1 |
♠Q5
♥A97
♦975
♣A8532
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♥ 3NT ♦6 ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣3 ♦6 ♥3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
420 4.00 0.00 4♥ S 4 4-Hampton-Keaton vs 6-Fordon-Bender
50 1.50 2.50 3N S -1 3-Vettraino-Sendrow vs 4-Morgan-Adams
50 1.50 2.50 2N S -1 1-Allen-Ash vs 1-James-Bailey
50 1.50 2.50 4♥ S -1 5-Schrader-Back vs 3-Beckvall-Clark
50 1.50 2.50 4♥ S -1 6-Banucci-Banucci vs 5-Walker-Bingaman
|
2 |
♠K32
♥Q972
♦982
♣Q73
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦1 ♥2 ♠3 NT1 |
EW: 5♣ 5♦ 5♥ 4♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 4.00 0.00 3N E -1 6-Banucci-Banucci vs 5-Walker-Bingaman
400 3.00 1.00 3N W 3 3-Vettraino-Sendrow vs 4-Morgan-Adams
430 1.00 3.00 3N W 4 1-Allen-Ash vs 1-James-Bailey
430 1.00 3.00 3N W 4 4-Hampton-Keaton vs 6-Fordon-Bender
430 1.00 3.00 3N W 4 5-Schrader-Back vs 3-Beckvall-Clark
|
3 |
♠T7543
♥84
♦65
♣AQ73
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1NT ♦5 ♥4 ♠6 |
EW: 2♦ 3♥ 1♠ ♣4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.00 1.00 4♥ E -1 1-Allen-Ash vs 1-James-Bailey
100 3.00 1.00 4♥ E -1 3-Vettraino-Sendrow vs 4-Morgan-Adams
100 3.00 1.00 4♥ E -1 4-Hampton-Keaton vs 6-Fordon-Bender
140 0.50 3.50 3♥ E 3 5-Schrader-Back vs 3-Beckvall-Clark
140 0.50 3.50 3♥ E 3 6-Banucci-Banucci vs 5-Walker-Bingaman
|
4 |
♠AJ
♥QT764
♦T72
♣T85
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 4♦ 7♥ 7♠ 7NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦3 ♥0 ♠0 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
680 4.00 0.00 4♥ N 6 1-Allen-Ash vs 1-James-Bailey
660 3.00 1.00 5N S 5 6-Banucci-Banucci vs 5-Walker-Bingaman
230 2.00 2.00 3♥ S 6 3-Vettraino-Sendrow vs 4-Morgan-Adams
170 1.00 3.00 3♠ S 4 5-Schrader-Back vs 3-Beckvall-Clark
110 0.00 4.00 1♠ S 2 4-Hampton-Keaton vs 6-Fordon-Bender
|
5 |
♠KJ962
♥J2
♦K543
♣Q5
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 2♠ ♣4 ♥5 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 2♥ ♦4 ♠5 NT6/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
130 4.00 0.00 3♦ S 4 5-Schrader-Back vs 1-James-Bailey
100 3.00 1.00 1N E -2 4-Hampton-Keaton vs 5-Walker-Bingaman
100 2.00 2.00 2♠ N -1 1-Allen-Ash vs 6-Fordon-Bender
110 0.50 3.50 2♥ E 2 2-Farnham-Max vs 2-Mattingly-Mattingly
110 0.50 3.50 2♥ E 2 6-Banucci-Banucci vs 4-Morgan-Adams
|
6 |
♠A2
♥K7
♦876432
♣AKJ
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ 4♥ 4NT ♣6 ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣6 ♦2 ♥3 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
500 4.00 0.00 4♠* W -2 5-Schrader-Back vs 1-James-Bailey
420 2.50 1.50 4♥ S 4 1-Allen-Ash vs 6-Fordon-Bender
420 2.50 1.50 4♥ S 4 4-Hampton-Keaton vs 5-Walker-Bingaman
170 1.00 3.00 3♥ S 4 2-Farnham-Max vs 2-Mattingly-Mattingly
150 0.00 4.00 3♦ N 5 6-Banucci-Banucci vs 4-Morgan-Adams
|
7 |
♠KJ5
♥K82
♦T9842
♣98
