1 |
♠AQJT842
♥A8
♦J5
♣K6
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
1010 3.00 0.00 6♠ N 7 3-Beuchel-Osborne vs 7-Robertson-Quiros
510 1.50 1.50 4♠ N 7 2-Calise-Calise vs 4-McIntosh-Dalton
510 1.50 1.50 4♠ N 7 5-Schlect-Kennedy vs 6-Rankin-Parks
480 0.00 3.00 4♠ N 6 8-Sarko-Alleman vs 1-Gaer-Quiros
|
2 |
♠JT875
♥T2
♦AJ63
♣Q5
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 2.00 1.00 3♠ N 3 3-Beuchel-Osborne vs 7-Robertson-Quiros
140 2.00 1.00 3♠ N 3 8-Sarko-Alleman vs 1-Gaer-Quiros
140 2.00 1.00 2♠ N 3 2-Calise-Calise vs 4-McIntosh-Dalton
50 0.00 3.00 3♥ W -1 5-Schlect-Kennedy vs 6-Rankin-Parks
|
3 |
♠Q5
♥AK53
♦KT97
♣KJT
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
530 3.00 0.00 3♥* N 3 3-Beuchel-Osborne vs 7-Robertson-Quiros
430 2.00 1.00 3N N 4 2-Calise-Calise vs 4-McIntosh-Dalton
110 1.00 2.00 2♥ N 2 8-Sarko-Alleman vs 1-Gaer-Quiros
50 0.00 3.00 4♦ S -1 5-Schlect-Kennedy vs 6-Rankin-Parks
|
4 |
♠652
♥KQ63
♦975
♣764
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 3.00 0.00 3♦ E 3 3-Beuchel-Osborne vs 7-Robertson-Quiros
120 1.50 1.50 1N W 2 5-Schlect-Kennedy vs 6-Rankin-Parks
120 1.50 1.50 1N W 2 8-Sarko-Alleman vs 1-Gaer-Quiros
150 0.00 3.00 1N W 3 2-Calise-Calise vs 4-McIntosh-Dalton
|
5 |
♠87
♥KT876
♦T98
♣KQ8
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
680 2.50 0.50 4♥ S 6 3-Beuchel-Osborne vs 5-Schlect-Kennedy
680 2.50 0.50 4♥ S 6 6-Rankin-Parks vs 7-Robertson-Quiros
660 1.00 2.00 3N S 5 4-McIntosh-Dalton vs 1-Gaer-Quiros
100 0.00 3.00 5N S -1 8-Sarko-Alleman vs 2-Calise-Calise
|
6 |
♠84
♥AQJ9
♦K765
♣QJ6
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 3.00 0.00 3N W -2 3-Beuchel-Osborne vs 5-Schlect-Kennedy
600 2.00 1.00 3N E 3 6-Rankin-Parks vs 7-Robertson-Quiros
630 0.50 2.50 3N W 4 8-Sarko-Alleman vs 2-Calise-Calise
630 0.50 2.50 3N E 4 4-McIntosh-Dalton vs 1-Gaer-Quiros
|
7 |
♠KQ9
♥KJ2
♦83
♣KQJ96
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
650 3.00 0.00 4♥ N 5 3-Beuchel-Osborne vs 5-Schlect-Kennedy
100 2.00 1.00 3♠ W -1 6-Rankin-Parks vs 7-Robertson-Quiros
100 0.50 2.50 3♥ S -1 8-Sarko-Alleman vs 2-Calise-Calise
100 0.50 2.50 4♣ N -1 4-McIntosh-Dalton vs 1-Gaer-Quiros
|
8 |
♠K7
♥KQ2
♦J954
♣JT43
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 3.00 0.00 1N N 3 8-Sarko-Alleman vs 2-Calise-Calise
50 1.50 1.50 3♥ W -1 3-Beuchel-Osborne vs 5-Schlect-Kennedy
50 1.50 1.50 2♥ W -1 4-McIntosh-Dalton vs 1-Gaer-Quiros
110 0.00 3.00 2♥ E 2 6-Rankin-Parks vs 7-Robertson-Quiros
|
9 |
♠2
♥J643
♦J93
♣J9863
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
300 3.00 0.00 3♠ W -3 5-Schlect-Kennedy vs 2-Calise-Calise
100 1.50 1.50 3♠ W -1 7-Robertson-Quiros vs 1-Gaer-Quiros
100 1.50 1.50 3♠ W -1 8-Sarko-Alleman vs 3-Beuchel-Osborne
90 0.00 3.00 1N S 1 4-McIntosh-Dalton vs 6-Rankin-Parks
|
10 |
♠T
♥7543
♦AQ74
♣Q953
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 2.50 0.50 4♠ W -1 4-McIntosh-Dalton vs 6-Rankin-Parks
