1 |
♠KQT
♥Q76
♦A543
♣KQ8
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 1NT ♣6 ♥5 ♠6 |
EW: 1♣ 1/2♥ ♦5 ♠5/6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 6.00 0.00 3♣ W -3 4-Katzin-James vs 7-Brewer-Lusby
50 5.00 1.00 1N N -1 6-Kepes-Kepes vs 4-Back-Farnham
100 4.00 2.00 2N N -2 7-Lamer-Lamer vs 6-Hollnagel-Ashley
110 1.50 4.50 2♥ W 2 1-Sorknes-Sorknes vs 1-Morgan-Adams
110 1.50 4.50 2♥ W 2 2-Nabours-Crowley vs 3-Hargest-Cosgrove
110 1.50 4.50 2♥ W 2 5-Smith-Culbert vs 2-Ram-Kessler
110 1.50 4.50 2♥ E 2 3-Riggers-Riggers vs 5-Ash-Johnston
|
2 |
♠KJT82
♥AK97
♦Q9
♣K5
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 1♥ 2♠ 1NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦5 ♥6 ♠5 NT4/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
180 6.00 0.00 1N N 4 5-Smith-Culbert vs 2-Ram-Kessler
140 5.00 1.00 1♠ N 3 4-Katzin-James vs 7-Brewer-Lusby
120 3.50 2.50 1N S 2 1-Sorknes-Sorknes vs 1-Morgan-Adams
120 3.50 2.50 1N N 2 7-Lamer-Lamer vs 6-Hollnagel-Ashley
90 2.00 4.00 1N S 1 6-Kepes-Kepes vs 4-Back-Farnham
100 1.00 5.00 3♠ N -1 2-Nabours-Crowley vs 3-Hargest-Cosgrove
200 0.00 6.00 3N N -2 3-Riggers-Riggers vs 5-Ash-Johnston
|
3 |
♠843
♥KQ
♦KJT73
♣J75
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦5 ♥2 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 2♦ 5♥ 5♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
300 6.00 0.00 3N W -3 7-Lamer-Lamer vs 6-Hollnagel-Ashley
100 5.00 1.00 3N W -1 4-Katzin-James vs 7-Brewer-Lusby
180 4.00 2.00 1N W 4 3-Riggers-Riggers vs 5-Ash-Johnston
600 2.50 3.50 3N W 3 5-Smith-Culbert vs 2-Ram-Kessler
600 2.50 3.50 3N W 3 6-Kepes-Kepes vs 4-Back-Farnham
630 0.50 5.50 3N W 4 1-Sorknes-Sorknes vs 1-Morgan-Adams
630 0.50 5.50 3N W 4 2-Nabours-Crowley vs 3-Hargest-Cosgrove
|
4 |
♠T86
♥A4
♦87542
♣AKJ
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ 2♥ 2♠ 3/4NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦3 ♥4 ♠4/5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 6.00 0.00 2♠ S 3 2-Nabours-Crowley vs 2-Ram-Kessler
120 5.00 1.00 2N N 2 1-Sorknes-Sorknes vs 7-Brewer-Lusby
90 4.00 2.00 2♦ S 2 7-Lamer-Lamer vs 5-Ash-Johnston
PASS 3.00 3.00 Pass Out 3-Riggers-Riggers vs 4-Back-Farnham
100 2.00 4.00 2♠ S -1 6-Kepes-Kepes vs 3-Hargest-Cosgrove
300 0.50 5.50 4♠ S -3 4-Katzin-James vs 6-Hollnagel-Ashley
300 0.50 5.50 4♥ S -3 5-Smith-Culbert vs 1-Morgan-Adams
|
5 |
♠A6
♥A42
♦AK982
♣A73
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ 4♥ 4♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦4 ♥3 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
630 6.00 0.00 3N N 4 4-Katzin-James vs 6-Hollnagel-Ashley
600 5.00 1.00 3N N 3 3-Riggers-Riggers vs 4-Back-Farnham
100 3.50 2.50 3N N -1 2-Nabours-Crowley vs 2-Ram-Kessler
100 3.50 2.50 4♥ S -1 7-Lamer-Lamer vs 5-Ash-Johnston
200 1.00 5.00 3N N -2 1-Sorknes-Sorknes vs 7-Brewer-Lusby
200 1.00 5.00 4♠* S -1 5-Smith-Culbert vs 1-Morgan-Adams
200 1.00 5.00 4♥ S -2 6-Kepes-Kepes vs 3-Hargest-Cosgrove
|
6 |
♠A65
♥AK5
♦AT76
♣Q95
