1 |
♠KQJ
♥7653
♦63
♣9764
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ ♦6 ♥3 ♠6 NT3 |
EW: 1♦ 3♥ ♣3 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 4.00 0.00 3♠ E -3 5-Sunenshine-Sunenshine vs 3-Goldberg-Renfrow
50 3.00 1.00 3♥ W -1 1-Averkamp-James vs 1-Beckvall-Clark
140 1.50 2.50 3♥ W 3 3-Hampton-Keaton vs 4-Brewer-Lusby
140 1.50 2.50 3♥ W 3 4-Jones-Back vs 6-Morgan-Lipon
170 0.00 4.00 3♥ W 4 6-Urben-Jacobson vs 5-Banucci-Banucci
|
2 |
♠AJ83
♥J94
♦J76
♣K74
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ 2♥ 3♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦6 ♥5 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
600 4.00 0.00 3N S 3 6-Urben-Jacobson vs 5-Banucci-Banucci
150 3.00 1.00 2N S 3 3-Hampton-Keaton vs 4-Brewer-Lusby
110 2.00 2.00 2♠ N 2 1-Averkamp-James vs 1-Beckvall-Clark
80 1.00 3.00 1♠ N 1 4-Jones-Back vs 6-Morgan-Lipon
100 0.00 4.00 3N S -1 5-Sunenshine-Sunenshine vs 3-Goldberg-Renfrow
|
3 |
♠KQJ5
♥T63
♦J96
♣K83
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦3 ♥5 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 4♦ 1♥ 3♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.50 0.50 3♠ W -1 5-Sunenshine-Sunenshine vs 3-Goldberg-Renfrow
100 3.50 0.50 3♠ W -1 6-Urben-Jacobson vs 5-Banucci-Banucci
120 1.50 2.50 2N E 2 3-Hampton-Keaton vs 4-Brewer-Lusby
120 1.50 2.50 2N E 2 4-Jones-Back vs 6-Morgan-Lipon
170 0.00 4.00 3♠ W 4 1-Averkamp-James vs 1-Beckvall-Clark
|
4 |
♠T932
♥8765
♦Q4
♣942
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦4 ♥2 ♠4 NT2 |
EW: 4♣ 3♦ 3♥ 2♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 4.00 0.00 1N W -1 4-Jones-Back vs 6-Morgan-Lipon
150 3.00 1.00 1N E 3 1-Averkamp-James vs 1-Beckvall-Clark
600 2.00 2.00 3N E 3 5-Sunenshine-Sunenshine vs 3-Goldberg-Renfrow
630 0.50 3.50 3N W 4 3-Hampton-Keaton vs 4-Brewer-Lusby
630 0.50 3.50 3N W 4 6-Urben-Jacobson vs 5-Banucci-Banucci
|
5 |
♠K2
♥Q62
♦AKT432
♣96
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♦ 3♥ 2NT ♠5 |
EW: 2♠ ♣6/5 ♦3 ♥4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 4.00 0.00 3♦ N 5 6-Urben-Jacobson vs 4-Brewer-Lusby
140 3.00 1.00 2♥ S 3 4-Jones-Back vs 5-Banucci-Banucci
110 2.00 2.00 2♥ S 2 2-Farnham-Max vs 2-Mattingly-Mattingly
100 1.00 3.00 4♥ S -1 5-Sunenshine-Sunenshine vs 1-Beckvall-Clark
140 0.00 4.00 3♠ E 3 1-Averkamp-James vs 6-Morgan-Lipon
|
6 |
♠T53
♥K
♦A84
♣AKQ965
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ ♥5 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣5 ♦4 ♥6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 4.00 0.00 3♠ E -2 1-Averkamp-James vs 6-Morgan-Lipon
100 3.00 1.00 3♠ E -1 2-Farnham-Max vs 2-Mattingly-Mattingly
90 2.00 2.00 2♣ N 2 6-Urben-Jacobson vs 4-Brewer-Lusby
50 0.50 3.50 3♣ N -1 4-Jones-Back vs 5-Banucci-Banucci
50 0.50 3.50 3♣ N -1 5-Sunenshine-Sunenshine vs 1-Beckvall-Clark
|
7 |
♠T8652
♥Q96
♦8432
♣5