100 2.50 0.50 4♠ W -1 5-Schlect-Kennedy vs 2-Calise-Calise
100 1.00 2.00 5♥ S -1 7-Robertson-Quiros vs 1-Gaer-Quiros
200 0.00 3.00 4♥* S -1 8-Sarko-Alleman vs 3-Beuchel-Osborne
|
11 |
♠KQ2
♥Q83
♦QJT43
♣K4
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
130 2.00 1.00 3♦ N 4 4-McIntosh-Dalton vs 6-Rankin-Parks
130 2.00 1.00 3♦ N 4 5-Schlect-Kennedy vs 2-Calise-Calise
130 2.00 1.00 3♦ N 4 7-Robertson-Quiros vs 1-Gaer-Quiros
50 0.00 3.00 2♠ E -1 8-Sarko-Alleman vs 3-Beuchel-Osborne
|
12 |
♠J4
♥A86
♦AQ8753
♣A5
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
130 2.50 0.50 3♦ N 4 5-Schlect-Kennedy vs 2-Calise-Calise
130 2.50 0.50 3♦ N 4 8-Sarko-Alleman vs 3-Beuchel-Osborne
120 1.00 2.00 1N N 2 4-McIntosh-Dalton vs 6-Rankin-Parks
140 0.00 3.00 3♠ E 3 7-Robertson-Quiros vs 1-Gaer-Quiros
|
13 |
♠QJ
♥6
♦QJ863
♣KQT83
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 2.50 0.50 2♥ S 3 1-Gaer-Quiros vs 2-Calise-Calise
140 2.50 0.50 2♥ S 3 6-Rankin-Parks vs 3-Beuchel-Osborne
100 1.00 2.00 3♣ N -1 8-Sarko-Alleman vs 4-McIntosh-Dalton
800 0.00 3.00 4♣* N -3 5-Schlect-Kennedy vs 7-Robertson-Quiros
|
14 |
♠J64
♥KJT974
♦Q542
♣-
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 3.00 0.00 2♥ N 2 1-Gaer-Quiros vs 2-Calise-Calise
120 2.00 1.00 1N E 2 6-Rankin-Parks vs 3-Beuchel-Osborne
150 1.00 2.00 3♣ E 5 5-Schlect-Kennedy vs 7-Robertson-Quiros
180 0.00 3.00 1N E 4 8-Sarko-Alleman vs 4-McIntosh-Dalton
|
15 |
♠AT6
♥KQT87
♦JT6
♣K5
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
680 3.00 0.00 4♥ N 6 1-Gaer-Quiros vs 2-Calise-Calise
150 2.00 1.00 4♦ S 5 5-Schlect-Kennedy vs 7-Robertson-Quiros
100 0.50 2.50 6♥ N -1 6-Rankin-Parks vs 3-Beuchel-Osborne
100 0.50 2.50 6♥ N -1 8-Sarko-Alleman vs 4-McIntosh-Dalton
|
16 |
♠72
♥AQ9853
♦432
♣A8
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.00 0.00 4♠ E -1 6-Rankin-Parks vs 3-Beuchel-Osborne
140 1.50 1.50 3♠ E 3 8-Sarko-Alleman vs 4-McIntosh-Dalton
140 1.50 1.50 2♠ E 3 1-Gaer-Quiros vs 2-Calise-Calise
630 0.00 3.00 3N W 4 5-Schlect-Kennedy vs 7-Robertson-Quiros
|
17 |
♠Q64
♥T65
♦973
♣A754
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
420 2.50 0.50 4♥ W 4 2-Calise-Calise vs 3-Beuchel-Osborne
420 2.50 0.50 4♥ W 4 8-Sarko-Alleman vs 5-Schlect-Kennedy
450 1.00 2.00 4♥ W 5 7-Robertson-Quiros vs 4-McIntosh-Dalton
480 0.00 3.00 4♥ E 6 6-Rankin-Parks vs 1-Gaer-Quiros
|
18 |
♠JT9632
♥3
♦T92
♣T53
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
420 2.00 1.00 4♥ E 4 6-Rankin-Parks vs 1-Gaer-Quiros
420 2.00 1.00 4♥ E 4 7-Robertson-Quiros vs 4-McIntosh-Dalton
420 2.00 1.00 4♥ E 4 8-Sarko-Alleman vs 5-Schlect-Kennedy
450 0.00 3.00 4♥ E 5 2-Calise-Calise vs 3-Beuchel-Osborne
|
19 |
♠K7
♥QT63
♦QJ4
♣KQ65
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 3.00 0.00 3♦* E -1 6-Rankin-Parks vs 1-Gaer-Quiros
130 2.00 1.00 3♣ N 4 8-Sarko-Alleman vs 5-Schlect-Kennedy