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3/4♦ 2♥ 3♠ ♣5 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 1NT ♦3 ♥5 ♠3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 4.00 0.00 2♠ S 4 4-Hampton-Keaton vs 5-Walker-Bingaman
140 3.00 1.00 2♠ S 3 2-Farnham-Max vs 2-Mattingly-Mattingly
110 1.50 2.50 2♠ S 2 5-Schrader-Back vs 1-James-Bailey
110 1.50 2.50 2♠ S 2 6-Banucci-Banucci vs 4-Morgan-Adams
100 0.00 4.00 3♠ S -1 1-Allen-Ash vs 6-Fordon-Bender
|
8 |
♠KT963
♥J643
♦K632
♣-
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3/2♦ 3/2♠ ♣5 ♥6 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ ♦4 ♥6 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 4.00 0.00 3♠ N 3 6-Banucci-Banucci vs 4-Morgan-Adams
110 3.00 1.00 2♠ N 2 4-Hampton-Keaton vs 5-Walker-Bingaman
100 2.00 2.00 3♥ W -2 2-Farnham-Max vs 2-Mattingly-Mattingly
50 1.00 3.00 3♠ N -1 5-Schrader-Back vs 1-James-Bailey
180 0.00 4.00 1N E 4 1-Allen-Ash vs 6-Fordon-Bender
|
9 |
♠AK9763
♥T7
♦AQ8
♣Q7
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/2♣ 7♦ 4/6♥ 7♠ 7NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦0 ♥1 ♠0 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
510 4.00 0.00 4♠ N 7 3-Vettraino-Sendrow vs 3-Beckvall-Clark
480 2.50 1.50 4♠ N 6 2-Farnham-Max vs 1-James-Bailey
480 2.50 1.50 4♠ N 6 6-Banucci-Banucci vs 2-Mattingly-Mattingly
450 1.00 3.00 4♠ N 5 5-Schrader-Back vs 6-Fordon-Bender
200 0.00 4.00 3♠ N 5 1-Allen-Ash vs 5-Walker-Bingaman
|
10 |
♠976
♥KQ93
♦T72
♣J75
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦4 ♥4 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 2♦ 3♥ 1♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.50 0.50 3N E -1 3-Vettraino-Sendrow vs 3-Beckvall-Clark
100 3.50 0.50 2N E -1 6-Banucci-Banucci vs 2-Mattingly-Mattingly
100 2.00 2.00 2♠ S -1 2-Farnham-Max vs 1-James-Bailey
120 1.00 3.00 2N E 2 5-Schrader-Back vs 6-Fordon-Bender
200 0.00 4.00 2♠ S -2 1-Allen-Ash vs 5-Walker-Bingaman
|
11 |
♠95
♥63
♦KT852
♣T953
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♠ ♣4 ♥2 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 5♥ ♦6 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 3.50 0.50 3♥ W -1 1-Allen-Ash vs 5-Walker-Bingaman
50 3.50 0.50 3♥ W -1 2-Farnham-Max vs 1-James-Bailey
170 1.50 2.50 3♥ W 4 3-Vettraino-Sendrow vs 3-Beckvall-Clark
170 1.50 2.50 3♥ W 4 5-Schrader-Back vs 6-Fordon-Bender
420 0.00 4.00 4♥ W 4 6-Banucci-Banucci vs 2-Mattingly-Mattingly
|
12 |
♠KJ5
♥953
♦A2
♣QT976
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ 1♥ 2NT ♠5 |
EW: 2♠ ♣4 ♦6 ♥6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 4.00 0.00 1N W -2 1-Allen-Ash vs 5-Walker-Bingaman
50 3.00 1.00 2♠ W -1 6-Banucci-Banucci vs 2-Mattingly-Mattingly
110 1.50 2.50 2♠ W 2 3-Vettraino-Sendrow vs 3-Beckvall-Clark
110 1.50 2.50 1♠ W 2 5-Schrader-Back vs 6-Fordon-Bender
140 0.00 4.00 1♠ W 3 2-Farnham-Max vs 1-James-Bailey
|
13 |
♠T74
♥K9543
