1 |
♠KQ6
♥KJ54
♦9765
♣AJ
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1♦ 1♥ 3♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦6 ♥6 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
180 4.00 0.00 1N N 4 4-Katten-Beuchel vs 1-Leavitt-Fuller
170 3.00 1.00 3♠ S 4 9-Kuller-Butwin vs 2-Solow-McNamee II
150 1.50 2.50 2N S 3 10-Higbee-Wright vs 8-Ambrose-Osborne
150 1.50 2.50 1N N 3 7-Titow-Titow vs 3-Marsh-Spanier
120 0.00 4.00 1N N 2 6-Bender-Ulrey vs 5-Yee-Perlstein
|
2 |
♠Q3
♥J83
♦K84
♣Q9863
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣4 ♦6 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 1/2♠ ♦6 ♥6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
120 3.50 0.50 1N N 2 4-Katten-Beuchel vs 1-Leavitt-Fuller
120 3.50 0.50 1N N 2 6-Bender-Ulrey vs 5-Yee-Perlstein
90 2.00 2.00 1N N 1 10-Higbee-Wright vs 8-Ambrose-Osborne
100 1.00 3.00 2♥ N -1 7-Titow-Titow vs 3-Marsh-Spanier
200 0.00 4.00 1N N -2 9-Kuller-Butwin vs 2-Solow-McNamee II
|
3 |
♠A52
♥T8
♦Q7
♣AQ7542
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♠ 1NT ♦6 ♥5 |
EW: 2♥ ♣4 ♦6 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 4.00 0.00 2♣ N 3 4-Katten-Beuchel vs 1-Leavitt-Fuller
100 2.50 1.50 3♥ E -1 10-Higbee-Wright vs 8-Ambrose-Osborne
100 2.50 1.50 2♥ E -1 9-Kuller-Butwin vs 2-Solow-McNamee II
50 1.00 3.00 2♠ S -1 6-Bender-Ulrey vs 5-Yee-Perlstein
140 0.00 4.00 3♥ E 3 7-Titow-Titow vs 3-Marsh-Spanier
|
4 |
♠J
♥AK43
♦8732
♣QJT2
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦6 ♥3 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 3♥ 1♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
90 4.00 0.00 1N E 1 1-Leavitt-Fuller vs 3-Marsh-Spanier
110 2.50 1.50 2♥ E 2 7-Titow-Titow vs 6-Bender-Ulrey
110 2.50 1.50 2♥ E 2 8-Ambrose-Osborne vs 4-Katten-Beuchel
200 1.00 3.00 1N N -2 5-Yee-Perlstein vs 2-Solow-McNamee II
300 0.00 4.00 2♠ S -3 10-Higbee-Wright vs 9-Kuller-Butwin
|
5 |
♠A7643
♥97
♦97
♣Q875
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦6 ♥3 ♠5 NT3 |
EW: 3♥ 1♠ 2NT ♣5 ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 4.00 0.00 4♥ W -1 7-Titow-Titow vs 6-Bender-Ulrey
420 1.50 2.50 4♥ W 4 1-Leavitt-Fuller vs 3-Marsh-Spanier
420 1.50 2.50 4♥ W 4 5-Yee-Perlstein vs 2-Solow-McNamee II
420 1.50 2.50 4♥ W 4 10-Higbee-Wright vs 9-Kuller-Butwin
420 1.50 2.50 4♥ E 4 8-Ambrose-Osborne vs 4-Katten-Beuchel
|
6 |
♠AQ874
♥JT76
♦AT
♣T4
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 7♥ 6♠ 6NT ♣4 ♦5 |
EW: 3♣ 2♦ ♥0 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
980 4.00 0.00 6♠ S 6 1-Leavitt-Fuller vs 3-Marsh-Spanier
480 1.50 2.50 4♠ S 6 5-Yee-Perlstein vs 2-Solow-McNamee II
480 1.50 2.50 4♠ S 6 7-Titow-Titow vs 6-Bender-Ulrey
480 1.50 2.50 4♠ S 6 8-Ambrose-Osborne vs 4-Katten-Beuchel
480 1.50 2.50 4♠ S 6 10-Higbee-Wright vs 9-Kuller-Butwin
|
7 |
♠72
♥AK53
♦64
♣Q8754
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♦ 4♥ 1♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦3 ♥2 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
600 4.00 0.00 3N S 3 10-Higbee-Wright vs 1-Leavitt-Fuller
200 2.50 1.50 3♠ E -2 6-Bender-Ulrey vs 3-Marsh-Spanier
200 2.50 1.50 3♠ E -2 8-Ambrose-Osborne vs 7-Titow-Titow
