1 |
♠AQJ95
♥QJ7
♦QJ9
♣76
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 5♦ 2♥ 5♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦2 ♥5 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
480 2.00 0.00 5♠ N 6 3-Schultz-Nelson vs 5-Einck-Hart
450 0.50 1.50 5♠ N 5 2-Desaveniers-Kue vs 4-Berlin-Nair
450 0.50 1.50 5♠ N 5 6-Jacobozzi-Zack vs 1-Bender-Ulrey
|
2 |
♠QJ43
♥QJ2
♦KT5
♣AK6
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♦ 4♥ 2♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦4 ♥3 ♠5 NT3/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
630 2.00 0.00 3N N 4 3-Schultz-Nelson vs 5-Einck-Hart
600 1.00 1.00 3N N 3 6-Jacobozzi-Zack vs 1-Bender-Ulrey
120 0.00 2.00 2N N 2 2-Desaveniers-Kue vs 4-Berlin-Nair
|
3 |
♠JT84
♥T7
♦QJT7
♣T92
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/-♠ ♣3 ♦6 ♥6 ♠7/6 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 1/-♦ 1/-♥ 3NT ♦7/6 ♥7/6 ♠6/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 2.00 0.00 3N W -1 3-Schultz-Nelson vs 5-Einck-Hart
600 1.00 1.00 3N E 3 2-Desaveniers-Kue vs 4-Berlin-Nair
630 0.00 2.00 3N W 4 6-Jacobozzi-Zack vs 1-Bender-Ulrey
|
4 |
♠J86
♥K9
♦AKT7
♣9842
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 2♥ 1NT ♠6 |
EW: ♣6 ♦6 ♥5 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
300 2.00 0.00 2♠ E -3 2-Desaveniers-Kue vs 4-Berlin-Nair
110 1.00 1.00 2♥ S 2 3-Schultz-Nelson vs 5-Einck-Hart
100 0.00 2.00 2♦ N -1 6-Jacobozzi-Zack vs 1-Bender-Ulrey
|
5 |
♠Q84
♥85
♦AQ542
♣J54
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2/1♦ 4NT ♥4 ♠5 |
EW: 3♥ 2♠ ♣2 ♦5 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
910 2.00 0.00 4♣* S 5 2-Desaveniers-Kue vs 4-Berlin-Nair
660 1.00 1.00 3N S 5 3-Schultz-Nelson vs 5-Einck-Hart
130 0.00 2.00 3♣ S 4 6-Jacobozzi-Zack vs 1-Bender-Ulrey
|
6 |
♠9753
♥K54
♦7
♣AT952
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦2/3 ♥6 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 3♦ 1♥ 2♠ 3NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
90 2.00 0.00 1N E 1 3-Schultz-Nelson vs 4-Berlin-Nair
110 1.00 1.00 3♦ W 3 5-Einck-Hart vs 1-Bender-Ulrey
150 0.00 2.00 4♣ N -3 6-Jacobozzi-Zack vs 2-Desaveniers-Kue
|
7 |
♠A4
♥K2
♦J74
♣AT9653
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ 1♥ 2♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦6 ♥6 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 2.00 0.00 2N S 3 6-Jacobozzi-Zack vs 2-Desaveniers-Kue
110 1.00 1.00 2♣ N 3 5-Einck-Hart vs 1-Bender-Ulrey
200 0.00 2.00 3N S -2 3-Schultz-Nelson vs 4-Berlin-Nair
|
8 |
♠AK8642
♥T
♦T5
♣J853
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♠ 3NT ♣6 ♦5 ♥4 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 1♥ ♠2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
500 2.00 0.00 4♥* E -3 6-Jacobozzi-Zack vs 2-Desaveniers-Kue
420 1.00 1.00 4♠ N 4 3-Schultz-Nelson vs 4-Berlin-Nair
50 0.00 2.00 4♠ N -1 5-Einck-Hart vs 1-Bender-Ulrey
|
9 |
♠QJ86
♥AQJ43
♦72
♣65