50 1.00 2.00 3♠ S -1 7-Robertson-Quiros vs 4-McIntosh-Dalton
110 0.00 3.00 2♦ E 3 2-Calise-Calise vs 3-Beuchel-Osborne
|
20 |
♠QT8
♥Q43
♦AKT
♣8543
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 2.50 0.50 2N W -2 8-Sarko-Alleman vs 5-Schlect-Kennedy
200 2.50 0.50 2♦ E -2 7-Robertson-Quiros vs 4-McIntosh-Dalton
100 1.00 2.00 1N W -1 6-Rankin-Parks vs 1-Gaer-Quiros
100 0.00 3.00 2♥ S -1 2-Calise-Calise vs 3-Beuchel-Osborne
|
21 |
♠KJ54
♥Q865
♦QJ2
♣93
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
180 3.00 0.00 2N S 4 1-Gaer-Quiros vs 5-Schlect-Kennedy
130 2.00 1.00 3♦ S 4 8-Sarko-Alleman vs 6-Rankin-Parks
120 0.50 2.50 2N S 2 3-Beuchel-Osborne vs 4-McIntosh-Dalton
120 0.50 2.50 2N S 2 7-Robertson-Quiros vs 2-Calise-Calise
|
22 |
♠K43
♥QT9
♦743
♣6543
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
300 3.00 0.00 2N E -3 1-Gaer-Quiros vs 5-Schlect-Kennedy
130 2.00 1.00 3♦ E 4 8-Sarko-Alleman vs 6-Rankin-Parks
620 1.00 2.00 4♥ W 4 3-Beuchel-Osborne vs 4-McIntosh-Dalton
630 0.00 3.00 3N W 4 7-Robertson-Quiros vs 2-Calise-Calise
|
23 |
♠KJ532
♥AKJ
♦KT
♣A96
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 3.00 0.00 2N N 3 1-Gaer-Quiros vs 5-Schlect-Kennedy
80 2.00 1.00 1♠ N 1 8-Sarko-Alleman vs 6-Rankin-Parks
100 1.00 2.00 3N S -1 7-Robertson-Quiros vs 2-Calise-Calise
200 0.00 3.00 3N S -2 3-Beuchel-Osborne vs 4-McIntosh-Dalton
|
24 |
♠A9863
♥954
♦J
♣KJ93
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
500 3.00 0.00 4♦* W -3 1-Gaer-Quiros vs 5-Schlect-Kennedy
150 2.00 1.00 3N E -3 7-Robertson-Quiros vs 2-Calise-Calise
110 1.00 2.00 2♦ W 3 8-Sarko-Alleman vs 6-Rankin-Parks
130 0.00 3.00 2♦ W 4 3-Beuchel-Osborne vs 4-McIntosh-Dalton
|
25 |
♠AKT97
♥Q9
♦K964
♣Q2
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.00 0.00 3♥ E -1 4-McIntosh-Dalton vs 5-Schlect-Kennedy
170 1.50 1.50 3♥ E 4 8-Sarko-Alleman vs 7-Robertson-Quiros
170 1.50 1.50 2♥ E 4 2-Calise-Calise vs 6-Rankin-Parks
620 0.00 3.00 4♥ E 4 1-Gaer-Quiros vs 3-Beuchel-Osborne
|
26 |
♠JT864
♥6
♦Q932
♣743
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.00 0.00 2♦ N -1 1-Gaer-Quiros vs 3-Beuchel-Osborne
150 2.00 1.00 2N W 3 4-McIntosh-Dalton vs 5-Schlect-Kennedy
800 0.50 2.50 2♥* S -3 2-Calise-Calise vs 6-Rankin-Parks
800 0.50 2.50 1♥* S -3 8-Sarko-Alleman vs 7-Robertson-Quiros
|
27 |
♠7
♥Q854
♦T9542
♣Q53
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 3.00 0.00 3♦ S -1 4-McIntosh-Dalton vs 5-Schlect-Kennedy
100 2.00 1.00 1♠ S -2 1-Gaer-Quiros vs 3-Beuchel-Osborne
110 1.00 2.00 3♣ E 3 8-Sarko-Alleman vs 7-Robertson-Quiros
210 0.00 3.00 2N E 5 2-Calise-Calise vs 6-Rankin-Parks
|
28 |
♠KJT943
♥AK8
♦6
♣K73
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.00 0.00 3♠ N -1 8-Sarko-Alleman vs 7-Robertson-Quiros
110 2.00 1.00 3♦ W 3 4-McIntosh-Dalton vs 5-Schlect-Kennedy
120 1.00 2.00 1N E 2 2-Calise-Calise vs 6-Rankin-Parks
130 0.00 3.00 3♦ E 4 1-Gaer-Quiros vs 3-Beuchel-Osborne
|