1 |
♠QT873
♥KT73
♦QJ
♣J9
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ 1NT ♣5 ♦5 ♥4 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 2♥ ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.00 1.00 4♥ W -2 1-Kokjohn-Helmick vs 1-Schrader-Armell
100 3.00 1.00 2♥ W -2 5-Buri-Johnston vs 5-Kirdani-Highsmith
100 3.00 1.00 2♦ E -2 4-Jones-Farnham vs 4-Brewer-Lusby
50 0.50 3.50 3♠ N -1 2-Sunenshine-Sunenshine vs 2-Clarke-Babits
50 0.50 3.50 2♠ N -1 3-Verheyden-McElroy vs 3-Jones-Daley
|
2 |
♠2
♥QJ85
♦Q8542
♣A65
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 3♥ ♣2 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 2♠ 1NT ♦5 ♥3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 4.00 0.00 4♠* E -1 4-Jones-Farnham vs 4-Brewer-Lusby
130 3.00 1.00 3♣ W 4 2-Sunenshine-Sunenshine vs 2-Clarke-Babits
140 1.00 3.00 3♠ E 3 3-Verheyden-McElroy vs 3-Jones-Daley
140 1.00 3.00 2♠ E 3 1-Kokjohn-Helmick vs 1-Schrader-Armell
140 1.00 3.00 2♠ E 3 5-Buri-Johnston vs 5-Kirdani-Highsmith
|
3 |
♠J9854
♥A
♦93
♣AQ542
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♥ 2♠ ♦5 NT6 |
EW: 1NT ♣5 ♦6 ♥4 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
420 4.00 0.00 4♥ S 4 4-Jones-Farnham vs 3-Jones-Daley
140 3.00 1.00 2♥ S 3 5-Buri-Johnston vs 4-Brewer-Lusby
110 2.00 2.00 2♥ S 2 2-Sunenshine-Sunenshine vs 1-Schrader-Armell
50 1.00 3.00 3♥ S -1 6-Smith-Bender vs 5-Kirdani-Highsmith
150 0.00 4.00 3N N -3 3-Verheyden-McElroy vs 2-Clarke-Babits
|
4 |
♠AJ762
♥K
♦9862
♣KT6
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ 3♠ 2NT ♥5 |
EW: 2♥ ♣6 ♦5 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 4.00 0.00 2♠ N 3 5-Buri-Johnston vs 4-Brewer-Lusby
110 2.50 1.50 2♠ N 2 2-Sunenshine-Sunenshine vs 1-Schrader-Armell
110 2.50 1.50 2♠ N 2 3-Verheyden-McElroy vs 2-Clarke-Babits
100 0.50 3.50 3♠ N -1 4-Jones-Farnham vs 3-Jones-Daley
100 0.50 3.50 3♠ N -1 6-Smith-Bender vs 5-Kirdani-Highsmith
|
5 |
♠KQJ
♥J42
♦AQ3
♣KQ52
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ 2/-NT ♣6 ♦4 ♥4 NT8/6 |
EW: 1♣ 3♦ 2♥ ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
600 4.00 0.00 3N N 3 4-Jones-Farnham vs 2-Clarke-Babits
110 3.00 1.00 2♠ S 2 6-Smith-Bender vs 4-Brewer-Lusby
100 1.50 2.50 1N N -1 1-Kokjohn-Helmick vs 5-Kirdani-Highsmith
100 1.50 2.50 4♠ S -1 5-Buri-Johnston vs 3-Jones-Daley
200 0.00 4.00 3N N -2 3-Verheyden-McElroy vs 1-Schrader-Armell
|
6 |
♠J86
♥T7
♦A942
♣Q943
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ ♣3/2 ♥4 ♠3 NT5/4 |
EW: 4♣ 3♥ 4♠ 1NT ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
300 3.50 0.50 3N E -3 4-Jones-Farnham vs 2-Clarke-Babits
300 3.50 0.50 3N E -3 5-Buri-Johnston vs 3-Jones-Daley
200 1.00 3.00 3N E -2 1-Kokjohn-Helmick vs 5-Kirdani-Highsmith
200 1.00 3.00 3N E -2 3-Verheyden-McElroy vs 1-Schrader-Armell
200 1.00 3.00 3N E -2 6-Smith-Bender vs 4-Brewer-Lusby
|
7 |
♠765
♥Q
♦AKT942
♣T54