♦T3
♣AT8
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ ♣5 ♦2 ♠2 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 4♦ 5♠ ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
300 4.00 0.00 4N W -3 4-Hampton-Keaton vs 4-Morgan-Adams
230 3.00 1.00 3♠ W 6 1-Allen-Ash vs 3-Beckvall-Clark
600 2.00 2.00 5♦ E 5 2-Farnham-Max vs 6-Fordon-Bender
620 0.50 3.50 4♠ W 4 3-Vettraino-Sendrow vs 2-Mattingly-Mattingly
620 0.50 3.50 5♦ E 6 6-Banucci-Banucci vs 1-James-Bailey
|
14 |
♠K863
♥J75
♦T98
♣752
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦2 ♥5 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 6♣ 4♦ 2♥ 6♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
450 3.50 0.50 4♠ E 5 2-Farnham-Max vs 6-Fordon-Bender
450 3.50 0.50 4♠ E 5 4-Hampton-Keaton vs 4-Morgan-Adams
480 2.00 2.00 4♠ E 6 6-Banucci-Banucci vs 1-James-Bailey
490 1.00 3.00 3N W 6 3-Vettraino-Sendrow vs 2-Mattingly-Mattingly
990 0.00 4.00 6N W 6 1-Allen-Ash vs 3-Beckvall-Clark
|
15 |
♠A8
♥AK543
♦93
♣AT72
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ 5♥ 1♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦5 ♥2 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
650 3.50 0.50 4♥ N 5 1-Allen-Ash vs 3-Beckvall-Clark
650 3.50 0.50 4♥ N 5 4-Hampton-Keaton vs 4-Morgan-Adams
170 1.50 2.50 3♥ N 4 2-Farnham-Max vs 6-Fordon-Bender
170 1.50 2.50 3♥ N 4 6-Banucci-Banucci vs 1-James-Bailey
150 0.00 4.00 4♣ W -3 3-Vettraino-Sendrow vs 2-Mattingly-Mattingly
|
16 |
♠953
♥Q8743
♦J52
♣T2
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦1 ♥3 ♠2 NT1 |
EW: 6♦ 4♥ 5♠ 4/-NT ♣6/5 NT10/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.00 1.00 5♠ E -1 1-Allen-Ash vs 3-Beckvall-Clark
100 3.00 1.00 4♠ E -1 4-Hampton-Keaton vs 4-Morgan-Adams
100 3.00 1.00 4♥ W -1 2-Farnham-Max vs 6-Fordon-Bender
170 1.00 3.00 2♠ E 4 3-Vettraino-Sendrow vs 2-Mattingly-Mattingly
620 0.00 4.00 4♠ E 4 6-Banucci-Banucci vs 1-James-Bailey
|
17 |
♠Q642
♥T98
♦AK3
♣K65
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 4♥ 4♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦5 ♥3 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 4.00 0.00 3♥ S 3 3-Vettraino-Sendrow vs 1-James-Bailey
120 2.50 1.50 2N S 2 1-Allen-Ash vs 2-Mattingly-Mattingly
120 2.50 1.50 2N N 2 2-Farnham-Max vs 4-Morgan-Adams
50 0.50 3.50 3N S -1 5-Schrader-Back vs 5-Walker-Bingaman
50 0.50 3.50 3N N -1 4-Hampton-Keaton vs 3-Beckvall-Clark
|
18 |
♠876
♥A4
♦KJ8653
♣J6
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♥ ♣6 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 1♠ 2NT ♣6 ♦6 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
90 4.00 0.00 1N E 1 2-Farnham-Max vs 4-Morgan-Adams
100 3.00 1.00 2♥ S -1 3-Vettraino-Sendrow vs 1-James-Bailey
120 2.00 2.00 2N E 2 5-Schrader-Back vs 5-Walker-Bingaman
200 1.00 3.00 3♦ N -2 1-Allen-Ash vs 2-Mattingly-Mattingly
600 0.00 4.00 4♣ N -6 4-Hampton-Keaton vs 3-Beckvall-Clark
|
