1 |
♠J84
♥T74
♦QT96
♣QT6
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1/-♥ ♣1 ♥7/6 ♠1 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 4♠ 5NT ♦6 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 4.00 0.00 3N W -3 2-Claymon-Claymon vs 3-Kennedy-Ramier
100 3.00 1.00 3N W -2 3-Lowe-Verlander vs 5-Hawes-Cowie
50 2.00 2.00 4♠ E -1 5-Gore-Healy vs 4-Marshall-Shreves
110 1.00 3.00 3♣ E 3 1-King-King vs 1-Robbins-Poepl
420 0.00 4.00 4♠ W 4 4-Bader-Potter vs 2-Swartzbaugh-Goodman
|
2 |
♠62
♥KQT75
♦AJ98
♣QJ
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦6 ♥6 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ -/1♥ 1/2♠ 1NT ♦6 ♥6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 2.50 1.50 2N W -1 3-Lowe-Verlander vs 5-Hawes-Cowie
50 2.50 1.50 2N W -1 5-Gore-Healy vs 4-Marshall-Shreves
50 2.50 1.50 2♠ W -1 4-Bader-Potter vs 2-Swartzbaugh-Goodman
50 2.50 1.50 2♥ E -1 2-Claymon-Claymon vs 3-Kennedy-Ramier
200 0.00 4.00 2N S -2 1-King-King vs 1-Robbins-Poepl
|
3 |
♠AQJ954
♥2
♦KT987
♣8
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ 1♠ ♣2 ♥2 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 4♥ 1NT ♦2 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
400 4.00 0.00 5♦ S 5 5-Gore-Healy vs 4-Marshall-Shreves
200 3.00 1.00 4♥ E -2 4-Bader-Potter vs 2-Swartzbaugh-Goodman
100 2.00 2.00 3♠ W -1 3-Lowe-Verlander vs 5-Hawes-Cowie
50 1.00 3.00 5♦ S -1 2-Claymon-Claymon vs 3-Kennedy-Ramier
150 0.00 4.00 3♠ N -3 1-King-King vs 1-Robbins-Poepl
|
4 |
♠-
♥KQT62
♦K753
♣JT63
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 2♥ -/1NT ♣6 ♠5 NT6/7 |
EW: 2♠ ♣6 ♦2 ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 4.00 0.00 4♠ E -2 1-King-King vs 1-Robbins-Poepl
100 3.00 1.00 3♠ E -1 2-Claymon-Claymon vs 3-Kennedy-Ramier
110 2.00 2.00 2♠ E 2 4-Bader-Potter vs 2-Swartzbaugh-Goodman
140 0.50 3.50 3♠ E 3 3-Lowe-Verlander vs 5-Hawes-Cowie
140 0.50 3.50 3♠ E 3 5-Gore-Healy vs 4-Marshall-Shreves
|
5 |
♠72
♥J9
♦QJT83
♣AKQ9
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♦ 1♠ 1NT ♥4 |
EW: 3♥ ♣2 ♦3 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 3.50 0.50 3♣ S 6 1-King-King vs 1-Robbins-Poepl
170 3.50 0.50 2♣ S 6 5-Gore-Healy vs 4-Marshall-Shreves
150 1.50 2.50 2♣ S 5 4-Bader-Potter vs 2-Swartzbaugh-Goodman
150 1.50 2.50 2♣ N 5 2-Claymon-Claymon vs 3-Kennedy-Ramier
200 0.00 4.00 3N S -2 3-Lowe-Verlander vs 5-Hawes-Cowie
|
6 |
♠2
♥AJ32
♦A74
♣86542
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ ♣6 ♦3 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 3♦ 2♠ 1NT ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
300 4.00 0.00 4♠ E -3 2-Claymon-Claymon vs 2-Swartzbaugh-Goodman
200 3.00 1.00 4♠ E -2 3-Lowe-Verlander vs 4-Marshall-Shreves
100 2.00 2.00 2♠ E -1 5-Gore-Healy vs 3-Kennedy-Ramier
110 1.00 3.00 2♠ E 2 4-Bader-Potter vs 1-Robbins-Poepl
140 0.00 4.00 2♠ E 3 1-King-King vs 5-Hawes-Cowie
|
7 |
♠9542
♥K43
♦864
♣JT7
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♠ 1NT ♦6 ♥6 |
