1 |
♠AT7
♥3
♦72
♣AQJ9853
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 4♠ 2NT ♥4 |
EW: 2♥ ♣3 ♦5 ♠3/2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
420 2.00 0.00 4♠ S 4 6-Tracey-Joselit-Bartick vs 1-Banucci-Sells
400 1.00 1.00 3N S 3 2-Fordon-Gillette vs 4-Jacobson-Daley
50 0.00 2.00 5♣ N -1 3-Oditt-Bartick vs 5-Jones-Beckvall
|
2 |
♠987
♥AQ654
♦94
♣AT4
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5/4 ♦3 ♥5 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 4♦ 2♥ 2♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
130 2.00 0.00 3♦ E 4 6-Tracey-Joselit-Bartick vs 1-Banucci-Sells
170 1.00 1.00 1♠ E 4 2-Fordon-Gillette vs 4-Jacobson-Daley
400 0.00 2.00 3N E 3 3-Oditt-Bartick vs 5-Jones-Beckvall
|
3 |
♠J984
♥T8
♦QT6
♣T975
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ 1♠ 2NT ♥5 |
EW: 2♥ ♣5 ♦5 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
120 1.50 0.50 2N S 2 6-Tracey-Joselit-Bartick vs 1-Banucci-Sells
120 1.50 0.50 1N S 2 3-Oditt-Bartick vs 5-Jones-Beckvall
100 0.00 2.00 3N* S -1 2-Fordon-Gillette vs 4-Jacobson-Daley
|
4 |
♠AKT762
♥T43
♦T7
♣Q5
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♥ 1♠ 1NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣6/5 ♥5/6 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 1.75 0.25 2♠ N -1 3-Oditt-Bartick vs 5-Jones-Beckvall
200 0.25 1.75 2♠ N -2 6-Tracey-Joselit-Bartick vs 1-Banucci-Sells
|
5 |
♠AJ
♥J9
♦876
♣Q97542
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦6 ♥5 ♠3 NT5 |
EW: 2♥ 4♠ 2NT ♣5 ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 1.75 0.25 2♠ W 4 6-Tracey-Joselit-Bartick vs 1-Banucci-Sells
300 0.25 1.75 1N N -3 3-Oditt-Bartick vs 5-Jones-Beckvall
|
6 |
♠JT4
♥7
♦J75
♣AKQ742
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 5♠ 3NT ♦4 ♥4 |
EW: 2♦ 3♥ ♣1 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
420 2.00 0.00 4♠ S 4 3-Oditt-Bartick vs 4-Jacobson-Daley
140 1.00 1.00 3♠ S 3 6-Tracey-Joselit-Bartick vs 2-Fordon-Gillette
110 0.00 2.00 3♦ W 3 5-Jones-Beckvall vs 1-Banucci-Sells
|
7 |
♠KQT
♥T
♦JT76
♣KJ742
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/1♣ 2♥ ♦4 ♠2 NT6 |
EW: 3♦ 5♠ 1NT ♣5 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 2.00 0.00 4♥ S -2 5-Jones-Beckvall vs 1-Banucci-Sells
400 1.00 1.00 3N N -4 6-Tracey-Joselit-Bartick vs 2-Fordon-Gillette
990 0.00 2.00 4♠* E 5 3-Oditt-Bartick vs 4-Jacobson-Daley
|
8 |
♠A92
♥AQT2
♦85
♣T654
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦4 ♥4 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 1/3♣ 2/3♦ 3♥ 2♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
90 2.00 0.00 2♦ E 2 6-Tracey-Joselit-Bartick vs 2-Fordon-Gillette
400 0.50 1.50 3N W 3 5-Jones-Beckvall vs 1-Banucci-Sells
400 0.50 1.50 3N E 3 3-Oditt-Bartick vs 4-Jacobson-Daley
|
9 |
♠Q2
♥T862
♦AQJ7
♣AJ7
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♠ ♣5 ♥6 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ -/1♥ ♦5 ♥6/7 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 2.00 0.00 3♣ W -1 6-Tracey-Joselit-Bartick vs 2-Fordon-Gillette
90 1.00 1.00 1N W 1 3-Oditt-Bartick vs 4-Jacobson-Daley
100 0.00 2.00 1N N -2 5-Jones-Beckvall vs 1-Banucci-Sells
|
10 |
♠Q97
♥K
♦4
♣JT987632
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ ♦3 ♥4 ♠6/5 NT3 |
EW: 4♦ 3♥ 1♠ 3NT ♣3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 1.75 0.25 5♣ N -1 6-Tracey-Joselit-Bartick vs 2-Fordon-Gillette
1700 0.25 1.75 3N* S -6 5-Jones-Beckvall vs 1-Banucci-Sells
|
11 |
♠964
♥AK93
♦T
♣QT863
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 7♣ 2/3♦ 2♥ 5♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣0 ♦4 ♥5 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
920 2.00 0.00 6♣ S 6 1-Banucci-Sells vs 2-Fordon-Gillette
460 1.00 1.00 3N S 5 6-Tracey-Joselit-Bartick vs 3-Oditt-Bartick
170 0.00 2.00 2♠ S 4 4-Jacobson-Daley vs 5-Jones-Beckvall
|
12 |
♠T975
♥A83
♦7
♣T9432
