1 |
♠QT95
♥7
♦KJ8
♣QT864
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ ♣6 ♦5 ♥5 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 2♥ 1NT ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 2.00 0.00 4♥ E -1 2-Sailer-Padon vs 4-Shreves-Marshall
110 1.00 1.00 2♥ E 2 3-Healey-Ruck vs 5-Belton-Snider
150 0.00 2.00 2N E 3 6-Jones-Beckvall vs 1-Eilers-Day
|
2 |
♠KJ97
♥AQ865
♦J93
♣9
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 1♠ 1NT ♣3 ♥6 |
EW: 4♣ ♦4 ♥5/6 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 2.00 0.00 3N W -4 6-Jones-Beckvall vs 1-Eilers-Day
110 1.00 1.00 3♣ E 3 3-Healey-Ruck vs 5-Belton-Snider
150 0.00 2.00 2N W 3 2-Sailer-Padon vs 4-Shreves-Marshall
|
3 |
♠5
♥AQT64
♦8432
♣K93
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♦ 5♥ 4NT ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣2 ♦2 ♥2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
420 2.00 0.00 4♥ S 4 3-Healey-Ruck vs 5-Belton-Snider
170 1.00 1.00 2♥ N 4 6-Jones-Beckvall vs 1-Eilers-Day
100 0.00 2.00 3♠ W -1 2-Sailer-Padon vs 4-Shreves-Marshall
|
4 |
♠JT8
♥9532
♦K8
♣KQ74
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1NT ♦4 ♥6 ♠6 |
EW: 3♦ 1♥ 1♠ ♣6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 2.00 0.00 2♦ E 3 3-Healey-Ruck vs 5-Belton-Snider
130 0.50 1.50 3♦ E 4 2-Sailer-Padon vs 4-Shreves-Marshall
130 0.50 1.50 2♦ E 4 6-Jones-Beckvall vs 1-Eilers-Day
|
5 |
♠KQ7
♥82
♦T762
♣QJ96
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 3♠ 1NT ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣4 ♦4 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 1.50 0.50 2N E -1 3-Healey-Ruck vs 5-Belton-Snider
50 1.50 0.50 2♠ E -1 6-Jones-Beckvall vs 1-Eilers-Day
140 0.00 2.00 3♥ W 3 2-Sailer-Padon vs 4-Shreves-Marshall
|
6 |
♠8
♥AJT7
♦Q742
♣KQT6
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♥ 2♠ ♦5 NT6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣5 ♥4 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
300 2.00 0.00 3♦ W -3 3-Healey-Ruck vs 4-Shreves-Marshall
170 1.00 1.00 3♥ N 4 5-Belton-Snider vs 1-Eilers-Day
PASS 0.00 2.00 Pass Out 6-Jones-Beckvall vs 2-Sailer-Padon
|
7 |
♠KJ643
♥K32
♦KJ7
♣AQ
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ 5♥ 4♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦3 ♥2 ♠3 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
660 1.50 0.50 3N N 5 3-Healey-Ruck vs 4-Shreves-Marshall
660 1.50 0.50 3N N 5 5-Belton-Snider vs 1-Eilers-Day
630 0.00 2.00 3N N 4 6-Jones-Beckvall vs 2-Sailer-Padon
|
8 |
♠A97
♥A8752
♦653
♣43
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣5 ♦6 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 1♠ ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 2.00 0.00 3♦ E -1 5-Belton-Snider vs 1-Eilers-Day
90 1.00 1.00 2♦ E 2 3-Healey-Ruck vs 4-Shreves-Marshall
150 0.00 2.00 2N E 3 6-Jones-Beckvall vs 2-Sailer-Padon
|
9 |
♠A652
♥KQ94
♦J62
♣K5
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 1♠ 2NT ♣6 ♥6 |
