1 |
♠Q872
♥KJT7
♦QJ762
♣-
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣0 ♦6 ♥3 ♠5/4 NT3 |
EW: 7♣ 1♦ 3♥ 2♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
440 2.00 0.00 5♣ E 7 4-Verheyden-McElroy vs 3-Sherwood-Johnston
490 1.00 1.00 3N E 6 3-Highsmith-Ash vs 4-Armell-Fishman
550 0.00 2.00 5♣* E 5 1-Conner-Wagner vs 1-Culbert-Averkamp
|
2 |
♠T83
♥9
♦T62
♣AJT864
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣6 ♦6 ♥2 NT3 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 5/4♥ 4/3NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 2.00 0.00 6♥ W -2 4-Verheyden-McElroy vs 3-Sherwood-Johnston
420 1.00 1.00 4♥ W 4 1-Conner-Wagner vs 1-Culbert-Averkamp
450 0.00 2.00 4♥ W 5 3-Highsmith-Ash vs 4-Armell-Fishman
|
3 |
♠6
♥T43
♦JT8753
♣AJT
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣6 ♥5 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 1/2♥ 4♠ 3NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
500 2.00 0.00 6♠* W -2 4-Verheyden-McElroy vs 3-Sherwood-Johnston
620 0.50 1.50 4♠ W 4 1-Conner-Wagner vs 1-Culbert-Averkamp
620 0.50 1.50 4♠ W 4 3-Highsmith-Ash vs 4-Armell-Fishman
|
4 |
♠QT843
♥8
♦T764
♣KQT
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 1♥ 4♠ 2NT ♣6 |
EW: ♣6 ♦4 ♥5 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 1.00 1.00 3♠ N 4 3-Highsmith-Ash vs 4-Armell-Fishman
170 1.00 1.00 2♠ S 4 4-Verheyden-McElroy vs 3-Sherwood-Johnston
170 1.00 1.00 2♠ N 4 1-Conner-Wagner vs 1-Culbert-Averkamp
|
5 |
♠T
♥J8743
♦A9863
♣97
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1NT ♦5 ♥4 ♠6 |
EW: 1♦ 3♥ 1♠ ♣3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
300 2.00 0.00 4♠* E -2 1-Conner-Wagner vs 1-Culbert-Averkamp
100 1.00 1.00 4♦ W -2 4-Verheyden-McElroy vs 3-Sherwood-Johnston
100 0.00 2.00 5♣ S -1 3-Highsmith-Ash vs 4-Armell-Fishman
|
6 |
♠3
♥AKJ98
♦KQ8
♣K754
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1♦ 5♥ 1♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦5 ♥2 ♠6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
450 1.50 0.50 4♥ N 5 1-Conner-Wagner vs 1-Culbert-Averkamp
450 1.50 0.50 4♥ N 5 4-Verheyden-McElroy vs 3-Sherwood-Johnston
420 0.00 2.00 4♥ N 4 3-Highsmith-Ash vs 4-Armell-Fishman
|
7 |
♠JT82
♥843
♦AQ8
♣QT5
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣4 ♦6 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ 2♠ 1NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
90 2.00 0.00 1N W 1 3-Highsmith-Ash vs 4-Armell-Fishman
120 1.00 1.00 1N W 2 4-Verheyden-McElroy vs 3-Sherwood-Johnston
150 0.00 2.00 1N W 3 1-Conner-Wagner vs 1-Culbert-Averkamp
|
8 |
♠953
♥AQJ
♦AKJ94
♣95
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♥ ♣0 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 6♣ 6♠ ♦5 ♥5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
230 2.00 0.00 2♠ W 6 2-Eilers-Day vs 2-Schrader-Back
480 1.00 1.00 4♠ W 6 4-Verheyden-McElroy vs 1-Culbert-Averkamp
870 0.00 2.00 2♠* W 6 1-Conner-Wagner vs 4-Armell-Fishman
|
9 |
♠3
♥AKT6
♦T942
♣AQ83
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/3♣ 1♥ 2♠ ♦4 NT4 |
EW: 1♦ ♣4 ♥6 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 1.50 0.50 2N N -1 2-Eilers-Day vs 2-Schrader-Back
50 1.50 0.50 3♠ S -1 4-Verheyden-McElroy vs 1-Culbert-Averkamp
100 0.00 2.00 4♠ S -2 1-Conner-Wagner vs 4-Armell-Fishman
|
10 |
♠QJ53
♥KQ42
♦A62
♣Q2
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♠ ♦3 ♥3/4 NT3 |
