1 |
♠Q83
♥AQ63
♦832
♣KT8
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ 3♥ 3♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦6 ♥4 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 2.00 0.00 1♥ W -4 3-Farnham-Back vs 2-James-Katzin
90 1.00 1.00 1N N 1 1-Nabours-Ash vs 1-Averkamp-McBride
50 0.00 2.00 2♠ S -1 2-Brewer-Lusby vs 3-Sherwood-Johnston
|
2 |
♠A96
♥K76
♦Q9
♣AKJ64
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 1♦ 5/6♥ 4/5♠ 3/5NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦6 ♥1 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
650 1.50 0.50 4♥ S 5 2-Brewer-Lusby vs 3-Sherwood-Johnston
650 1.50 0.50 4♥ S 5 3-Farnham-Back vs 2-James-Katzin
200 0.00 2.00 2♥ S 5 1-Nabours-Ash vs 1-Averkamp-McBride
|
3 |
♠8653
♥K
♦QJ952
♣432
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♠ ♣1 ♥1 NT4 |
EW: 6♣ 6♥ 2NT ♦5 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 2.00 0.00 4♥ W -2 3-Farnham-Back vs 2-James-Katzin
170 1.00 1.00 3♣ E 6 2-Brewer-Lusby vs 3-Sherwood-Johnston
600 0.00 2.00 3N W 3 1-Nabours-Ash vs 1-Averkamp-McBride
|
4 |
♠75
♥KT6
♦J8742
♣KQJ
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♦ 1♥ 3NT ♠4 |
EW: 2/1♠ ♣6 ♦3 ♥6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 1.50 0.50 2♠ W 2 3-Farnham-Back vs 2-James-Katzin
110 1.50 0.50 1♣ E 3 2-Brewer-Lusby vs 3-Sherwood-Johnston
140 0.00 2.00 2♠ W 3 1-Nabours-Ash vs 1-Averkamp-McBride
|
5 |
♠7632
♥KQJ63
♦T4
♣T4
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣2 ♦3 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 3♦ 4♠ 4NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 1.50 0.50 2♠ W 4 1-Nabours-Ash vs 1-Averkamp-McBride
170 1.50 0.50 2♠ W 4 3-Farnham-Back vs 2-James-Katzin
450 0.00 2.00 4♠ W 5 2-Brewer-Lusby vs 3-Sherwood-Johnston
|
6 |
♠-
♥9854
♦KQ954
♣AQJT
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♦ 1♥ ♠3 NT5 |
EW: 3♠ 2NT ♣4 ♦3 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 1.50 0.50 3N E -1 1-Nabours-Ash vs 1-Averkamp-McBride
100 1.50 0.50 3♠ W -1 3-Farnham-Back vs 2-James-Katzin
140 0.00 2.00 2♠ W 3 2-Brewer-Lusby vs 3-Sherwood-Johnston
|
7 |
♠-
♥AKJ97
♦853
♣Q7542
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♦ 3/2♥ ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 3♠ 1NT ♣5 ♦4 ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 2.00 0.00 4♠ W -1 3-Farnham-Back vs 2-James-Katzin
620 0.50 1.50 4♠ W 4 1-Nabours-Ash vs 1-Averkamp-McBride
620 0.50 1.50 4♠ W 4 2-Brewer-Lusby vs 3-Sherwood-Johnston
|
8 |
♠972
♥AJT32
♦87
♣AT4
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♥ ♦3 ♠3 NT6 |
EW: 4♦ 4♠ ♣3 ♥3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
130 2.00 0.00 3♣ S 4 2-Brewer-Lusby vs 2-James-Katzin
130 1.00 1.00 3♦ E 4 3-Farnham-Back vs 1-Averkamp-McBride
400 0.00 2.00 5♦ E 5 1-Nabours-Ash vs 3-Sherwood-Johnston
|
9 |
♠A865
♥J863
♦653
♣J6
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 1NT ♣4 ♦4 ♠6 |
EW: 3♣ 3♦ 1♠ ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 1.50 0.50 3♥ S -1 1-Nabours-Ash vs 3-Sherwood-Johnston
50 1.50 0.50 2♥ S -1 3-Farnham-Back vs 1-Averkamp-McBride
100 0.00 2.00 2♥ S -2 2-Brewer-Lusby vs 2-James-Katzin
|
10 |
♠986
♥7
♦AT9832
♣KJT
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ ♥6 ♠3 NT5 |
EW: 3♠ ♣3 ♦6 ♥6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 2.00 0.00 3♠ W -1 2-Brewer-Lusby vs 2-James-Katzin
140 1.00 1.00 3♠ W 3 3-Farnham-Back vs 1-Averkamp-McBride
170 0.00 2.00 3♠ W 4 1-Nabours-Ash vs 3-Sherwood-Johnston
|
11 |
♠K42
♥AK54
♦QT87
♣J8
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦4 ♥5 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 2/3♦ 1/2♥ 5♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
420 1.50 0.50 4♠ W 4 1-Nabours-Ash vs 3-Sherwood-Johnston
