1 |
♠J72
♥A3
♦A86
♣KQ942
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♦ 3/4♥ 2♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦3 ♥3 ♠4/5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 4.00 0.00 2N N 3 4-Whalen-Highsmith vs 2-McBride-Averkamp
140 3.00 1.00 2♥ S 3 1-Sunenshine-Sunenshine vs 1-Cosgrove-Hargest
120 2.00 2.00 1N N 2 5-Farnham-Back vs 4-Morgan-Adams
50 0.50 3.50 3♥ S -1 3-Allen-Ash vs 5-Sherwood-Johnston
50 0.50 3.50 3♦ S -1 2-Nabours-Crowley vs 3-James-Katzin
|
2 |
♠AJ32
♥A4
♦K62
♣J865
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♦ 1♥ 1♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦5 ♥5 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
130 4.00 0.00 2♣ N 4 1-Sunenshine-Sunenshine vs 1-Cosgrove-Hargest
110 3.00 1.00 2♣ N 3 5-Farnham-Back vs 4-Morgan-Adams
100 2.00 2.00 2♠ W -2 4-Whalen-Highsmith vs 2-McBride-Averkamp
90 1.00 3.00 2♦ S 2 3-Allen-Ash vs 5-Sherwood-Johnston
100 0.00 4.00 4♣ N -1 2-Nabours-Crowley vs 3-James-Katzin
|
3 |
♠T7
♥KQ65
♦9732
♣T32
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3/4♦ -/2♥ -/1♠ -/3NT ♣5/6 ♥6/8 ♠6/7 NT5/9 |
EW: 1♣ ♦3 ♥5 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 3.00 1.00 2N S 3 2-Nabours-Crowley vs 3-James-Katzin
150 3.00 1.00 2N S 3 3-Allen-Ash vs 5-Sherwood-Johnston
150 3.00 1.00 3♦ S 5 1-Sunenshine-Sunenshine vs 1-Cosgrove-Hargest
130 1.00 3.00 3♦ S 4 5-Farnham-Back vs 4-Morgan-Adams
100 0.00 4.00 2♣ W -1 4-Whalen-Highsmith vs 2-McBride-Averkamp
|
4 |
♠A82
♥QT863
♦QT94
♣Q
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 3♥ ♣4 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 1♠ ♦4 ♥3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
620 4.00 0.00 4♥ N 4 1-Sunenshine-Sunenshine vs 1-Cosgrove-Hargest
140 2.50 1.50 2♥ N 3 2-Nabours-Crowley vs 3-James-Katzin
140 2.50 1.50 2♥ N 3 3-Allen-Ash vs 5-Sherwood-Johnston
100 1.00 3.00 3♥ N -1 4-Whalen-Highsmith vs 2-McBride-Averkamp
140 0.00 4.00 1♠ E 3 5-Farnham-Back vs 4-Morgan-Adams
|
5 |
♠A542
♥Q65
♦94
♣K932
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦2 ♥4 ♠3/4 NT3 |
EW: 2♣ 4♦ 3♥ 3♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 4.00 0.00 3♦ E 3 2-Nabours-Crowley vs 2-McBride-Averkamp
130 3.00 1.00 3♦ E 4 1-Sunenshine-Sunenshine vs 5-Sherwood-Johnston
150 2.00 2.00 2N E 3 5-Farnham-Back vs 3-James-Katzin
400 0.50 3.50 3N E 3 3-Allen-Ash vs 4-Morgan-Adams
400 0.50 3.50 3N E 3 4-Whalen-Highsmith vs 1-Cosgrove-Hargest
|
6 |
♠AKQ62
♥93
♦AQ95
♣82
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ ♣2 ♥3 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 3/4♣ 3♥ -/3NT ♦3/5 ♠5/6 NT5/9 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 4.00 0.00 4♥* W -1 1-Sunenshine-Sunenshine vs 5-Sherwood-Johnston
170 3.00 1.00 3♥ W 4 5-Farnham-Back vs 3-James-Katzin
620 1.00 3.00 4♥ W 4 2-Nabours-Crowley vs 2-McBride-Averkamp
620 1.00 3.00 4♥ W 4 3-Allen-Ash vs 4-Morgan-Adams
620 1.00 3.00 4♥ W 4 4-Whalen-Highsmith vs 1-Cosgrove-Hargest
|
7 |
♠A3
♥J3
♦K98743
♣K86
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6/5♣ 4♦ 2♠ 2NT ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣1 ♦3 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 3.00 1.00 4♣ S 5 2-Nabours-Crowley vs 2-McBride-Averkamp