EW: -/1♥ ♣6 ♦3 ♥6/7 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 2.00 0.00 3♦ N 5 6-Jones-Beckvall vs 2-Sailer-Padon
130 1.00 1.00 3♦ S 4 5-Belton-Snider vs 1-Eilers-Day
110 0.00 2.00 2♦ S 3 3-Healey-Ruck vs 4-Shreves-Marshall
|
10 |
♠T852
♥K7
♦8
♣K97653
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♥ ♦2 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 5♦ 4♠ 1NT ♣5 ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 2.00 0.00 4♦ E 5 3-Healey-Ruck vs 4-Shreves-Marshall
600 0.50 1.50 5♦ E 5 5-Belton-Snider vs 1-Eilers-Day
600 0.50 1.50 5♦ E 5 6-Jones-Beckvall vs 2-Sailer-Padon
|
11 |
♠863
♥J94
♦K9742
♣86
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 1♠ 2NT ♣4 ♥5 |
EW: 2♣ 2♥ ♦4 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 2.00 0.00 2♦ S 3 6-Jones-Beckvall vs 3-Healey-Ruck
90 1.00 1.00 1N S 1 1-Eilers-Day vs 2-Sailer-Padon
50 0.00 2.00 2♥ W -1 4-Shreves-Marshall vs 5-Belton-Snider
|
12 |
♠QJ96
♥KJ2
♦Q4
♣AJ64
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♥ 3♠ ♦3 NT4 |
EW: 4♦ 1NT ♣5 ♥5 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 2.00 0.00 3♠ S 4 1-Eilers-Day vs 2-Sailer-Padon
50 0.50 1.50 5♦ W -1 4-Shreves-Marshall vs 5-Belton-Snider
50 0.50 1.50 4♦ W -1 6-Jones-Beckvall vs 3-Healey-Ruck
|
13 |
♠KJT
♥Q62
♦A543
♣K75
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♦ 2♥ 4♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦4 ♥4 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
650 2.00 0.00 4♠ S 5 4-Shreves-Marshall vs 5-Belton-Snider
600 1.00 1.00 3N N 3 6-Jones-Beckvall vs 3-Healey-Ruck
100 0.00 2.00 4♠ S -1 1-Eilers-Day vs 2-Sailer-Padon
|
14 |
♠A
♥953
♦K965
♣AKQ86
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ ♦2 ♥2 ♠5 NT3 |
EW: 4♦ 5♥ 1♠ 1NT ♣3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 2.00 0.00 2♣ N 3 6-Jones-Beckvall vs 3-Healey-Ruck
50 0.50 1.50 5♣ N -1 1-Eilers-Day vs 2-Sailer-Padon
50 0.50 1.50 5♣ N -1 4-Shreves-Marshall vs 5-Belton-Snider
|
15 |
♠864
♥96
♦8762
♣QJT7
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ ♣5 ♥4 ♠3 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 2♥ 4♠ 2NT ♦4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 2.00 0.00 3♠ W -1 6-Jones-Beckvall vs 3-Healey-Ruck
420 1.00 1.00 4♠ W 4 1-Eilers-Day vs 2-Sailer-Padon
500 0.00 2.00 5♦* S -2 4-Shreves-Marshall vs 5-Belton-Snider
|
16 |
♠QJ42
♥K7654
♦-
♣AQ72
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/1♥ 3/2♠ ♣6/5 ♦5 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 1NT ♥5 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 2.00 0.00 2♠ S 2 6-Jones-Beckvall vs 4-Shreves-Marshall
50 1.00 1.00 2♥ N -1 1-Eilers-Day vs 3-Healey-Ruck
120 0.00 2.00 1N E 2 5-Belton-Snider vs 2-Sailer-Padon
|
17 |
♠95
♥Q8653
♦96
♣KQ76
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♥ 2♠ ♦3 NT4 |
EW: 4♦ 1NT ♣4 ♥4 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 2.00 0.00 2♠ S 2 5-Belton-Snider vs 2-Sailer-Padon