150 1.00 3.00 3♦ S 5 2-Solow-McNamee II vs 4-Katten-Beuchel
130 0.00 4.00 2♦ S 4 9-Kuller-Butwin vs 5-Yee-Perlstein
|
8 |
♠KQ2
♥742
♦QJ
♣KT642
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦1 ♥4 ♠5 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 6♦ 3♥ 2♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
120 3.50 0.50 1N W 2 8-Ambrose-Osborne vs 7-Titow-Titow
120 3.50 0.50 1N W 2 10-Higbee-Wright vs 1-Leavitt-Fuller
180 1.50 2.50 2N W 4 9-Kuller-Butwin vs 5-Yee-Perlstein
180 1.50 2.50 1N W 4 6-Bender-Ulrey vs 3-Marsh-Spanier
210 0.00 4.00 1N W 5 2-Solow-McNamee II vs 4-Katten-Beuchel
|
9 |
♠3
♥QT87
♦Q6432
♣862
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦3 ♥5 ♠3 NT1 |
EW: 5♣ 4♦ 2♥ 4♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 4.00 0.00 1♠ W 3 9-Kuller-Butwin vs 5-Yee-Perlstein
600 3.00 1.00 3N E 3 6-Bender-Ulrey vs 3-Marsh-Spanier
660 1.50 2.50 3N W 5 8-Ambrose-Osborne vs 7-Titow-Titow
660 1.50 2.50 3N E 5 2-Solow-McNamee II vs 4-Katten-Beuchel
690 0.00 4.00 3N E 6 10-Higbee-Wright vs 1-Leavitt-Fuller
|
10 |
♠QJ98763
♥4
♦A72
♣JT
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦4 ♥2 ♠6 NT2 |
EW: 5/4♣ 1/-♦ 4♥ 1♠ 5NT ♦7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 4.00 0.00 4♥ W -1 3-Marsh-Spanier vs 5-Yee-Perlstein
630 3.00 1.00 3N E 4 1-Leavitt-Fuller vs 6-Bender-Ulrey
660 1.50 2.50 3N E 5 9-Kuller-Butwin vs 8-Ambrose-Osborne
660 1.50 2.50 3N E 5 10-Higbee-Wright vs 2-Solow-McNamee II
800 0.00 4.00 4♠* N -3 7-Titow-Titow vs 4-Katten-Beuchel
|
11 |
♠QT32
♥AJ43
♦K742
♣4
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ 3♥ 4♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦4 ♥4 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 3.50 0.50 2N N 3 1-Leavitt-Fuller vs 6-Bender-Ulrey
150 3.50 0.50 1N S 3 7-Titow-Titow vs 4-Katten-Beuchel
110 2.00 2.00 2♣ S 3 3-Marsh-Spanier vs 5-Yee-Perlstein
50 0.50 3.50 3N N -1 9-Kuller-Butwin vs 8-Ambrose-Osborne
50 0.50 3.50 2N N -1 10-Higbee-Wright vs 2-Solow-McNamee II
|
12 |
♠QJ5
♥2
♦A975
♣KT983
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦5 ♥4 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 2♦ 3♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.50 0.50 2N E -2 3-Marsh-Spanier vs 5-Yee-Perlstein
100 3.50 0.50 2N E -2 9-Kuller-Butwin vs 8-Ambrose-Osborne
50 2.00 2.00 2♦ E -1 10-Higbee-Wright vs 2-Solow-McNamee II
PASS 1.00 3.00 Pass Out 1-Leavitt-Fuller vs 6-Bender-Ulrey
140 0.00 4.00 2♥ W 3 7-Titow-Titow vs 4-Katten-Beuchel
|
13 |
♠AQ874
♥T9
♦AK98
♣KT
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♦ 3♥ 3♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦4 ♥4 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
660 4.00 0.00 3N N 5 8-Ambrose-Osborne vs 5-Yee-Perlstein
630 3.00 1.00 3N S 4 1-Leavitt-Fuller vs 9-Kuller-Butwin
600 2.00 2.00 3N S 3 10-Higbee-Wright vs 3-Marsh-Spanier
140 0.50 3.50 2♠ N 3 2-Solow-McNamee II vs 7-Titow-Titow
140 0.50 3.50 2♠ N 3 4-Katten-Beuchel vs 6-Bender-Ulrey
|
14 |
♠KT42
♥A43
♦K532
♣73
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ 4♥ 5♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦4 ♥3 ♠2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 3.50 0.50 2♠ N 5 1-Leavitt-Fuller vs 9-Kuller-Butwin
