1 |
♠AQ9842
♥Q53
♦974
♣K
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 2♠ ♣2 ♥2 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 4♥ ♦5 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
450 2.00 0.00 4♠ N 5 2-Houston-Weiland vs 4-Shreves-Back
110 1.00 1.00 2♠ N 2 3-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 5-Scheiner-Scult
50 0.00 2.00 4♠ N -1 6-Riggers-Riggers vs 1-Hargest-Cosgrove
|
2 |
♠QT53
♥754
♦A6
♣9432
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ 1♥ 1♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦6 ♥5 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 2.00 0.00 2♠* E -1 6-Riggers-Riggers vs 1-Hargest-Cosgrove
100 1.00 1.00 3N N -1 3-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 5-Scheiner-Scult
200 0.00 2.00 3♣ S -2 2-Houston-Weiland vs 4-Shreves-Back
|
3 |
♠KQ93
♥T9876
♦84
♣75
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 2♦ 6♥ 5♠ 5/6NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦4 ♥1 ♠2 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
460 2.00 0.00 3N N 5 3-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 5-Scheiner-Scult
450 1.00 1.00 4♥ N 5 2-Houston-Weiland vs 4-Shreves-Back
430 0.00 2.00 3N S 4 6-Riggers-Riggers vs 1-Hargest-Cosgrove
|
4 |
♠AJ9
♥KT754
♦KJ5
♣42
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 3♥ 2♠ 4NT ♣6 |
EW: -/1♣ ♣6/7 ♦3 ♥4 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 1.50 0.50 3♦ S 3 6-Riggers-Riggers vs 1-Hargest-Cosgrove
110 1.50 0.50 2♦ S 3 3-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 5-Scheiner-Scult
100 0.00 2.00 1N W -1 2-Houston-Weiland vs 4-Shreves-Back
|
5 |
♠QJ95
♥T52
♦842
♣J63
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣2 ♥3 ♠5 NT3 |
EW: 5♣ 4♥ 2♠ 1NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
130 2.00 0.00 3♣ W 4 2-Houston-Weiland vs 4-Shreves-Back
150 0.50 1.50 3♣ W 5 6-Riggers-Riggers vs 1-Hargest-Cosgrove
150 0.50 1.50 3♣ E 5 3-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 5-Scheiner-Scult
|
6 |
♠Q
♥T63
♦KQJ932
♣KQ4
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ ♣5/4 ♥5 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 1♥ 2♠ ♦5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
90 1.00 1.00 2♦ N 2 3-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 4-Shreves-Back
90 1.00 1.00 2♦ N 2 5-Scheiner-Scult vs 1-Hargest-Cosgrove
90 1.00 1.00 2♦ N 2 6-Riggers-Riggers vs 2-Houston-Weiland
|
7 |
♠632
♥43
♦AKQJ6
♣A82
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4/5♦ 4♥ 2♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦2 ♥3 ♠5 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
690 2.00 0.00 3N S 6 5-Scheiner-Scult vs 1-Hargest-Cosgrove
630 1.00 1.00 3N N 4 3-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 4-Shreves-Back
600 0.00 2.00 3N S 3 6-Riggers-Riggers vs 2-Houston-Weiland
|
8 |
♠-
♥AQ97642
♦AKJ3
♣98
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ 6♥ 1/5NT ♠5 |
EW: 2♠ ♣3/4 ♦6 ♥1 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
510 2.00 0.00 4♥ N 7 5-Scheiner-Scult vs 1-Hargest-Cosgrove
450 0.50 1.50 4♥ N 5 3-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 4-Shreves-Back
450 0.50 1.50 4♥ N 5 6-Riggers-Riggers vs 2-Houston-Weiland