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣3 ♦5 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 1♦ 2NT ♥6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
90 4.00 0.00 1N S 1 6-Urben-Jacobson vs 4-Brewer-Lusby
110 2.50 1.50 3♣ W 3 1-Averkamp-James vs 6-Morgan-Lipon
110 2.50 1.50 3♣ E 3 4-Jones-Back vs 5-Banucci-Banucci
130 0.50 3.50 3♣ E 4 2-Farnham-Max vs 2-Mattingly-Mattingly
130 0.50 3.50 3♣ E 4 5-Sunenshine-Sunenshine vs 1-Beckvall-Clark
|
8 |
♠AJT
♥T3
♦K732
♣QJ83
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 5♦ 1♠ 1NT ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣2 ♦2 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
400 4.00 0.00 3N N 3 6-Urben-Jacobson vs 4-Brewer-Lusby
150 3.00 1.00 2♣ S 5 4-Jones-Back vs 5-Banucci-Banucci
130 2.00 2.00 3♦ S 4 2-Farnham-Max vs 2-Mattingly-Mattingly
100 1.00 3.00 3♥ E -2 1-Averkamp-James vs 6-Morgan-Lipon
50 0.00 4.00 2♥ E -1 5-Sunenshine-Sunenshine vs 1-Beckvall-Clark
|
9 |
♠J6
♥AT73
♦AJ863
♣Q9
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣2 ♥4 ♠4 NT3 |
EW: 5♣ 2♥ 3♠ 3NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 4.00 0.00 4♠ E -2 2-Farnham-Max vs 1-Beckvall-Clark
50 3.00 1.00 3♦ N -1 5-Sunenshine-Sunenshine vs 6-Morgan-Lipon
100 2.00 2.00 3♦ N -2 3-Hampton-Keaton vs 3-Goldberg-Renfrow
150 1.00 3.00 4♣ W 5 1-Averkamp-James vs 5-Banucci-Banucci
170 0.00 4.00 4♣ W 6 6-Urben-Jacobson vs 2-Mattingly-Mattingly
|
10 |
♠A8
♥KJ6
♦AJ84
♣J842
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦6 ♥5 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ 2♥ 3♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 4.00 0.00 3♠ W -1 2-Farnham-Max vs 1-Beckvall-Clark
140 2.50 1.50 3♠ W 3 3-Hampton-Keaton vs 3-Goldberg-Renfrow
140 2.50 1.50 2♠ E 3 6-Urben-Jacobson vs 2-Mattingly-Mattingly
180 1.00 3.00 1N W 4 1-Averkamp-James vs 5-Banucci-Banucci
200 0.00 4.00 2♦* N -1 5-Sunenshine-Sunenshine vs 6-Morgan-Lipon
|
11 |
♠QJ64
♥KQ862
♦J97
♣A
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦2 ♥5 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 5♦ 2/1♥ 2/1♠ 4NT ♣4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
470 4.00 0.00 3♣* S 3 5-Sunenshine-Sunenshine vs 6-Morgan-Lipon
50 3.00 1.00 4♣ S -1 2-Farnham-Max vs 1-Beckvall-Clark
150 2.00 2.00 4♦ E 5 1-Averkamp-James vs 5-Banucci-Banucci
300 1.00 3.00 5♣* S -2 6-Urben-Jacobson vs 2-Mattingly-Mattingly
550 0.00 4.00 5♦* E 5 3-Hampton-Keaton vs 3-Goldberg-Renfrow
|
12 |
♠KQ96
♥985
♦KQ2
♣KJ3
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 1♠ 1NT ♣6 ♥6 |
EW: ♣6 ♦4 ♥6 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.50 0.50 1N E -2 6-Urben-Jacobson vs 2-Mattingly-Mattingly
100 3.50 0.50 2♥ E -2 2-Farnham-Max vs 1-Beckvall-Clark
90 2.00 2.00 2♦ S 2 1-Averkamp-James vs 5-Banucci-Banucci
100 0.50 3.50 3N S -1 5-Sunenshine-Sunenshine vs 6-Morgan-Lipon
100 0.50 3.50 2N S -1 3-Hampton-Keaton vs 3-Goldberg-Renfrow
|
13 |
♠A8764
♥T865
♦75
♣KQ
