1 |
♠T2
♥T543
♦J76
♣A983
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦2 ♥5 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 3♣ 5♦ 2♥ 5♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 5.00 0.00 2♠ W 4 3-Passon-Levine vs 5-Belton-Snider
430 4.00 1.00 3N E 4 6-McClintock-Ashby vs 6-Stone-Hargest
460 1.50 3.50 3N E 5 1-Matthews-Beckvall vs 1-Glassman-Mattrey
460 1.50 3.50 3N E 5 2-Baronofsky-Paley vs 3-Mattingly-Mattingly
460 1.50 3.50 3N E 5 4-Thomas-Orr vs 2-Galloway-Morse
460 1.50 3.50 3N E 5 5-Urben-Goldstein vs 4-Segal-Kerster
|
2 |
♠KJT94
♥T7
♦K5
♣QT85
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣6 ♦2 ♥6 NT5 |
EW: 5♦ 1♥ 1NT ♣6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
90 5.00 0.00 1N W 1 3-Passon-Levine vs 5-Belton-Snider
100 4.00 1.00 2♠ N -1 5-Urben-Goldstein vs 4-Segal-Kerster
130 2.50 2.50 3♦ E 4 2-Baronofsky-Paley vs 3-Mattingly-Mattingly
130 2.50 2.50 3♦ E 4 4-Thomas-Orr vs 2-Galloway-Morse
150 0.50 4.50 3♦ E 5 1-Matthews-Beckvall vs 1-Glassman-Mattrey
150 0.50 4.50 3♦ E 5 6-McClintock-Ashby vs 6-Stone-Hargest
|
3 |
♠A
♥A964
♦7654
♣8765
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 4♥ 1NT ♦5 ♠6 |
EW: 1♦ 1♠ ♣5 ♥3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
590 5.00 0.00 4♥* S 4 6-McClintock-Ashby vs 6-Stone-Hargest
170 3.50 1.50 3♥ S 4 2-Baronofsky-Paley vs 3-Mattingly-Mattingly
170 3.50 1.50 3♥ S 4 3-Passon-Levine vs 5-Belton-Snider
140 2.00 3.00 3♥ S 3 4-Thomas-Orr vs 2-Galloway-Morse
100 1.00 4.00 4♥* S -1 1-Matthews-Beckvall vs 1-Glassman-Mattrey
110 0.00 5.00 3♦ E 3 5-Urben-Goldstein vs 4-Segal-Kerster
|
4 |
♠QT73
♥7652
♦8
♣KJ62
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♥ 4♠ ♣5 ♦4 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 2/3♦ ♥3 ♠3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
300 4.50 0.50 3N E -3 2-Baronofsky-Paley vs 3-Mattingly-Mattingly
300 4.50 0.50 4♣ W -3 3-Passon-Levine vs 5-Belton-Snider
170 3.00 2.00 3♠ S 4 5-Urben-Goldstein vs 4-Segal-Kerster
100 2.00 3.00 4♦ W -1 4-Thomas-Orr vs 2-Galloway-Morse
100 1.00 4.00 3♠ S -1 6-McClintock-Ashby vs 6-Stone-Hargest
110 0.00 5.00 3♦ W 3 1-Matthews-Beckvall vs 1-Glassman-Mattrey
|
5 |
♠K64
♥Q986
♦KQ52
♣Q4
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦4 ♥6 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 3♦ 1♥ 3♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 5.00 0.00 1♥ S -1 5-Urben-Goldstein vs 3-Mattingly-Mattingly
140 4.00 1.00 1♠ E 3 2-Baronofsky-Paley vs 2-Galloway-Morse
150 3.00 2.00 2N W 3 1-Matthews-Beckvall vs 6-Stone-Hargest
170 2.00 3.00 1♠ E 4 3-Passon-Levine vs 4-Segal-Kerster