150 3.00 1.00 4♣ S 5 3-Allen-Ash vs 4-Morgan-Adams
150 3.00 1.00 3♣ S 5 4-Whalen-Highsmith vs 1-Cosgrove-Hargest
130 1.00 3.00 3♦ N 4 1-Sunenshine-Sunenshine vs 5-Sherwood-Johnston
200 0.00 4.00 3N N -2 5-Farnham-Back vs 3-James-Katzin
|
8 |
♠KT
♥Q84
♦KT9874
♣Q4
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ ♣6 ♥3 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 1♣ 4♥ 4/5♠ 2/4NT ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 3.50 0.50 3♥ W 4 2-Nabours-Crowley vs 2-McBride-Averkamp
170 3.50 0.50 3♥ W 4 5-Farnham-Back vs 3-James-Katzin
400 2.00 2.00 3N W 3 3-Allen-Ash vs 4-Morgan-Adams
450 0.50 3.50 4♥ W 5 1-Sunenshine-Sunenshine vs 5-Sherwood-Johnston
450 0.50 3.50 4♥ W 5 4-Whalen-Highsmith vs 1-Cosgrove-Hargest
|
9 |
♠9873
♥KJ
♦J96
♣KJ43
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♠ ♦4 ♥4 NT5 |
EW: 2♦ 2♥ ♣4 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 4.00 0.00 2♠ N 4 1-Sunenshine-Sunenshine vs 4-Morgan-Adams
140 2.50 1.50 2♠ S 3 2-Nabours-Crowley vs 1-Cosgrove-Hargest
140 2.50 1.50 2♠ N 3 4-Whalen-Highsmith vs 5-Sherwood-Johnston
110 0.50 3.50 2♠ N 2 3-Allen-Ash vs 3-James-Katzin
110 0.50 3.50 2♠ N 2 5-Farnham-Back vs 2-McBride-Averkamp
|
10 |
♠T52
♥54
♦KJT62
♣KJ4
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 6♦ 1/2♥ 3♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦1 ♥5 ♠4 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
690 4.00 0.00 3N S 6 5-Farnham-Back vs 2-McBride-Averkamp
660 3.00 1.00 3N S 5 4-Whalen-Highsmith vs 5-Sherwood-Johnston
600 1.50 2.50 3N S 3 2-Nabours-Crowley vs 1-Cosgrove-Hargest
600 1.50 2.50 5♦ N 5 1-Sunenshine-Sunenshine vs 4-Morgan-Adams
100 0.00 4.00 3N S -1 3-Allen-Ash vs 3-James-Katzin
|
11 |
♠63
♥QJT7542
♦KT5
♣3
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 4♥ ♦3 ♠2 NT6 |
EW: 3♦ 3♠ ♣5 ♥2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
420 3.50 0.50 4♥ S 4 4-Whalen-Highsmith vs 5-Sherwood-Johnston
420 3.50 0.50 4♥ N 4 2-Nabours-Crowley vs 1-Cosgrove-Hargest
50 2.00 2.00 5♥ N -1 5-Farnham-Back vs 2-McBride-Averkamp
420 1.00 3.00 4♠ W 4 3-Allen-Ash vs 3-James-Katzin
690 0.00 4.00 4♠* W 5 1-Sunenshine-Sunenshine vs 4-Morgan-Adams
|
12 |
♠QT985
♥AJ95
♦764
♣2
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣4 ♦3 ♠5 NT3 |
EW: 2♣ 4♦ 1♠ 4NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 4.00 0.00 5♦ W -1 2-Nabours-Crowley vs 1-Cosgrove-Hargest
130 1.50 2.50 3♦ W 4 1-Sunenshine-Sunenshine vs 4-Morgan-Adams
130 1.50 2.50 2♦ W 4 4-Whalen-Highsmith vs 5-Sherwood-Johnston
130 1.50 2.50 2♦ W 4 5-Farnham-Back vs 2-McBride-Averkamp
130 1.50 2.50 1♦ W 4 3-Allen-Ash vs 3-James-Katzin
|
13 |
♠T754
♥K9
♦AT
♣QT942
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 4♦ 1NT ♥3 ♠3 |
EW: 3♥ 3♠ ♣5 ♦3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
300 4.00 0.00 4♠ W -3 4-Whalen-Highsmith vs 4-Morgan-Adams
100 3.00 1.00 5♦ S -1 3-Allen-Ash vs 2-McBride-Averkamp
140 2.00 2.00 2♥ W 3 5-Farnham-Back vs 1-Cosgrove-Hargest
500 1.00 3.00 5♦* S -2 2-Nabours-Crowley vs 5-Sherwood-Johnston
790 0.00 4.00 4♥* W 4 1-Sunenshine-Sunenshine vs 3-James-Katzin
|
14 |
♠A742
♥Q75
♦AK95
♣QJ
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 1/-♥ ♣4 ♥7/6 ♠6/5 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ ♦4 ♥5 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 4.00 0.00 1N N 3 1-Sunenshine-Sunenshine vs 3-James-Katzin