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣5 ♦4 ♥5 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 1♥ 2NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 4.00 0.00 4♦ E -2 1-Averkamp-James vs 3-Goldberg-Renfrow
100 3.00 1.00 2♦ E -1 4-Jones-Back vs 4-Brewer-Lusby
100 2.00 2.00 2♠ N -1 2-Farnham-Max vs 6-Morgan-Lipon
110 1.00 3.00 2♦ E 3 3-Hampton-Keaton vs 2-Mattingly-Mattingly
120 0.00 4.00 1N E 2 6-Urben-Jacobson vs 1-Beckvall-Clark
|
14 |
♠653
♥QJT9742
♦3
♣T9
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ 3♥ ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 2♠ ♣4 ♦6 ♥4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
130 4.00 0.00 2♣ S 4 4-Jones-Back vs 4-Brewer-Lusby
50 3.00 1.00 4♠ E -1 3-Hampton-Keaton vs 2-Mattingly-Mattingly
100 1.00 3.00 4♥ N -2 2-Farnham-Max vs 6-Morgan-Lipon
100 1.00 3.00 6♣* S -1 6-Urben-Jacobson vs 1-Beckvall-Clark
100 1.00 3.00 5♣ S -2 1-Averkamp-James vs 3-Goldberg-Renfrow
|
15 |
♠865
♥AKT75
♦Q95
♣94
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣3 ♦3 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 4♦ 1♠ 3NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 4.00 0.00 2♥ N 2 1-Averkamp-James vs 3-Goldberg-Renfrow
100 3.00 1.00 2N W -2 3-Hampton-Keaton vs 2-Mattingly-Mattingly
90 2.00 2.00 1♦ E 2 4-Jones-Back vs 4-Brewer-Lusby
100 1.00 3.00 2♥ N -1 6-Urben-Jacobson vs 1-Beckvall-Clark
110 0.00 4.00 1♦ E 3 2-Farnham-Max vs 6-Morgan-Lipon
|
16 |
♠T73
♥T984
♦AT952
♣2
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦5 ♥4 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 2♦ 3♥ 3♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
620 4.00 0.00 4♠ E 4 1-Averkamp-James vs 3-Goldberg-Renfrow
630 2.00 2.00 3N W 4 2-Farnham-Max vs 6-Morgan-Lipon
630 2.00 2.00 3N W 4 3-Hampton-Keaton vs 2-Mattingly-Mattingly
630 2.00 2.00 3N W 4 6-Urben-Jacobson vs 1-Beckvall-Clark
650 0.00 4.00 4♠ E 5 4-Jones-Back vs 4-Brewer-Lusby
|
17 |
♠K96
♥J8
♦Q985
♣J974
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♠ 2NT ♣5 ♦6 ♥4/5 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ 2♥ ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
420 4.00 0.00 4♠ S 4 3-Hampton-Keaton vs 1-Beckvall-Clark
170 3.00 1.00 3♠ S 4 4-Jones-Back vs 3-Goldberg-Renfrow
140 2.00 2.00 3♠ S 3 1-Averkamp-James vs 2-Mattingly-Mattingly
120 1.00 3.00 1N S 2 5-Sunenshine-Sunenshine vs 5-Banucci-Banucci
50 0.00 4.00 4♠ S -1 2-Farnham-Max vs 4-Brewer-Lusby
|
18 |
♠T65
♥KQJ
♦K963
♣QJ6
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 3♥ 2♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦5 ♥4 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
600 4.00 0.00 3N S 3 3-Hampton-Keaton vs 1-Beckvall-Clark
150 3.00 1.00 1N W -3 4-Jones-Back vs 3-Goldberg-Renfrow
120 2.00 2.00 1N N 2 2-Farnham-Max vs 4-Brewer-Lusby
100 1.00 3.00 3N N -1 1-Averkamp-James vs 2-Mattingly-Mattingly
500 0.00 4.00 6N* S -2 5-Sunenshine-Sunenshine vs 5-Banucci-Banucci
|
19 |
♠32
♥AKJT82
♦J
♣9654