200 1.00 4.00 2♥ S -2 4-Thomas-Orr vs 1-Glassman-Mattrey
300 0.00 5.00 3♥ N -3 6-McClintock-Ashby vs 5-Belton-Snider
|
6 |
♠J32
♥7
♦Q9863
♣QJ53
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ ♥4 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 2♥ 2♠ ♣4 ♦5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 5.00 0.00 2♦ N 3 4-Thomas-Orr vs 1-Glassman-Mattrey
110 3.00 2.00 2♠ W 2 2-Baronofsky-Paley vs 2-Galloway-Morse
110 3.00 2.00 2♠ W 2 3-Passon-Levine vs 4-Segal-Kerster
110 3.00 2.00 2♠ W 2 6-McClintock-Ashby vs 5-Belton-Snider
140 0.50 4.50 3♠ W 3 5-Urben-Goldstein vs 3-Mattingly-Mattingly
140 0.50 4.50 2♠ W 3 1-Matthews-Beckvall vs 6-Stone-Hargest
|
7 |
♠A76543
♥A
♦AT53
♣74
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ 1NT ♣2 ♥3 ♠5/6 |
EW: 2♣ 4♥ ♦1 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
600 3.50 1.50 5♦ S 5 2-Baronofsky-Paley vs 2-Galloway-Morse
600 3.50 1.50 5♦ S 5 3-Passon-Levine vs 4-Segal-Kerster
600 3.50 1.50 5♦ S 5 5-Urben-Goldstein vs 3-Mattingly-Mattingly
600 3.50 1.50 5♦ S 5 6-McClintock-Ashby vs 5-Belton-Snider
130 1.00 4.00 4♦ S 4 1-Matthews-Beckvall vs 6-Stone-Hargest
200 0.00 5.00 5♦* S -1 4-Thomas-Orr vs 1-Glassman-Mattrey
|
8 |
♠K74
♥KQ972
♦Q
♣6532
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1/-♦ 4♥ 2NT ♦7/6 ♠6 |
EW: ♣4 ♦6 ♥3 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
420 5.00 0.00 4♥ N 4 2-Baronofsky-Paley vs 2-Galloway-Morse
140 3.50 1.50 3♥ N 3 6-McClintock-Ashby vs 5-Belton-Snider
140 3.50 1.50 1♥ N 3 5-Urben-Goldstein vs 3-Mattingly-Mattingly
100 2.00 3.00 3♠ E -2 3-Passon-Levine vs 4-Segal-Kerster
50 0.50 4.50 2♠ E -1 1-Matthews-Beckvall vs 6-Stone-Hargest
50 0.50 4.50 2♠ E -1 4-Thomas-Orr vs 1-Glassman-Mattrey
|
9 |
♠8
♥KT92
♦QJ75
♣Q742
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣6 ♥6 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 1/-♥ 1♠ 1NT ♦6 ♥7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 5.00 0.00 3♥ W -2 1-Matthews-Beckvall vs 5-Belton-Snider
100 3.50 1.50 1N E -1 2-Baronofsky-Paley vs 1-Glassman-Mattrey
100 3.50 1.50 1N E -1 6-McClintock-Ashby vs 4-Segal-Kerster
90 1.50 3.50 1N E 1 4-Thomas-Orr vs 6-Stone-Hargest
90 1.50 3.50 1♦ E 2 5-Urben-Goldstein vs 2-Galloway-Morse
100 0.00 5.00 2♠ S -2 3-Passon-Levine vs 3-Mattingly-Mattingly
|
10 |
♠62
♥Q9
♦98632
♣KT53
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦5 ♥4 ♠3 NT5/4 |
EW: 3♣ 2♦ 3♥ 4/3♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 4.50 0.50 3N W -1 2-Baronofsky-Paley vs 1-Glassman-Mattrey
100 4.50 0.50 3N W -1 3-Passon-Levine vs 3-Mattingly-Mattingly
150 3.00 2.00 2N W 3 5-Urben-Goldstein vs 2-Galloway-Morse
