1 |
♠32
♥9
♦J9853
♣AT962
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ 2♠ 1NT ♥5 |
EW: 2♥ ♣4 ♦3 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
550 4.00 0.00 5♣* N 5 6-Olsky-Olsky vs 5-Ashby-Peca
50 3.00 1.00 3♠ S -1 10-Harrington-Schechter vs 8-Marsh-Spanier
140 2.00 2.00 3♥ E 3 4-Bender-Wood vs 1-Randol-Schultz
150 1.00 3.00 2N N -3 7-Beuchel-Katten vs 3-Osborne-Nair
170 0.00 4.00 3♥ E 4 9-Mattingly-Mattingly vs 2-Gorrelick-Leavitt
|
2 |
♠K
♥AJ98654
♦AT
♣A97
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ ♣5 ♦5 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 3♠ 3NT ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 4.00 0.00 4♠ W -1 9-Mattingly-Mattingly vs 2-Gorrelick-Leavitt
140 3.00 1.00 3♠ W 3 10-Harrington-Schechter vs 8-Marsh-Spanier
200 2.00 2.00 4♥ N -2 7-Beuchel-Katten vs 3-Osborne-Nair
450 1.00 3.00 4♠ W 5 4-Bender-Wood vs 1-Randol-Schultz
500 0.00 4.00 4♥* N -2 6-Olsky-Olsky vs 5-Ashby-Peca
|
3 |
♠A86
♥Q65
♦AK65
♣J53
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 1/2♥ 1♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦5 ♥5 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 4.00 0.00 1N W -2 9-Mattingly-Mattingly vs 2-Gorrelick-Leavitt
120 2.50 1.50 2N N 2 6-Olsky-Olsky vs 5-Ashby-Peca
120 2.50 1.50 1N S 2 7-Beuchel-Katten vs 3-Osborne-Nair
100 1.00 3.00 1N W -1 4-Bender-Wood vs 1-Randol-Schultz
80 0.00 4.00 1♥ W 1 10-Harrington-Schechter vs 8-Marsh-Spanier
|
4 |
♠A94
♥Q973
♦AK4
♣654
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ 1NT ♣6 ♦6 ♥6 |
EW: 1/-♦ 1♥ ♣6 ♦7/6 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
120 4.00 0.00 2N N 2 5-Ashby-Peca vs 2-Gorrelick-Leavitt
100 3.00 1.00 2♥ E -1 7-Beuchel-Katten vs 6-Olsky-Olsky
90 1.00 3.00 1N N 1 1-Randol-Schultz vs 3-Osborne-Nair
90 1.00 3.00 1N N 1 8-Marsh-Spanier vs 4-Bender-Wood
90 1.00 3.00 1N N 1 10-Harrington-Schechter vs 9-Mattingly-Mattingly
|
5 |
♠75
♥KQ864
♦KJT5
♣K2
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ ♣3/4 ♥4 ♠4/5 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 2♥ 1♠ 1NT ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
90 3.50 0.50 1N N 1 10-Harrington-Schechter vs 9-Mattingly-Mattingly
90 3.50 0.50 2♦ S 2 8-Marsh-Spanier vs 4-Bender-Wood
100 1.50 2.50 1N N -1 5-Ashby-Peca vs 2-Gorrelick-Leavitt
100 1.50 2.50 3♦ N -1 7-Beuchel-Katten vs 6-Olsky-Olsky
200 0.00 4.00 3♦* N -1 1-Randol-Schultz vs 3-Osborne-Nair
|
6 |
♠765
♥A65
♦AQJ
♣K972
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 2♠ 3NT ♣6 ♥4 |
EW: 1♣ 3♥ ♦4 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
300 4.00 0.00 2♠ E -3 7-Beuchel-Katten vs 6-Olsky-Olsky
200 3.00 1.00 3♥ W -2 10-Harrington-Schechter vs 9-Mattingly-Mattingly
100 2.00 2.00 2N W -1 5-Ashby-Peca vs 2-Gorrelick-Leavitt
140 1.00 3.00 3♥ W 3 8-Marsh-Spanier vs 4-Bender-Wood
200 0.00 4.00 2♥ W 5 1-Randol-Schultz vs 3-Osborne-Nair
|
7 |
♠KQ9
♥763
♦QT96
♣976
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦4 ♥1 ♠2 NT2/3 |
EW: 1♣ 3♦ 6♥ 5♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 4.00 0.00 5♦ E -2 8-Marsh-Spanier vs 7-Beuchel-Katten
140 3.00 1.00 3♠ W 3 2-Gorrelick-Leavitt vs 4-Bender-Wood
200 2.00 2.00 2♠ W 5 9-Mattingly-Mattingly vs 5-Ashby-Peca
650 0.50 3.50 4♠ W 5 6-Olsky-Olsky vs 3-Osborne-Nair