EW: 1/-♦ 1♥ ♣6/5 ♦7/6 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
120 4.00 0.00 1N S 2 1-King-King vs 5-Hawes-Cowie
90 3.00 1.00 1♣ S 2 3-Lowe-Verlander vs 4-Marshall-Shreves
70 1.00 3.00 1♣ S 1 2-Claymon-Claymon vs 2-Swartzbaugh-Goodman
70 1.00 3.00 1♣ S 1 4-Bader-Potter vs 1-Robbins-Poepl
70 1.00 3.00 1♣ S 1 5-Gore-Healy vs 3-Kennedy-Ramier
|
8 |
♠QJ
♥AJ53
♦KT752
♣75
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦4 ♥3 ♠4 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 2♦ 4♥ 3♠ 3/4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
120 4.00 0.00 2N E 2 3-Lowe-Verlander vs 4-Marshall-Shreves
130 3.00 1.00 3♣ E 4 2-Claymon-Claymon vs 2-Swartzbaugh-Goodman
150 2.00 2.00 2N E 3 4-Bader-Potter vs 1-Robbins-Poepl
400 1.00 3.00 3N E 3 5-Gore-Healy vs 3-Kennedy-Ramier
430 0.00 4.00 3N E 4 1-King-King vs 5-Hawes-Cowie
|
9 |
♠8763
♥J952
♦-
♣AKT63
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♠ 2NT ♦4 ♥6 |
EW: 2♦ 1♥ ♣5 ♠4/5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
420 4.00 0.00 4♠ S 4 5-Gore-Healy vs 3-Kennedy-Ramier
200 3.00 1.00 2♥ W -2 4-Bader-Potter vs 1-Robbins-Poepl
140 2.00 2.00 3♠ S 3 1-King-King vs 5-Hawes-Cowie
100 1.00 3.00 2♥ W -1 2-Claymon-Claymon vs 2-Swartzbaugh-Goodman
50 0.00 4.00 4♠ S -1 3-Lowe-Verlander vs 4-Marshall-Shreves
|
10 |
♠Q972
♥AT
♦AQT4
♣432
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2/1♦ 2♥ 2♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦5 ♥4/5 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
120 3.00 1.00 2N N 2 5-Gore-Healy vs 3-Kennedy-Ramier
120 3.00 1.00 1N S 2 1-King-King vs 5-Hawes-Cowie
120 3.00 1.00 1N S 2 3-Lowe-Verlander vs 4-Marshall-Shreves
80 1.00 3.00 1♠ N 1 4-Bader-Potter vs 1-Robbins-Poepl
100 0.00 4.00 2N N -1 2-Claymon-Claymon vs 2-Swartzbaugh-Goodman
|
11 |
♠8763
♥T4
♦632
♣7632
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣0 ♦2 ♥0 ♠1 NT0 |
EW: 7/6♣ 5♦ 6♥ 6/5♠ 7/6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.50 0.50 5♠ W -2 2-Claymon-Claymon vs 1-Robbins-Poepl
100 3.50 0.50 6♣ W -2 3-Lowe-Verlander vs 3-Kennedy-Ramier
460 2.00 2.00 3N W 5 5-Gore-Healy vs 2-Swartzbaugh-Goodman
520 1.00 3.00 3N E 7 4-Bader-Potter vs 5-Hawes-Cowie
990 0.00 4.00 6N W 6 1-King-King vs 4-Marshall-Shreves
|
12 |
♠KT4
♥974
♦T5
♣KQT83
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣6 ♦5 ♥5 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 2♥ 2NT ♠6/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 4.00 0.00 2♠ S 3 1-King-King vs 4-Marshall-Shreves
80 3.00 1.00 1♠ S 1 2-Claymon-Claymon vs 1-Robbins-Poepl
50 2.00 2.00 2♣ E -1 5-Gore-Healy vs 2-Swartzbaugh-Goodman
100 1.00 3.00 2♠ S -1 4-Bader-Potter vs 5-Hawes-Cowie
300 0.00 4.00 3♠ S -3 3-Lowe-Verlander vs 3-Kennedy-Ramier
|
13 |
♠97
♥AK7
♦76
♣KJ9743
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 5♥ 3NT ♦6 ♠6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣1 ♥0 ♠6 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
650 3.50 0.50 4♥ S 5 2-Claymon-Claymon vs 1-Robbins-Poepl
