1 |
♠AJ965
♥T8
♦A875
♣96
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5/4 ♦3 ♥5 ♠6 NT3 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ 2♥ 4NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 2.50 0.50 4♥ W -1 2-Johnson-McBride vs 2-Crowley-Nabours
50 2.50 0.50 4♣ E -1 1-Kuller-Finkle vs 1-Victor-Healy
430 0.50 2.50 3N E 4 3-Gore-St. Amant vs 4-James-Katzin
430 0.50 2.50 3N E 4 4-Back-Lusby vs 3-Smith-Robbins
|
2 |
♠A3
♥KQT54
♦K873
♣T6
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♥ 1NT ♦6 ♠5 |
EW: 1♠ ♣4 ♦6 ♥4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
90 3.00 0.00 2♣ S 2 2-Johnson-McBride vs 2-Crowley-Nabours
50 1.50 1.50 3♠ E -1 3-Gore-St. Amant vs 4-James-Katzin
50 1.50 1.50 2♠ E -1 4-Back-Lusby vs 3-Smith-Robbins
100 0.00 3.00 3♥ N -1 1-Kuller-Finkle vs 1-Victor-Healy
|
3 |
♠T98763
♥T32
♦A
♣A32
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣3 ♦3 ♥3 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 4♦ 3♥ 3NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 2.50 0.50 3N W -1 4-Back-Lusby vs 3-Smith-Robbins
100 2.50 0.50 3♥ E -1 3-Gore-St. Amant vs 4-James-Katzin
130 1.00 2.00 2♦ E 4 2-Johnson-McBride vs 2-Crowley-Nabours
630 0.00 3.00 3N W 4 1-Kuller-Finkle vs 1-Victor-Healy
|
4 |
♠AQ4
♥KQT6
♦Q82
♣AK6
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 1♥ 3♠ 4NT ♣6 |
EW: ♣6 ♦3 ♥5 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
630 3.00 0.00 3N N 4 3-Gore-St. Amant vs 4-James-Katzin
170 2.00 1.00 2♠ S 4 2-Johnson-McBride vs 2-Crowley-Nabours
100 1.00 2.00 3N N -1 4-Back-Lusby vs 3-Smith-Robbins
200 0.00 3.00 4♠ S -2 1-Kuller-Finkle vs 1-Victor-Healy
|
5 |
♠Q43
♥T9432
♦98
♣854
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ -/1♦ 2♥ 1NT ♦6/7 ♠5 |
EW: 1♠ ♣5/4 ♦6 ♥5 NT6/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
600 3.00 0.00 3N S 3 2-Johnson-McBride vs 2-Crowley-Nabours
100 1.00 2.00 2N S -1 1-Kuller-Finkle vs 1-Victor-Healy
100 1.00 2.00 2N S -1 3-Gore-St. Amant vs 4-James-Katzin
100 1.00 2.00 3♥ S -1 4-Back-Lusby vs 3-Smith-Robbins
|
6 |
♠AQT9
♥A
♦KQT
♣Q9875
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ 2♥ 2♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣4/5 ♦4/5 ♥5 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 3.00 0.00 2♠ W -2 1-Kuller-Finkle vs 4-James-Katzin
130 2.00 1.00 3♣ N 4 3-Gore-St. Amant vs 3-Smith-Robbins
90 1.00 2.00 1N S 1 2-Johnson-McBride vs 1-Victor-Healy
100 0.00 3.00 2♥ S -2 4-Back-Lusby vs 2-Crowley-Nabours
|
7 |
♠97
♥T8653
♦863
♣K65
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣1/0 ♦4/3 ♠3 NT1/0 |
EW: 6♣ 2♦ 3♠ 6NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 3.00 0.00 3N W -2 1-Kuller-Finkle vs 4-James-Katzin
130 2.00 1.00 2♣ E 4 3-Gore-St. Amant vs 3-Smith-Robbins
