1 |
♠53
♥J754
♦K964
♣JT4
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ ♣6 ♦5 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 1♦ 2♠ 1NT ♣6 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 1.00 1.00 3♠ E 3 6-Sarko-Nelson vs 1-McAdam-McAdam
140 1.00 1.00 2♠ E 3 2-Johns-Weiss vs 4-Beuchel-Pientka
140 1.00 1.00 2♠ E 3 3-Robertson-Newman vs 5-Quiros-Rankin
|
2 |
♠AT2
♥K86
♦QJ2
♣9762
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ 2♥ 3♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦4 ♥5 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
630 1.50 0.50 3N S 4 2-Johns-Weiss vs 4-Beuchel-Pientka
630 1.50 0.50 3N S 4 6-Sarko-Nelson vs 1-McAdam-McAdam
600 0.00 2.00 3N S 3 3-Robertson-Newman vs 5-Quiros-Rankin
|
3 |
♠J762
♥QT986
♦K94
♣5
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ ♣1 ♦6 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 6♣ 1♦ 6♠ 2NT ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 2.00 0.00 3♠ E -1 3-Robertson-Newman vs 5-Quiros-Rankin
110 1.00 1.00 2♠ E 2 2-Johns-Weiss vs 4-Beuchel-Pientka
200 0.00 2.00 2♠ E 5 6-Sarko-Nelson vs 1-McAdam-McAdam
|
4 |
♠QT4
♥KJ8
♦QJ42
♣K53
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣5 ♥3 ♠3 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 3/4♥ 3/4♠ ♦5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 2.00 0.00 3N W -1 2-Johns-Weiss vs 4-Beuchel-Pientka
120 0.50 1.50 2N W 2 3-Robertson-Newman vs 5-Quiros-Rankin
120 0.50 1.50 2N W 2 6-Sarko-Nelson vs 1-McAdam-McAdam
|
5 |
♠AQ965
♥J982
♦973
♣6
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 4♦ 3♥ 5♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣6/5 ♦3 ♥3 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
680 2.00 0.00 4♠ N 6 2-Johns-Weiss vs 4-Beuchel-Pientka
650 0.50 1.50 4♠ S 5 3-Robertson-Newman vs 5-Quiros-Rankin
650 0.50 1.50 4♠ N 5 6-Sarko-Nelson vs 1-McAdam-McAdam
|
6 |
♠QT9
♥QJ98643
♦JT4
♣-
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ 5♥ ♣3 ♠3 NT5 |
EW: 4♣ 2/3♠ 2NT ♦2 ♥2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
650 2.00 0.00 5♥* N 5 6-Sarko-Nelson vs 2-Johns-Weiss
450 1.00 1.00 5♥ N 5 3-Robertson-Newman vs 4-Beuchel-Pientka
620 0.00 2.00 4♠ E 4 5-Quiros-Rankin vs 1-McAdam-McAdam
|
7 |
♠AKJ753
♥AT62
♦J
♣K5
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♥ 5♠ 2NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣4 ♥2 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
650 1.50 0.50 4♠ N 5 3-Robertson-Newman vs 4-Beuchel-Pientka
650 1.50 0.50 4♠ N 5 5-Quiros-Rankin vs 1-McAdam-McAdam
200 0.00 2.00 4♠ N -2 6-Sarko-Nelson vs 2-Johns-Weiss
|
8 |
♠Q7
♥962
♦AKT83
♣J32
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣2 ♥5 ♠2 NT5 |
EW: 5♣ 2♥ 5♠ 2NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 2.00 0.00 2♠ E 4 3-Robertson-Newman vs 4-Beuchel-Pientka
420 0.50 1.50 4♠ E 4 5-Quiros-Rankin vs 1-McAdam-McAdam
420 0.50 1.50 4♠ E 4 6-Sarko-Nelson vs 2-Johns-Weiss
|
9 |
♠Q7
♥KJ732
♦KT862
♣3
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦3 ♥5 ♠0 NT0 |
