vs 4-Weintraub-Ermel
130 1.00 1.00 4♦ W 4 6-Bailey-Johansen vs 1-Belton-Snider
200 0.00 2.00 3♣ N -2 3-Healey-Ruck vs 5-Jones-Beckvall
|
5 |
♠5
♥-
♦AKT86542
♣QJ42
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ 1/2♠ 2/3NT ♣5 ♥6 |
EW: 2♣ 1♥ ♦1 ♠5/4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
620 2.00 0.00 5♦ N 6 6-Bailey-Johansen vs 1-Belton-Snider
600 1.00 1.00 5♦ N 5 3-Healey-Ruck vs 5-Jones-Beckvall
150 0.00 2.00 3♦ N 5 2-Sailer-Berger vs 4-Weintraub-Ermel
|
6 |
♠QJT97542
♥KT5
♦-
♣83
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 4♠ ♣0 ♦0 NT0 |
EW: 6/7♣ 7♦ 5NT ♥5 ♠3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
620 1.00 1.00 5♦ E 6 3-Healey-Ruck vs 4-Weintraub-Ermel
620 1.00 1.00 5♦ E 6 5-Jones-Beckvall vs 1-Belton-Snider
620 1.00 1.00 5♦ E 6 6-Bailey-Johansen vs 2-Sailer-Berger
|
7 |
♠J32
♥KQ3
♦T6
♣A9862
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♥ 4♠ 2NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣4 ♥3 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
620 2.00 0.00 4♠ S 4 3-Healey-Ruck vs 4-Weintraub-Ermel
170 1.00 1.00 2♠ S 4 6-Bailey-Johansen vs 2-Sailer-Berger
110 0.00 2.00 2♠ S 2 5-Jones-Beckvall vs 1-Belton-Snider
|
8 |
♠J643
♥42
♦J83
♣T842
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦3/4 ♥3 ♠5 NT3 |
EW: 1♣ 3♦ 4♥ 2♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
130 2.00 0.00 2♦ W 4 5-Jones-Beckvall vs 1-Belton-Snider
420 1.00 1.00 4♥ W 4 3-Healey-Ruck vs 4-Weintraub-Ermel
430 0.00 2.00 3N W 4 6-Bailey-Johansen vs 2-Sailer-Berger
|
9 |
♠T98
♥6
♦J862
♣AK876
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦6 ♥5 ♠5/6 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ 2♥ 1♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 2.00 0.00 3N W -2 6-Bailey-Johansen vs 2-Sailer-Berger
100 1.00 1.00 2♦ W -1 5-Jones-Beckvall vs 1-Belton-Snider
120 0.00 2.00 1N W 2 3-Healey-Ruck vs 4-Weintraub-Ermel
|
10 |
♠QJ
♥KQ93
♦J97
♣6542
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ 3♥ ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 4♠ ♣6 ♦5 ♥4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 2.00 0.00 3♠ E 4 3-Healey-Ruck vs 4-Weintraub-Ermel
200 1.00 1.00 3♠ E 5 6-Bailey-Johansen vs 2-Sailer-Berger
620 0.00 2.00 4♠ E 4 5-Jones-Beckvall vs 1-Belton-Snider
|
11 |
♠2
♥JT742
♦AK3
♣K982
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 2♥ ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 2♠ 2NT ♣3 ♦4 ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 1.50 0.50 4♠ W -1 1-Belton-Snider vs 2-Sailer-Berger
50 1.50 0.50 4♠ W -1 4-Weintraub-Ermel vs 5-Jones-Beckvall
170 0.00 2.00 2♠ W 4 6-Bailey-Johansen vs 3-Healey-Ruck
|
12 |
♠KJT75
♥AQJ6
♦A6
♣K7
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 4♥ 1♠ 1NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣4/5 ♥3 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 2.00 0.00 2♥ N 3 1-Belton-Snider vs 2-Sailer-Berger
80 1.00 1.00 1♠ N 1 4-Weintraub-Ermel vs 5-Jones-Beckvall
100 0.00 2.00 1N S -1 6-Bailey-Johansen vs 3-Healey-Ruck
|
13 |
♠Q43
♥K432
♦K65
♣862
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣1 ♦1 ♠3 NT5 |
EW: 5♣ 5♦ 3♠ 1NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 2.00 0.00 3♣ W -1 6-Bailey-Johansen vs 3-Healey-Ruck
130 1.00 1.00 4♣ W 4 1-Belton-Snider vs 2-Sailer-Berger
170 0.00 2.00 3♠ E 4 4-Weintraub-Ermel vs 5-Jones-Beckvall
|
14 |
♠A76
♥QT96
♦AT63
♣A5
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 5♦ 2♥ 1♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦2 ♥5 ♠6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
430 2.00 0.00 3N N 4 6-Bailey-Johansen vs 3-Healey-Ruck
400 1.00 1.00 3N N 3 1-Belton-Snider vs 2-Sailer-Berger
150 0.00 2.00 2♦ N 5 4-Weintraub-Ermel vs 5-Jones-Beckvall
|
15 |
♠AK76
♥J97
♦KT853
♣5
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 1♥ 2♠ 3NT ♣4 |
