1 |
♠Q753
♥T3
♦QJ843
♣43
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♠ ♣1 ♥1 NT2 |
EW: 6♣ 6♥ 1NT ♦6 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
420 3.00 0.00 4♠ S 4 1-Reinherz-Shreves vs 1-Back-Farnham
50 2.00 1.00 4♠ S -1 3-Averkamp-Smith vs 4-Cosgrove-Hargest
100 1.00 2.00 4♠* S -1 4-Lusby-Brewer vs 3-Morgan-Adams
480 0.00 3.00 4♥ E 6 2-Johnston-Katzin vs 2-James-Bailey
|
2 |
♠AK93
♥Q532
♦8762
♣9
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ ♦3 ♥3 ♠4 NT3 |
EW: 2♦ 2♥ 2♠ 4NT ♣4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 2.50 0.50 3♣ S 3 1-Reinherz-Shreves vs 1-Back-Farnham
110 2.50 0.50 3♣ S 3 4-Lusby-Brewer vs 3-Morgan-Adams
100 0.50 2.50 4♣ S -1 2-Johnston-Katzin vs 2-James-Bailey
100 0.50 2.50 4♣ S -1 3-Averkamp-Smith vs 4-Cosgrove-Hargest
|
3 |
♠-
♥J8743
♦QJ76542
♣7
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ 1♠ ♣1 ♥3 NT2 |
EW: 5/6♣ 1♥ ♦1 ♠5/6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 3.00 0.00 5♠ S -3 3-Averkamp-Smith vs 4-Cosgrove-Hargest
170 2.00 1.00 4♣ E 6 1-Reinherz-Shreves vs 1-Back-Farnham
800 1.00 2.00 4♠* S -4 2-Johnston-Katzin vs 2-James-Bailey
1100 0.00 3.00 5♠* S -5 4-Lusby-Brewer vs 3-Morgan-Adams
|
4 |
♠6
♥KQJ5
♦98
♣AJT976
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♥ ♦0 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 7♦ 6♠ 1NT ♣4 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
680 1.50 1.50 4♠ W 6 1-Reinherz-Shreves vs 1-Back-Farnham
680 1.50 1.50 4♠ W 6 2-Johnston-Katzin vs 2-James-Bailey
680 1.50 1.50 4♠ W 6 3-Averkamp-Smith vs 4-Cosgrove-Hargest
680 1.50 1.50 4♠ W 6 4-Lusby-Brewer vs 3-Morgan-Adams
|
5 |
♠76
♥73
♦J95
♣KQ8752
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: -/1♣ ♣6/7 ♦4/5 ♥5 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 2♦ 1♥ 2♠ 2NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.00 0.00 2♥ S -1 4-Lusby-Brewer vs 3-Morgan-Adams
200 1.00 2.00 3N S -2 3-Averkamp-Smith vs 4-Cosgrove-Hargest
200 1.00 2.00 2N N -2 2-Johnston-Katzin vs 2-James-Bailey
200 1.00 2.00 1N N -2 1-Reinherz-Shreves vs 1-Back-Farnham
|
6 |
♠K762
♥AJT84
♦KQ9
♣5
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2NT ♦5 ♥6 ♠6 |
EW: 2♦ -/1♥ 1♠ ♣4 ♥6/7 NT4/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 3.00 0.00 3♦ E -2 3-Averkamp-Smith vs 4-Cosgrove-Hargest
50 1.50 1.50 4♥ N -1 1-Reinherz-Shreves vs 1-Back-Farnham
50 1.50 1.50 3♣ S -1 4-Lusby-Brewer vs 3-Morgan-Adams
150 0.00 3.00 3♥ N -3 2-Johnston-Katzin vs 2-James-Bailey
|
7 |
♠-
♥J3
♦KJT654
♣AKJ64
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: -/1♣ 3♦ ♣6/7 ♥4 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 2♥ 2♠ 1/2NT ♣6 ♦3/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 3.00 0.00 3N W -2 1-Reinherz-Shreves vs 4-Cosgrove-Hargest
100 2.00 1.00 2N W -1 3-Averkamp-Smith vs 3-Morgan-Adams
200 1.00 2.00 3♦* N -1 2-Johnston-Katzin vs 1-Back-Farnham
500 0.00 3.00 4♦* N -2 4-Lusby-Brewer vs 2-James-Bailey
|
8 |
♠2
♥KQT63
♦32
♣AKJ53
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♥ -/1♠ ♦4 ♠6/7 NT6 |
EW: 3♦ ♣3 ♥3 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
420 3.00 0.00 4♥ N 4 2-Johnston-Katzin vs 1-Back-Farnham
170 2.00 1.00 3♥ N 4 3-Averkamp-Smith vs 3-Morgan-Adams
140 0.50 2.50 3♥ N 3 1-Reinherz-Shreves vs 4-Cosgrove-Hargest
140 0.50 2.50 3♥ N 3 4-Lusby-Brewer vs 2-James-Bailey
|
9 |
♠762