630 1.00 2.00 3N W 4 4-Back-Lusby vs 2-Crowley-Nabours
750 0.00 3.00 5♣* E 5 2-Johnson-McBride vs 1-Victor-Healy
|
8 |
♠AK97532
♥Q6
♦T8
♣QJ
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♠ 2NT ♣6 ♦4 ♥6 |
EW: 1♦ 1♥ ♣5 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
450 3.00 0.00 4♠ N 5 3-Gore-St. Amant vs 3-Smith-Robbins
420 1.50 1.50 4♠ S 4 2-Johnson-McBride vs 1-Victor-Healy
420 1.50 1.50 4♠ N 4 4-Back-Lusby vs 2-Crowley-Nabours
200 0.00 3.00 3♠ N 5 1-Kuller-Finkle vs 4-James-Katzin
|
9 |
♠Q3
♥Q652
♦K84
♣JT65
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦6 ♥6 ♠3 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 1♥ 4♠ ♦5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.00 0.00 4♠ W -1 3-Gore-St. Amant vs 3-Smith-Robbins
140 1.50 1.50 3♠ W 3 1-Kuller-Finkle vs 4-James-Katzin
140 1.50 1.50 2♠ W 3 4-Back-Lusby vs 2-Crowley-Nabours
620 0.00 3.00 4♠ W 4 2-Johnson-McBride vs 1-Victor-Healy
|
10 |
♠965
♥J73
♦QJ54
♣QJ3
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦4 ♥3 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 2/1♣ 3/2♦ 4♥ 1♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.00 0.00 3♦ E -1 2-Johnson-McBride vs 1-Victor-Healy
170 2.00 1.00 2♥ E 4 1-Kuller-Finkle vs 4-James-Katzin
300 1.00 2.00 2♠ S -3 4-Back-Lusby vs 2-Crowley-Nabours
620 0.00 3.00 4♥ W 4 3-Gore-St. Amant vs 3-Smith-Robbins
|
11 |
♠AJT8762
♥AK
♦A
♣A64
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♦ 2♥ 7♠ 7NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦2 ♥4 ♠0 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
520 3.00 0.00 4N N 7 2-Johnson-McBride vs 4-James-Katzin
510 2.00 1.00 4♠ N 7 4-Back-Lusby vs 1-Victor-Healy
430 1.00 2.00 4N N 4 1-Kuller-Finkle vs 3-Smith-Robbins
230 0.00 3.00 3♠ N 6 3-Gore-St. Amant vs 2-Crowley-Nabours
|
12 |
♠Q763
♥85
♦T9
♣K9765
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦3 ♥3 ♠5 NT3 |
EW: 4♦ 4♥ 2♠ 4NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 3.00 0.00 3N W -1 2-Johnson-McBride vs 4-James-Katzin
120 2.00 1.00 2N E 2 3-Gore-St. Amant vs 2-Crowley-Nabours
430 0.50 2.50 3N W 4 1-Kuller-Finkle vs 3-Smith-Robbins
430 0.50 2.50 3N W 4 4-Back-Lusby vs 1-Victor-Healy
|
13 |
♠A6
♥T873
♦K9
♣AJ652
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♠ ♦2 ♥3 NT3 |
EW: 3/4♦ 3/4♥ -/1NT ♣3 ♠3 NT6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.00 0.00 4♥ E -1 1-Kuller-Finkle vs 3-Smith-Robbins
100 2.00 1.00 4♠ S -1 2-Johnson-McBride vs 4-James-Katzin
130 1.00 2.00 4♦ W 4 4-Back-Lusby vs 1-Victor-Healy
200 0.00 3.00 5♣* N -1 3-Gore-St. Amant vs 2-Crowley-Nabours
|
14 |
♠K4
♥QT54
♦Q6
♣AK963
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦4 ♥6 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 2♦ 1♥ 1♠ 2NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