EW: 6♣ 3♦ 2/1♥ 7♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
710 1.50 0.50 4♠ E 7 5-Quiros-Rankin vs 1-McAdam-McAdam
710 1.50 0.50 4♠ E 7 6-Sarko-Nelson vs 2-Johns-Weiss
2210 0.00 2.00 7♠ E 7 3-Robertson-Newman vs 4-Beuchel-Pientka
|
10 |
♠A8
♥KJ6532
♦84
♣A83
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♥ 4♠ 4/3NT ♦5 |
EW: 2/1♦ ♣3 ♥6 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
930 2.00 0.00 3♠* S 4 3-Robertson-Newman vs 4-Beuchel-Pientka
170 1.00 1.00 3♠ S 4 5-Quiros-Rankin vs 1-McAdam-McAdam
200 0.00 2.00 4♠* S -1 6-Sarko-Nelson vs 2-Johns-Weiss
|
11 |
♠Q93
♥JT94
♦KJ32
♣97
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣3 ♥4 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 2♥ 4♠ 2NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 2.00 0.00 3N W -1 4-Beuchel-Pientka vs 5-Quiros-Rankin
140 1.00 1.00 2♥ W 3 1-McAdam-McAdam vs 2-Johns-Weiss
520 0.00 2.00 3N W 7 6-Sarko-Nelson vs 3-Robertson-Newman
|
12 |
♠A976
♥AQJ9
♦AJ8
♣J7
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 4♠ 1NT ♣5 ♦5 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ ♥4 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
620 2.00 0.00 4♠ S 4 6-Sarko-Nelson vs 3-Robertson-Newman
100 1.00 1.00 4♥ N -1 1-McAdam-McAdam vs 2-Johns-Weiss
110 0.00 2.00 2♣ E 3 4-Beuchel-Pientka vs 5-Quiros-Rankin
|
13 |
♠63
♥92
♦QT72
♣AKT65
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2/3♦ 1♥ 1NT ♠4/5 |
EW: 2♠ ♣4 ♦4 ♥6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
710 2.00 0.00 4♣* S 4 6-Sarko-Nelson vs 3-Robertson-Newman
110 1.00 1.00 3♣ S 3 1-McAdam-McAdam vs 2-Johns-Weiss
140 0.00 2.00 3♠ W 3 4-Beuchel-Pientka vs 5-Quiros-Rankin
|
14 |
♠QJ
♥T7432
♦KJT
♣K98
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦3 ♥5 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 2♣ 4♦ 2♥ 4♠ 3/4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
420 1.50 0.50 4♠ W 4 4-Beuchel-Pientka vs 5-Quiros-Rankin
420 1.50 0.50 4♠ W 4 6-Sarko-Nelson vs 3-Robertson-Newman
450 0.00 2.00 4♠ W 5 1-McAdam-McAdam vs 2-Johns-Weiss
|
15 |
♠AQT8
♥Q8653
♦JT7
♣8
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣2 ♦1/2 ♠5 NT2 |
EW: 4♣ 3♦ 2♠ 3NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 2.00 0.00 2♥ N -1 4-Beuchel-Pientka vs 5-Quiros-Rankin
150 1.00 1.00 3♣ E 5 1-McAdam-McAdam vs 2-Johns-Weiss
200 0.00 2.00 3♥ N -2 6-Sarko-Nelson vs 3-Robertson-Newman
|
16 |
♠A764
♥A4
♦AK64
♣A96
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 2♦ 2♥ 5♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦4 ♥5 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
430 1.50 0.50 3N N 4 1-McAdam-McAdam vs 3-Robertson-Newman
430 1.50 0.50 3N N 4 6-Sarko-Nelson vs 4-Beuchel-Pientka
180 0.00 2.00 2N S 4 5-Quiros-Rankin vs 2-Johns-Weiss
|
17 |
♠KJT
♥KT8
♦T82
♣A863
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦3 ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 2/3♣ 3/4♦ 2/3♥ 3♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
400 1.50 0.50 3N W 3 6-Sarko-Nelson vs 4-Beuchel-Pientka