650 3.50 0.50 4♥ S 5 4-Bader-Potter vs 5-Hawes-Cowie
620 2.00 2.00 5♣ N 6 5-Gore-Healy vs 2-Swartzbaugh-Goodman
600 1.00 3.00 3N N 3 3-Lowe-Verlander vs 3-Kennedy-Ramier
150 0.00 4.00 2N S 3 1-King-King vs 4-Marshall-Shreves
|
14 |
♠KJT98743
♥5
♦T4
♣AK
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 4♠ ♦1 ♥2 NT2 |
EW: 5♦ 5♥ ♣5 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
650 4.00 0.00 5♠* N 5 2-Claymon-Claymon vs 1-Robbins-Poepl
420 3.00 1.00 4♠ N 4 3-Lowe-Verlander vs 3-Kennedy-Ramier
50 2.00 2.00 5♠ N -1 5-Gore-Healy vs 2-Swartzbaugh-Goodman
450 1.00 3.00 5♥ E 5 1-King-King vs 4-Marshall-Shreves
650 0.00 4.00 5♥* E 5 4-Bader-Potter vs 5-Hawes-Cowie
|
15 |
♠J4
♥K2
♦JT63
♣KT986
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦5 ♥5 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 2♦ 1♥ 3♠ ♣4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 4.00 0.00 2♣ S 3 2-Claymon-Claymon vs 1-Robbins-Poepl
90 3.00 1.00 1N E 1 4-Bader-Potter vs 5-Hawes-Cowie
110 1.50 2.50 2♠ W 2 1-King-King vs 4-Marshall-Shreves
110 1.50 2.50 2♠ W 2 3-Lowe-Verlander vs 3-Kennedy-Ramier
140 0.00 4.00 3♠ W 3 5-Gore-Healy vs 2-Swartzbaugh-Goodman
|
16 |
♠K9643
♥5
♦Q4
♣KQ843
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3/4♣ 4/5♠ 2/3NT ♦5 ♥5 |
EW: 2♦ 2♥ ♣3 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
450 3.50 0.50 4♠ N 5 1-King-King vs 3-Kennedy-Ramier
450 3.50 0.50 4♠ N 5 2-Claymon-Claymon vs 5-Hawes-Cowie
420 2.00 2.00 4♠ N 4 5-Gore-Healy vs 1-Robbins-Poepl
200 0.50 3.50 3♠ S 5 3-Lowe-Verlander vs 2-Swartzbaugh-Goodman
200 0.50 3.50 2♠ S 5 4-Bader-Potter vs 4-Marshall-Shreves
|
17 |
♠Q84
♥J962
♦KJ75
♣A7
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦5 ♥5 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 6♣ 2♦ 2♥ 6♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
420 4.00 0.00 4♠ E 4 4-Bader-Potter vs 4-Marshall-Shreves
450 2.50 1.50 4♠ E 5 1-King-King vs 3-Kennedy-Ramier
450 2.50 1.50 4♠ E 5 5-Gore-Healy vs 1-Robbins-Poepl
480 0.50 3.50 4♠ E 6 2-Claymon-Claymon vs 5-Hawes-Cowie
480 0.50 3.50 4♠ E 6 3-Lowe-Verlander vs 2-Swartzbaugh-Goodman
|
18 |
♠Q62
♥Q9876
♦Q986
♣K
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♥ ♣2 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 5♠ 4NT ♦6 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 4.00 0.00 5♣ W -2 5-Gore-Healy vs 1-Robbins-Poepl
110 3.00 1.00 3♣ W 3 3-Lowe-Verlander vs 2-Swartzbaugh-Goodman
180 2.00 2.00 2N W 4 2-Claymon-Claymon vs 5-Hawes-Cowie
400 1.00 3.00 5♣ W 5 4-Bader-Potter vs 4-Marshall-Shreves
430 0.00 4.00 3N W 4 1-King-King vs 3-Kennedy-Ramier
|
19 |
♠A984
♥T3
♦JT98
♣AJ9
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦3 ♥3 ♠5 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 3♦ 4♥ 2♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
120 4.00 0.00 2N E 2 1-King-King vs 3-Kennedy-Ramier
600 3.00 1.00 3N E 3 5-Gore-Healy vs 1-Robbins-Poepl
620 2.00 2.00 4♥ E 4 3-Lowe-Verlander vs 2-Swartzbaugh-Goodman
630 1.00 3.00 3N E 4 2-Claymon-Claymon vs 5-Hawes-Cowie