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣4/3 ♦4 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 3♦ 1♠ 2NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 2.00 0.00 2♥ N -1 5-Einck-Hart vs 1-Bender-Ulrey
100 1.00 1.00 3♥ N -2 6-Jacobozzi-Zack vs 2-Desaveniers-Kue
110 0.00 2.00 2♠ E 2 3-Schultz-Nelson vs 4-Berlin-Nair
|
10 |
♠7
♥KQ98542
♦86
♣K54
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ -/1NT ♣4 ♦6 ♠4 NT6/7 |
EW: 3♣ 2♠ ♦6 ♥5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 2.00 0.00 3♠ W -1 5-Einck-Hart vs 1-Bender-Ulrey
100 0.50 1.50 3♥ N -1 3-Schultz-Nelson vs 4-Berlin-Nair
100 0.50 1.50 3♥ N -1 6-Jacobozzi-Zack vs 2-Desaveniers-Kue
|
11 |
♠Q3
♥J4
♦AJ764
♣Q974
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/3♣ 1/2♦ 1/3♠ 1NT ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣3 ♦5 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 1.50 0.50 3N S -2 4-Berlin-Nair vs 5-Einck-Hart
100 1.50 0.50 3♦ N -2 1-Bender-Ulrey vs 2-Desaveniers-Kue
150 0.00 2.00 3N S -3 6-Jacobozzi-Zack vs 3-Schultz-Nelson
|
12 |
♠J953
♥A73
♦2
♣KQT75
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 4♠ 2NT ♦6 ♥5/6 |
EW: 1♦ 1♥ ♣2 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
620 1.50 0.50 4♠ N 4 4-Berlin-Nair vs 5-Einck-Hart
620 1.50 0.50 4♠ N 4 6-Jacobozzi-Zack vs 3-Schultz-Nelson
100 0.00 2.00 4♥ E -2 1-Bender-Ulrey vs 2-Desaveniers-Kue
|
13 |
♠Q87
♥KQ85
♦8
♣JT873
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣6 ♦5 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 1/-♦ 1/2♠ 1NT ♦7/6 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 2.00 0.00 3N E -1 1-Bender-Ulrey vs 2-Desaveniers-Kue
100 1.00 1.00 1N N -1 4-Berlin-Nair vs 5-Einck-Hart
500 0.00 2.00 2♣* N -2 6-Jacobozzi-Zack vs 3-Schultz-Nelson
|
14 |
♠JT842
♥6
♦A64
♣KT97
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1/-♦ 1♥ 2♠ 1NT ♦7/6 |
EW: ♣4 ♦6 ♥6 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
120 1.50 0.50 2N S 2 4-Berlin-Nair vs 5-Einck-Hart
120 1.50 0.50 1N S 2 6-Jacobozzi-Zack vs 3-Schultz-Nelson
90 0.00 2.00 1N S 1 1-Bender-Ulrey vs 2-Desaveniers-Kue
|
15 |
♠J974
♥T
♦AKT842
♣K9
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 1NT ♣2 ♥5 ♠5 |
EW: 4♣ 2♥ 1♠ ♦4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 2.00 0.00 4♥ E -2 1-Bender-Ulrey vs 2-Desaveniers-Kue
50 0.50 1.50 2♠ W -1 6-Jacobozzi-Zack vs 3-Schultz-Nelson
50 0.50 1.50 4♣ E -1 4-Berlin-Nair vs 5-Einck-Hart
|
16 |
♠KJ
♥532
♦QJ9
♣QT854
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦5 ♥6 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 1♥ 2♠ 2/1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 2.00 0.00 3♦ W -1 1-Bender-Ulrey vs 3-Schultz-Nelson
110 1.00 1.00 2♦ W 3 6-Jacobozzi-Zack vs 4-Berlin-Nair
120 0.00 2.00 1N E 2 5-Einck-Hart vs 2-Desaveniers-Kue
|
17 |
♠63
♥K752
♦KT5
♣K874
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 5/4♠ 3/2NT ♣5 ♦3 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ ♥4 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
420 1.00 1.00 4♠ S 4 1-Bender-Ulrey vs 3-Schultz-Nelson