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦6 ♥6 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ 1♥ 2♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 6.00 0.00 1N E -1 1-Sorknes-Sorknes vs 7-Brewer-Lusby
90 5.00 1.00 1N N 1 3-Riggers-Riggers vs 4-Back-Farnham
70 4.00 2.00 1♦ N 1 5-Smith-Culbert vs 1-Morgan-Adams
50 2.00 4.00 1N N -1 4-Katzin-James vs 6-Hollnagel-Ashley
50 2.00 4.00 1N N -1 6-Kepes-Kepes vs 3-Hargest-Cosgrove
50 2.00 4.00 1N N -1 7-Lamer-Lamer vs 5-Ash-Johnston
120 0.00 6.00 2N E 2 2-Nabours-Crowley vs 2-Ram-Kessler
|
7 |
♠T42
♥T652
♦AJ65
♣AJ
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 3♠ 3NT ♣5 ♦5 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ ♥3 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
1100 6.00 0.00 6♦* E -4 6-Kepes-Kepes vs 2-Ram-Kessler
800 5.00 1.00 5♦* E -3 4-Katzin-James vs 5-Ash-Johnston
500 4.00 2.00 4N W -5 2-Nabours-Crowley vs 1-Morgan-Adams
300 3.00 3.00 5♦ E -3 5-Smith-Culbert vs 7-Brewer-Lusby
200 1.50 4.50 5♦ E -2 3-Riggers-Riggers vs 3-Hargest-Cosgrove
200 1.50 4.50 5♦ E -2 7-Lamer-Lamer vs 4-Back-Farnham
100 0.00 6.00 4♦ E -1 1-Sorknes-Sorknes vs 6-Hollnagel-Ashley
|
8 |
♠JT2
♥AKQ8
♦AJ93
♣64
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1/-♦ ♦7/6 ♥6 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 1♥ 1♠ 1NT ♣5 ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
120 6.00 0.00 1N N 2 4-Katzin-James vs 5-Ash-Johnston
90 4.00 2.00 1N N 1 1-Sorknes-Sorknes vs 6-Hollnagel-Ashley
90 4.00 2.00 1N N 1 2-Nabours-Crowley vs 1-Morgan-Adams
90 4.00 2.00 1N N 1 6-Kepes-Kepes vs 2-Ram-Kessler
100 2.00 4.00 1N N -2 5-Smith-Culbert vs 7-Brewer-Lusby
110 1.00 5.00 2♠ E 2 3-Riggers-Riggers vs 3-Hargest-Cosgrove
120 0.00 6.00 1N E 2 7-Lamer-Lamer vs 4-Back-Farnham
|
9 |
♠Q3
♥KQ9854
♦J4
♣T76
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣3 ♦2 ♠5 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 5♦ 2/1♠ 4NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 6.00 0.00 3♥ N -2 4-Katzin-James vs 5-Ash-Johnston
150 5.00 1.00 3♦ W 5 2-Nabours-Crowley vs 1-Morgan-Adams
210 4.00 2.00 2N W 5 3-Riggers-Riggers vs 3-Hargest-Cosgrove
600 3.00 3.00 5♦ W 5 6-Kepes-Kepes vs 2-Ram-Kessler
620 2.00 4.00 5♦ W 6 5-Smith-Culbert vs 7-Brewer-Lusby
630 1.00 5.00 3N E 4 1-Sorknes-Sorknes vs 6-Hollnagel-Ashley
660 0.00 6.00 3N E 5 7-Lamer-Lamer vs 4-Back-Farnham
|
10 |
♠KJ9652
♥Q
♦T93
♣A32
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 1♥ 3♠ 2NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦4 ♥6 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
1400 6.00 0.00 3N* W -5 6-Kepes-Kepes vs 1-Morgan-Adams
200 5.00 1.00 1N W -2 3-Riggers-Riggers vs 2-Ram-Kessler
170 3.50 2.50 2♠ N 4 1-Sorknes-Sorknes vs 5-Ash-Johnston
170 3.50 2.50 2♠ N 4 2-Nabours-Crowley vs 7-Brewer-Lusby
140 2.00 4.00 2♠ N 3 5-Smith-Culbert vs 6-Hollnagel-Ashley
110 1.00 5.00 2♠ N 2 4-Katzin-James vs 4-Back-Farnham
100 0.00 6.00 4♠ N -1 7-Lamer-Lamer vs 3-Hargest-Cosgrove
|
11 |
♠Q92
♥AK32
♦T53
♣J75
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 3♠ ♣6 ♦3 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ ♥3 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