110 3.00 1.00 1♦ N 3 3-Allen-Ash vs 2-McBride-Averkamp
90 2.00 2.00 1N N 1 4-Whalen-Highsmith vs 4-Morgan-Adams
50 1.00 3.00 2N N -1 2-Nabours-Crowley vs 5-Sherwood-Johnston
100 0.00 4.00 1N N -2 5-Farnham-Back vs 1-Cosgrove-Hargest
|
15 |
♠8
♥AJT876
♦KQ6
♣J75
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ -/1♦ 4/5♥ 1/3NT ♦6/7 ♠5/6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣6 ♦6 ♥2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
650 4.00 0.00 4♥ N 5 2-Nabours-Crowley vs 5-Sherwood-Johnston
620 2.00 2.00 4♥ N 4 1-Sunenshine-Sunenshine vs 3-James-Katzin
620 2.00 2.00 4♥ N 4 3-Allen-Ash vs 2-McBride-Averkamp
620 2.00 2.00 4♥ N 4 5-Farnham-Back vs 1-Cosgrove-Hargest
150 0.00 4.00 4♠ W -3 4-Whalen-Highsmith vs 4-Morgan-Adams
|
16 |
♠J875
♥KQ8
♦Q7
♣Q654
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦5 ♥5 ♠6 NT6/5 |
EW: 2♦ 2♥ ♣5 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 4.00 0.00 1N E -2 3-Allen-Ash vs 2-McBride-Averkamp
110 3.00 1.00 2♠ S 2 1-Sunenshine-Sunenshine vs 3-James-Katzin
PASS 1.00 3.00 Pass Out 2-Nabours-Crowley vs 5-Sherwood-Johnston
PASS 1.00 3.00 Pass Out 4-Whalen-Highsmith vs 4-Morgan-Adams
PASS 1.00 3.00 Pass Out 5-Farnham-Back vs 1-Cosgrove-Hargest
|
17 |
♠A8532
♥K8
♦952
♣K87
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 2♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦3 ♥5 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
90 4.00 0.00 2♦ S 2 5-Farnham-Back vs 5-Sherwood-Johnston
50 2.50 1.50 4♠ S -1 1-Sunenshine-Sunenshine vs 2-McBride-Averkamp
50 2.50 1.50 3♥ S -1 4-Whalen-Highsmith vs 3-James-Katzin
100 1.00 3.00 3N N -2 3-Allen-Ash vs 1-Cosgrove-Hargest
150 0.00 4.00 4♠ N -3 2-Nabours-Crowley vs 4-Morgan-Adams
|
18 |
♠J765
♥9764
♦743
♣K9
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ -/1♠ ♣5 ♦2 ♠6/7 NT2 |
EW: 2/1♣ 5♦ 5NT ♥5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 4.00 0.00 4♦ W 5 4-Whalen-Highsmith vs 3-James-Katzin
400 2.00 2.00 5♦ W 5 3-Allen-Ash vs 1-Cosgrove-Hargest
400 2.00 2.00 5♦ W 5 5-Farnham-Back vs 5-Sherwood-Johnston
400 2.00 2.00 5♦ E 5 2-Nabours-Crowley vs 4-Morgan-Adams
420 0.00 4.00 5♦ W 6 1-Sunenshine-Sunenshine vs 2-McBride-Averkamp
|
19 |
♠72
♥KQT3
♦T753
♣T65
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 4♥ ♦4 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 2♦ ♣5 ♥3 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
300 4.00 0.00 4♦ E -3 1-Sunenshine-Sunenshine vs 2-McBride-Averkamp
170 1.50 2.50 3♥ S 4 3-Allen-Ash vs 1-Cosgrove-Hargest
170 1.50 2.50 3♥ S 4 4-Whalen-Highsmith vs 3-James-Katzin
170 1.50 2.50 2♥ S 4 2-Nabours-Crowley vs 4-Morgan-Adams
170 1.50 2.50 2♥ S 4 5-Farnham-Back vs 5-Sherwood-Johnston
|
20 |
♠AQJ85
♥AQ5
♦Q5
♣A82
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1♦ 3/2♥ 4♠ 4/3NT |
EW: ♣2/3 ♦6 ♥4 ♠3 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.00 1.00 4♠ S -1 5-Farnham-Back vs 5-Sherwood-Johnston
100 3.00 1.00 4♠ N -1 3-Allen-Ash vs 1-Cosgrove-Hargest
100 3.00 1.00 4♠ N -1 4-Whalen-Highsmith vs 3-James-Katzin
200 0.50 3.50 4♠ N -2 1-Sunenshine-Sunenshine vs 2-McBride-Averkamp
200 0.50 3.50 4♠ N -2 2-Nabours-Crowley vs 4-Morgan-Adams
|