|
9 |
♠K97
♥A6532
♦A
♣QJ32
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♥ 1NT ♦4 ♠5 |
EW: 2♦ 2♠ ♣4 ♥5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 2.00 0.00 1N E -1 5-Scheiner-Scult vs 1-Hargest-Cosgrove
50 1.00 1.00 4♥ N -1 3-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 4-Shreves-Back
110 0.00 2.00 2♠ W 2 6-Riggers-Riggers vs 2-Houston-Weiland
|
10 |
♠AKQT8
♥-
♦QJ8
♣Q8752
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 4♠ ♣5 ♥1 NT3 |
EW: 2♣ 6♥ 2NT ♦4 ♠3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
650 2.00 0.00 4♠ N 5 3-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 4-Shreves-Back
170 1.00 1.00 2♠ N 4 5-Scheiner-Scult vs 1-Hargest-Cosgrove
110 0.00 2.00 2♠ N 2 6-Riggers-Riggers vs 2-Houston-Weiland
|
11 |
♠J
♥KQT4
♦J9863
♣852
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 1♠ ♣3 ♥4 NT3 |
EW: 3/2♣ 2♥ 2NT ♦3 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 2.00 0.00 4♥ W -2 4-Shreves-Back vs 5-Scheiner-Scult
50 0.50 1.50 4♥ W -1 1-Hargest-Cosgrove vs 2-Houston-Weiland
50 0.50 1.50 4♥ E -1 6-Riggers-Riggers vs 3-Burchfield-Burchfield
|
12 |
♠6
♥AJT
♦Q9864
♣KQJT
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣3 ♦6 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 4♣ 5♠ 4NT ♦6 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
450 2.00 0.00 4♠ E 5 1-Hargest-Cosgrove vs 2-Houston-Weiland
460 1.00 1.00 3N W 5 6-Riggers-Riggers vs 3-Burchfield-Burchfield
480 0.00 2.00 4♠ E 6 4-Shreves-Back vs 5-Scheiner-Scult
|
13 |
♠975
♥953
♦T752
♣532
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 2♠ ♣6 ♦4 NT5 |
EW: 1/-♣ 3♦ 1NT ♣7/6 ♥6 ♠5/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 2.00 0.00 4♦ W -2 6-Riggers-Riggers vs 3-Burchfield-Burchfield
110 1.00 1.00 3♦ E 3 4-Shreves-Back vs 5-Scheiner-Scult
200 0.00 2.00 3♠ S -2 1-Hargest-Cosgrove vs 2-Houston-Weiland
|
14 |
♠KJ
♥KQT9
♦873
♣AT93
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♦ 3♥ 4NT ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣3 ♦3 ♥4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
130 2.00 0.00 3♦ S 4 6-Riggers-Riggers vs 3-Burchfield-Burchfield
50 1.00 1.00 3♥ N -1 1-Hargest-Cosgrove vs 2-Houston-Weiland
140 0.00 2.00 3♠ E 3 4-Shreves-Back vs 5-Scheiner-Scult
|
15 |
♠A3
♥AQ32
♦KJ876
♣92
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 4♦ 5♥ 4♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦3 ♥2 ♠3 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
630 2.00 0.00 3N N 4 4-Shreves-Back vs 5-Scheiner-Scult
100 0.50 1.50 3N N -1 6-Riggers-Riggers vs 3-Burchfield-Burchfield
100 0.50 1.50 3♥ N -1 1-Hargest-Cosgrove vs 2-Houston-Weiland
|
16 |
♠AKQ85
♥QT
♦T4
♣QT84
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦3 ♥5 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 3♦ 1♥ 1/2♠ 3NT ♣4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 2.00 0.00 5♦ W -2 1-Hargest-Cosgrove vs 3-Burchfield-Burchfield
130 0.50 1.50 3♦ W 4 6-Riggers-Riggers vs 4-Shreves-Back
130 0.50 1.50 2♦ W 4 5-Scheiner-Scult vs 2-Houston-Weiland
|
17 |
♠K75
♥T8754
♦AQT7
♣T
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣5/6 ♦5 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ ♥4 ♠3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 1.00 1.00 3♠ S 3 1-Hargest-Cosgrove vs 3-Burchfield-Burchfield
