1 |
♠QJ2
♥9
♦A43
♣AKQ964
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 6♦ 1♥ 5♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣0 ♦0 ♥6 ♠1 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
460 2.00 0.00 3N S 5 1-Jones-Back vs 1-Fuchs-Fuchs
420 1.00 1.00 5♦ S 6 3-Fisher-Beckvall vs 4-Bishop-Bishop
400 0.00 2.00 5♦ S 5 4-Mathisen-Scioneaux vs 3-Lederman-O'Connell
|
2 |
♠8
♥QJT9754
♦Q54
♣93
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ ♣3 ♦4/3 ♠3 NT6 |
EW: 4♣ 3♦ 4♠ ♥4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 2.00 0.00 4♥ N -1 3-Fisher-Beckvall vs 4-Bishop-Bishop
420 1.00 1.00 4♠ E 4 4-Mathisen-Scioneaux vs 3-Lederman-O'Connell
450 0.00 2.00 4♠ E 5 1-Jones-Back vs 1-Fuchs-Fuchs
|
3 |
♠K8762
♥AJ75
♦-
♣9764
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ 1NT ♣6 ♦2 ♥6 |
EW: 5♦ 1♥ ♣6 ♠5 NT6/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 2.00 0.00 2♠ N 2 1-Jones-Back vs 1-Fuchs-Fuchs
100 1.00 1.00 3♥ W -1 3-Fisher-Beckvall vs 4-Bishop-Bishop
110 0.00 2.00 3♦ E 3 4-Mathisen-Scioneaux vs 3-Lederman-O'Connell
|
4 |
♠J6432
♥973
♦KJ7
♣KT
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 3♠ ♣3 ♦5/4 NT6 |
EW: 4/3♣ 3/2♦ 1NT ♥5/4 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 1.50 0.50 3♠ S 3 4-Mathisen-Scioneaux vs 3-Lederman-O'Connell
140 1.50 0.50 1♠ S 3 1-Jones-Back vs 1-Fuchs-Fuchs
100 0.00 2.00 4♠ S -1 3-Fisher-Beckvall vs 4-Bishop-Bishop
|
5 |
♠J8
♥Q98
♦AT653
♣Q64
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦3 ♥1 ♠6 NT2/1 |
EW: 6♣ 4♦ 6♥ 1♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 2.00 0.00 4♥ E -1 1-Jones-Back vs 1-Fuchs-Fuchs
420 1.00 1.00 4♥ W 4 3-Fisher-Beckvall vs 4-Bishop-Bishop
450 0.00 2.00 4♥ E 5 4-Mathisen-Scioneaux vs 3-Lederman-O'Connell
|
6 |
♠KQ965
♥K76
♦872
♣92
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦2 ♥2 ♠6 NT3 |
EW: 5♣ 5♦ 5♥ 1♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 2.00 0.00 4♥ E -2 1-Jones-Back vs 1-Fuchs-Fuchs
100 1.00 1.00 3♠ N -2 3-Fisher-Beckvall vs 4-Bishop-Bishop
620 0.00 2.00 4♥ W 4 4-Mathisen-Scioneaux vs 3-Lederman-O'Connell
|
7 |
♠AQJ
♥J
♦A963
♣K9863
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♦ 1♠ 3NT ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣3 ♦4 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
180 2.00 0.00 1N S 4 1-Jones-Back vs 1-Fuchs-Fuchs
130 1.00 1.00 2♣ N 4 4-Mathisen-Scioneaux vs 3-Lederman-O'Connell
120 0.00 2.00 1N S 2 3-Fisher-Beckvall vs 4-Bishop-Bishop
|
8 |
♠7
♥-
♦K9532
♣AKQJ962
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♦ 1♥ 2♠ 1NT |
EW: ♣0 ♦3 ♥6/5 ♠2 NT6/0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
450 2.00 0.00 4♠ S 5 4-Mathisen-Scioneaux vs 1-Fuchs-Fuchs
440 1.00 1.00 5♣ N 7 1-Jones-Back vs 4-Bishop-Bishop
150 0.00 2.00 6♠ S -3 2-Marcus-Marcus vs 2-Violante-Violante
|
9 |
♠QJ62
♥AQ4
♦Q82
♣KQ4
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 4♦ 4/3♠ 5/4NT ♥6/5 |
EW: ♣5 ♦2 ♥6 ♠3 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
420 2.00 0.00 4♠ N 4 1-Jones-Back vs 4-Bishop-Bishop
200 1.00 1.00 3♥ E -2 2-Marcus-Marcus vs 2-Violante-Violante
50 0.00 2.00 5♦ S -1 4-Mathisen-Scioneaux vs 1-Fuchs-Fuchs
|
10 |
♠AQ6
♥KT8
♦T87
♣AT74
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3/2♣ 3♦ 4♥ 3♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦4 ♥2 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
