1 |
♠KJT75
♥K5
♦K87
♣KQT
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: -/1♦ -/1♠ ♣4 ♦6/7 ♥5 ♠6/7 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 2♥ ♦6 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 4.00 0.00 4N E -3 5-Cosgrove-Hargest vs 4-Wareham-Weiland
50 2.00 2.00 3♥ E -1 3-Finkle-Johansen vs 5-Back-Culbert
50 2.00 2.00 3♥ E -1 4-Robbins-Parker vs 2-Kuffner-Kuffner
50 2.00 2.00 2♥ E -1 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 1-Pierce-Hargest
110 0.00 4.00 2♥ E 2 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 3-Leve-Leve
|
2 |
♠6
♥9742
♦AT983
♣JT4
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 4/3♦ 3♥ 2/1NT ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣5 ♦4/3 ♥4 NT5/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 4.00 0.00 3♦ N 3 3-Finkle-Johansen vs 5-Back-Culbert
100 3.00 1.00 3♠ W -2 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 1-Pierce-Hargest
90 2.00 2.00 1N S 1 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 3-Leve-Leve
50 1.00 3.00 2♠ W -1 5-Cosgrove-Hargest vs 4-Wareham-Weiland
200 0.00 4.00 3N S -2 4-Robbins-Parker vs 2-Kuffner-Kuffner
|
3 |
♠Q86
♥875
♦KT6
♣KJT4
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: -/1♦ 1♥ 1NT ♣6 ♦6/7 ♠6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦6 ♥6 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.00 1.00 1N E -1 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 1-Pierce-Hargest
100 3.00 1.00 1N E -1 4-Robbins-Parker vs 2-Kuffner-Kuffner
100 3.00 1.00 2♦ E -1 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 3-Leve-Leve
50 1.00 3.00 2♠ S -1 5-Cosgrove-Hargest vs 4-Wareham-Weiland
150 0.00 4.00 2♥ S -3 3-Finkle-Johansen vs 5-Back-Culbert
|
4 |
♠953
♥982
♦KQT4
♣T53
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♥ ♣3 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 5♠ 3NT ♦5 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 4.00 0.00 3♠ E 5 4-Robbins-Parker vs 2-Kuffner-Kuffner
620 2.50 1.50 4♠ E 4 3-Finkle-Johansen vs 5-Back-Culbert
620 2.50 1.50 4♠ E 4 5-Cosgrove-Hargest vs 4-Wareham-Weiland
650 0.50 3.50 4♠ E 5 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 1-Pierce-Hargest
650 0.50 3.50 4♠ E 5 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 3-Leve-Leve
|
5 |
♠AKT82
♥-
♦3
♣QJ97432
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 5♠ ♦3 ♥2 NT4 |
EW: 3♦ 5♥ 1NT ♣3 ♠1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
790 4.00 0.00 4♠* N 4 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 3-Leve-Leve
110 3.00 1.00 3♣ N 3 3-Finkle-Johansen vs 5-Back-Culbert
200 2.00 2.00 5♣* N -1 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 1-Pierce-Hargest
300 1.00 3.00 4♠ N -3 4-Robbins-Parker vs 2-Kuffner-Kuffner
450 0.00 4.00 4♥ W 5 5-Cosgrove-Hargest vs 4-Wareham-Weiland
|
6 |
♠T764
♥T964
♦953
♣A2
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣3 ♦2 ♥4 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 5♦ 3♥ 2NT ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 4.00 0.00 3N E -1 5-Cosgrove-Hargest vs 3-Leve-Leve
600 1.50 2.50 3N E 3 4-Robbins-Parker vs 1-Pierce-Hargest
600 1.50 2.50 5♦ W 5 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 2-Kuffner-Kuffner
600 1.50 2.50 5♦ E 5 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 5-Back-Culbert
600 1.50 2.50 5♦ E 5 3-Finkle-Johansen vs 4-Wareham-Weiland
|
7 |
♠984
♥AQT4
♦AQ9652
♣-
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 6♦ 1NT ♥6 ♠6 |