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♠ ♣5 ♥5 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 2♥ 2NT ♦6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 4.00 0.00 2♥ E -1 6-Smith-Bender vs 3-Jones-Daley
100 3.00 1.00 2♠ S -1 5-Buri-Johnston vs 2-Clarke-Babits
110 2.00 2.00 2♥ E 2 1-Kokjohn-Helmick vs 4-Brewer-Lusby
140 0.50 3.50 2♥ E 3 2-Sunenshine-Sunenshine vs 5-Kirdani-Highsmith
140 0.50 3.50 2♥ E 3 4-Jones-Farnham vs 1-Schrader-Armell
|
8 |
♠T532
♥K7642
♦AT4
♣8
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ ♣6 ♥6 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 1/-♣ 1/-♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣7/6 ♦4 ♥7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.50 0.50 4♠ E -2 4-Jones-Farnham vs 1-Schrader-Armell
100 3.50 0.50 2♣ W -2 2-Sunenshine-Sunenshine vs 5-Kirdani-Highsmith
90 2.00 2.00 2♦ S 2 6-Smith-Bender vs 3-Jones-Daley
50 0.50 3.50 2N W -1 5-Buri-Johnston vs 2-Clarke-Babits
50 0.50 3.50 2♠ W -1 1-Kokjohn-Helmick vs 4-Brewer-Lusby
|
9 |
♠T42
♥T9
♦KQJ62
♣J63
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣1 ♥5 ♠5 NT3 |
EW: 5♣ 1♥ 3NT ♦6/5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
130 3.50 0.50 3♣ E 4 1-Kokjohn-Helmick vs 3-Jones-Daley
130 3.50 0.50 2♣ E 4 2-Sunenshine-Sunenshine vs 4-Brewer-Lusby
150 1.50 2.50 3♦ N -3 6-Smith-Bender vs 2-Clarke-Babits
150 1.50 2.50 2♣ E 5 5-Buri-Johnston vs 1-Schrader-Armell
600 0.00 4.00 5♣ E 5 3-Verheyden-McElroy vs 5-Kirdani-Highsmith
|
10 |
♠J7
♥J632
♦AT87
♣J96
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 1♥ ♠3 NT6 |
EW: 2♠ ♣6 ♦5 ♥5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 4.00 0.00 2♥ N 2 1-Kokjohn-Helmick vs 3-Jones-Daley
100 3.00 1.00 4♠ W -1 2-Sunenshine-Sunenshine vs 4-Brewer-Lusby
100 2.00 2.00 2♥ N -1 6-Smith-Bender vs 2-Clarke-Babits
140 1.00 3.00 2♠ W 3 5-Buri-Johnston vs 1-Schrader-Armell
200 0.00 4.00 2♥ N -2 3-Verheyden-McElroy vs 5-Kirdani-Highsmith
|
11 |
♠KJ743
♥94
♦KT763
♣2
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 4♠ 2NT ♣6 ♥5 |
EW: 1♣ 1♥ ♦4 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
450 4.00 0.00 4♠ S 5 6-Smith-Bender vs 1-Schrader-Armell
140 2.50 1.50 2♠ S 3 2-Sunenshine-Sunenshine vs 3-Jones-Daley
140 2.50 1.50 2♠ N 3 1-Kokjohn-Helmick vs 2-Clarke-Babits
50 1.00 3.00 2N S -1 4-Jones-Farnham vs 5-Kirdani-Highsmith
150 0.00 4.00 4♠ S -3 3-Verheyden-McElroy vs 4-Brewer-Lusby
|
12 |
♠QT72
♥T9842
♦8
♣JT5
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 1♠ 1NT ♣6 ♥5 |
EW: 1♣ 2♥ ♦2 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
130 4.00 0.00 3♦ S 4 1-Kokjohn-Helmick vs 2-Clarke-Babits
110 3.00 1.00 2♦ S 3 3-Verheyden-McElroy vs 4-Brewer-Lusby
50 2.00 2.00 3♥ E -1 4-Jones-Farnham vs 5-Kirdani-Highsmith
140 1.00 3.00 3♥ E 3 2-Sunenshine-Sunenshine vs 3-Jones-Daley
200 0.00 4.00 4♠ N -2 6-Smith-Bender vs 1-Schrader-Armell
|