1 |
♠KQJ5
♥K86
♦J95
♣QT9
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♠ ♣4 ♥5 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 2♥ ♦5 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.00 0.00 3♥* W -1 5-Packer-Osborne vs 6-Lowe-Tomkinson
50 2.00 1.00 3♥ W -1 3-Hendricks-Hendricks vs 7-Pientka-Beuchel
PASS 1.00 2.00 Pass Out 8-Jacobozzi-Zack vs 1-Verkamp-Gaer
50 0.00 3.00 3♠ S -1 2-Dalton-McIntosh vs 4-Sarko-Parker
|
2 |
♠73
♥J9862
♦A43
♣QJ3
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦4 ♥5 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ 1♥ 1NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 3.00 0.00 2♣ W -1 8-Jacobozzi-Zack vs 1-Verkamp-Gaer
90 1.50 1.50 1N W 1 3-Hendricks-Hendricks vs 7-Pientka-Beuchel
90 1.50 1.50 2♦ E 2 2-Dalton-McIntosh vs 4-Sarko-Parker
120 0.00 3.00 1N W 2 5-Packer-Osborne vs 6-Lowe-Tomkinson
|
3 |
♠AQ64
♥AK9
♦AJ
♣QT32
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ 1/-♥ 5/4♠ 3NT ♥7/6 |
EW: ♣4 ♦5 ♥6 ♠2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
420 2.50 0.50 4♠ N 4 5-Packer-Osborne vs 6-Lowe-Tomkinson
420 2.50 0.50 4♠ N 4 8-Jacobozzi-Zack vs 1-Verkamp-Gaer
200 1.00 2.00 3♠ N 5 3-Hendricks-Hendricks vs 7-Pientka-Beuchel
50 0.00 3.00 4♠ N -1 2-Dalton-McIntosh vs 4-Sarko-Parker
|
4 |
♠9
♥QJT764
♦842
♣654
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦4 ♥6 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 5♠ 5NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
650 1.50 1.50 4♠ W 5 2-Dalton-McIntosh vs 4-Sarko-Parker
650 1.50 1.50 4♠ W 5 3-Hendricks-Hendricks vs 7-Pientka-Beuchel
650 1.50 1.50 4♠ W 5 5-Packer-Osborne vs 6-Lowe-Tomkinson
650 1.50 1.50 4♠ W 5 8-Jacobozzi-Zack vs 1-Verkamp-Gaer
|
5 |
♠QJ72
♥-
♦AJT53
♣Q986
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ ♥2 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 4/5♥ 2♠ 2NT ♣4 ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 2.50 0.50 4♥ E -1 4-Sarko-Parker vs 1-Verkamp-Gaer
50 2.50 0.50 3♥ E -1 8-Jacobozzi-Zack vs 2-Dalton-McIntosh
140 1.00 2.00 2♥ E 3 6-Lowe-Tomkinson vs 7-Pientka-Beuchel
450 0.00 3.00 4♥ E 5 3-Hendricks-Hendricks vs 5-Packer-Osborne
|
6 |
♠KJ965
♥K9
♦A5
♣9653
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦1 ♥4 ♠5 NT1 |
EW: 6♣ 5♦ 2♥ 1♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 1.50 1.50 4♣ W 6 8-Jacobozzi-Zack vs 2-Dalton-McIntosh
170 1.50 1.50 3♣ W 6 3-Hendricks-Hendricks vs 5-Packer-Osborne
170 1.50 1.50 3♣ W 6 4-Sarko-Parker vs 1-Verkamp-Gaer
170 1.50 1.50 3♣ W 6 6-Lowe-Tomkinson vs 7-Pientka-Beuchel
|
7 |
♠AQ
♥AK87
♦843
♣KT98
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5/4♣ 5♥ ♦2 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 4♦ 1♠ 1NT ♣2 ♥2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
500 3.00 0.00 5♦* W -2 8-Jacobozzi-Zack vs 2-Dalton-McIntosh
170 1.50 1.50 3♥ S 4 3-Hendricks-Hendricks vs 5-Packer-Osborne
170 1.50 1.50 3♥ N 4 4-Sarko-Parker vs 1-Verkamp-Gaer
130 0.00 3.00 4♦ W 4 6-Lowe-Tomkinson vs 7-Pientka-Beuchel
|
8 |
♠62
♥9432
♦QJ5
♣AQ63