19 |
♠A53
♥KJ95
♦T73
♣K94
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 4♦ 3♥ 2♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦3 ♥4 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
300 3.50 0.50 2♥ W -3 1-Allen-Ash vs 2-Mattingly-Mattingly
300 3.50 0.50 2♥ W -3 3-Vettraino-Sendrow vs 1-James-Bailey
120 2.00 2.00 2N S 2 5-Schrader-Back vs 5-Walker-Bingaman
100 0.50 3.50 3N S -2 4-Hampton-Keaton vs 3-Beckvall-Clark
100 0.50 3.50 3♦ S -2 2-Farnham-Max vs 4-Morgan-Adams
|
20 |
♠T95
♥Q5
♦Q72
♣JT876
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦2 ♥4 ♠1 NT2 |
EW: 3♣ 5♦ 3♥ 6♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.50 0.50 4♠ W -1 3-Vettraino-Sendrow vs 1-James-Bailey
100 3.50 0.50 4♠ W -1 4-Hampton-Keaton vs 3-Beckvall-Clark
600 1.50 2.50 3N W 3 1-Allen-Ash vs 2-Mattingly-Mattingly
600 1.50 2.50 3N W 3 2-Farnham-Max vs 4-Morgan-Adams
630 0.00 4.00 3N W 4 5-Schrader-Back vs 5-Walker-Bingaman
|
21 |
♠Q5
♥JT94
♦KQJ62
♣95
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ ♣6 ♦6 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 5♠ 5NT ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
420 4.00 0.00 4♠ E 4 6-Banucci-Banucci vs 6-Fordon-Bender
450 1.50 2.50 4♠ E 5 2-Farnham-Max vs 3-Beckvall-Clark
450 1.50 2.50 4♠ E 5 3-Vettraino-Sendrow vs 5-Walker-Bingaman
450 1.50 2.50 4♠ E 5 4-Hampton-Keaton vs 2-Mattingly-Mattingly
450 1.50 2.50 4♠ E 5 5-Schrader-Back vs 4-Morgan-Adams
|
22 |
♠Q63
♥JT853
♦K9
♣A52
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦5 ♥6 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 2♦ 4♠ 4NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 4.00 0.00 3♠ E 3 5-Schrader-Back vs 4-Morgan-Adams
170 2.50 1.50 3♠ E 4 3-Vettraino-Sendrow vs 5-Walker-Bingaman
170 2.50 1.50 1♠ E 4 2-Farnham-Max vs 3-Beckvall-Clark
600 1.00 3.00 3N E 3 6-Banucci-Banucci vs 6-Fordon-Bender
630 0.00 4.00 3N E 4 4-Hampton-Keaton vs 2-Mattingly-Mattingly
|
23 |
♠9
♥KJ9732
♦AJ73
♣T6
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♥ ♣3 ♠4/5 NT4 |
EW: 4/3♣ 2♠ 3NT ♦6 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 4.00 0.00 3N E -1 4-Hampton-Keaton vs 2-Mattingly-Mattingly
150 3.00 1.00 2N E 3 3-Vettraino-Sendrow vs 5-Walker-Bingaman
200 1.50 2.50 3N S -2 6-Banucci-Banucci vs 6-Fordon-Bender
200 1.50 2.50 2♥ N -2 2-Farnham-Max vs 3-Beckvall-Clark
600 0.00 4.00 3N W 3 5-Schrader-Back vs 4-Morgan-Adams
|
24 |
♠J764
♥AJ
♦874
♣9542
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/1♣ 1/-♦ ♦7/6 ♥3 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 3♥ 1NT ♣5 ♦6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.50 0.50 4♥ E -2 2-Farnham-Max vs 3-Beckvall-Clark
100 3.50 0.50 4♥ E -2 4-Hampton-Keaton vs 2-Mattingly-Mattingly
50 1.50 2.50 4♥ E -1 5-Schrader-Back vs 4-Morgan-Adams
50 1.50 2.50 4♥ E -1 6-Banucci-Banucci vs 6-Fordon-Bender
170 0.00 4.00 2♥ E 4 3-Vettraino-Sendrow vs 5-Walker-Bingaman
|