50 1.00 1.00 5♦ W -1 6-Jones-Beckvall vs 4-Shreves-Marshall
110 0.00 2.00 3♦ W 3 1-Eilers-Day vs 3-Healey-Ruck
|
18 |
♠JT752
♥K4
♦JT932
♣J
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 4♠ 1NT ♣5 ♥5 |
EW: 1♣ 2♥ ♦3 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
620 1.50 0.50 4♠ S 4 1-Eilers-Day vs 3-Healey-Ruck
620 1.50 0.50 4♠ S 4 6-Jones-Beckvall vs 4-Shreves-Marshall
200 0.00 2.00 2♠ S 5 5-Belton-Snider vs 2-Sailer-Padon
|
19 |
♠QJ84
♥J64
♦62
♣A832
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦3 ♥4 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 4♦ 3♥ 2♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 1.00 1.00 2N E 3 1-Eilers-Day vs 3-Healey-Ruck
150 1.00 1.00 2N E 3 5-Belton-Snider vs 2-Sailer-Padon
150 1.00 1.00 2N E 3 6-Jones-Beckvall vs 4-Shreves-Marshall
|
20 |
♠9
♥K9652
♦K9
♣A9532
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♥ ♦6 ♠3 NT5 |
EW: 1♦ 4♠ ♣3 ♥4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 2.00 0.00 5♠ E -1 6-Jones-Beckvall vs 4-Shreves-Marshall
620 1.00 1.00 4♠ E 4 1-Eilers-Day vs 3-Healey-Ruck
650 0.00 2.00 4♠ E 5 5-Belton-Snider vs 2-Sailer-Padon
|
21 |
♠4
♥T8
♦K852
♣KT9874
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦3 ♥5 ♠0 NT1 |
EW: 4♦ 2♥ 5♠ 1NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
450 1.00 1.00 4♠ W 5 2-Sailer-Padon vs 3-Healey-Ruck
450 1.00 1.00 4♠ W 5 6-Jones-Beckvall vs 5-Belton-Snider
450 1.00 1.00 4♠ E 5 4-Shreves-Marshall vs 1-Eilers-Day
|
22 |
♠932
♥Q98
♦QJ5
♣KT86
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦3 ♥6 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 4/3♣ 3♦ 1♥ 5♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 2.00 0.00 3N E -1 6-Jones-Beckvall vs 5-Belton-Snider
90 1.00 1.00 2♦ W 2 4-Shreves-Marshall vs 1-Eilers-Day
130 0.00 2.00 2♦ W 4 2-Sailer-Padon vs 3-Healey-Ruck
|
23 |
♠T
♥AT874
♦J43
♣A982
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♥ ♦4 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 3♦ 3♠ ♣4 ♥4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 2.00 0.00 3♣ S 3 6-Jones-Beckvall vs 5-Belton-Snider
110 1.00 1.00 1♠ W 2 2-Sailer-Padon vs 3-Healey-Ruck
200 0.00 2.00 4♥ N -2 4-Shreves-Marshall vs 1-Eilers-Day
|
24 |
♠K5
♥9632
♦Q654
♣AKT
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦4 ♥3 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ 4♥ 4♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
420 1.00 1.00 4♠ W 4 4-Shreves-Marshall vs 1-Eilers-Day
420 1.00 1.00 4♠ E 4 2-Sailer-Padon vs 3-Healey-Ruck
420 1.00 1.00 4♠ E 4 6-Jones-Beckvall vs 5-Belton-Snider
|
25 |
♠82
♥84
♦KJT84
♣JT74
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦5 ♥3 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 4♥ 5♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 2.00 0.00 2♥ E 4 2-Sailer-Padon vs 3-Healey-Ruck
650 0.50 1.50 4♠ W 5 4-Shreves-Marshall vs 1-Eilers-Day
650 0.50 1.50 4♠ E 5 6-Jones-Beckvall vs 5-Belton-Snider
|