1 |
♠KQJ
♥874
♦KT8654
♣T
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣2 ♥1 ♠5 NT3 |
EW: 5♣ 6♥ 1♠ 4NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 4.00 0.00 6♥ W -2 3-Allen-Ash vs 4-Morgan-Averkamp
50 3.00 1.00 6♥ E -1 1-Thomas-Mishel vs 1-Hampton-Beckvall
230 2.00 2.00 2♥ E 6 6-Nabours-Crowley vs 5-James-Lipon
420 1.00 3.00 4♥ E 4 4-Bender-Mattingly vs 6-Greenberg-Leavitt
480 0.00 4.00 4♥ E 6 5-Yoder-Yoder vs 3-Jones-Back
|
2 |
♠JT752
♥J42
♦J4
♣K85
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦4 ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 3♦ 3♥ 2♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 4.00 0.00 3N W -2 3-Allen-Ash vs 4-Morgan-Averkamp
110 2.50 1.50 2♦ W 3 1-Thomas-Mishel vs 1-Hampton-Beckvall
110 2.50 1.50 2♦ W 3 6-Nabours-Crowley vs 5-James-Lipon
140 1.00 3.00 2♥ W 3 5-Yoder-Yoder vs 3-Jones-Back
150 0.00 4.00 1N E 3 4-Bender-Mattingly vs 6-Greenberg-Leavitt
|
3 |
♠AQJ3
♥95
♦T4
♣KT874
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦5/4 ♥3 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 2♦ 4♥ 1♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 4.00 0.00 4♠ E -2 4-Bender-Mattingly vs 6-Greenberg-Leavitt
170 3.00 1.00 2♥ E 4 3-Allen-Ash vs 4-Morgan-Averkamp
620 1.50 2.50 4♥ E 4 1-Thomas-Mishel vs 1-Hampton-Beckvall
620 1.50 2.50 4♥ E 4 5-Yoder-Yoder vs 3-Jones-Back
650 0.00 4.00 4♥ E 5 6-Nabours-Crowley vs 5-James-Lipon
|
4 |
♠7
♥J642
♦KQ6
♣QT932
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2/3♥ 2♠ 2NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣4 ♥4 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 4.00 0.00 1N W -2 1-Thomas-Mishel vs 1-Hampton-Beckvall
170 3.00 1.00 2♠ S 4 6-Nabours-Crowley vs 5-James-Lipon
120 2.00 2.00 2N N 2 5-Yoder-Yoder vs 3-Jones-Back
110 1.00 3.00 2♠ S 2 4-Bender-Mattingly vs 6-Greenberg-Leavitt
100 0.00 4.00 2♠ S -1 3-Allen-Ash vs 4-Morgan-Averkamp
|
5 |
♠Q92
♥AK762
♦AJ93
♣A
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 2♥ 2/1♠ 2NT ♣4 |
EW: 3♣ ♦4 ♥5 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 4.00 0.00 1♥ N 3 4-Bender-Mattingly vs 5-James-Lipon
110 2.50 1.50 1♥ N 2 2-Farnham-Max vs 2-Lusby-Brewer
110 2.50 1.50 2♦ N 3 5-Yoder-Yoder vs 1-Hampton-Beckvall
110 0.50 3.50 3♣ W 3 6-Nabours-Crowley vs 4-Morgan-Averkamp
110 0.50 3.50 2♣ E 3 1-Thomas-Mishel vs 6-Greenberg-Leavitt
|
6 |
♠A9
♥Q973
♦J5
♣T9732
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♥ ♣4 ♠2 NT3/2 |
EW: 3♣ 4♠ 3NT ♦6 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 4.00 0.00 4♠ E -1 6-Nabours-Crowley vs 4-Morgan-Averkamp
100 3.00 1.00 3♥ N -2 5-Yoder-Yoder vs 1-Hampton-Beckvall
140 2.00 2.00 2♠ E 3 1-Thomas-Mishel vs 6-Greenberg-Leavitt
170 1.00 3.00 3♠ E 4 2-Farnham-Max vs 2-Lusby-Brewer
200 0.00 4.00 2♠ E 5 4-Bender-Mattingly vs 5-James-Lipon
|
7 |
♠AT42
♥Q543
