1 |
♠K9532
♥AK
♦T92
♣KT3
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦5 ♥6 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 1/2♣ 2♦ -/1♥ 1♠ 2NT ♥6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 3.50 0.50 2N W -1 3-Bernard-Bernard vs 3-Fisher-Adler
50 3.50 0.50 2♦ W -1 1-Highsmith-Whalen vs 1-Busse-Robins
90 1.50 2.50 1N W 1 4-Lipon-James vs 4-Ermel-Back
90 1.50 2.50 2♦ W 2 5-Fuchs-Fuchs vs 5-Morgan-Adams
100 0.00 4.00 2N N -2 2-Stone-Nabours vs 2-Robbins-Brewer
|
2 |
♠7
♥Q85
♦AJ954
♣KT85
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 6♦ 6♥ 5♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦0 ♥0 ♠1 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
660 4.00 0.00 3N N 5 3-Bernard-Bernard vs 3-Fisher-Adler
630 3.00 1.00 3N S 4 4-Lipon-James vs 4-Ermel-Back
620 2.00 2.00 4♥ S 4 5-Fuchs-Fuchs vs 5-Morgan-Adams
170 1.00 3.00 2♥ S 4 2-Stone-Nabours vs 2-Robbins-Brewer
140 0.00 4.00 2♠ S 3 1-Highsmith-Whalen vs 1-Busse-Robins
|
3 |
♠KJ75
♥J7
♦Q97
♣AJ72
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1♦ 3♠ ♥6 NT6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣3 ♦6 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
130 4.00 0.00 4♣ S 4 3-Bernard-Bernard vs 3-Fisher-Adler
120 3.00 1.00 2N S 2 2-Stone-Nabours vs 2-Robbins-Brewer
110 2.00 2.00 3♣ S 3 5-Fuchs-Fuchs vs 5-Morgan-Adams
50 1.00 3.00 4♠ N -1 4-Lipon-James vs 4-Ermel-Back
110 0.00 4.00 2♥ E 2 1-Highsmith-Whalen vs 1-Busse-Robins
|
4 |
♠8
♥T9842
♦A6
♣QJ765
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♥ 1♠ 2NT ♦5 |
EW: ♣2 ♦6 ♥4/3 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
180 4.00 0.00 2N S 4 1-Highsmith-Whalen vs 5-Morgan-Adams
120 3.00 1.00 1N N 2 5-Fuchs-Fuchs vs 4-Ermel-Back
100 2.00 2.00 2♦ E -1 2-Stone-Nabours vs 1-Busse-Robins
80 1.00 3.00 1♠ S 1 4-Lipon-James vs 3-Fisher-Adler
100 0.00 4.00 2N N -1 3-Bernard-Bernard vs 2-Robbins-Brewer
|
5 |
♠KJ98
♥K9
♦KT7
♣QT42
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1/-♥ 2♠ ♦2 ♥7/6 NT6 |
EW: 4♦ 1NT ♣4 ♥6 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 4.00 0.00 3♦ W 3 5-Fuchs-Fuchs vs 4-Ermel-Back
130 1.50 2.50 3♦ W 4 1-Highsmith-Whalen vs 5-Morgan-Adams
130 1.50 2.50 3♦ W 4 2-Stone-Nabours vs 1-Busse-Robins
130 1.50 2.50 3♦ W 4 3-Bernard-Bernard vs 2-Robbins-Brewer
130 1.50 2.50 3♦ W 4 4-Lipon-James vs 3-Fisher-Adler
|
6 |
♠KQJ752
♥5
♦K974
♣T5
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ 2♥ 5♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦5 ♥5 ♠1 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
480 3.00 1.00 4♠ N 6 1-Highsmith-Whalen vs 5-Morgan-Adams
480 3.00 1.00 4♠ N 6 4-Lipon-James vs 3-Fisher-Adler
480 3.00 1.00 4♠ N 6 5-Fuchs-Fuchs vs 4-Ermel-Back
100 0.50 3.50 2♦ E -1 2-Stone-Nabours vs 1-Busse-Robins
100 0.50 3.50 2♦ E -1 3-Bernard-Bernard vs 2-Robbins-Brewer