♥A9642
♦A73
♣85
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♥ 4♠ ♣4 ♦6 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ ♥2 ♠3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
450 2.50 0.50 4♠ S 5 2-Johnston-Katzin vs 1-Back-Farnham
450 2.50 0.50 4♥ S 5 3-Averkamp-Smith vs 3-Morgan-Adams
420 1.00 2.00 4♥ S 4 1-Reinherz-Shreves vs 4-Cosgrove-Hargest
130 0.00 3.00 4♣ W 4 4-Lusby-Brewer vs 2-James-Bailey
|
10 |
♠J3
♥832
♦QT65
♣T852
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♥ ♦5 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 1♦ 3♠ 1NT ♣6 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 2.00 1.00 1N W -2 2-Johnston-Katzin vs 1-Back-Farnham
200 2.00 1.00 4♠ W -2 4-Lusby-Brewer vs 2-James-Bailey
200 2.00 1.00 3♠ W -2 3-Averkamp-Smith vs 3-Morgan-Adams
100 0.00 3.00 2♠ W -1 1-Reinherz-Shreves vs 4-Cosgrove-Hargest
|
11 |
♠95
♥K972
♦J932
♣K32
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ ♣4 ♥5 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 2/1♥ 2♠ 2NT ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
90 3.00 0.00 2♦ S 2 3-Averkamp-Smith vs 3-Morgan-Adams
50 1.50 1.50 1♥ N -1 2-Johnston-Katzin vs 1-Back-Farnham
50 1.50 1.50 2♦ S -1 1-Reinherz-Shreves vs 4-Cosgrove-Hargest
110 0.00 3.00 3♣ W 3 4-Lusby-Brewer vs 2-James-Bailey
|
12 |
♠QJ42
♥97632
♦AQ4
♣K
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ ♣3 ♦4 ♥3 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 2♦ 3♥ ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 3.00 0.00 3♥ E -3 4-Lusby-Brewer vs 2-James-Bailey
50 2.00 1.00 3♥ E -1 1-Reinherz-Shreves vs 4-Cosgrove-Hargest
110 1.00 2.00 2♦ W 3 2-Johnston-Katzin vs 1-Back-Farnham
130 0.00 3.00 4♦ W 4 3-Averkamp-Smith vs 3-Morgan-Adams
|
13 |
♠QT4
♥T85
♦AQ872
♣64
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 2♥ 2NT ♣4 ♠4 |
EW: 2♣ 3♠ ♦3 ♥5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
130 2.00 1.00 4♦ S 4 1-Reinherz-Shreves vs 3-Morgan-Adams
130 2.00 1.00 4♦ S 4 2-Johnston-Katzin vs 4-Cosgrove-Hargest
130 2.00 1.00 4♦ S 4 3-Averkamp-Smith vs 2-James-Bailey
100 0.00 3.00 4♦ S -1 4-Lusby-Brewer vs 1-Back-Farnham
|
14 |
♠J6432
♥A3
♦AJ86
♣Q8
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3NT ♦4 ♥5/4 ♠6 |
EW: 3♦ 2♥ ♣3 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 3.00 0.00 2N E -3 2-Johnston-Katzin vs 4-Cosgrove-Hargest
110 1.50 1.50 3♣ S 3 1-Reinherz-Shreves vs 3-Morgan-Adams
110 1.50 1.50 3♣ S 3 4-Lusby-Brewer vs 1-Back-Farnham
50 0.00 3.00 3♣ S -1 3-Averkamp-Smith vs 2-James-Bailey
|
15 |
♠T952
♥K95
♦KQ9
♣J82
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 2♠ ♣5 ♦5 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 1/-NT ♥6 ♠5 NT7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
670 3.00 0.00 2♠* S 2 1-Reinherz-Shreves vs 3-Morgan-Adams
110 2.00 1.00 2♠ S 2 2-Johnston-Katzin vs 4-Cosgrove-Hargest
100 1.00 2.00 2♠ S -1 4-Lusby-Brewer vs 1-Back-Farnham
300 0.00 3.00 4♠ S -3 3-Averkamp-Smith vs 2-James-Bailey
|
16 |
♠AK963
♥AQJ
♦KT53
♣T
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 1♦ 2♥ 2♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣0 ♦4 ♥5 ♠4 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
520 3.00 0.00 3N N 7 1-Reinherz-Shreves vs 3-Morgan-Adams
490 2.00 1.00 3N N 6 4-Lusby-Brewer vs 1-Back-Farnham
420 1.00 2.00 5♣ S 6 2-Johnston-Katzin vs 4-Cosgrove-Hargest
