1 |
♠-
♥QJ542
♦QT982
♣865
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 5♦ 1♥ 2NT ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣2/3 ♦1/2 ♥6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
130 1.50 0.50 3♦ S 4 1-Max-Beckvall vs 1-Back-Rothman
130 1.50 0.50 3♦ S 4 2-Nia-Glaser vs 3-Kennedy-Schlect
100 0.00 2.00 3♠ E -2 3-Kalman-Araghi vs 2-Laybourne-Buri
|
2 |
♠8642
♥T83
♦A83
♣KJ9
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣5 ♦4 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ 3♠ 1NT ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 1.50 0.50 3N W -1 2-Nia-Glaser vs 3-Kennedy-Schlect
50 1.50 0.50 4♠ E -1 1-Max-Beckvall vs 1-Back-Rothman
400 0.00 2.00 3N W 3 3-Kalman-Araghi vs 2-Laybourne-Buri
|
3 |
♠T96
♥KT93
♦A87
♣T83
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3/2♣ 5♦ 2♥ 5♠ 5/4NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦2 ♥5 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
430 2.00 0.00 3N S 4 1-Max-Beckvall vs 1-Back-Rothman
200 1.00 1.00 1♠ S 5 2-Nia-Glaser vs 3-Kennedy-Schlect
180 0.00 2.00 1N S 4 3-Kalman-Araghi vs 2-Laybourne-Buri
|
4 |
♠-
♥QT86
♦T9832
♣KT87
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 4♥ ♣6 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♠ ♦3/4 ♥3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
500 2.00 0.00 3♠* W -2 3-Kalman-Araghi vs 2-Laybourne-Buri
200 1.00 1.00 3♠ W -2 2-Nia-Glaser vs 3-Kennedy-Schlect
140 0.00 2.00 2♠ W 3 1-Max-Beckvall vs 1-Back-Rothman
|
5 |
♠63
♥K8654
♦4
♣AJ652
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 4♥ ♣6 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 1NT ♦5 ♥2 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 2.00 0.00 3♠ E 3 3-Kalman-Araghi vs 2-Laybourne-Buri
170 1.00 1.00 3♠ E 4 2-Nia-Glaser vs 3-Kennedy-Schlect
420 0.00 2.00 4♠ E 4 1-Max-Beckvall vs 1-Back-Rothman
|
6 |
♠K73
♥753
♦Q4
♣AK532
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 3♦ 2♥ 3NT ♠5 |
EW: 2♠ ♣2 ♦3 ♥5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
400 2.00 0.00 3N N 3 3-Kalman-Araghi vs 1-Back-Rothman
150 1.00 1.00 3♣ N 5 2-Nia-Glaser vs 2-Laybourne-Buri
130 0.00 2.00 3♣ N 4 1-Max-Beckvall vs 3-Kennedy-Schlect
|
7 |
♠Q3
♥K43
♦K765
♣Q942
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣5/4 ♦2 ♥2 NT3 |
EW: 2♣ 5♦ 5♥ 4NT ♠5/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 1.50 0.50 3♠ S 3 1-Max-Beckvall vs 3-Kennedy-Schlect
140 1.50 0.50 3♠ S 3 3-Kalman-Araghi vs 1-Back-Rothman
200 0.00 2.00 4♠ S -2 2-Nia-Glaser vs 2-Laybourne-Buri
|
8 |
♠AKT98
♥AT
♦Q94
♣AT3
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♥ 5♠ 2NT ♣5 |
EW: 1/2♣ ♦5 ♥5/6 ♠2 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
450 2.00 0.00 4♠ N 5 3-Kalman-Araghi vs 1-Back-Rothman
200 1.00 1.00 2♠ N 5 1-Max-Beckvall vs 3-Kennedy-Schlect
140 0.00 2.00 3♠ N 3 2-Nia-Glaser vs 2-Laybourne-Buri
|
9 |
♠43
♥T53
♦J972
♣AT42
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♥ ♦6 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 1♦ 3♠ ♣6/5 ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 1.50 0.50 4♠ E -1 1-Max-Beckvall vs 3-Kennedy-Schlect
100 1.50 0.50 2♠ W -1 2-Nia-Glaser vs 2-Laybourne-Buri
110 0.00 2.00 2♠ W 2 3-Kalman-Araghi vs 1-Back-Rothman
|
10 |
♠J94
♥AJ4
♦K76543
♣Q
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦6 ♥3 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 3♥ 4♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 2.00 0.00 3♥ W 4 3-Kalman-Araghi vs 1-Back-Rothman
200 1.00 1.00 3♠ W 5 2-Nia-Glaser vs 2-Laybourne-Buri
660 0.00 2.00 3N E 5 1-Max-Beckvall vs 3-Kennedy-Schlect
|
11 |
♠J3
♥A8764
♦AJ
♣7642
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/1♣ ♦4 ♥3 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 3♦ 4♥ 4♠ 3NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 2.00 0.00 2♠ W 4 1-Max-Beckvall vs 2-Laybourne-Buri
420 0.50 1.50 4♠ E 4 2-Nia-Glaser vs 1-Back-Rothman
420 0.50 1.50 4♠ E 4 3-Kalman-Araghi vs 3-Kennedy-Schlect
|
12 |
♠AKJ2
♥QJ9875
♦76
♣Q
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♥ 4♠ ♦3 NT4 |
EW: 3♦ 2NT ♣5 ♥4 ♠3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 1.50 0.50 3♥ N -1 1-Max-Beckvall vs 2-Laybourne-Buri
100 1.50 0.50 3♥ N -1 2-Nia-Glaser vs 1-Back-Rothman
130 0.00 2.00 4♦ W 4 3-Kalman-Araghi vs 3-Kennedy-Schlect
|
13 |
♠9862
♥T
♦KT9
♣AT632
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2/1♠ 1NT ♦6 ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣5 ♦6 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 2.00 0.00 2♠ N 2 2-Nia-Glaser vs 1-Back-Rothman
100 0.50 1.50 2♠ N -1 1-Max-Beckvall vs 2-Laybourne-Buri
100 0.50 1.50 1♥ S -1 3-Kalman-Araghi vs 3-Kennedy-Schlect
|
14 |
♠T8543
♥K94
♦T3
♣K54
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ ♣5 ♦5 ♥5 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 2♥ ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 1.50 0.50 2♥ W 2 2-Nia-Glaser vs 1-Back-Rothman
110 1.50 0.50 2♣ E 3 1-Max-Beckvall vs 2-Laybourne-Buri
120 0.00 2.00 2N E 2 3-Kalman-Araghi vs 3-Kennedy-Schlect
|
15 |
♠85
♥3
♦AKJ6432
♣A94
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 5♦ 3♠ 2NT ♥5 |
EW: 2♥ ♣2 ♦1 ♠3 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
720 2.00 0.00 3N S 7 3-Kalman-Araghi vs 3-Kennedy-Schlect
150 1.00 1.00 3♦ N 5 1-Max-Beckvall vs 2-Laybourne-Buri
200 0.00 2.00 4♣ S -2 2-Nia-Glaser vs 1-Back-Rothman
|