|
7 |
♠764
♥AJ6542
♦KQ75
♣-
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♥ ♣3 ♦4 ♠3 NT5 |
EW: 4♣ 3♦ 4♠ 1NT ♥3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 4.00 0.00 3♠ W 4 4-Lipon-James vs 2-Robbins-Brewer
200 3.00 1.00 5♥* N -1 1-Highsmith-Whalen vs 4-Ermel-Back
230 2.00 2.00 3♠ W 6 2-Stone-Nabours vs 5-Morgan-Adams
620 1.00 3.00 4♠ E 4 5-Fuchs-Fuchs vs 3-Fisher-Adler
650 0.00 4.00 4♠ W 5 3-Bernard-Bernard vs 1-Busse-Robins
|
8 |
♠K63
♥QT954
♦AQT7
♣2
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♠ ♣3 ♥6 NT5 |
EW: 4♣ 1♥ ♦5 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 3.50 0.50 5♣ E -1 4-Lipon-James vs 2-Robbins-Brewer
50 3.50 0.50 3♣ E -1 5-Fuchs-Fuchs vs 3-Fisher-Adler
130 2.00 2.00 3♣ E 4 1-Highsmith-Whalen vs 4-Ermel-Back
400 0.50 3.50 3N W 3 2-Stone-Nabours vs 5-Morgan-Adams
400 0.50 3.50 5♣ E 5 3-Bernard-Bernard vs 1-Busse-Robins
|
9 |
♠KQJ9
♥AT8
♦86
♣Q982
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 2♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦5 ♥5 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
400 4.00 0.00 3N S 3 5-Fuchs-Fuchs vs 3-Fisher-Adler
150 3.00 1.00 1N S 3 4-Lipon-James vs 2-Robbins-Brewer
120 2.00 2.00 2N N 2 2-Stone-Nabours vs 5-Morgan-Adams
50 1.00 3.00 3♠ N -1 3-Bernard-Bernard vs 1-Busse-Robins
100 0.00 4.00 2N N -2 1-Highsmith-Whalen vs 4-Ermel-Back
|
10 |
♠964
♥AKJ
♦QT87
♣AJT
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 5♦ 4♥ 2♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦2 ♥3 ♠5 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
630 3.50 0.50 3N N 4 1-Highsmith-Whalen vs 3-Fisher-Adler
630 3.50 0.50 3N N 4 5-Fuchs-Fuchs vs 2-Robbins-Brewer
600 2.00 2.00 3N N 3 4-Lipon-James vs 1-Busse-Robins
140 1.00 3.00 1♥ N 3 2-Stone-Nabours vs 4-Ermel-Back
130 0.00 4.00 4♦ S 4 3-Bernard-Bernard vs 5-Morgan-Adams
|
11 |
♠82
♥Q4
♦KJ9
♣AK7654
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦5 ♥3 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 2♦ 3♥ 2♠ ♣6 NT5/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 4.00 0.00 3♥ W -2 5-Fuchs-Fuchs vs 2-Robbins-Brewer
50 2.50 1.50 3♥ W -1 3-Bernard-Bernard vs 5-Morgan-Adams
50 2.50 1.50 3♥ W -1 4-Lipon-James vs 1-Busse-Robins
110 1.00 3.00 2♥ W 2 2-Stone-Nabours vs 4-Ermel-Back
140 0.00 4.00 3♥ W 3 1-Highsmith-Whalen vs 3-Fisher-Adler
|
12 |
♠K642
♥743
♦A8763
♣T
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ ♣1 ♥2 ♠6 NT3 |
EW: 5♣ 5♥ 1♠ 2/4NT ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 4.00 0.00 3N W -3 4-Lipon-James vs 1-Busse-Robins
210 3.00 1.00 2N W 5 5-Fuchs-Fuchs vs 2-Robbins-Brewer
420 2.00 2.00 4♥ W 4 1-Highsmith-Whalen vs 3-Fisher-Adler
430 1.00 3.00 3N W 4 2-Stone-Nabours vs 4-Ermel-Back
460 0.00 4.00 3N W 5 3-Bernard-Bernard vs 5-Morgan-Adams
|