100 0.00 3.00 4♠ N -2 3-Averkamp-Smith vs 2-James-Bailey
|
17 |
♠Q42
♥963
♦964
♣T954
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦0 ♥4 ♠2 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 7♦ 3♥ 5♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
130 3.00 0.00 3♦ E 4 1-Reinherz-Shreves vs 3-Morgan-Adams
170 2.00 1.00 3♦ E 6 3-Averkamp-Smith vs 2-James-Bailey
400 1.00 2.00 3N E 3 2-Johnston-Katzin vs 4-Cosgrove-Hargest
460 0.00 3.00 3N W 5 4-Lusby-Brewer vs 1-Back-Farnham
|
18 |
♠K8762
♥AK3
♦KJ8
♣82
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 4♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣5 |
EW: 2♣ ♦3 ♥3 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 3.00 0.00 1♠ N 3 4-Lusby-Brewer vs 1-Back-Farnham
130 1.50 1.50 4♦ S 4 3-Averkamp-Smith vs 2-James-Bailey
130 1.50 1.50 3♦ S 4 2-Johnston-Katzin vs 4-Cosgrove-Hargest
100 0.00 3.00 2N S -1 1-Reinherz-Shreves vs 3-Morgan-Adams
|
19 |
♠Q642
♥QT765
♦AK5
♣3
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 5♥ 2♠ 3NT ♣3 |
EW: 4♣ ♦5 ♥2 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
450 2.50 0.50 4♥ S 5 1-Reinherz-Shreves vs 2-James-Bailey
450 2.50 0.50 4♥ S 5 3-Averkamp-Smith vs 1-Back-Farnham
420 0.50 2.50 4♥ S 4 2-Johnston-Katzin vs 3-Morgan-Adams
420 0.50 2.50 4♥ S 4 4-Lusby-Brewer vs 4-Cosgrove-Hargest
|
20 |
♠KJ3
♥Q3
♦T82
♣T9832
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: -/1♣ ♣6/7 ♦5 ♥4 ♠6/5 NT5 |
EW: 2♦ 3♥ 1♠ 1NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
130 3.00 0.00 2♣ S 4 3-Averkamp-Smith vs 1-Back-Farnham
90 2.00 1.00 1N S 1 4-Lusby-Brewer vs 4-Cosgrove-Hargest
140 0.50 2.50 3♥ E 3 1-Reinherz-Shreves vs 2-James-Bailey
140 0.50 2.50 2♥ E 3 2-Johnston-Katzin vs 3-Morgan-Adams
|
21 |
♠J76
♥KT754
♦KT76
♣9
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♥ ♣0 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 5♠ 5NT ♦5 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
400 3.00 0.00 3N W 3 4-Lusby-Brewer vs 4-Cosgrove-Hargest
450 2.00 1.00 4♠ W 5 2-Johnston-Katzin vs 3-Morgan-Adams
480 0.50 2.50 4♠ W 6 1-Reinherz-Shreves vs 2-James-Bailey
480 0.50 2.50 4♠ W 6 3-Averkamp-Smith vs 1-Back-Farnham
|
22 |
♠AJ52
♥K873
♦Q84
♣Q2
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 2♠ ♣2 ♥2 NT2 |
EW: 3♣ 2♥ 2NT ♦4 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.00 0.00 3♣ W -1 1-Reinherz-Shreves vs 2-James-Bailey
50 2.00 1.00 2♦ S -1 3-Averkamp-Smith vs 1-Back-Farnham
110 1.00 2.00 3♣ W 3 4-Lusby-Brewer vs 4-Cosgrove-Hargest
150 0.00 3.00 2♣ W 5 2-Johnston-Katzin vs 3-Morgan-Adams
|
23 |
♠AKJ542
♥A43
♦5
♣J64
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♥ 3♠ 2NT ♣4 ♦4 |
EW: 1♣ 3♦ ♥0 ♠0 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
680 3.00 0.00 4♥ S 6 3-Averkamp-Smith vs 1-Back-Farnham
620 2.00 1.00 4♥ S 4 1-Reinherz-Shreves vs 2-James-Bailey
200 1.00 2.00 2♥ S 5 4-Lusby-Brewer vs 4-Cosgrove-Hargest
170 0.00 3.00 3♥ S 4 2-Johnston-Katzin vs 3-Morgan-Adams
|
24 |
♠A4
♥T874
♦7432
♣K75
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 3♥ 1NT ♣6 ♠5 |
EW: 1♣ 1♠ ♦4 ♥3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 3.00 0.00 2♥ S 3 3-Averkamp-Smith vs 1-Back-Farnham
50 2.00 1.00 1N S -1 4-Lusby-Brewer vs 4-Cosgrove-Hargest
90 1.00 2.00 2♣ W 2 1-Reinherz-Shreves vs 2-James-Bailey
100 0.00 3.00 3♦ N -2 2-Johnston-Katzin vs 3-Morgan-Adams
|