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♥ 1♠ 2NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣3 ♥4 ♠6/5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 2.50 0.50 3N S -1 3-Hendricks-Hendricks vs 5-Packer-Osborne
50 2.50 0.50 2N N -1 6-Lowe-Tomkinson vs 7-Pientka-Beuchel
150 0.50 2.50 3N S -3 8-Jacobozzi-Zack vs 2-Dalton-McIntosh
150 0.50 2.50 4♠ S -3 4-Sarko-Parker vs 1-Verkamp-Gaer
|
9 |
♠AT52
♥42
♦JT74
♣JT4
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 3♠ ♣2/3 ♥3 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 4♥ 1NT ♦4 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 3.00 0.00 1♠ S 3 8-Jacobozzi-Zack vs 3-Hendricks-Hendricks
50 1.50 1.50 4♠ S -1 5-Packer-Osborne vs 2-Dalton-McIntosh
50 1.50 1.50 4♠ S -1 7-Pientka-Beuchel vs 1-Verkamp-Gaer
650 0.00 3.00 5♥ E 5 4-Sarko-Parker vs 6-Lowe-Tomkinson
|
10 |
♠9
♥AT982
♦QT974
♣KQ
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 6♦ 5♥ 2♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦0 ♥1 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
600 2.00 1.00 3N S 3 4-Sarko-Parker vs 6-Lowe-Tomkinson
600 2.00 1.00 3N S 3 7-Pientka-Beuchel vs 1-Verkamp-Gaer
600 2.00 1.00 3N S 3 8-Jacobozzi-Zack vs 3-Hendricks-Hendricks
190 0.00 3.00 2♦ S 7 5-Packer-Osborne vs 2-Dalton-McIntosh
|
11 |
♠Q8
♥752
♦Q9753
♣KQ8
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: -/1♠ ♣4 ♦5 ♥3 ♠6/7 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ 4♥ 3NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 2.00 1.00 3♥ W 3 5-Packer-Osborne vs 2-Dalton-McIntosh
140 2.00 1.00 3♥ W 3 7-Pientka-Beuchel vs 1-Verkamp-Gaer
140 2.00 1.00 2♥ W 3 4-Sarko-Parker vs 6-Lowe-Tomkinson
420 0.00 3.00 4♥ W 4 8-Jacobozzi-Zack vs 3-Hendricks-Hendricks
|
12 |
♠J652
♥KT2
♦AJT5
♣Q3
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 4♦ 5♥ 1/-♠ 3/-NT ♠7/6 NT9/6 |
EW: ♣4 ♦2 ♥2 ♠6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
620 3.00 0.00 4♥ S 4 8-Jacobozzi-Zack vs 3-Hendricks-Hendricks
500 1.50 1.50 4♠* E -3 5-Packer-Osborne vs 2-Dalton-McIntosh
500 1.50 1.50 4♠* E -3 7-Pientka-Beuchel vs 1-Verkamp-Gaer
200 0.00 3.00 4♠ E -4 4-Sarko-Parker vs 6-Lowe-Tomkinson
|
13 |
♠973
♥KJ65
♦52
♣AT75
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦4 ♥6 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 3♦ 1NT ♣6 ♥6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
90 2.00 1.00 1N W 1 1-Verkamp-Gaer vs 2-Dalton-McIntosh
90 2.00 1.00 1N W 1 5-Packer-Osborne vs 7-Pientka-Beuchel
90 2.00 1.00 1N W 1 6-Lowe-Tomkinson vs 3-Hendricks-Hendricks
130 0.00 3.00 2♦ W 4 8-Jacobozzi-Zack vs 4-Sarko-Parker
|
14 |
♠72
♥AQ2
♦J85
♣KJ976
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦5/6 ♥2 ♠2 NT5 |
EW: 1♦ 5♥ 5♠ 1NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 3.00 0.00 3♣ N -1 1-Verkamp-Gaer vs 2-Dalton-McIntosh
200 2.00 1.00 2♠ W 5 5-Packer-Osborne vs 7-Pientka-Beuchel
450 1.00 2.00 4♠ E 5 6-Lowe-Tomkinson vs 3-Hendricks-Hendricks
500 0.00 3.00 5♣* S -3 8-Jacobozzi-Zack vs 4-Sarko-Parker
|
15 |
♠96
♥A54
♦72