210 2.00 3.00 2N E 5 6-McClintock-Ashby vs 4-Segal-Kerster
600 1.00 4.00 3N E 3 4-Thomas-Orr vs 6-Stone-Hargest
630 0.00 5.00 3N E 4 1-Matthews-Beckvall vs 5-Belton-Snider
|
11 |
♠832
♥T4
♦K864
♣A742
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ ♥3 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 4♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣4 ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 5.00 0.00 3♣ S 3 2-Baronofsky-Paley vs 1-Glassman-Mattrey
110 4.00 1.00 1♠ W 2 3-Passon-Levine vs 3-Mattingly-Mattingly
140 3.00 2.00 2♥ W 3 6-McClintock-Ashby vs 4-Segal-Kerster
170 2.00 3.00 3♥ W 4 1-Matthews-Beckvall vs 5-Belton-Snider
420 1.00 4.00 4♥ W 4 5-Urben-Goldstein vs 2-Galloway-Morse
450 0.00 5.00 4♥ W 5 4-Thomas-Orr vs 6-Stone-Hargest
|
12 |
♠AQJ4
♥T72
♦T6
♣AQT3
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 3♥ 1NT ♣6 ♠5 |
EW: 1♠ ♣6 ♦4 ♥4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 5.00 0.00 2N W -3 6-McClintock-Ashby vs 4-Segal-Kerster
100 3.00 2.00 4♠* E -1 2-Baronofsky-Paley vs 1-Glassman-Mattrey
100 3.00 2.00 3♠ E -2 4-Thomas-Orr vs 6-Stone-Hargest
100 3.00 2.00 3♣ W -2 1-Matthews-Beckvall vs 5-Belton-Snider
300 1.00 4.00 2N N -3 5-Urben-Goldstein vs 2-Galloway-Morse
400 0.00 5.00 3♦ S -4 3-Passon-Levine vs 3-Mattingly-Mattingly
|
13 |
♠A4
♥JT4
♦84
♣AQ9432
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2/1♦ 3NT ♥6 ♠6 |
EW: 1♥ 1♠ ♣3 ♦5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 4.50 0.50 3♣ N 5 2-Baronofsky-Paley vs 6-Stone-Hargest
150 4.50 0.50 2♣ N 5 6-McClintock-Ashby vs 3-Mattingly-Mattingly
110 3.00 2.00 2♣ N 3 5-Urben-Goldstein vs 1-Glassman-Mattrey
100 2.00 3.00 2♠ W -1 3-Passon-Levine vs 2-Galloway-Morse
110 1.00 4.00 2♠ W 2 4-Thomas-Orr vs 5-Belton-Snider
140 0.00 5.00 2♠ W 3 1-Matthews-Beckvall vs 4-Segal-Kerster
|
14 |
♠JT862
♥QT4
♦9874
♣K
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♥ 3♠ 2NT ♣5 ♦6 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ ♥2 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
450 4.50 0.50 4♥ S 5 2-Baronofsky-Paley vs 6-Stone-Hargest
450 4.50 0.50 4♥ S 5 6-McClintock-Ashby vs 3-Mattingly-Mattingly
420 3.00 2.00 4♥ S 4 4-Thomas-Orr vs 5-Belton-Snider
200 2.00 3.00 3♥ S 5 3-Passon-Levine vs 2-Galloway-Morse
170 1.00 4.00 3♥ S 4 1-Matthews-Beckvall vs 4-Segal-Kerster
50 0.00 5.00 4♥ S -1 5-Urben-Goldstein vs 1-Glassman-Mattrey
|
15 |
♠QJ3
♥A
♦AJ952
♣J972
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♦ 2♥ 2♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦3 ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
600 3.50 1.50 3N S 3 2-Baronofsky-Paley vs 6-Stone-Hargest