140 1.00 1.00 3♠ S 3 5-Scheiner-Scult vs 2-Houston-Weiland
140 1.00 1.00 2♠ S 3 6-Riggers-Riggers vs 4-Shreves-Back
|
18 |
♠6
♥AQ72
♦AQJ82
♣A97
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/3♣ 5♦ 4♥ -/1♠ 5NT ♠6/7 |
EW: ♣4 ♦2 ♥3 ♠6 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
660 1.50 0.50 3N S 5 1-Hargest-Cosgrove vs 3-Burchfield-Burchfield
660 1.50 0.50 3N S 5 5-Scheiner-Scult vs 2-Houston-Weiland
600 0.00 2.00 5♦ N 5 6-Riggers-Riggers vs 4-Shreves-Back
|
19 |
♠J7
♥KQ5
♦Q76
♣KJ853
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2/1♦ 4/3♥ ♠3/2 NT5/4 |
EW: 4♠ ♣4 ♦5 ♥3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 2.00 0.00 4♥ S -1 1-Hargest-Cosgrove vs 3-Burchfield-Burchfield
100 1.00 1.00 5♥* S -1 6-Riggers-Riggers vs 4-Shreves-Back
170 0.00 2.00 3♠ E 4 5-Scheiner-Scult vs 2-Houston-Weiland
|
20 |
♠A95
♥AK7
♦963
♣KJ92
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 1♥ 2♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦4 ♥6 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
630 2.00 0.00 3N N 4 5-Scheiner-Scult vs 2-Houston-Weiland
200 0.50 1.50 3N S -2 1-Hargest-Cosgrove vs 3-Burchfield-Burchfield
200 0.50 1.50 3N N -2 6-Riggers-Riggers vs 4-Shreves-Back
|
21 |
♠Q9765
♥Q865
♦J64
♣Q
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 1♠ ♣3 ♦6 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 2NT ♦6 ♥5 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 2.00 0.00 3♥ E -2 2-Houston-Weiland vs 3-Burchfield-Burchfield
130 0.50 1.50 4♣ W 4 6-Riggers-Riggers vs 5-Scheiner-Scult
130 0.50 1.50 3♣ W 4 4-Shreves-Back vs 1-Hargest-Cosgrove
|
22 |
♠2
♥A93
♦Q986
♣Q5432
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 2♥ 1♠ 1NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦5 ♥5 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
90 2.00 0.00 1N N 1 4-Shreves-Back vs 1-Hargest-Cosgrove
50 1.00 1.00 2♥ S -1 6-Riggers-Riggers vs 5-Scheiner-Scult
150 0.00 2.00 2N N -3 2-Houston-Weiland vs 3-Burchfield-Burchfield
|
23 |
♠AQ5
♥Q93
♦QT94
♣AT6
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 3♥ 2♠ ♣4 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ ♦3 ♥4 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 2.00 0.00 1♥ S 4 4-Shreves-Back vs 1-Hargest-Cosgrove
110 1.00 1.00 3♣ W 3 2-Houston-Weiland vs 3-Burchfield-Burchfield
130 0.00 2.00 2♣ W 4 6-Riggers-Riggers vs 5-Scheiner-Scult
|
24 |
♠AJ2
♥Q
♦QJ6432
♣A95
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 1♠ ♣3 ♥5 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 1♥ ♦5 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 2.00 0.00 4♦ N -2 4-Shreves-Back vs 1-Hargest-Cosgrove
110 1.00 1.00 3♣ W 3 2-Houston-Weiland vs 3-Burchfield-Burchfield
150 0.00 2.00 4♦ N -3 6-Riggers-Riggers vs 5-Scheiner-Scult
|
25 |
♠AQJ96
♥9
♦KJT
♣JT73
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣5 ♦5 |
EW: 1/2♣ 1♦ ♥5 ♠4 NT5/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 2.00 0.00 4♦ E -2 6-Riggers-Riggers vs 5-Scheiner-Scult
140 1.00 1.00 3♠ N 3 2-Houston-Weiland vs 3-Burchfield-Burchfield
100 0.00 2.00 4♠* N -1 4-Shreves-Back vs 1-Hargest-Cosgrove
|