650 0.50 3.50 4♠ W 5 10-Harrington-Schechter vs 1-Randol-Schultz
|
8 |
♠AK94
♥T7653
♦Q62
♣T
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 3♠ ♣3 ♥5 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 2♥ 2NT ♦4 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 4.00 0.00 3N W -1 8-Marsh-Spanier vs 7-Beuchel-Katten
50 3.00 1.00 3♠ S -1 9-Mattingly-Mattingly vs 5-Ashby-Peca
100 2.00 2.00 4♠* N -1 6-Olsky-Olsky vs 3-Osborne-Nair
150 1.00 3.00 4♣ E 5 2-Gorrelick-Leavitt vs 4-Bender-Wood
400 0.00 4.00 3N W 3 10-Harrington-Schechter vs 1-Randol-Schultz
|
9 |
♠Q5
♥AK73
♦KQJ4
♣AT9
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/3♣ 4/5♦ 4/5♥ -/1♠ 2/5NT ♠6/7 |
EW: ♣4 ♦2 ♥2 ♠6 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
450 3.50 0.50 4♥ S 5 2-Gorrelick-Leavitt vs 4-Bender-Wood
450 3.50 0.50 4♥ S 5 8-Marsh-Spanier vs 7-Beuchel-Katten
420 1.50 2.50 4♥ S 4 9-Mattingly-Mattingly vs 5-Ashby-Peca
420 1.50 2.50 4♥ N 4 6-Olsky-Olsky vs 3-Osborne-Nair
200 0.00 4.00 3♥ S 5 10-Harrington-Schechter vs 1-Randol-Schultz
|
10 |
♠K8764
♥A8
♦QJT
♣754
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 1♠ ♣4 ♦5 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 2♦ ♥5 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 4.00 0.00 3♥ S 3 1-Randol-Schultz vs 6-Olsky-Olsky
110 3.00 1.00 2♥ S 2 10-Harrington-Schechter vs 2-Gorrelick-Leavitt
100 1.00 3.00 3♥ S -1 3-Osborne-Nair vs 5-Ashby-Peca
100 1.00 3.00 3♥ S -1 7-Beuchel-Katten vs 4-Bender-Wood
100 1.00 3.00 3♥ S -1 9-Mattingly-Mattingly vs 8-Marsh-Spanier
|
11 |
♠K654
♥J85
♦2
♣A8763
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 4♥ 1♠ 2NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣2 ♥3 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
210 4.00 0.00 1N S 5 10-Harrington-Schechter vs 2-Gorrelick-Leavitt
200 3.00 1.00 2♥ E -4 1-Randol-Schultz vs 6-Olsky-Olsky
190 2.00 2.00 2♣ S 7 7-Beuchel-Katten vs 4-Bender-Wood
150 1.00 3.00 2♣ S 5 3-Osborne-Nair vs 5-Ashby-Peca
130 0.00 4.00 3♣ S 4 9-Mattingly-Mattingly vs 8-Marsh-Spanier
|
12 |
♠T4
♥A94
♦8642
♣AK93
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 4♥ ♦5 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 2♦ ♣3 ♥2 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 4.00 0.00 2♥ S 4 7-Beuchel-Katten vs 4-Bender-Wood
100 3.00 1.00 4♦ E -2 1-Randol-Schultz vs 6-Olsky-Olsky
50 2.00 2.00 3♦ E -1 9-Mattingly-Mattingly vs 8-Marsh-Spanier
PASS 1.00 3.00 Pass Out 10-Harrington-Schechter vs 2-Gorrelick-Leavitt
120 0.00 4.00 1N W 2 3-Osborne-Nair vs 5-Ashby-Peca
|
13 |
♠A86
♥J
♦K964
♣AT843
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ 1NT ♥6 ♠6 |
EW: 1♥ 1♠ ♣4 ♦4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
90 3.50 0.50 1N N 1 1-Randol-Schultz vs 9-Mattingly-Mattingly
90 3.50 0.50 2♣ N 2 4-Bender-Wood vs 6-Olsky-Olsky
PASS 2.00 2.00 Pass Out 8-Marsh-Spanier vs 5-Ashby-Peca
140 1.00 3.00 2♠ W 3 10-Harrington-Schechter vs 3-Osborne-Nair
200 0.00 4.00 3♦ N -2 2-Gorrelick-Leavitt vs 7-Beuchel-Katten
|
14 |
♠Q64
♥QT2
♦J63
♣AT83
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ 1♥ 2♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦6 ♥6 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 4.00 0.00 2♥ E -4 8-Marsh-Spanier vs 5-Ashby-Peca