♣AQJ985
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦2 ♥3 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 1♣ 4♦ 4♥ 5♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
420 3.00 0.00 4♠ W 4 1-Verkamp-Gaer vs 2-Dalton-McIntosh
450 1.50 1.50 4♠ W 5 5-Packer-Osborne vs 7-Pientka-Beuchel
450 1.50 1.50 4♠ W 5 8-Jacobozzi-Zack vs 4-Sarko-Parker
500 0.00 3.00 2♣* N -2 6-Lowe-Tomkinson vs 3-Hendricks-Hendricks
|
16 |
♠KQ6
♥K84
♦J8
♣AQJT3
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♥ 3♠ ♦6 NT6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣5 ♥4 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 3.00 0.00 3♦ W -2 1-Verkamp-Gaer vs 2-Dalton-McIntosh
140 2.00 1.00 3♥ S 3 8-Jacobozzi-Zack vs 4-Sarko-Parker
100 1.00 2.00 2♦ E -1 6-Lowe-Tomkinson vs 3-Hendricks-Hendricks
50 0.00 3.00 4♥ S -1 5-Packer-Osborne vs 7-Pientka-Beuchel
|
17 |
♠AKJ65
♥T84
♦97643
♣-
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 1♠ ♣6 ♥5 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♥ ♦3 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 2.50 0.50 4♥ E -3 7-Pientka-Beuchel vs 4-Sarko-Parker
150 2.50 0.50 4♥ E -3 8-Jacobozzi-Zack vs 5-Packer-Osborne
100 1.00 2.00 3N W -2 6-Lowe-Tomkinson vs 1-Verkamp-Gaer
50 0.00 3.00 4♥ E -1 2-Dalton-McIntosh vs 3-Hendricks-Hendricks
|
18 |
♠987
♥J74
♦A84
♣7652
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣4 ♦6 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 1/-♦ 1♠ 1NT ♦7/6 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
400 1.50 1.50 3N W 3 2-Dalton-McIntosh vs 3-Hendricks-Hendricks
400 1.50 1.50 3N W 3 6-Lowe-Tomkinson vs 1-Verkamp-Gaer
400 1.50 1.50 3N W 3 7-Pientka-Beuchel vs 4-Sarko-Parker
400 1.50 1.50 3N E 3 8-Jacobozzi-Zack vs 5-Packer-Osborne
|
19 |
♠QJ
♥T854
♦Q986
♣J83
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ ♣2 ♦6 ♠2 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 1/-♦ 5♠ 2NT ♦7/6 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 2.50 0.50 5♥ S -3 7-Pientka-Beuchel vs 4-Sarko-Parker
150 2.50 0.50 4♥ S -3 6-Lowe-Tomkinson vs 1-Verkamp-Gaer
790 1.00 2.00 4♠* E 4 2-Dalton-McIntosh vs 3-Hendricks-Hendricks
800 0.00 3.00 5♥* S -4 8-Jacobozzi-Zack vs 5-Packer-Osborne
|
20 |
♠Q98
♥QT7
♦J84
♣Q653
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦3 ♥3 ♠5 NT3 |
EW: 1♣ 4♦ 4♥ 2♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
120 3.00 0.00 1N W 2 7-Pientka-Beuchel vs 4-Sarko-Parker
170 2.00 1.00 3♥ E 4 8-Jacobozzi-Zack vs 5-Packer-Osborne
300 1.00 2.00 2♠ S -3 6-Lowe-Tomkinson vs 1-Verkamp-Gaer
650 0.00 3.00 4♥ W 5 2-Dalton-McIntosh vs 3-Hendricks-Hendricks
|
21 |
♠73
♥Q842
♦Q
♣KJ9643
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1♥ 2♠ 2NT ♦6 |
EW: ♣2 ♦6 ♥6 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 2.00 1.00 1N N 3 1-Verkamp-Gaer vs 5-Packer-Osborne
150 2.00 1.00 1N N 3 3-Hendricks-Hendricks vs 4-Sarko-Parker
150 2.00 1.00 1N N 3 7-Pientka-Beuchel vs 2-Dalton-McIntosh
100 0.00 3.00 2♠ S -1 8-Jacobozzi-Zack vs 6-Lowe-Tomkinson
|
22 |
♠Q65
♥J62
♦K852