EW: 1♥ 1♠ ♣5 ♦1 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
500 4.00 0.00 3♥* W -2 5-Cosgrove-Hargest vs 3-Leve-Leve
170 3.00 1.00 4♦ N 6 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 5-Back-Culbert
150 1.50 2.50 4♦ N 5 3-Finkle-Johansen vs 4-Wareham-Weiland
150 1.50 2.50 3♦ N 5 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 2-Kuffner-Kuffner
130 0.00 4.00 3♦ N 4 4-Robbins-Parker vs 1-Pierce-Hargest
|
8 |
♠K8762
♥8654
♦T64
♣6
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣2 ♦6 ♠4 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 3♠ 3NT ♦6 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 4.00 0.00 2N W 3 5-Cosgrove-Hargest vs 3-Leve-Leve
170 3.00 1.00 3♣ W 6 3-Finkle-Johansen vs 4-Wareham-Weiland
200 2.00 2.00 5♦ N -4 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 5-Back-Culbert
400 1.00 3.00 3N W 3 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 2-Kuffner-Kuffner
430 0.00 4.00 3N W 4 4-Robbins-Parker vs 1-Pierce-Hargest
|
9 |
♠9873
♥K96
♦K932
♣62
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♠ ♣0 ♥0/1 NT0 |
EW: 6♣ 6/5♥ 6/5NT ♦5 ♠6/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
620 3.50 0.50 4♥ E 4 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 2-Kuffner-Kuffner
620 3.50 0.50 5♣ W 6 4-Robbins-Parker vs 1-Pierce-Hargest
650 2.00 2.00 4♥ E 5 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 5-Back-Culbert
680 1.00 3.00 4♥ E 6 5-Cosgrove-Hargest vs 3-Leve-Leve
1370 0.00 4.00 6♣ W 6 3-Finkle-Johansen vs 4-Wareham-Weiland
|
10 |
♠Q4
♥J6
♦K63
♣KT9854
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦6 ♥5/4 ♠0 NT0 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 2♥ 7♠ 7NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
710 2.50 1.50 4♠ E 7 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 5-Back-Culbert
710 2.50 1.50 4♠ E 7 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 2-Kuffner-Kuffner
710 2.50 1.50 4♠ E 7 4-Robbins-Parker vs 1-Pierce-Hargest
710 2.50 1.50 4♠ E 7 5-Cosgrove-Hargest vs 3-Leve-Leve
1430 0.00 4.00 6♠ E 6 3-Finkle-Johansen vs 4-Wareham-Weiland
|
11 |
♠QT65
♥KT2
♦AQT4
♣K6
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ 2♥ 4♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦5 ♥5 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 4.00 0.00 2♠ N 3 5-Cosgrove-Hargest vs 2-Kuffner-Kuffner
110 3.00 1.00 1♥ N 2 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 4-Wareham-Weiland
80 2.00 2.00 1♥ S 1 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 1-Pierce-Hargest
50 0.50 3.50 3N S -1 4-Robbins-Parker vs 5-Back-Culbert
50 0.50 3.50 2N S -1 3-Finkle-Johansen vs 3-Leve-Leve
|
12 |
♠T2
♥3
♦KJT82
♣QT932
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1/-♦ ♦7/6 ♥2 ♠3 NT5/3 |
EW: 5♥ 3♠ 2NT ♣6 ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 4.00 0.00 4♥ W -1 4-Robbins-Parker vs 5-Back-Culbert
140 3.00 1.00 3♥ W 3 3-Finkle-Johansen vs 3-Leve-Leve
200 2.00 2.00 3♥ W 5 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 4-Wareham-Weiland
420 1.00 3.00 4♥ W 4 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 1-Pierce-Hargest
450 0.00 4.00 4♥ W 5 5-Cosgrove-Hargest vs 2-Kuffner-Kuffner
|
13 |
♠Q84
♥KQT764
♦KT
♣65
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣6 ♦2 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 5♦ 2♠ ♣6 ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 4.00 0.00 4♠ E -2 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 1-Pierce-Hargest