150 2.50 1.50 2N S 3 1-Randol-Schultz vs 9-Mattingly-Mattingly
150 2.50 1.50 2N S 3 2-Gorrelick-Leavitt vs 7-Beuchel-Katten
120 0.50 3.50 2N N 2 4-Bender-Wood vs 6-Olsky-Olsky
120 0.50 3.50 1N S 2 10-Harrington-Schechter vs 3-Osborne-Nair
|
15 |
♠A7543
♥54
♦K642
♣Q5
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/-♦ 1♠ ♣3 ♦7/6 ♥5 NT6 |
EW: 4♣ 2♥ 1NT ♦6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
120 4.00 0.00 1N S 2 1-Randol-Schultz vs 9-Mattingly-Mattingly
100 2.00 2.00 1N S -1 2-Gorrelick-Leavitt vs 7-Beuchel-Katten
100 2.00 2.00 1N S -1 8-Marsh-Spanier vs 5-Ashby-Peca
100 2.00 2.00 2♠ N -1 10-Harrington-Schechter vs 3-Osborne-Nair
130 0.00 4.00 3♣ E 4 4-Bender-Wood vs 6-Olsky-Olsky
|
16 |
♠K42
♥KQ92
♦J5
♣AKT4
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 2NT ♣6 ♦5 ♠6 |
EW: 2♦ ♣6 ♥4 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 4.00 0.00 2♥ N 4 5-Ashby-Peca vs 7-Beuchel-Katten
140 1.50 2.50 3♥ N 3 9-Mattingly-Mattingly vs 6-Olsky-Olsky
140 1.50 2.50 2♥ N 3 2-Gorrelick-Leavitt vs 1-Randol-Schultz
140 1.50 2.50 2♥ N 3 3-Osborne-Nair vs 8-Marsh-Spanier
140 1.50 2.50 2♥ N 3 10-Harrington-Schechter vs 4-Bender-Wood
|
17 |
♠84
♥9643
♦632
♣K542
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♠ ♦3 ♥4 NT4 |
EW: 3♦ 3♥ 2/-NT ♣5/4 ♠6/5 NT8/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 4.00 0.00 3♣ S -2 5-Ashby-Peca vs 7-Beuchel-Katten
110 3.00 1.00 2♦ E 3 10-Harrington-Schechter vs 4-Bender-Wood
130 2.00 2.00 2♦ E 4 2-Gorrelick-Leavitt vs 1-Randol-Schultz
140 1.00 3.00 3♥ E 3 3-Osborne-Nair vs 8-Marsh-Spanier
170 0.00 4.00 2♥ E 4 9-Mattingly-Mattingly vs 6-Olsky-Olsky
|
18 |
♠KQ964
♥Q875
♦5
♣952
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣1 ♦1 ♥3 NT1 |
EW: 5♣ 6♦ 4♥ 2NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.50 0.50 3N E -2 9-Mattingly-Mattingly vs 6-Olsky-Olsky
100 3.50 0.50 3N E -2 10-Harrington-Schechter vs 4-Bender-Wood
420 2.00 2.00 5♦ E 6 2-Gorrelick-Leavitt vs 1-Randol-Schultz
920 0.50 3.50 6♦ E 6 3-Osborne-Nair vs 8-Marsh-Spanier
920 0.50 3.50 6♦ E 6 5-Ashby-Peca vs 7-Beuchel-Katten
|
19 |
♠AT85
♥Q98
♦QJ6
♣T64
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ 1NT ♣6 ♦5 ♥5 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 2♥ ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 4.00 0.00 3♠ S 3 3-Osborne-Nair vs 2-Gorrelick-Leavitt
110 3.00 1.00 2♠ S 2 6-Olsky-Olsky vs 8-Marsh-Spanier
PASS 1.00 3.00 Pass Out 1-Randol-Schultz vs 7-Beuchel-Katten
PASS 1.00 3.00 Pass Out 4-Bender-Wood vs 9-Mattingly-Mattingly
PASS 1.00 3.00 Pass Out 10-Harrington-Schechter vs 5-Ashby-Peca
|
20 |
♠J
♥K96
♦A9754
♣QJ94
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 1♦ 5♥ 1NT ♠4 |
EW: 2♠ ♣2 ♦6/5 ♥2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
650 4.00 0.00 5♥ S 5 10-Harrington-Schechter vs 5-Ashby-Peca
600 3.00 1.00 5♣ S 5 3-Osborne-Nair vs 2-Gorrelick-Leavitt
100 1.50 2.50 4♠ W -1 1-Randol-Schultz vs 7-Beuchel-Katten
100 1.50 2.50 4♠ E -1 4-Bender-Wood vs 9-Mattingly-Mattingly
620 0.00 4.00 4♠ W 4 6-Olsky-Olsky vs 8-Marsh-Spanier
|
21 |
♠J765
♥86
♦T976
♣AT7
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦6 ♥3/2 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 3♥ 2♠ 2NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 4.00 0.00 4♠ W -3 6-Olsky-Olsky vs 8-Marsh-Spanier