♦J76
♣98
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦2 ♥6 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 2♣ 3/4♦ 1♥ 4♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.50 0.50 4♠ E -1 2-Farnham-Max vs 2-Lusby-Brewer
100 3.50 0.50 4♠ E -1 4-Bender-Mattingly vs 5-James-Lipon
170 1.50 2.50 3♠ E 4 1-Thomas-Mishel vs 6-Greenberg-Leavitt
170 1.50 2.50 2♠ E 4 6-Nabours-Crowley vs 4-Morgan-Averkamp
180 0.00 4.00 1N E 4 5-Yoder-Yoder vs 1-Hampton-Beckvall
|
8 |
♠K62
♥Q4
♦AK42
♣AJ86
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ 2♥ 4♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦4 ♥5 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 4.00 0.00 2♠ N 5 4-Bender-Mattingly vs 5-James-Lipon
140 3.00 1.00 2♠ N 3 6-Nabours-Crowley vs 4-Morgan-Averkamp
50 1.00 3.00 3N N -1 1-Thomas-Mishel vs 6-Greenberg-Leavitt
50 1.00 3.00 3N N -1 2-Farnham-Max vs 2-Lusby-Brewer
50 1.00 3.00 4♠ N -1 5-Yoder-Yoder vs 1-Hampton-Beckvall
|
9 |
♠Q8
♥T83
♦A642
♣AT42
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♦ 1♥ 2♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦3 ♥6 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
120 3.50 0.50 2N N 2 3-Allen-Ash vs 3-Jones-Back
120 3.50 0.50 1N N 2 5-Yoder-Yoder vs 6-Greenberg-Leavitt
100 2.00 2.00 1♣ W -1 1-Thomas-Mishel vs 5-James-Lipon
50 1.00 3.00 2♦ N -1 2-Farnham-Max vs 1-Hampton-Beckvall
90 0.00 4.00 1♣ W 2 6-Nabours-Crowley vs 2-Lusby-Brewer
|
10 |
♠83
♥K87
♦Q972
♣9832
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ 1♥ -/1♠ -/2NT ♠6/7 NT6/8 |
EW: ♣4 ♦5 ♥6 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
630 4.00 0.00 3N S 4 6-Nabours-Crowley vs 2-Lusby-Brewer
100 3.00 1.00 3♠ W -1 5-Yoder-Yoder vs 6-Greenberg-Leavitt
100 1.50 2.50 3N S -1 2-Farnham-Max vs 1-Hampton-Beckvall
100 1.50 2.50 3N S -1 3-Allen-Ash vs 3-Jones-Back
200 0.00 4.00 3N S -2 1-Thomas-Mishel vs 5-James-Lipon
|
11 |
♠J6
♥T8762
♦Q92
♣AT3
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ 5♥ 3♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦4 ♥2 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
430 4.00 0.00 3N S 4 2-Farnham-Max vs 1-Hampton-Beckvall
420 2.50 1.50 4♥ S 4 6-Nabours-Crowley vs 2-Lusby-Brewer
420 2.50 1.50 4♥ N 4 1-Thomas-Mishel vs 5-James-Lipon
200 1.00 3.00 2♥ S 5 5-Yoder-Yoder vs 6-Greenberg-Leavitt
140 0.00 4.00 2♥ S 3 3-Allen-Ash vs 3-Jones-Back
|
12 |
♠AT95
♥98
♦Q762
♣976
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♦ ♥5 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 2♥ 2/1♠ 1/-NT ♣6/5 ♦4 NT7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 4.00 0.00 4♠ E -2 5-Yoder-Yoder vs 6-Greenberg-Leavitt
50 3.00 1.00 3♠ E -1 1-Thomas-Mishel vs 5-James-Lipon
110 1.50 2.50 2♠ E 2 3-Allen-Ash vs 3-Jones-Back
110 1.50 2.50 2♠ E 2 6-Nabours-Crowley vs 2-Lusby-Brewer