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 1NT ♣6 ♦6 ♠5 |
EW: 1♦ 2♠ ♣6 ♥4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 3.50 0.50 3♥ N 3 1-Averkamp-James vs 2-Mattingly-Mattingly
140 3.50 0.50 2♥ N 3 4-Jones-Back vs 3-Goldberg-Renfrow
100 2.00 2.00 4♠ W -1 2-Farnham-Max vs 4-Brewer-Lusby
50 1.00 3.00 4♥ N -1 3-Hampton-Keaton vs 1-Beckvall-Clark
100 0.00 4.00 4♥ N -2 5-Sunenshine-Sunenshine vs 5-Banucci-Banucci
|
20 |
♠A98
♥85
♦974
♣K9872
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3/2♦ 1♠ ♣4 ♥4 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 3♥ 1/-NT ♦4 ♠6 NT7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 4.00 0.00 3♦ S 3 1-Averkamp-James vs 2-Mattingly-Mattingly
100 2.50 1.50 4♥ E -1 4-Jones-Back vs 3-Goldberg-Renfrow
100 2.50 1.50 4♥ E -1 5-Sunenshine-Sunenshine vs 5-Banucci-Banucci
140 0.50 3.50 3♥ E 3 2-Farnham-Max vs 4-Brewer-Lusby
140 0.50 3.50 2♥ W 3 3-Hampton-Keaton vs 1-Beckvall-Clark
|
21 |
♠K84
♥Q3
♦J
♣AKJ9532
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1/-♠ 3NT ♦2 ♥3 ♠7/6 |
EW: 5♦ 3♥ ♣4 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
630 4.00 0.00 3N S 4 6-Urben-Jacobson vs 6-Morgan-Lipon
130 3.00 1.00 2♣ N 4 2-Farnham-Max vs 3-Goldberg-Renfrow
110 2.00 2.00 2♣ N 3 5-Sunenshine-Sunenshine vs 4-Brewer-Lusby
100 1.00 3.00 4♣ N -1 3-Hampton-Keaton vs 5-Banucci-Banucci
200 0.00 4.00 5♣ N -2 4-Jones-Back vs 2-Mattingly-Mattingly
|
22 |
♠T9
♥98753
♦QT953
♣8
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♥ ♣2 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 5♣ 4♠ 2NT ♦6 ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 4.00 0.00 3N W -2 4-Jones-Back vs 2-Mattingly-Mattingly
100 2.50 1.50 3N W -1 3-Hampton-Keaton vs 5-Banucci-Banucci
100 2.50 1.50 3N W -1 6-Urben-Jacobson vs 6-Morgan-Lipon
200 1.00 3.00 2♠ E 5 2-Farnham-Max vs 3-Goldberg-Renfrow
620 0.00 4.00 4♠ E 4 5-Sunenshine-Sunenshine vs 4-Brewer-Lusby
|
23 |
♠7
♥QT874
♦KT863
♣A5
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 3♥ 1/-♠ ♣4 ♠7/6 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ ♦4/5 ♥4 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
800 4.00 0.00 5♣* E -3 5-Sunenshine-Sunenshine vs 4-Brewer-Lusby
140 3.00 1.00 3♥ N 3 4-Jones-Back vs 2-Mattingly-Mattingly
110 2.00 2.00 3♣ S 3 6-Urben-Jacobson vs 6-Morgan-Lipon
150 1.00 3.00 1N W 3 3-Hampton-Keaton vs 5-Banucci-Banucci
300 0.00 4.00 3♥ N -3 2-Farnham-Max vs 3-Goldberg-Renfrow
|
24 |
♠QT62
♥Q85
♦AQ4
♣654
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♥ ♣3 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 2♠ ♦4 ♥6 NT4/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 3.00 1.00 3♦ S -1 3-Hampton-Keaton vs 5-Banucci-Banucci
50 3.00 1.00 3♦ S -1 6-Urben-Jacobson vs 6-Morgan-Lipon
50 3.00 1.00 2♦ S -1 4-Jones-Back vs 2-Mattingly-Mattingly
90 1.00 3.00 1N W 1 2-Farnham-Max vs 3-Goldberg-Renfrow
100 0.00 4.00 3♠ N -2 5-Sunenshine-Sunenshine vs 4-Brewer-Lusby
|