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5/4 ♦4 ♥4/3 ♠5/4 NT4/3 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ 3♥ 2♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 1.50 0.50 3N W -1 1-Banucci-Sells vs 2-Fordon-Gillette
50 1.50 0.50 3N E -1 4-Jacobson-Daley vs 5-Jones-Beckvall
140 0.00 2.00 2♥ E 3 6-Tracey-Joselit-Bartick vs 3-Oditt-Bartick
|
13 |
♠J73
♥83
♦QT85
♣QJ94
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ 3NT ♥5 ♠6 |
EW: 2/1♥ 1♠ ♣4/3 ♦6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 2.00 0.00 4♥ E -2 6-Tracey-Joselit-Bartick vs 3-Oditt-Bartick
130 1.00 1.00 2♣ S 4 4-Jacobson-Daley vs 5-Jones-Beckvall
100 0.00 2.00 4♥ E -1 1-Banucci-Sells vs 2-Fordon-Gillette
|
14 |
♠A83
♥8
♦AKJ85
♣K873
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 2♠ 1NT ♣6 ♥4 |
EW: 2♥ ♣6 ♦3 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 2.00 0.00 5♦ N -1 4-Jacobson-Daley vs 5-Jones-Beckvall
100 0.50 1.50 4♠ S -2 1-Banucci-Sells vs 2-Fordon-Gillette
100 0.50 1.50 5♦ N -2 6-Tracey-Joselit-Bartick vs 3-Oditt-Bartick
|
15 |
♠T72
♥KJ87
♦AT76
♣94
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 1♠ -/1NT ♣5 ♦5 NT6/7 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ ♥5 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 2.00 0.00 3N E -4 1-Banucci-Sells vs 2-Fordon-Gillette
50 0.50 1.50 3♦ W -1 6-Tracey-Joselit-Bartick vs 3-Oditt-Bartick
50 0.50 1.50 2♦ W -1 4-Jacobson-Daley vs 5-Jones-Beckvall
|
16 |
♠AKQJ52
♥AK5
♦AT2
♣9
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 5♦ 3/2♥ 4♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦2 ♥4 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
420 2.00 0.00 4♠ N 4 5-Jones-Beckvall vs 2-Fordon-Gillette
400 1.00 1.00 5♦ S 5 1-Banucci-Sells vs 3-Oditt-Bartick
170 0.00 2.00 3♠ N 4 6-Tracey-Joselit-Bartick vs 4-Jacobson-Daley
|
17 |
♠KQ
♥AJT2
♦J942
♣KJ8
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦6 ♥6 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 1♥ 3♠ 1NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 1.50 0.50 2♥ N -1 5-Jones-Beckvall vs 2-Fordon-Gillette
50 1.50 0.50 2♦ N -1 6-Tracey-Joselit-Bartick vs 4-Jacobson-Daley
120 0.00 2.00 2N E 2 1-Banucci-Sells vs 3-Oditt-Bartick
|
18 |
♠AKT
♥654
♦876
♣J432
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♥ 3NT ♦6 ♠6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣2 ♥2 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 2.00 0.00 2♥ S 5 1-Banucci-Sells vs 3-Oditt-Bartick
170 1.00 1.00 2♥ S 4 5-Jones-Beckvall vs 2-Fordon-Gillette
140 0.00 2.00 2♥ S 3 6-Tracey-Joselit-Bartick vs 4-Jacobson-Daley
|
19 |
♠742
♥AT74
♦J8
♣JT53
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♥ 2NT ♣6 ♦6 ♠5 |
EW: 1♠ ♣4 ♦6 ♥3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 1.50 0.50 3♥ S 3 5-Jones-Beckvall vs 2-Fordon-Gillette
140 1.50 0.50 3♥ S 3 6-Tracey-Joselit-Bartick vs 4-Jacobson-Daley
110 0.00 2.00 1♠ E 2 1-Banucci-Sells vs 3-Oditt-Bartick
|
20 |
♠T742
♥K63
♦K7
♣AQ82
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♥ ♦2 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 3♦ 2♠ 1NT ♣4 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 2.00 0.00 4♠ W -2 1-Banucci-Sells vs 3-Oditt-Bartick
100 1.00 1.00 3♠ W -1 6-Tracey-Joselit-Bartick vs 4-Jacobson-Daley
140 0.00 2.00 3♠ W 3 5-Jones-Beckvall vs 2-Fordon-Gillette
|
21 |
♠9632
♥862
♦K874
♣QJ
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ ♣6 ♥1 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 1♣ 5♥ 1♠ 1NT ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
450 1.00 1.00 4♥ E 5 4-Jacobson-Daley vs 1-Banucci-Sells
450 1.00 1.00 4♥ E 5 6-Tracey-Joselit-Bartick vs 5-Jones-Beckvall
|
22 |
♠T
♥T873
♦53
♣AJ9876
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♠ 2NT ♦5 ♥6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣1 ♥6 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 1.75 0.25 3♠ S 4 6-Tracey-Joselit-Bartick vs 5-Jones-Beckvall
50 0.25 1.75 2♠ S -1 4-Jacobson-Daley vs 1-Banucci-Sells
|