EW: 4♦ 2♥ 2NT ♣5 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 2.00 0.00 3♦ W 3 2-Eilers-Day vs 2-Schrader-Back
130 0.50 1.50 3♦ W 4 1-Conner-Wagner vs 4-Armell-Fishman
130 0.50 1.50 2♦ W 4 4-Verheyden-McElroy vs 1-Culbert-Averkamp
|
11 |
♠K8
♥AJ32
♦KJ73
♣A53
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 3/4♥ 2/3NT ♣4/5 ♠5 |
EW: 2♣ 2♠ ♦3/4 ♥3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
420 1.50 0.50 4♥ N 4 2-Eilers-Day vs 2-Schrader-Back
420 1.50 0.50 4♥ N 4 4-Verheyden-McElroy vs 1-Culbert-Averkamp
140 0.00 2.00 3♥ S 3 1-Conner-Wagner vs 4-Armell-Fishman
|
12 |
♠K863
♥A75
♦QT4
♣K82
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 3♠ ♣4 ♥4 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 3♥ 1NT ♦4 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
90 2.00 0.00 1N W 1 2-Eilers-Day vs 2-Schrader-Back
140 1.00 1.00 2♥ W 3 4-Verheyden-McElroy vs 1-Culbert-Averkamp
400 0.00 2.00 3N W 3 1-Conner-Wagner vs 4-Armell-Fishman
|
13 |
♠943
♥K94
♦9764
♣J63
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ ♣4 ♥6 ♠3 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 1/-♥ 4♠ 1/-NT ♦5/4 ♥7/6 NT7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 2.00 0.00 3♠ W -1 2-Eilers-Day vs 2-Schrader-Back
170 1.00 1.00 3♠ W 4 4-Verheyden-McElroy vs 1-Culbert-Averkamp
790 0.00 2.00 4♠* W 4 1-Conner-Wagner vs 4-Armell-Fishman
|
14 |
♠Q6
♥T76
♦9632
♣KT76
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ ♣5 ♦3 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 3♦ 2♠ 2NT ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 1.00 1.00 3♥ S -2 1-Conner-Wagner vs 4-Armell-Fishman
100 1.00 1.00 3♥ S -2 2-Eilers-Day vs 2-Schrader-Back
100 1.00 1.00 3♥ S -2 4-Verheyden-McElroy vs 1-Culbert-Averkamp
|
15 |
♠AQ92
♥AT9
♦AK98
♣43
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♦ 1♥ 5♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦3 ♥6 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
620 1.50 0.50 4♠ N 4 2-Eilers-Day vs 1-Culbert-Averkamp
620 1.50 0.50 4♠ N 4 3-Highsmith-Ash vs 3-Sherwood-Johnston
200 0.00 2.00 1♠ S 5 1-Conner-Wagner vs 2-Schrader-Back
|
16 |
♠K9
♥862
♦9752
♣A865
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ 2♥ 2NT ♠6 |
EW: ♣4 ♦4 ♥4 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
120 2.00 0.00 1N S 2 2-Eilers-Day vs 1-Culbert-Averkamp
90 1.00 1.00 1N S 1 3-Highsmith-Ash vs 3-Sherwood-Johnston
50 0.00 2.00 1N S -1 1-Conner-Wagner vs 2-Schrader-Back
|
17 |
♠T87432
♥86
♦5
♣K982
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♠ ♣5 ♦3 ♥2 NT3 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ 3♥ ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
420 1.00 1.00 4♠ S 4 1-Conner-Wagner vs 2-Schrader-Back
420 1.00 1.00 4♠ S 4 2-Eilers-Day vs 1-Culbert-Averkamp
420 1.00 1.00 4♠ S 4 3-Highsmith-Ash vs 3-Sherwood-Johnston
|
18 |
♠Q6
♥Q
♦Q743
♣AT8743
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♦ 1♠ 1NT ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣4 ♦3 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
660 2.00 0.00 3N S 5 1-Conner-Wagner vs 2-Schrader-Back
150 1.00 1.00 3♦ S 5 2-Eilers-Day vs 1-Culbert-Averkamp
130 0.00 2.00 3♦ S 4 3-Highsmith-Ash vs 3-Sherwood-Johnston
|
19 |
♠AQ94
♥62
♦J43
♣K973
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦3 ♥1 ♠4 NT6/5 |
EW: 3♦ 5♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 2.00 0.00 2♥ W 3 3-Highsmith-Ash vs 3-Sherwood-Johnston
170 1.00 1.00 1♥ W 4 1-Conner-Wagner vs 2-Schrader-Back