90 3.00 0.00 2♣ N 2 3-Gore-St. Amant vs 2-Crowley-Nabours
100 1.50 1.50 2♥ N -2 2-Johnson-McBride vs 4-James-Katzin
100 1.50 1.50 3♣ N -2 4-Back-Lusby vs 1-Victor-Healy
110 0.00 3.00 2♦ E 3 1-Kuller-Finkle vs 3-Smith-Robbins
|
15 |
♠-
♥86
♦986432
♣Q9653
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 1♥ ♠0 NT1 |
EW: 6♠ 1NT ♣5 ♦5 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
480 1.50 1.50 4♠ E 6 1-Kuller-Finkle vs 3-Smith-Robbins
480 1.50 1.50 4♠ E 6 2-Johnson-McBride vs 4-James-Katzin
480 1.50 1.50 4♠ E 6 3-Gore-St. Amant vs 2-Crowley-Nabours
480 1.50 1.50 4♠ E 6 4-Back-Lusby vs 1-Victor-Healy
|
16 |
♠62
♥KJ85
♦762
♣9876
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣2 ♦5 ♠1 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 2♦ 5♠ 1NT ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 3.00 0.00 2♠ W 4 3-Gore-St. Amant vs 1-Victor-Healy
620 2.00 1.00 4♠ W 4 1-Kuller-Finkle vs 2-Crowley-Nabours
650 0.50 2.50 4♠ W 5 2-Johnson-McBride vs 3-Smith-Robbins
650 0.50 2.50 4♠ W 5 4-Back-Lusby vs 4-James-Katzin
|
17 |
♠962
♥A52
♦KJT
♣A932
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦3 ♥3 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 4♦ 4♥ 4♠ 2NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 3.00 0.00 4♠ E -1 2-Johnson-McBride vs 3-Smith-Robbins
170 1.00 2.00 2♥ W 4 1-Kuller-Finkle vs 2-Crowley-Nabours
170 1.00 2.00 2♥ W 4 4-Back-Lusby vs 4-James-Katzin
170 1.00 2.00 1♥ W 4 3-Gore-St. Amant vs 1-Victor-Healy
|
18 |
♠642
♥K
♦AKQT84
♣J32
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣2 ♥5 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 5♠ 1NT ♦6 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 2.50 0.50 3♠ W -1 2-Johnson-McBride vs 3-Smith-Robbins
50 2.50 0.50 3♥ E -1 3-Gore-St. Amant vs 1-Victor-Healy
100 1.00 2.00 2♦ N -1 1-Kuller-Finkle vs 2-Crowley-Nabours
200 0.00 3.00 3♦ N -2 4-Back-Lusby vs 4-James-Katzin
|
19 |
♠AQ942
♥9
♦AK972
♣A3
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/1♣ 3♦ 3♠ ♥4 NT4 |
EW: 3♥ 1NT ♣5 ♦3/4 ♠3/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 2.50 0.50 4♥* E -1 1-Kuller-Finkle vs 2-Crowley-Nabours
200 2.50 0.50 4♥* E -1 3-Gore-St. Amant vs 1-Victor-Healy
50 1.00 2.00 4♠ N -1 2-Johnson-McBride vs 3-Smith-Robbins
140 0.00 3.00 2♥ E 3 4-Back-Lusby vs 4-James-Katzin
|
20 |
♠643
♥KT65
♦A52
♣KJ9
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 6♦ 6♥ 3♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦1 ♥1 ♠3 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
600 2.50 0.50 5♦ S 5 1-Kuller-Finkle vs 2-Crowley-Nabours
600 2.50 0.50 5♦ S 5 3-Gore-St. Amant vs 1-Victor-Healy
150 0.50 2.50 2♦ S 5 2-Johnson-McBride vs 3-Smith-Robbins
150 0.50 2.50 2♦ S 5 4-Back-Lusby vs 4-James-Katzin
|