600 3.50 1.50 3N S 3 3-Passon-Levine vs 2-Galloway-Morse
600 3.50 1.50 3N S 3 5-Urben-Goldstein vs 1-Glassman-Mattrey
600 3.50 1.50 3N S 3 6-McClintock-Ashby vs 3-Mattingly-Mattingly
90 1.00 4.00 2♦ N 2 4-Thomas-Orr vs 5-Belton-Snider
200 0.00 5.00 3♥ S -2 1-Matthews-Beckvall vs 4-Segal-Kerster
|
16 |
♠T87
♥KT
♦KJT84
♣854
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 6♠ ♣5 ♥6 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ ♦4 ♥6 ♠0 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
480 4.00 1.00 4♠ S 6 1-Matthews-Beckvall vs 4-Segal-Kerster
480 4.00 1.00 4♠ S 6 4-Thomas-Orr vs 5-Belton-Snider
480 4.00 1.00 4♠ N 6 2-Baronofsky-Paley vs 6-Stone-Hargest
450 1.00 4.00 4♠ S 5 3-Passon-Levine vs 2-Galloway-Morse
450 1.00 4.00 4♠ S 5 5-Urben-Goldstein vs 1-Glassman-Mattrey
450 1.00 4.00 4♠ S 5 6-McClintock-Ashby vs 3-Mattingly-Mattingly
|
17 |
♠K863
♥KJ653
♦AJ5
♣T
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♥ 1NT ♣3 ♠6 |
EW: 4♣ 1♠ ♦5/6 ♥5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 5.00 0.00 5♣ E -3 6-McClintock-Ashby vs 2-Galloway-Morse
140 4.00 1.00 2♥ N 3 3-Passon-Levine vs 1-Glassman-Mattrey
50 3.00 2.00 3N E -1 1-Matthews-Beckvall vs 3-Mattingly-Mattingly
100 1.50 3.50 4♥* N -1 2-Baronofsky-Paley vs 5-Belton-Snider
100 1.50 3.50 3♥ N -2 5-Urben-Goldstein vs 6-Stone-Hargest
110 0.00 5.00 3♣ E 3 4-Thomas-Orr vs 4-Segal-Kerster
|
18 |
♠K
♥AKJ843
♦AJT
♣Q92
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 5♥ 5NT ♦4 ♠4 |
EW: 2♦ 3♠ ♣2 ♥2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
650 4.00 1.00 4♥ N 5 3-Passon-Levine vs 1-Glassman-Mattrey
650 4.00 1.00 4♥ N 5 4-Thomas-Orr vs 4-Segal-Kerster
650 4.00 1.00 4♥ N 5 6-McClintock-Ashby vs 2-Galloway-Morse
200 2.00 3.00 3♥ N 5 1-Matthews-Beckvall vs 3-Mattingly-Mattingly
170 1.00 4.00 3♥ N 4 5-Urben-Goldstein vs 6-Stone-Hargest
50 0.00 5.00 4♠ E -1 2-Baronofsky-Paley vs 5-Belton-Snider
|
19 |
♠KJ84
♥K
♦QT5
♣JT642
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣6 ♦4 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 2♦ 2NT ♣6 ♥6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 5.00 0.00 3♦ W -2 6-McClintock-Ashby vs 2-Galloway-Morse
100 4.00 1.00 3N E -1 3-Passon-Levine vs 1-Glassman-Mattrey
90 2.50 2.50 2♦ W 2 2-Baronofsky-Paley vs 5-Belton-Snider
90 2.50 2.50 2♦ W 2 5-Urben-Goldstein vs 6-Stone-Hargest
120 1.00 4.00 1N E 2 4-Thomas-Orr vs 4-Segal-Kerster
130 0.00 5.00 2♦ W 4 1-Matthews-Beckvall vs 3-Mattingly-Mattingly
|
20 |
♠KT9
♥K952
♦A9
♣QJ52
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 6♥ 2♠ 2NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦3 ♥1 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