200 3.50 0.50 2♠ N 5 4-Katten-Beuchel vs 6-Bender-Ulrey
170 2.00 2.00 2♠ N 4 8-Ambrose-Osborne vs 5-Yee-Perlstein
110 0.50 3.50 2♠ N 2 2-Solow-McNamee II vs 7-Titow-Titow
110 0.50 3.50 2♠ N 2 10-Higbee-Wright vs 3-Marsh-Spanier
|
15 |
♠AJ
♥KJT964
♦A
♣T765
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 2♥ 1♠ ♣5 NT6 |
EW: 1/2♣ -/1NT ♦5 ♥5 ♠6 NT5/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
620 4.00 0.00 4♥ N 4 1-Leavitt-Fuller vs 9-Kuller-Butwin
170 3.00 1.00 2♥ N 4 8-Ambrose-Osborne vs 5-Yee-Perlstein
140 2.00 2.00 3♥ N 3 4-Katten-Beuchel vs 6-Bender-Ulrey
100 1.00 3.00 3♣ W -2 2-Solow-McNamee II vs 7-Titow-Titow
50 0.00 4.00 2♠ E -1 10-Higbee-Wright vs 3-Marsh-Spanier
|
16 |
♠J
♥A872
♦KT9852
♣92
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ ♣1 ♥5 ♠0 NT1 |
EW: 6♣ 1♥ 6♠ ♦4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 4.00 0.00 3♠ E 5 3-Marsh-Spanier vs 8-Ambrose-Osborne
680 3.00 1.00 5♠ E 6 10-Higbee-Wright vs 4-Katten-Beuchel
710 1.00 3.00 4♠ W 7 5-Yee-Perlstein vs 7-Titow-Titow
710 1.00 3.00 4♠ E 7 2-Solow-McNamee II vs 1-Leavitt-Fuller
710 1.00 3.00 4♠ E 7 9-Kuller-Butwin vs 6-Bender-Ulrey
|
17 |
♠6
♥T832
♦82
♣JT9763
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣5 ♦4 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ 4♠ 3NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
300 4.00 0.00 6♠* W -2 10-Higbee-Wright vs 4-Katten-Beuchel
50 2.50 1.50 3N E -1 3-Marsh-Spanier vs 8-Ambrose-Osborne
50 2.50 1.50 4♠ E -1 2-Solow-McNamee II vs 1-Leavitt-Fuller
420 0.50 3.50 4♠ W 4 5-Yee-Perlstein vs 7-Titow-Titow
420 0.50 3.50 4♠ W 4 9-Kuller-Butwin vs 6-Bender-Ulrey
|
18 |
♠A864
♥J9
♦AQ5
♣JT32
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 1♦ 5♥ 4♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦5 ♥1 ♠3 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
680 4.00 0.00 4♥ S 6 2-Solow-McNamee II vs 1-Leavitt-Fuller
660 3.00 1.00 3N N 5 3-Marsh-Spanier vs 8-Ambrose-Osborne
620 2.00 2.00 4♥ S 4 10-Higbee-Wright vs 4-Katten-Beuchel
100 0.50 3.50 6♥ S -1 9-Kuller-Butwin vs 6-Bender-Ulrey
100 0.50 3.50 4♥ S -1 5-Yee-Perlstein vs 7-Titow-Titow
|
19 |
♠94
♥KQJ942
♦Q32
♣Q8
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♥ ♣2 ♠2 NT4 |
EW: 5♣ 5♠ ♦6 ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 4.00 0.00 2♥ N 3 4-Katten-Beuchel vs 9-Kuller-Butwin
110 3.00 1.00 2♥ N 2 3-Marsh-Spanier vs 2-Solow-McNamee II
50 1.50 2.50 3♥ N -1 6-Bender-Ulrey vs 8-Ambrose-Osborne
50 1.50 2.50 3♥ N -1 10-Higbee-Wright vs 5-Yee-Perlstein
100 0.00 4.00 3♥* N -1 1-Leavitt-Fuller vs 7-Titow-Titow
|
20 |
♠Q4
♥K93
♦AJ76432
♣T
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ 5♥ 1NT ♣6 ♠6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦0 ♥0 ♠6 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
650 4.00 0.00 4♥ S 5 4-Katten-Beuchel vs 9-Kuller-Butwin
620 3.00 1.00 5♦ N 6 6-Bender-Ulrey vs 8-Ambrose-Osborne
130 1.50 2.50 3♦ N 4 1-Leavitt-Fuller vs 7-Titow-Titow
130 1.50 2.50 3♦ N 4 10-Higbee-Wright vs 5-Yee-Perlstein
100 0.00 4.00 5♦ N -1 3-Marsh-Spanier vs 2-Solow-McNamee II
|
21 |
♠8
♥72
♦AK4
♣AQJ7653
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 4♦ ♥3 ♠3 NT6 |