620 1.50 0.50 4♥ S 4 1-Jones-Back vs 4-Bishop-Bishop
620 1.50 0.50 4♥ S 4 2-Marcus-Marcus vs 2-Violante-Violante
170 0.00 2.00 2♥ S 4 4-Mathisen-Scioneaux vs 1-Fuchs-Fuchs
|
11 |
♠AJ
♥AK42
♦T
♣J97543
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 5♦ 6♥ 1NT ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣1 ♦2 ♥1 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
480 2.00 0.00 4♥ N 6 1-Jones-Back vs 4-Bishop-Bishop
50 0.50 1.50 3N N -1 4-Mathisen-Scioneaux vs 1-Fuchs-Fuchs
50 0.50 1.50 5♦ S -1 2-Marcus-Marcus vs 2-Violante-Violante
|
12 |
♠KQ76
♥T872
♦7653
♣8
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ 1♥ 3♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦5 ♥5 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 2.00 0.00 2N N 3 1-Jones-Back vs 4-Bishop-Bishop
110 1.00 1.00 2♠ N 2 4-Mathisen-Scioneaux vs 1-Fuchs-Fuchs
200 0.00 2.00 4♠ N -2 2-Marcus-Marcus vs 2-Violante-Violante
|
13 |
♠92
♥J7643
♦KJT97
♣4
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ ♣0 ♦6 ♠0 NT0 |
EW: 6♣ 6♠ 6NT ♦5 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
130 2.00 0.00 3♣ E 4 1-Jones-Back vs 4-Bishop-Bishop
170 1.00 1.00 2♠ W 4 4-Mathisen-Scioneaux vs 1-Fuchs-Fuchs
690 0.00 2.00 3N E 6 2-Marcus-Marcus vs 2-Violante-Violante
|
14 |
♠K6
♥652
♦KJ6
♣98753
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦5/4 ♥4 ♠6 NT6/5 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 3♥ 1♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 2.00 0.00 3N W -3 2-Marcus-Marcus vs 2-Violante-Violante
50 0.50 1.50 1♠ E -1 1-Jones-Back vs 4-Bishop-Bishop
50 0.50 1.50 1♠ E -1 4-Mathisen-Scioneaux vs 1-Fuchs-Fuchs
|
15 |
♠J654
♥T4
♦QT943
♣J7
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦5/4 ♥6 ♠5/6 NT6 |
EW: 2/1♣ 2♦ 1/-♥ 1♠ 1NT ♥7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 2.00 0.00 2N W -3 2-Marcus-Marcus vs 1-Fuchs-Fuchs
PASS 1.00 1.00 Pass Out 3-Fisher-Beckvall vs 3-Lederman-O'Connell
400 0.00 2.00 3N E 3 1-Jones-Back vs 2-Violante-Violante
|
16 |
♠J8743
♥7
♦984
♣AQ75
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣1 ♦3 ♥1 NT1 |
EW: 6♣ 3♦ 5♥ 6NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
650 2.00 0.00 4♥ W 5 2-Marcus-Marcus vs 1-Fuchs-Fuchs
690 1.00 1.00 3N E 6 1-Jones-Back vs 2-Violante-Violante
1540 0.00 2.00 6♣* E 6 3-Fisher-Beckvall vs 3-Lederman-O'Connell
|
17 |
♠A743
♥Q65
♦JT42
♣87
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦4 ♥3 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 3♦ 3♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 2.00 0.00 4♥ E -1 1-Jones-Back vs 2-Violante-Violante
140 1.00 1.00 2♥ E 3 2-Marcus-Marcus vs 1-Fuchs-Fuchs
420 0.00 2.00 4♥ E 4 3-Fisher-Beckvall vs 3-Lederman-O'Connell
|
18 |
♠T965
♥Q7
♦Q75
♣T732
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♥ 2NT ♦6 ♠6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣5 ♥6 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 2.00 0.00 2♥ W -3 2-Marcus-Marcus vs 1-Fuchs-Fuchs
50 0.50 1.50 2N W -1 1-Jones-Back vs 2-Violante-Violante
50 0.50 1.50 1♠ E -1 3-Fisher-Beckvall vs 3-Lederman-O'Connell
|
19 |
♠QJ9
♥A986
♦A7
♣J963
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦3 ♥6 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 4♦ 1♥ 1/-♠ 3/2NT ♠7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 2.00 0.00 3N W -1 1-Jones-Back vs 2-Violante-Violante
90 1.00 1.00 2♣ W 2 2-Marcus-Marcus vs 1-Fuchs-Fuchs