400 1.50 0.50 3N E 3 5-Quiros-Rankin vs 2-Johns-Weiss
430 0.00 2.00 3N E 4 1-McAdam-McAdam vs 3-Robertson-Newman
|
18 |
♠92
♥T83
♦JT84
♣T863
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦6 ♥2 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ 5♥ 2♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 2.00 0.00 3♥ E 5 5-Quiros-Rankin vs 2-Johns-Weiss
450 0.50 1.50 4♥ E 5 1-McAdam-McAdam vs 3-Robertson-Newman
450 0.50 1.50 4♥ E 5 6-Sarko-Nelson vs 4-Beuchel-Pientka
|
19 |
♠J9542
♥KJ2
♦A42
♣86
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1NT ♦5 ♥4 ♠6 |
EW: 1♦ 3♥ 1♠ ♣6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 2.00 0.00 4♥* W -1 5-Quiros-Rankin vs 2-Johns-Weiss
100 1.00 1.00 4♥ W -1 1-McAdam-McAdam vs 3-Robertson-Newman
140 0.00 2.00 3♥ W 3 6-Sarko-Nelson vs 4-Beuchel-Pientka
|
20 |
♠AJ43
♥A85
♦AJ63
♣62
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 3♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦6 ♥4 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 1.50 0.50 2♠ N 3 6-Sarko-Nelson vs 4-Beuchel-Pientka
140 1.50 0.50 3♥ S 3 1-McAdam-McAdam vs 3-Robertson-Newman
100 0.00 2.00 4♥ S -1 5-Quiros-Rankin vs 2-Johns-Weiss
|
21 |
♠J3
♥98
♦T8754
♣K986
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ ♦2 ♥2 ♠1 NT2 |
EW: 5♦ 5/4♥ 5/4♠ 1NT ♣4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
450 2.00 0.00 4♠ E 5 4-Beuchel-Pientka vs 1-McAdam-McAdam
480 0.50 1.50 4♠ E 6 2-Johns-Weiss vs 3-Robertson-Newman
480 0.50 1.50 4♠ E 6 6-Sarko-Nelson vs 5-Quiros-Rankin
|
22 |
♠Q972
♥AT7
♦A852
♣T9
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 2♥ 3♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦5 ♥5 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 2.00 0.00 3♠ N 3 2-Johns-Weiss vs 3-Robertson-Newman
110 1.00 1.00 2♠ N 2 4-Beuchel-Pientka vs 1-McAdam-McAdam
PASS 0.00 2.00 Pass Out 6-Sarko-Nelson vs 5-Quiros-Rankin
|
23 |
♠KJT76
♥7
♦J982
♣AQ8
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 1♥ 1♠ 1NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦6 ♥6 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 1.50 0.50 2N N -1 6-Sarko-Nelson vs 5-Quiros-Rankin
100 1.50 0.50 2♠ N -1 4-Beuchel-Pientka vs 1-McAdam-McAdam
200 0.00 2.00 2♠ N -2 2-Johns-Weiss vs 3-Robertson-Newman
|
24 |
♠632
♥Q52
♦J65
♣Q642
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦4 ♥3 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 3♦ 4♥ 4♠ 4NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
420 1.50 0.50 4♠ W 4 2-Johns-Weiss vs 3-Robertson-Newman
420 1.50 0.50 4♠ W 4 4-Beuchel-Pientka vs 1-McAdam-McAdam
450 0.00 2.00 4♠ W 5 6-Sarko-Nelson vs 5-Quiros-Rankin
|
25 |
♠K7
♥JT
♦J85
♣A98752
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♦ 2NT ♥5 ♠5 |
EW: 1♥ 2♠ ♣4 ♦3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
130 2.00 0.00 3♦ S 4 6-Sarko-Nelson vs 5-Quiros-Rankin
100 1.00 1.00 3♠ W -1 2-Johns-Weiss vs 3-Robertson-Newman
620 0.00 2.00 4♠ W 4 4-Beuchel-Pientka vs 1-McAdam-McAdam
|