650 0.00 2.00 4♥ W 5 2-Eilers-Day vs 1-Culbert-Averkamp
|
20 |
♠T53
♥QJT8
♦AK943
♣7
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 3♥ ♣4 ♠3 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 4♠ 1NT ♦3 ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
620 2.00 0.00 4♠ E 4 1-Conner-Wagner vs 2-Schrader-Back
650 0.50 1.50 4♠ E 5 2-Eilers-Day vs 1-Culbert-Averkamp
650 0.50 1.50 4♠ E 5 3-Highsmith-Ash vs 3-Sherwood-Johnston
|
21 |
♠KQ942
♥763
♦975
♣T2
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦6 ♥5 ♠6 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 2♥ 3NT ♦6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
130 2.00 0.00 3♣ E 4 2-Eilers-Day vs 1-Culbert-Averkamp
150 0.50 1.50 3♣ E 5 1-Conner-Wagner vs 2-Schrader-Back
150 0.50 1.50 3♣ E 5 3-Highsmith-Ash vs 3-Sherwood-Johnston
|
22 |
♠T
♥QJT743
♦8
♣Q8532
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 5♥ ♣5 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 4♠ ♦6 ♥1 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
450 2.00 0.00 5♥ S 5 4-Verheyden-McElroy vs 4-Armell-Fishman
100 1.00 1.00 3♠ E -1 3-Highsmith-Ash vs 2-Schrader-Back
170 0.00 2.00 2♠ E 4 2-Eilers-Day vs 3-Sherwood-Johnston
|
23 |
♠AJT98
♥AQ
♦KJ9
♣T64
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 4♥ 5♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦5 ♥3 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
600 1.50 0.50 3N S 3 2-Eilers-Day vs 3-Sherwood-Johnston
600 1.50 0.50 3N N 3 3-Highsmith-Ash vs 2-Schrader-Back
100 0.00 2.00 4♠ N -1 4-Verheyden-McElroy vs 4-Armell-Fishman
|
24 |
♠KQJT32
♥42
♦52
♣T32
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♠ ♦6 ♥5 NT6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣4 ♦6 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 2.00 0.00 3♥ E -1 3-Highsmith-Ash vs 2-Schrader-Back
100 1.00 1.00 3N S -2 2-Eilers-Day vs 3-Sherwood-Johnston
300 0.00 2.00 5♣* N -2 4-Verheyden-McElroy vs 4-Armell-Fishman
|
25 |
♠QT98
♥KQJ92
♦Q
♣Q98
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♥ ♦3 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 3♦ 2♠ 1NT ♣5 ♥3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
420 2.00 0.00 4♥ N 4 3-Highsmith-Ash vs 2-Schrader-Back
50 0.50 1.50 4♥ N -1 2-Eilers-Day vs 3-Sherwood-Johnston
50 0.50 1.50 4♥ N -1 4-Verheyden-McElroy vs 4-Armell-Fishman
|
26 |
♠AQ96
♥763
♦8543
♣32
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♠ ♣5 ♥4 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 2♥ 1NT ♦5 ♠6/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 2.00 0.00 2♥ E 3 4-Verheyden-McElroy vs 4-Armell-Fishman
170 0.50 1.50 2♥ E 4 2-Eilers-Day vs 3-Sherwood-Johnston
170 0.50 1.50 2♥ E 4 3-Highsmith-Ash vs 2-Schrader-Back
|
27 |
♠AK43
♥AQ82
♦KQ743
♣-
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ 5♥ 2NT ♣5 ♠6 |
EW: 2♣ -/1♠ ♦2 ♥1 ♠6/7 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
300 2.00 0.00 4♠* E -2 2-Eilers-Day vs 3-Sherwood-Johnston
110 1.00 1.00 2♦ N 3 4-Verheyden-McElroy vs 4-Armell-Fishman
90 0.00 2.00 2♣ W 2 3-Highsmith-Ash vs 2-Schrader-Back
|
28 |
♠T82
♥A86
♦AK9863
♣7
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ 7♠ 5NT ♣5 ♥6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦1 ♥6 ♠0 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
1050 2.00 0.00 5♠* S 6 4-Verheyden-McElroy vs 4-Armell-Fishman
650 1.00 1.00 4♠ S 5 3-Highsmith-Ash vs 2-Schrader-Back
230 0.00 2.00 3♠ S 6 2-Eilers-Day vs 3-Sherwood-Johnston
|