110 0.00 2.00 2♦ E 3 3-Fisher-Beckvall vs 3-Lederman-O'Connell
|
20 |
♠KQJ98
♥-
♦KJ98
♣Q763
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 2/3♠ ♣6 ♥3/4 NT3/6 |
EW: 3♥ ♣6 ♦3 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 2.00 0.00 4♦ S 5 3-Fisher-Beckvall vs 3-Lederman-O'Connell
100 1.00 1.00 5♦ S -1 2-Marcus-Marcus vs 1-Fuchs-Fuchs
140 0.00 2.00 3♥ E 3 1-Jones-Back vs 2-Violante-Violante
|
21 |
♠Q94
♥Q73
♦Q43
♣T864
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1NT ♦5 ♥6 ♠5 |
EW: 2♦ 1♠ ♣6 ♥5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 2.00 0.00 1N W -3 3-Fisher-Beckvall vs 3-Lederman-O'Connell
90 1.00 1.00 2♦ E 2 1-Jones-Back vs 2-Violante-Violante
100 0.00 2.00 1♣ S -1 2-Marcus-Marcus vs 1-Fuchs-Fuchs
|
22 |
♠Q542
♥J643
♦A2
♣975
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣0 ♦5 ♥4 ♠0 NT0 |
EW: 6♣ 1♦ 3♥ 6♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
650 2.00 0.00 4♠ E 5 3-Fisher-Beckvall vs 2-Violante-Violante
660 1.00 1.00 3N W 5 4-Mathisen-Scioneaux vs 4-Bishop-Bishop
720 0.00 2.00 3N W 7 2-Marcus-Marcus vs 3-Lederman-O'Connell
|
23 |
♠97
♥Q32
♦KQJ985
♣Q6
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4/2♣ 5♦ 5♥ 1♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦2 ♥2 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
650 2.00 0.00 4♥ N 5 2-Marcus-Marcus vs 3-Lederman-O'Connell
620 1.00 1.00 4♥ S 4 4-Mathisen-Scioneaux vs 4-Bishop-Bishop
200 0.00 2.00 3♥ N 5 3-Fisher-Beckvall vs 2-Violante-Violante
|
24 |
♠AKT543
♥9
♦AT
♣AJ72
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♠ 4NT ♦6 ♥6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣4 ♥6 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
450 2.00 0.00 4♠ N 5 3-Fisher-Beckvall vs 2-Violante-Violante
170 1.00 1.00 3♠ N 4 4-Mathisen-Scioneaux vs 4-Bishop-Bishop
140 0.00 2.00 1♠ N 3 2-Marcus-Marcus vs 3-Lederman-O'Connell
|
25 |
♠T6
♥AKQT
♦Q6
♣T9732
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♥ 1♠ 2NT ♦5 |
EW: 2♦ ♣3 ♥3 ♠6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 2.00 0.00 2♣ S 5 3-Fisher-Beckvall vs 2-Violante-Violante
130 1.00 1.00 2♣ S 4 4-Mathisen-Scioneaux vs 4-Bishop-Bishop
PASS 0.00 2.00 Pass Out 2-Marcus-Marcus vs 3-Lederman-O'Connell
|
26 |
♠T2
♥765432
♦73
♣A73
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦2 ♥5 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 5♦ 2♥ 4♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
630 1.00 1.00 3N W 4 4-Mathisen-Scioneaux vs 4-Bishop-Bishop
630 1.00 1.00 3N E 4 2-Marcus-Marcus vs 3-Lederman-O'Connell
630 1.00 1.00 3N E 4 3-Fisher-Beckvall vs 2-Violante-Violante
|
27 |
♠KT4
♥976
♦AK7
♣AQT4
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♦ 4♥ 3♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦3 ♥2 ♠4 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
430 2.00 0.00 3N N 4 3-Fisher-Beckvall vs 2-Violante-Violante
140 1.00 1.00 2♥ S 3 4-Mathisen-Scioneaux vs 4-Bishop-Bishop
50 0.00 2.00 3♣ N -1 2-Marcus-Marcus vs 3-Lederman-O'Connell
|
28 |
♠K52
♥6
♦AQJT95
♣875
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♦ 2♥ 4♠ 1NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦4 ♥5 ♠3 NT6/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 1.50 0.50 4♠ S -1 4-Mathisen-Scioneaux vs 4-Bishop-Bishop
100 1.50 0.50 3♦ N -1 2-Marcus-Marcus vs 3-Lederman-O'Connell
200 0.00 2.00 3N S -2 3-Fisher-Beckvall vs 2-Violante-Violante
|