180 6.00 0.00 1N N 4 3-Riggers-Riggers vs 2-Ram-Kessler
170 5.00 1.00 2♥ S 4 4-Katzin-James vs 4-Back-Farnham
150 4.00 2.00 2N W -3 7-Lamer-Lamer vs 3-Hargest-Cosgrove
100 3.00 3.00 1N W -2 5-Smith-Culbert vs 6-Hollnagel-Ashley
50 1.50 4.50 3♦ E -1 2-Nabours-Crowley vs 7-Brewer-Lusby
50 1.50 4.50 3♦ E -1 6-Kepes-Kepes vs 1-Morgan-Adams
240 0.00 6.00 2N W 6 1-Sorknes-Sorknes vs 5-Ash-Johnston
|
12 |
♠T9
♥65
♦KQT86
♣K863
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3/4♦ 1♠ 1/2NT ♥6 |
EW: ♣3 ♦3 ♥6 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 5.00 1.00 3♥ E -2 4-Katzin-James vs 4-Back-Farnham
100 5.00 1.00 2♥ E -2 1-Sorknes-Sorknes vs 5-Ash-Johnston
100 5.00 1.00 2♥ E -2 2-Nabours-Crowley vs 7-Brewer-Lusby
110 2.50 3.50 2♥ E 2 5-Smith-Culbert vs 6-Hollnagel-Ashley
110 2.50 3.50 2♥ E 2 6-Kepes-Kepes vs 1-Morgan-Adams
140 1.00 5.00 2♥ E 3 7-Lamer-Lamer vs 3-Hargest-Cosgrove
170 0.00 6.00 2♥ E 4 3-Riggers-Riggers vs 2-Ram-Kessler
|
13 |
♠KJ9873
♥Q9
♦AKQ
♣95
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 3♥ 5♠ 3/5NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦6/5 ♥3 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
650 3.50 2.50 4♠ N 5 1-Sorknes-Sorknes vs 4-Back-Farnham
650 3.50 2.50 4♠ N 5 2-Nabours-Crowley vs 6-Hollnagel-Ashley
650 3.50 2.50 4♠ N 5 3-Riggers-Riggers vs 1-Morgan-Adams
650 3.50 2.50 4♠ N 5 4-Katzin-James vs 3-Hargest-Cosgrove
650 3.50 2.50 4♠ N 5 6-Kepes-Kepes vs 7-Brewer-Lusby
650 3.50 2.50 4♠ N 5 7-Lamer-Lamer vs 2-Ram-Kessler
620 0.00 6.00 4♠ N 4 5-Smith-Culbert vs 5-Ash-Johnston
|
14 |
♠AT75
♥A94
♦T
♣J8654
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♥ 1♠ 3NT ♣5 ♦5 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ ♥2/1 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
480 6.00 0.00 4♥ S 6 2-Nabours-Crowley vs 6-Hollnagel-Ashley
450 4.50 1.50 4♥ S 5 3-Riggers-Riggers vs 1-Morgan-Adams
450 4.50 1.50 4♥ S 5 5-Smith-Culbert vs 5-Ash-Johnston
230 3.00 3.00 3♥ S 6 6-Kepes-Kepes vs 7-Brewer-Lusby
200 1.50 4.50 3♥ S 5 1-Sorknes-Sorknes vs 4-Back-Farnham
200 1.50 4.50 3♥ S 5 4-Katzin-James vs 3-Hargest-Cosgrove
170 0.00 6.00 3♥ S 4 7-Lamer-Lamer vs 2-Ram-Kessler
|
15 |
♠A983
♥4
♦KQ3
♣AJ973
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 5♦ 1♠ 2NT ♥5 |
EW: 2♥ ♣2 ♦1 ♠5 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
710 6.00 0.00 4♣* N 4 5-Smith-Culbert vs 5-Ash-Johnston
150 5.00 1.00 4♥ W -3 4-Katzin-James vs 3-Hargest-Cosgrove
130 4.00 2.00 2♣ N 4 6-Kepes-Kepes vs 7-Brewer-Lusby
100 2.50 3.50 4♥ W -2 3-Riggers-Riggers vs 1-Morgan-Adams
100 2.50 3.50 3♥ W -2 7-Lamer-Lamer vs 2-Ram-Kessler
110 1.00 5.00 2♥ W 2 2-Nabours-Crowley vs 6-Hollnagel-Ashley
140 0.00 6.00 2♥ W 3 1-Sorknes-Sorknes vs 4-Back-Farnham
|
16 |
♠T8
♥Q65
♦AK4
♣KQJT2
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 2♥ ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 3♠ ♣5 ♦5 ♥4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 5.50 0.50 4♠ W -2 1-Sorknes-Sorknes vs 3-Hargest-Cosgrove
200 5.50 0.50 2♣ W -2 3-Riggers-Riggers vs 7-Brewer-Lusby
100 4.00 2.00 4♣ N -2 5-Smith-Culbert vs 4-Back-Farnham