680 5.00 0.00 4♥ S 6 2-Baronofsky-Paley vs 5-Belton-Snider
620 4.00 1.00 4♥ S 4 5-Urben-Goldstein vs 6-Stone-Hargest
170 2.50 2.50 2♥ S 4 1-Matthews-Beckvall vs 3-Mattingly-Mattingly
170 2.50 2.50 2♥ S 4 3-Passon-Levine vs 1-Glassman-Mattrey
140 1.00 4.00 2♥ S 3 6-McClintock-Ashby vs 2-Galloway-Morse
110 0.00 5.00 2♥ S 2 4-Thomas-Orr vs 4-Segal-Kerster
|
21 |
♠J7654
♥Q76
♦J32
♣86
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦1 ♥1 ♠3 NT1 |
EW: 4♣ 6♦ 6♥ 4♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 4.50 0.50 6♥ E -1 2-Baronofsky-Paley vs 4-Segal-Kerster
50 4.50 0.50 6♥ E -1 5-Urben-Goldstein vs 5-Belton-Snider
450 2.50 2.50 4♥ E 5 4-Thomas-Orr vs 3-Mattingly-Mattingly
450 2.50 2.50 4♥ E 5 6-McClintock-Ashby vs 1-Glassman-Mattrey
480 1.00 4.00 4♥ E 6 3-Passon-Levine vs 6-Stone-Hargest
980 0.00 5.00 6♥ E 6 1-Matthews-Beckvall vs 2-Galloway-Morse
|
22 |
♠J
♥AKJ9
♦KQ74
♣8754
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 5♥ ♣3 ♠3 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 3♠ ♦6 ♥1 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
500 5.00 0.00 5♣* E -2 3-Passon-Levine vs 6-Stone-Hargest
480 4.00 1.00 5♥ S 6 5-Urben-Goldstein vs 5-Belton-Snider
50 3.00 2.00 5♥ S -1 1-Matthews-Beckvall vs 2-Galloway-Morse
100 2.00 3.00 6♥* S -1 6-McClintock-Ashby vs 1-Glassman-Mattrey
130 1.00 4.00 4♣ E 4 2-Baronofsky-Paley vs 4-Segal-Kerster
710 0.00 5.00 4♣* E 4 4-Thomas-Orr vs 3-Mattingly-Mattingly
|
23 |
♠7
♥KJ74
♦KQJT
♣QT75
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 5♦ 4♥ 3♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦2 ♥3 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
660 5.00 0.00 3N N 5 6-McClintock-Ashby vs 1-Glassman-Mattrey
600 3.00 2.00 3N S 3 1-Matthews-Beckvall vs 2-Galloway-Morse
600 3.00 2.00 3N S 3 3-Passon-Levine vs 6-Stone-Hargest
600 3.00 2.00 3N N 3 4-Thomas-Orr vs 3-Mattingly-Mattingly
100 1.00 4.00 3♦ S -1 2-Baronofsky-Paley vs 4-Segal-Kerster
300 0.00 5.00 6N S -3 5-Urben-Goldstein vs 5-Belton-Snider
|
24 |
♠94
♥T3
♦K752
♣Q9642
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ ♣3 ♦2 ♥2 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 4♦ 5♥ ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 4.50 0.50 3♠ S 3 6-McClintock-Ashby vs 1-Glassman-Mattrey
140 4.50 0.50 3♠ N 3 1-Matthews-Beckvall vs 2-Galloway-Morse
110 3.00 2.00 2♠ N 2 4-Thomas-Orr vs 3-Mattingly-Mattingly
50 2.00 3.00 5♥ E -1 2-Baronofsky-Paley vs 4-Segal-Kerster
50 1.00 4.00 4♠ N -1 5-Urben-Goldstein vs 5-Belton-Snider
420 0.00 5.00 4♥ E 4 3-Passon-Levine vs 6-Stone-Hargest
|