660 0.00 4.00 3N E 5 4-Bader-Potter vs 4-Marshall-Shreves
|
20 |
♠T7
♥K63
♦QJ9
♣Q9743
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 7♦ 3♠ 5NT ♥5 |
EW: 2♥ ♣3 ♦0 ♠4 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
500 4.00 0.00 4♥* W -2 5-Gore-Healy vs 1-Robbins-Poepl
150 2.00 2.00 4♦ S 5 1-King-King vs 3-Kennedy-Ramier
150 2.00 2.00 4♦ S 5 3-Lowe-Verlander vs 2-Swartzbaugh-Goodman
150 2.00 2.00 3♦ S 5 2-Claymon-Claymon vs 5-Hawes-Cowie
100 0.00 4.00 5♦ S -1 4-Bader-Potter vs 4-Marshall-Shreves
|
21 |
♠9
♥A863
♦QJ53
♣9632
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♥ ♦3 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 3♦ 3♠ 3NT ♣4 ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 3.50 0.50 4♠ E -1 1-King-King vs 2-Swartzbaugh-Goodman
50 3.50 0.50 4♠ E -1 5-Gore-Healy vs 5-Hawes-Cowie
420 1.00 3.00 4♠ W 4 2-Claymon-Claymon vs 4-Marshall-Shreves
420 1.00 3.00 4♠ W 4 3-Lowe-Verlander vs 1-Robbins-Poepl
420 1.00 3.00 4♠ E 4 4-Bader-Potter vs 3-Kennedy-Ramier
|
22 |
♠KJ9432
♥976
♦KT7
♣7
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ 3♥ 6♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦4 ♥4 ♠1 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
490 4.00 0.00 3N S 6 5-Gore-Healy vs 5-Hawes-Cowie
480 2.00 2.00 4♠ S 6 2-Claymon-Claymon vs 4-Marshall-Shreves
480 2.00 2.00 4♠ S 6 3-Lowe-Verlander vs 1-Robbins-Poepl
480 2.00 2.00 4♠ N 6 1-King-King vs 2-Swartzbaugh-Goodman
110 0.00 4.00 1♣ S 3 4-Bader-Potter vs 3-Kennedy-Ramier
|
23 |
♠KQJ6
♥AJ94
♦K98
♣J3
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 5♦ 5♥ 2♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦2 ♥2 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
600 2.50 1.50 3N N 3 2-Claymon-Claymon vs 4-Marshall-Shreves
600 2.50 1.50 3N N 3 3-Lowe-Verlander vs 1-Robbins-Poepl
600 2.50 1.50 3N N 3 4-Bader-Potter vs 3-Kennedy-Ramier
600 2.50 1.50 5♦ S 5 1-King-King vs 2-Swartzbaugh-Goodman
100 0.00 4.00 3N S -1 5-Gore-Healy vs 5-Hawes-Cowie
|
24 |
♠QT763
♥AJ92
♦3
♣J82
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 3♠ 1/2NT ♣5/6 ♦4 |
EW: 3♦ ♣6 ♥3 ♠3 NT5/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 4.00 0.00 2♠ N 2 3-Lowe-Verlander vs 1-Robbins-Poepl
50 2.00 2.00 4♠ N -1 2-Claymon-Claymon vs 4-Marshall-Shreves
50 2.00 2.00 4♥ S -1 1-King-King vs 2-Swartzbaugh-Goodman
50 2.00 2.00 3♥ N -1 5-Gore-Healy vs 5-Hawes-Cowie
100 0.00 4.00 4♠ S -2 4-Bader-Potter vs 3-Kennedy-Ramier
|
25 |
♠T97
♥JT8
♦KQ854
♣A2
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ ♥4 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 2♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣4 ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 4.00 0.00 3♣ S 3 3-Lowe-Verlander vs 1-Robbins-Poepl
100 3.00 1.00 2♥ W -1 4-Bader-Potter vs 3-Kennedy-Ramier
50 1.00 3.00 2N S -1 5-Gore-Healy vs 5-Hawes-Cowie
50 1.00 3.00 4♣ S -1 1-King-King vs 2-Swartzbaugh-Goodman
50 1.00 3.00 3♣ S -1 2-Claymon-Claymon vs 4-Marshall-Shreves
|