100 3.00 1.00 3♥ N -1 4-Robbins-Parker vs 5-Back-Culbert
110 2.00 2.00 2♠ E 2 5-Cosgrove-Hargest vs 2-Kuffner-Kuffner
130 1.00 3.00 4♦ W 4 3-Finkle-Johansen vs 3-Leve-Leve
200 0.00 4.00 4♥ N -2 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 4-Wareham-Weiland
|
14 |
♠T54
♥AKQJ43
♦QT
♣AT
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 6♦ 6♥ 6♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦1 ♥1/0 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
480 3.00 1.00 4♠ S 6 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 1-Pierce-Hargest
480 3.00 1.00 4♠ S 6 3-Finkle-Johansen vs 3-Leve-Leve
480 3.00 1.00 4♥ N 6 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 4-Wareham-Weiland
450 1.00 3.00 4♥ N 5 5-Cosgrove-Hargest vs 2-Kuffner-Kuffner
50 0.00 4.00 6♠ S -1 4-Robbins-Parker vs 5-Back-Culbert
|
15 |
♠KJT2
♥K4
♦AKQ
♣Q542
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♠ 2NT ♦5/6 ♥5 |
EW: 1♦ 1♥ ♣5 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 4.00 0.00 2♠ N 3 3-Finkle-Johansen vs 3-Leve-Leve
100 3.00 1.00 4♠ S -1 5-Cosgrove-Hargest vs 2-Kuffner-Kuffner
200 1.50 2.50 4♠ N -2 4-Robbins-Parker vs 5-Back-Culbert
200 1.50 2.50 3♠ S -2 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 1-Pierce-Hargest
300 0.00 4.00 4♠ N -3 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 4-Wareham-Weiland
|
16 |
♠K9653
♥QT9
♦Q4
♣QT5
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♥ 4♠ 3/2NT ♦5 |
EW: 2♦ ♣3 ♥4 ♠3 NT4/3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 3.50 0.50 3♠ S 4 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 5-Back-Culbert
170 3.50 0.50 2♠ N 4 4-Robbins-Parker vs 4-Wareham-Weiland
50 1.00 3.00 4♠ S -1 5-Cosgrove-Hargest vs 1-Pierce-Hargest
50 1.00 3.00 4♠ N -1 3-Finkle-Johansen vs 2-Kuffner-Kuffner
50 1.00 3.00 3♠ S -1 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 3-Leve-Leve
|
17 |
♠AT8632
♥Q73
♦7
♣QJ8
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 4♠ 2/1NT ♣6 ♦5 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ ♥6 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 3.00 1.00 3♠ N 4 4-Robbins-Parker vs 4-Wareham-Weiland
170 3.00 1.00 2♠ N 4 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 3-Leve-Leve
170 3.00 1.00 2♠ N 4 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 5-Back-Culbert
140 1.00 3.00 2♠ N 3 3-Finkle-Johansen vs 2-Kuffner-Kuffner
50 0.00 4.00 3♠ N -1 5-Cosgrove-Hargest vs 1-Pierce-Hargest
|
18 |
♠K75
♥983
♦KQJ84
♣Q8
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦6 ♥5 ♠3 NT6 |
EW: 4♣ 1♦ 2♥ 3♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 4.00 0.00 3♣ W 3 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 3-Leve-Leve
130 3.00 1.00 3♣ W 4 3-Finkle-Johansen vs 2-Kuffner-Kuffner
140 1.50 2.50 3♠ W 3 4-Robbins-Parker vs 4-Wareham-Weiland
140 1.50 2.50 2♠ E 3 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 5-Back-Culbert
400 0.00 4.00 2♥ S -4 5-Cosgrove-Hargest vs 1-Pierce-Hargest
|
19 |
♠872
♥KQ7
♦KT7
♣KT72
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 7♣ 7♦ 4♥ ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣0 ♦0 ♥3/2 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
440 4.00 0.00 5♦ S 7 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 3-Leve-Leve
200 2.50 1.50 4♠ W -2 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 5-Back-Culbert
200 2.50 1.50 3♠ W -2 5-Cosgrove-Hargest vs 1-Pierce-Hargest