420 1.00 1.00 4♠ S 4 5-Einck-Hart vs 2-Desaveniers-Kue
420 1.00 1.00 4♠ S 4 6-Jacobozzi-Zack vs 4-Berlin-Nair
|
18 |
♠A7643
♥-
♦KT853
♣976
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ ♥3 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 3♥ 1♠ 2NT ♣4 ♦4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 2.00 0.00 4♥ W -2 1-Bender-Ulrey vs 3-Schultz-Nelson
420 1.00 1.00 4♥ W 4 6-Jacobozzi-Zack vs 4-Berlin-Nair
450 0.00 2.00 4♥ W 5 5-Einck-Hart vs 2-Desaveniers-Kue
|
19 |
♠K
♥QJT963
♦Q94
♣J95
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣6 ♦6 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 3♠ 3NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 2.00 0.00 1N W 3 5-Einck-Hart vs 2-Desaveniers-Kue
170 1.00 1.00 3♠ E 4 1-Bender-Ulrey vs 3-Schultz-Nelson
620 0.00 2.00 4♠ E 4 6-Jacobozzi-Zack vs 4-Berlin-Nair
|
20 |
♠T9
♥AKQ5
♦92
♣97543
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 3♥ ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 3♠ ♣3 ♦4 ♥3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 1.50 0.50 4♠ W -1 5-Einck-Hart vs 2-Desaveniers-Kue
100 1.50 0.50 4♠ W -1 6-Jacobozzi-Zack vs 4-Berlin-Nair
300 0.00 2.00 4♥ N -3 1-Bender-Ulrey vs 3-Schultz-Nelson
|
21 |
♠AQJ8
♥AQJT
♦32
♣KQ2
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/-♣ 4♥ 3♠ 3NT ♣8/6 ♦6 |
EW: ♣5 ♦6/5 ♥3 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 2.00 0.00 3♥ N 4 6-Jacobozzi-Zack vs 5-Einck-Hart
100 0.50 1.50 4♠ S -1 4-Berlin-Nair vs 1-Bender-Ulrey
100 0.50 1.50 4♥ N -1 2-Desaveniers-Kue vs 3-Schultz-Nelson
|
22 |
♠864
♥5
♦9864
♣KJ976
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦2 ♥2 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 4♦ 5♥ 4♠ 4NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 2.00 0.00 4♥* E -1 6-Jacobozzi-Zack vs 5-Einck-Hart
100 1.00 1.00 4♥ E -1 4-Berlin-Nair vs 1-Bender-Ulrey
630 0.00 2.00 3N E 4 2-Desaveniers-Kue vs 3-Schultz-Nelson
|
23 |
♠Q754
♥A2
♦A9864
♣A7
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 1♥ 2♠ ♣5 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦4 ♥6 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 2.00 0.00 2♠ N 3 6-Jacobozzi-Zack vs 5-Einck-Hart
200 0.50 1.50 4♠ N -2 2-Desaveniers-Kue vs 3-Schultz-Nelson
200 0.50 1.50 4♠ N -2 4-Berlin-Nair vs 1-Bender-Ulrey
|
24 |
♠96542
♥32
♦JT53
♣86
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♠ ♣5 ♥5 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 2♥ 1NT ♦6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 2.00 0.00 3N S -1 4-Berlin-Nair vs 1-Bender-Ulrey
150 0.50 1.50 3N S -3 6-Jacobozzi-Zack vs 5-Einck-Hart
150 0.50 1.50 3N N -3 2-Desaveniers-Kue vs 3-Schultz-Nelson
|
25 |
♠K4
♥JT
♦842
♣AK8754
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1♥ ♦3 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 3♦ 1♠ ♣3 ♥6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
130 1.50 0.50 4♣ N 4 2-Desaveniers-Kue vs 3-Schultz-Nelson
130 1.50 0.50 4♣ N 4 4-Berlin-Nair vs 1-Bender-Ulrey
100 0.00 2.00 6♣ N -2 6-Jacobozzi-Zack vs 5-Einck-Hart
|