EW: 1♣ ♦4 ♥6 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 2.00 0.00 2♦ N 3 6-Bailey-Johansen vs 3-Healey-Ruck
100 1.00 1.00 1N W -2 4-Weintraub-Ermel vs 5-Jones-Beckvall
100 0.00 2.00 1N S -1 1-Belton-Snider vs 2-Sailer-Berger
|
16 |
♠A7543
♥-
♦K87642
♣J5
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ 5♠ 2NT ♣5 ♥4/5 |
EW: 1♣ 2♥ ♦1 ♠1 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 2.00 0.00 3♠ S 4 1-Belton-Snider vs 3-Healey-Ruck
110 1.00 1.00 2♣ W 3 5-Jones-Beckvall vs 2-Sailer-Berger
140 0.00 2.00 3♥ E 3 6-Bailey-Johansen vs 4-Weintraub-Ermel
|
17 |
♠T2
♥KT63
♦AT64
♣Q93
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 3♥ 1NT ♣5 ♠5 |
EW: 2♣ 2♠ ♦5 ♥4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 1.50 0.50 3♠ W -1 1-Belton-Snider vs 3-Healey-Ruck
50 1.50 0.50 2♠ W -1 5-Jones-Beckvall vs 2-Sailer-Berger
140 0.00 2.00 3♠ W 3 6-Bailey-Johansen vs 4-Weintraub-Ermel
|
18 |
♠64
♥974
♦6
♣KQT8543
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♠ 1NT ♦4/5 ♥4 |
EW: 1♦ 2♥ ♣3 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 2.00 0.00 1N N 3 5-Jones-Beckvall vs 2-Sailer-Berger
130 1.00 1.00 3♣ N 4 6-Bailey-Johansen vs 4-Weintraub-Ermel
110 0.00 2.00 1♠ S 2 1-Belton-Snider vs 3-Healey-Ruck
|
19 |
♠9
♥KQ5
♦Q85
♣T87632
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1NT ♦6 ♥4 ♠5 |
EW: 1♦ 3♥ 1♠ ♣4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
300 2.00 0.00 3N E -3 6-Bailey-Johansen vs 4-Weintraub-Ermel
140 1.00 1.00 3♥ W 3 1-Belton-Snider vs 3-Healey-Ruck
150 0.00 2.00 1N N -3 5-Jones-Beckvall vs 2-Sailer-Berger
|
20 |
♠AT3
♥A65
♦543
♣KT85
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 4/5♦ 3♥ 4/5♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦2 ♥4 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
600 2.00 0.00 3N N 3 6-Bailey-Johansen vs 4-Weintraub-Ermel
400 1.00 1.00 2♥ W -4 1-Belton-Snider vs 3-Healey-Ruck
120 0.00 2.00 1N N 2 5-Jones-Beckvall vs 2-Sailer-Berger
|
21 |
♠87
♥KQ2
♦AJ2
♣KQ752
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♦ ♥5 ♠3 NT6 |
EW: 2♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣6 ♦4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 1.50 0.50 3♦ S 3 2-Sailer-Berger vs 3-Healey-Ruck
110 1.50 0.50 3♦ S 3 6-Bailey-Johansen vs 5-Jones-Beckvall
100 0.00 2.00 1N N -1 4-Weintraub-Ermel vs 1-Belton-Snider
|
22 |
♠87
♥KJT2
♦9732
♣Q42
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5/4 ♦4 ♥5/4 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ 2♥ 3♠ 3/4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
600 1.00 1.00 3N W 3 4-Weintraub-Ermel vs 1-Belton-Snider
600 1.00 1.00 3N E 3 2-Sailer-Berger vs 3-Healey-Ruck
600 1.00 1.00 3N E 3 6-Bailey-Johansen vs 5-Jones-Beckvall
|
23 |
♠QT63
♥K95
♦KQ952
♣T
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2/1♦ 2♠ 1NT ♥6 |
EW: ♣6 ♦4 ♥6 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
630 2.00 0.00 3N S 4 2-Sailer-Berger vs 3-Healey-Ruck
600 1.00 1.00 3N N 3 6-Bailey-Johansen vs 5-Jones-Beckvall
140 0.00 2.00 2♠ N 3 4-Weintraub-Ermel vs 1-Belton-Snider
|
24 |
♠Q875
♥75
♦KJT4
♣763
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦6 ♥5 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 2♥ 2♠ 2NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 1.50 0.50 3N E -1 4-Weintraub-Ermel vs 1-Belton-Snider
50 1.50 0.50 3N E -1 6-Bailey-Johansen vs 5-Jones-Beckvall
100 0.00 2.00 1N S -2 2-Sailer-Berger vs 3-Healey-Ruck
|
25 |
♠JT2
♥943
♦KT872
♣T9
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦6 ♥6 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 1♦ 1♥ 2♠ 3/2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 2.00 0.00 2♠ E -1 2-Sailer-Berger vs 3-Healey-Ruck
600 0.50 1.50 3N E 3 4-Weintraub-Ermel vs 1-Belton-Snider
600 0.50 1.50 3N E 3 6-Bailey-Johansen vs 5-Jones-Beckvall
|