170 1.00 3.00 4♦ S 6 4-Robbins-Parker vs 4-Wareham-Weiland
100 0.00 4.00 3♠ W -1 3-Finkle-Johansen vs 2-Kuffner-Kuffner
|
20 |
♠KT
♥K76
♦AK65
♣KQ87
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 3♦ 1♥ 5♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦4 ♥5 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
680 4.00 0.00 4♠ S 6 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 5-Back-Culbert
650 3.00 1.00 4♠ N 5 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 3-Leve-Leve
620 2.00 2.00 4♠ N 4 5-Cosgrove-Hargest vs 1-Pierce-Hargest
100 1.00 3.00 3N N -1 4-Robbins-Parker vs 4-Wareham-Weiland
200 0.00 4.00 3N N -2 3-Finkle-Johansen vs 2-Kuffner-Kuffner
|
21 |
♠J2
♥KQ
♦JT95
♣QT542
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦6 ♥5 ♠3 NT5 |
EW: 1/-♦ 2/1♥ 4/3♠ 2NT ♣6 ♦7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.50 0.50 3N W -2 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 2-Kuffner-Kuffner
100 3.50 0.50 2♥ W -2 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 4-Wareham-Weiland
50 2.00 2.00 1♣ W -1 4-Robbins-Parker vs 3-Leve-Leve
90 1.00 3.00 1N W 1 3-Finkle-Johansen vs 1-Pierce-Hargest
170 0.00 4.00 3♠ W 4 5-Cosgrove-Hargest vs 5-Back-Culbert
|
22 |
♠K954
♥87
♦983
♣T642
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3/4 ♦5/4 ♥1 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 2♦ 6♥ 5/4♠ 4/3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 4.00 0.00 2♠ W 2 4-Robbins-Parker vs 3-Leve-Leve
170 3.00 1.00 2♠ W 4 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 2-Kuffner-Kuffner
200 2.00 2.00 3♥ W 5 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 4-Wareham-Weiland
620 1.00 3.00 4♥ W 4 5-Cosgrove-Hargest vs 5-Back-Culbert
710 0.00 4.00 4♥ E 7 3-Finkle-Johansen vs 1-Pierce-Hargest
|
23 |
♠AT6
♥AKQT853
♦Q
♣73
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♥ ♦2 ♠2 NT5 |
EW: 3♦ 5♠ ♣4 ♥3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
620 4.00 0.00 4♥ N 4 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 4-Wareham-Weiland
100 3.00 1.00 5♥ N -1 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 2-Kuffner-Kuffner
600 2.00 2.00 5♦ W 5 3-Finkle-Johansen vs 1-Pierce-Hargest
650 0.50 3.50 4♠ E 5 4-Robbins-Parker vs 3-Leve-Leve
650 0.50 3.50 4♠ E 5 5-Cosgrove-Hargest vs 5-Back-Culbert
|
24 |
♠-
♥QJ54
♦A32
♣AQ6542
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1/-NT ♦5 ♥4 ♠4/3 NT7/6 |
EW: 1♦ 3♥ 3♠ ♣3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
510 4.00 0.00 4♣* N 4 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 4-Wareham-Weiland
150 3.00 1.00 3♣ N 5 4-Robbins-Parker vs 3-Leve-Leve
130 1.50 2.50 4♣ N 4 5-Cosgrove-Hargest vs 5-Back-Culbert
130 1.50 2.50 3♣ S 4 3-Finkle-Johansen vs 1-Pierce-Hargest
100 0.00 4.00 5♠* E -1 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 2-Kuffner-Kuffner
|
25 |
♠92
♥KQ84
♦KJ73
♣J82
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 1♠ ♣2/1 ♦6 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 3NT ♦6 ♥4 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 4.00 0.00 4♥ N -2 3-Finkle-Johansen vs 1-Pierce-Hargest
150 2.50 1.50 3♣ W 5 4-Robbins-Parker vs 3-Leve-Leve
150 2.50 1.50 2♣ W 5 5-Cosgrove-Hargest vs 5-Back-Culbert
600 0.50 3.50 5♣ W 5 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 2-Kuffner-Kuffner
600 0.50 3.50 5♣ W 5 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 4-Wareham-Weiland
|