♣653
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 4♦ 3NT ♥6 ♠6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣4 ♦3 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
400 2.50 0.50 3N S 3 7-Pientka-Beuchel vs 2-Dalton-McIntosh
400 2.50 0.50 3N N 3 3-Hendricks-Hendricks vs 4-Sarko-Parker
120 1.00 2.00 1N S 2 8-Jacobozzi-Zack vs 6-Lowe-Tomkinson
110 0.00 3.00 2♦ S 3 1-Verkamp-Gaer vs 5-Packer-Osborne
|
23 |
♠KT64
♥A9852
♦T9
♣A3
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/1♥ 1♠ ♣5 ♦4 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ 2NT ♥5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 3.00 0.00 2♥ S 2 1-Verkamp-Gaer vs 5-Packer-Osborne
100 2.00 1.00 3♦ W -1 7-Pientka-Beuchel vs 2-Dalton-McIntosh
130 1.00 2.00 3♦ W 4 3-Hendricks-Hendricks vs 4-Sarko-Parker
200 0.00 3.00 3♥ N -2 8-Jacobozzi-Zack vs 6-Lowe-Tomkinson
|
24 |
♠AK83
♥Q974
♦T95
♣J8
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣3 ♦2 ♠4 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 5♦ 3♠ 4NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
400 3.00 0.00 5♦ W 5 3-Hendricks-Hendricks vs 4-Sarko-Parker
430 1.50 1.50 3N W 4 1-Verkamp-Gaer vs 5-Packer-Osborne
430 1.50 1.50 3N W 4 7-Pientka-Beuchel vs 2-Dalton-McIntosh
460 0.00 3.00 3N W 5 8-Jacobozzi-Zack vs 6-Lowe-Tomkinson
|
25 |
♠AK7
♥J954
♦T9754
♣2
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦6 ♥6 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 1♥ 2♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 2.50 0.50 2♦ E -2 1-Verkamp-Gaer vs 3-Hendricks-Hendricks
200 2.50 0.50 2♦ E -2 8-Jacobozzi-Zack vs 7-Pientka-Beuchel
100 1.00 2.00 2♦ E -1 4-Sarko-Parker vs 5-Packer-Osborne
300 0.00 3.00 2N* N -2 2-Dalton-McIntosh vs 6-Lowe-Tomkinson
|
26 |
♠T932
♥J5
♦854
♣T987
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣1/2 ♦1/2 ♥2 NT1/3 |
EW: 5♣ 5♦ 4♥ 1NT ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.00 0.00 5♦ W -1 4-Sarko-Parker vs 5-Packer-Osborne
130 2.00 1.00 3♣ W 4 2-Dalton-McIntosh vs 6-Lowe-Tomkinson
650 0.50 2.50 4♥ E 5 1-Verkamp-Gaer vs 3-Hendricks-Hendricks
650 0.50 2.50 4♥ E 5 8-Jacobozzi-Zack vs 7-Pientka-Beuchel
|
27 |
♠QJ7
♥KT5
♦AJ842
♣J7
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦5 ♥3 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 2♦ 3♥ 1♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 3.00 0.00 3♥ W -1 1-Verkamp-Gaer vs 3-Hendricks-Hendricks
110 2.00 1.00 1♥ W 2 2-Dalton-McIntosh vs 6-Lowe-Tomkinson
170 1.00 2.00 3♥ W 4 8-Jacobozzi-Zack vs 7-Pientka-Beuchel
420 0.00 3.00 4♥ W 4 4-Sarko-Parker vs 5-Packer-Osborne
|
28 |
♠K
♥KT65
♦7
♣AKQ8753
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 5♥ 1NT ♦6 ♠6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣1 ♥1 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
680 3.00 0.00 4♥ N 6 1-Verkamp-Gaer vs 3-Hendricks-Hendricks
650 2.00 1.00 4♥ S 5 4-Sarko-Parker vs 5-Packer-Osborne
600 1.00 2.00 5♣ N 5 2-Dalton-McIntosh vs 6-Lowe-Tomkinson
100 0.00 3.00 4♥ S -1 8-Jacobozzi-Zack vs 7-Pientka-Beuchel
|