170 0.00 4.00 2♠ E 4 2-Farnham-Max vs 1-Hampton-Beckvall
|
13 |
♠JT8
♥AJ654
♦43
♣J64
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♥ 1♠ 3NT ♦5 |
EW: 2♦ ♣6 ♥4 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
600 4.00 0.00 3N S 3 4-Bender-Mattingly vs 4-Morgan-Averkamp
100 1.50 2.50 4♥ N -1 1-Thomas-Mishel vs 3-Jones-Back
100 1.50 2.50 4♥ N -1 2-Farnham-Max vs 6-Greenberg-Leavitt
100 1.50 2.50 4♥ N -1 3-Allen-Ash vs 2-Lusby-Brewer
100 1.50 2.50 4♥ N -1 6-Nabours-Crowley vs 1-Hampton-Beckvall
|
14 |
♠Q853
♥J9
♦J72
♣AT82
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦2 ♥4 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 4♣ 4♦ 3♥ 5♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 4.00 0.00 2♦ E 3 4-Bender-Mattingly vs 4-Morgan-Averkamp
430 2.50 1.50 3N E 4 2-Farnham-Max vs 6-Greenberg-Leavitt
430 2.50 1.50 3N E 4 6-Nabours-Crowley vs 1-Hampton-Beckvall
460 0.50 3.50 3N E 5 1-Thomas-Mishel vs 3-Jones-Back
460 0.50 3.50 3N E 5 3-Allen-Ash vs 2-Lusby-Brewer
|
15 |
♠T72
♥J63
♦J98
♣A983
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦3 ♥3 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 3♦ 3/4♥ 5♠ 2NT ♣5/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 4.00 0.00 3♠ E 3 6-Nabours-Crowley vs 1-Hampton-Beckvall
170 2.50 1.50 3♠ E 4 2-Farnham-Max vs 6-Greenberg-Leavitt
170 2.50 1.50 2♠ E 4 1-Thomas-Mishel vs 3-Jones-Back
200 1.00 3.00 2♠ E 5 3-Allen-Ash vs 2-Lusby-Brewer
400 0.00 4.00 3N W 3 4-Bender-Mattingly vs 4-Morgan-Averkamp
|
16 |
♠T
♥K32
♦KT832
♣KJ54
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦5/4 ♥5 ♠3 NT6 |
EW: 2♦ 2♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 4.00 0.00 4♥ W -2 6-Nabours-Crowley vs 1-Hampton-Beckvall
100 3.00 1.00 3♥ W -1 3-Allen-Ash vs 2-Lusby-Brewer
140 2.00 2.00 2♠ E 3 4-Bender-Mattingly vs 4-Morgan-Averkamp
170 1.00 3.00 2♥ W 4 1-Thomas-Mishel vs 3-Jones-Back
620 0.00 4.00 4♠ E 4 2-Farnham-Max vs 6-Greenberg-Leavitt
|
17 |
♠AK83
♥KJ652
♦92
♣A2
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 2♠ 3NT ♣6 ♦4 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
180 4.00 0.00 1N N 4 5-Yoder-Yoder vs 5-James-Lipon
110 3.00 1.00 2♥ N 2 4-Bender-Mattingly vs 3-Jones-Back
50 1.50 2.50 4♥ N -1 1-Thomas-Mishel vs 2-Lusby-Brewer
50 1.50 2.50 3♥ N -1 2-Farnham-Max vs 4-Morgan-Averkamp
100 0.00 4.00 3♥ N -2 3-Allen-Ash vs 1-Hampton-Beckvall
|
18 |
♠QJ82
♥KJ7532
♦93
♣5
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ ♣5 ♦4/5 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 1♠ 1NT ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 4.00 0.00 3♥ N 3 3-Allen-Ash vs 1-Hampton-Beckvall
100 3.00 1.00 1N W -2 5-Yoder-Yoder vs 5-James-Lipon
50 2.00 2.00 1N E -1 4-Bender-Mattingly vs 3-Jones-Back
90 1.00 3.00 1N W 1 1-Thomas-Mishel vs 2-Lusby-Brewer
100 0.00 4.00 3♥ N -1 2-Farnham-Max vs 4-Morgan-Averkamp