100 2.50 1.50 4♠ W -2 1-Randol-Schultz vs 7-Beuchel-Katten
100 2.50 1.50 4♠ W -2 10-Harrington-Schechter vs 5-Ashby-Peca
50 0.50 3.50 3N E -1 3-Osborne-Nair vs 2-Gorrelick-Leavitt
50 0.50 3.50 3N E -1 4-Bender-Wood vs 9-Mattingly-Mattingly
|
22 |
♠KT9
♥J
♦QJ752
♣QJ85
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦6 ♥4 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 1/2♣ 1♦ 3♥ 3♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 4.00 0.00 3N W -1 7-Beuchel-Katten vs 9-Mattingly-Mattingly
500 3.00 1.00 4♣* S -3 5-Ashby-Peca vs 1-Randol-Schultz
600 2.00 2.00 3N W 3 4-Bender-Wood vs 3-Osborne-Nair
630 1.00 3.00 3N W 4 10-Harrington-Schechter vs 6-Olsky-Olsky
660 0.00 4.00 3N E 5 2-Gorrelick-Leavitt vs 8-Marsh-Spanier
|
23 |
♠AK9
♥AK95
♦732
♣Q92
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: -/2♣ 1/2♦ 4♥ 5♠ 5NT ♣6/8 |
EW: ♣5 ♦5 ♥2/3 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
630 4.00 0.00 3N S 4 7-Beuchel-Katten vs 9-Mattingly-Mattingly
620 2.50 1.50 4♠ S 4 2-Gorrelick-Leavitt vs 8-Marsh-Spanier
620 2.50 1.50 4♠ S 4 10-Harrington-Schechter vs 6-Olsky-Olsky
100 0.50 3.50 4♠ S -1 4-Bender-Wood vs 3-Osborne-Nair
100 0.50 3.50 4♠ S -1 5-Ashby-Peca vs 1-Randol-Schultz
|
24 |
♠A8743
♥A2
♦J
♣J7432
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 4/3♥ 2♠ ♦4 NT5 |
EW: 2♦ ♣2 ♥3 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
500 4.00 0.00 2♠* E -3 5-Ashby-Peca vs 1-Randol-Schultz
200 3.00 1.00 3♥ S 5 4-Bender-Wood vs 3-Osborne-Nair
150 1.50 2.50 3♠ W -3 7-Beuchel-Katten vs 9-Mattingly-Mattingly
150 1.50 2.50 4♣ N 5 2-Gorrelick-Leavitt vs 8-Marsh-Spanier
50 0.00 4.00 4♦ E -1 10-Harrington-Schechter vs 6-Olsky-Olsky
|
25 |
♠8
♥97653
♦AKJ6
♣A73
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ 5♥ 1♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦5 ♥2 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
450 2.50 1.50 4♥ N 5 3-Osborne-Nair vs 9-Mattingly-Mattingly
450 2.50 1.50 4♥ N 5 6-Olsky-Olsky vs 2-Gorrelick-Leavitt
450 2.50 1.50 4♥ N 5 8-Marsh-Spanier vs 1-Randol-Schultz
450 2.50 1.50 4♥ N 5 10-Harrington-Schechter vs 7-Beuchel-Katten
50 0.00 4.00 4♥ S -1 5-Ashby-Peca vs 4-Bender-Wood
|
26 |
♠T87
♥9743
♦JT82
♣K2
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: -/1♥ ♣4 ♦5/6 ♥6/7 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ 4♠ 3NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 4.00 0.00 2♠ W 2 8-Marsh-Spanier vs 1-Randol-Schultz
120 3.00 1.00 1N W 2 10-Harrington-Schechter vs 7-Beuchel-Katten
140 2.00 2.00 3♠ W 3 6-Olsky-Olsky vs 2-Gorrelick-Leavitt
150 1.00 3.00 2N W 3 3-Osborne-Nair vs 9-Mattingly-Mattingly
200 0.00 4.00 2♥ S -2 5-Ashby-Peca vs 4-Bender-Wood
|
27 |
♠JT4
♥KT
♦Q52
♣AKT85
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♠ ♣6 ♦3 ♥4 NT6 |
EW: 4♦ 3♥ 1NT ♣6 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 3.50 0.50 3♠ S 4 3-Osborne-Nair vs 9-Mattingly-Mattingly
170 3.50 0.50 3♠ S 4 5-Ashby-Peca vs 4-Bender-Wood
100 2.00 2.00 4♥* W -1 10-Harrington-Schechter vs 7-Beuchel-Katten
50 1.00 3.00 4♥ W -1 8-Marsh-Spanier vs 1-Randol-Schultz
510 0.00 4.00 4♦* W 4 6-Olsky-Olsky vs 2-Gorrelick-Leavitt
|