420 1.50 0.50 4♠ W 4 3-Farnham-Back vs 1-Averkamp-McBride
450 0.00 2.00 4♠ W 5 2-Brewer-Lusby vs 2-James-Katzin
|
12 |
♠QJ7543
♥AK2
♦T
♣AT9
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 5♠ -/4NT ♦4 ♥3 NT5/10 |
EW: 2♦ 4♥ ♣5 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
680 1.50 0.50 5♠ N 6 1-Nabours-Ash vs 3-Sherwood-Johnston
680 1.50 0.50 4♠ S 6 2-Brewer-Lusby vs 2-James-Katzin
110 0.00 2.00 3♦ W 3 3-Farnham-Back vs 1-Averkamp-McBride
|
13 |
♠QT4
♥T95
♦Q94
♣K953
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ 3♥ 5♠ 4/5NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦4 ♥4 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
660 2.00 0.00 3N S 5 2-Brewer-Lusby vs 2-James-Katzin
630 1.00 1.00 3N S 4 3-Farnham-Back vs 1-Averkamp-McBride
100 0.00 2.00 3N S -1 1-Nabours-Ash vs 3-Sherwood-Johnston
|
14 |
♠Q76
♥A864
♦A986
♣T9
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣6 ♥6 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♠ ♦6 ♥6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 2.00 0.00 2♠ W -2 1-Nabours-Ash vs 3-Sherwood-Johnston
50 1.00 1.00 2N W -1 3-Farnham-Back vs 1-Averkamp-McBride
110 0.00 2.00 2♠ W 2 2-Brewer-Lusby vs 2-James-Katzin
|
15 |
♠JT
♥AQ87
♦954
♣QT53
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦5/4 ♥4 ♠5 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 2♦ 2♥ 2♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 1.50 0.50 2N E 3 2-Brewer-Lusby vs 1-Averkamp-McBride
150 1.50 0.50 2N E 3 3-Farnham-Back vs 3-Sherwood-Johnston
400 0.00 2.00 3N E 3 1-Nabours-Ash vs 2-James-Katzin
|
16 |
♠KT73
♥9
♦AT83
♣A942
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ 3♥ 5♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦4 ♥4 ♠2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 2.00 0.00 2♠ N 5 2-Brewer-Lusby vs 1-Averkamp-McBride
170 0.50 1.50 3♠ N 4 1-Nabours-Ash vs 2-James-Katzin
170 0.50 1.50 3♠ N 4 3-Farnham-Back vs 3-Sherwood-Johnston
|
17 |
♠JT64
♥K5
♦T72
♣KT63
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/-♣ 4/3♦ 2/1♠ 3/2NT ♣7/6 ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣5/6 ♦3 ♠5 NT5/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
400 2.00 0.00 3N N 3 3-Farnham-Back vs 3-Sherwood-Johnston
180 1.00 1.00 2N S 4 2-Brewer-Lusby vs 1-Averkamp-McBride
50 0.00 2.00 3♦ S -1 1-Nabours-Ash vs 2-James-Katzin
|
18 |
♠K954
♥AQ6
♦KQ
♣KQ65
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♥ 5♠ 4NT ♦4 |
EW: 2♦ ♣6 ♥1 ♠1 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
650 1.00 1.00 4♠ S 5 1-Nabours-Ash vs 2-James-Katzin
650 1.00 1.00 4♠ N 5 2-Brewer-Lusby vs 1-Averkamp-McBride
650 1.00 1.00 5♥ S 5 3-Farnham-Back vs 3-Sherwood-Johnston
|
19 |
♠983
♥QJ32
♦AT86
♣J3
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5/6 ♦6 ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 3♥ 3♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 2.00 0.00 3♠ W -2 3-Farnham-Back vs 3-Sherwood-Johnston
80 1.00 1.00 1♠ E 1 2-Brewer-Lusby vs 1-Averkamp-McBride
110 0.00 2.00 2♥ W 2 1-Nabours-Ash vs 2-James-Katzin
|
20 |
♠K2
♥AQ
♦QJT
♣Q86432
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦3 ♥2 ♠2 NT5 |
EW: 4♦ 4♥ 5♠ ♣5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
300 2.00 0.00 4♥ E -3 2-Brewer-Lusby vs 1-Averkamp-McBride
100 1.00 1.00 3♥ E -1 3-Farnham-Back vs 3-Sherwood-Johnston
200 0.00 2.00 3♣* N -1 1-Nabours-Ash vs 2-James-Katzin
|
21 |
♠AK5
♥Q5
♦T952
♣Q852
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♥ 1NT ♣6 ♠6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♠ ♦5 ♥6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
120 2.00 0.00 1N N 2 3-Farnham-Back vs 3-Sherwood-Johnston
100 1.00 1.00 1N N -1 2-Brewer-Lusby vs 1-Averkamp-McBride
110 0.00 2.00 1♠ W 2 1-Nabours-Ash vs 2-James-Katzin
|