140 2.00 4.00 3♠ W 3 2-Nabours-Crowley vs 5-Ash-Johnston
140 2.00 4.00 2♠ W 3 6-Kepes-Kepes vs 6-Hollnagel-Ashley
140 2.00 4.00 2♠ W 3 7-Lamer-Lamer vs 1-Morgan-Adams
200 0.00 6.00 3♠ W 5 4-Katzin-James vs 2-Ram-Kessler
|
17 |
♠K9
♥85
♦K7653
♣KQ74
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ ♥0/1 ♠0 NT0 |
EW: 5♥ 6♠ 1NT ♣4 ♦4/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 6.00 0.00 4♥ E -1 2-Nabours-Crowley vs 5-Ash-Johnston
140 5.00 1.00 2♠ W 3 1-Sorknes-Sorknes vs 3-Hargest-Cosgrove
170 4.00 2.00 3♥ E 4 4-Katzin-James vs 2-Ram-Kessler
200 2.50 3.50 3♠ W 5 3-Riggers-Riggers vs 7-Brewer-Lusby
200 2.50 3.50 2♠ W 5 6-Kepes-Kepes vs 6-Hollnagel-Ashley
450 1.00 5.00 4♥ E 5 5-Smith-Culbert vs 4-Back-Farnham
510 0.00 6.00 4♠ W 7 7-Lamer-Lamer vs 1-Morgan-Adams
|
18 |
♠K63
♥AK2
♦QJ943
♣J3
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 2/3♥ 1♠ 4NT ♣6 |
EW: ♣6 ♦3 ♥4 ♠6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 6.00 0.00 2♦ N 5 5-Smith-Culbert vs 4-Back-Farnham
130 4.50 1.50 2♦ N 4 3-Riggers-Riggers vs 7-Brewer-Lusby
130 4.50 1.50 2♦ N 4 4-Katzin-James vs 2-Ram-Kessler
110 2.00 4.00 3♦ N 3 7-Lamer-Lamer vs 1-Morgan-Adams
110 2.00 4.00 2♦ N 3 2-Nabours-Crowley vs 5-Ash-Johnston
110 2.00 4.00 2♦ N 3 6-Kepes-Kepes vs 6-Hollnagel-Ashley
100 0.00 6.00 2♠ E -2 1-Sorknes-Sorknes vs 3-Hargest-Cosgrove
|
19 |
♠A764
♥53
♦9762
♣842
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♠ ♣3 ♦2 ♥4 NT2 |
EW: 4♣ 3♦ 3♥ ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
420 6.00 0.00 4♠ S 4 4-Katzin-James vs 1-Morgan-Adams
300 5.00 1.00 3♥ E -3 1-Sorknes-Sorknes vs 2-Ram-Kessler
170 2.00 4.00 3♠ S 4 2-Nabours-Crowley vs 4-Back-Farnham
170 2.00 4.00 3♠ S 4 3-Riggers-Riggers vs 6-Hollnagel-Ashley
170 2.00 4.00 3♠ S 4 5-Smith-Culbert vs 3-Hargest-Cosgrove
170 2.00 4.00 2♠ S 4 6-Kepes-Kepes vs 5-Ash-Johnston
170 2.00 4.00 2♠ S 4 7-Lamer-Lamer vs 7-Brewer-Lusby
|
20 |
♠Q
♥Q8
♦764
♣A965432
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦4 ♥6 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 3♦ 1♥ 2NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
300 6.00 0.00 3♠ E -3 2-Nabours-Crowley vs 4-Back-Farnham
200 5.00 1.00 3N W -2 1-Sorknes-Sorknes vs 2-Ram-Kessler
110 4.00 2.00 3♣ N 3 7-Lamer-Lamer vs 7-Brewer-Lusby
100 2.50 3.50 2N W -1 4-Katzin-James vs 1-Morgan-Adams
100 2.50 3.50 3♦ W -1 5-Smith-Culbert vs 3-Hargest-Cosgrove
100 1.00 5.00 2♣ N -1 3-Riggers-Riggers vs 6-Hollnagel-Ashley
130 0.00 6.00 3♦ W 4 6-Kepes-Kepes vs 5-Ash-Johnston
|
21 |
♠A832
♥KT943
♦83
♣72
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 2♠ ♣5 ♦5 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ ♥3 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 5.00 1.00 2♥ N 3 1-Sorknes-Sorknes vs 2-Ram-Kessler
140 5.00 1.00 2♥ N 3 3-Riggers-Riggers vs 6-Hollnagel-Ashley
140 5.00 1.00 2♥ N 3 5-Smith-Culbert vs 3-Hargest-Cosgrove
100 3.00 3.00 4♥ S -1 4-Katzin-James vs 1-Morgan-Adams
120 2.00 4.00 2N E 2 2-Nabours-Crowley vs 4-Back-Farnham
200 0.50 5.50 4♥ S -2 6-Kepes-Kepes vs 5-Ash-Johnston
200 0.50 5.50 4♥ N -2 7-Lamer-Lamer vs 7-Brewer-Lusby
|