|
19 |
♠9832
♥JT543
♦K
♣T64
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦2 ♥6 ♠4 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 5♦ 1♥ 2♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
130 4.00 0.00 4♦ W 4 2-Farnham-Max vs 4-Morgan-Averkamp
150 3.00 1.00 4♦ W 5 1-Thomas-Mishel vs 2-Lusby-Brewer
210 2.00 2.00 2N W 5 5-Yoder-Yoder vs 5-James-Lipon
630 0.50 3.50 3N W 4 3-Allen-Ash vs 1-Hampton-Beckvall
630 0.50 3.50 3N W 4 4-Bender-Mattingly vs 3-Jones-Back
|
20 |
♠5
♥A865
♦AQJ854
♣32
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣2 ♥2 ♠4 NT2 |
EW: 3♣ 5♥ 3♠ 1NT ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
500 4.00 0.00 4♠* W -2 4-Bender-Mattingly vs 3-Jones-Back
200 2.50 1.50 3N E -2 1-Thomas-Mishel vs 2-Lusby-Brewer
200 2.50 1.50 3N E -2 3-Allen-Ash vs 1-Hampton-Beckvall
100 1.00 3.00 3♣ E -1 5-Yoder-Yoder vs 5-James-Lipon
150 0.00 4.00 3♣ E 5 2-Farnham-Max vs 4-Morgan-Averkamp
|
21 |
♠765
♥JT93
♦QJ93
♣KT
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦6 ♥5 ♠3 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ 2♥ 3♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 3.50 0.50 3N E -1 5-Yoder-Yoder vs 4-Morgan-Averkamp
50 3.50 0.50 4♠ W -1 3-Allen-Ash vs 5-James-Lipon
90 1.50 2.50 1N W 1 2-Farnham-Max vs 3-Jones-Back
90 1.50 2.50 1N E 1 4-Bender-Mattingly vs 2-Lusby-Brewer
400 0.00 4.00 3N E 3 6-Nabours-Crowley vs 6-Greenberg-Leavitt
|
22 |
♠T97
♥KT5
♦J973
♣Q73
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦6 ♥3 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 3♥ 3♠ 1NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 4.00 0.00 4♠ E -1 3-Allen-Ash vs 5-James-Lipon
100 3.00 1.00 4♣ S -2 4-Bender-Mattingly vs 2-Lusby-Brewer
140 1.00 3.00 3♠ E 3 2-Farnham-Max vs 3-Jones-Back
140 1.00 3.00 3♠ E 3 6-Nabours-Crowley vs 6-Greenberg-Leavitt
140 1.00 3.00 3♥ W 3 5-Yoder-Yoder vs 4-Morgan-Averkamp
|
23 |
♠KQJ75
♥QJ7
♦4
♣QJ92
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦0 ♥1 ♠5 NT1 |
EW: 6♦ 6♥ 2♠ 4NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
130 4.00 0.00 3♦ W 4 4-Bender-Mattingly vs 2-Lusby-Brewer
150 3.00 1.00 3♦ W 5 2-Farnham-Max vs 3-Jones-Back
170 2.00 2.00 3♦ W 6 3-Allen-Ash vs 5-James-Lipon
620 0.50 3.50 4♥ E 4 5-Yoder-Yoder vs 4-Morgan-Averkamp
620 0.50 3.50 4♥ E 4 6-Nabours-Crowley vs 6-Greenberg-Leavitt
|
24 |
♠T82
♥AT
♦K952
♣AKJ7
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 6♦ 4/5♥ 5♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦1 ♥2 ♠2 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
460 4.00 0.00 3N N 5 4-Bender-Mattingly vs 2-Lusby-Brewer
430 2.00 2.00 3N N 4 2-Farnham-Max vs 3-Jones-Back
430 2.00 2.00 3N N 4 3-Allen-Ash vs 5-James-Lipon
430 2.00 2.00 3N N 4 5-Yoder-Yoder vs 4-Morgan-Averkamp
50 0.00 4.00 3N N -1 6-Nabours-Crowley vs 6-Greenberg-Leavitt
|