EW: 3♥ 4♠ ♣1 ♦1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
690 4.00 0.00 3N S 6 3-Marsh-Spanier vs 2-Solow-McNamee II
170 3.00 1.00 4♣ N 6 10-Higbee-Wright vs 5-Yee-Perlstein
100 2.00 2.00 3♥ E -2 6-Bender-Ulrey vs 8-Ambrose-Osborne
200 1.00 3.00 3N S -2 4-Katten-Beuchel vs 9-Kuller-Butwin
800 0.00 4.00 3N* S -3 1-Leavitt-Fuller vs 7-Titow-Titow
|
22 |
♠Q74
♥K62
♦AJ86
♣Q52
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5/4 ♦4 ♥2 ♠2 NT3/2 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 5♥ 5♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 4.00 0.00 3N W -1 10-Higbee-Wright vs 6-Bender-Ulrey
120 3.00 1.00 1N W 2 7-Titow-Titow vs 9-Kuller-Butwin
140 2.00 2.00 2♠ E 3 5-Yee-Perlstein vs 1-Leavitt-Fuller
170 1.00 3.00 2♠ E 4 4-Katten-Beuchel vs 3-Marsh-Spanier
630 0.00 4.00 3N W 4 2-Solow-McNamee II vs 8-Ambrose-Osborne
|
23 |
♠QT86
♥JT86
♦K76
♣72
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦1 ♥4 ♠5 NT2 |
EW: 6♣ 6♦ 3♥ 2♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 3.50 0.50 3♣ W 6 2-Solow-McNamee II vs 8-Ambrose-Osborne
170 3.50 0.50 3♣ W 6 5-Yee-Perlstein vs 1-Leavitt-Fuller
630 2.00 2.00 3N W 4 10-Higbee-Wright vs 6-Bender-Ulrey
660 0.50 3.50 3N W 5 4-Katten-Beuchel vs 3-Marsh-Spanier
660 0.50 3.50 3N W 5 7-Titow-Titow vs 9-Kuller-Butwin
|
24 |
♠-
♥AK98542
♦J832
♣A7
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/1♦ 6♥ 3NT ♣6/5 ♠4 |
EW: 3♠ ♣6 ♦5 ♥1 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
450 2.50 1.50 4♥ N 5 2-Solow-McNamee II vs 8-Ambrose-Osborne
450 2.50 1.50 4♥ N 5 4-Katten-Beuchel vs 3-Marsh-Spanier
450 2.50 1.50 4♥ N 5 7-Titow-Titow vs 9-Kuller-Butwin
450 2.50 1.50 4♥ N 5 10-Higbee-Wright vs 6-Bender-Ulrey
50 0.00 4.00 6♥ N -1 5-Yee-Perlstein vs 1-Leavitt-Fuller
|
25 |
♠T6
♥KQT98542
♦A
♣JT
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♥ ♦4 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 3♦ 4♠ ♣5 ♥4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.50 0.50 4♠ W -1 5-Yee-Perlstein vs 4-Katten-Beuchel
100 3.50 0.50 4♠ W -1 10-Higbee-Wright vs 7-Titow-Titow
50 1.50 2.50 4♥ N -1 3-Marsh-Spanier vs 9-Kuller-Butwin
50 1.50 2.50 4♥ N -1 8-Ambrose-Osborne vs 1-Leavitt-Fuller
100 0.00 4.00 4♥ N -2 6-Bender-Ulrey vs 2-Solow-McNamee II
|
26 |
♠AKQ9876
♥QJ
♦63
♣AQ
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 5♠ ♣5 ♥4 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 3♥ ♦3 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
650 3.50 0.50 4♠ N 5 3-Marsh-Spanier vs 9-Kuller-Butwin
650 3.50 0.50 4♠ N 5 8-Ambrose-Osborne vs 1-Leavitt-Fuller
200 1.50 2.50 3♠ N 5 5-Yee-Perlstein vs 4-Katten-Beuchel
200 1.50 2.50 5♥ E -2 10-Higbee-Wright vs 7-Titow-Titow
100 0.00 4.00 5♠ N -1 6-Bender-Ulrey vs 2-Solow-McNamee II
|
27 |
♠J7432
♥J2
♦QT93
♣A8
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ 4♠ 2NT ♣5 ♥5 |
EW: 2♣ 1♥ ♦2 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
420 3.00 1.00 4♠ S 4 5-Yee-Perlstein vs 4-Katten-Beuchel
420 3.00 1.00 4♠ S 4 6-Bender-Ulrey vs 2-Solow-McNamee II
420 3.00 1.00 4♠ S 4 10-Higbee-Wright vs 7-Titow-Titow
170 1.00 3.00 2♠ S 4 8-Ambrose-Osborne vs 1-Leavitt-Fuller
120 0.00 4.00 1N N 2 3-Marsh-Spanier vs 9-Kuller-Butwin
|