1 |
♠AJ542
♥AQ7
♦76
♣Q52
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 6♦ 3♥ 6♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦1 ♥4 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
980 4.00 0.00 6♠ N 6 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 3-Weiland-Wareham
480 3.00 1.00 4♠ N 6 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 1-Pierce-Hargest
460 2.00 2.00 3N N 5 5-Graves-Graves vs 4-Reinherz-Finkle
450 1.00 3.00 4♠ N 5 3-Lusby-Culbert vs 5-Cowan-Ash
200 0.00 4.00 3♠ N 5 4-Robbins-Parker vs 2-Hollander-Austin
|
2 |
♠KT975
♥K953
♦42
♣Q7
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♦ 3♥ 5♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦4 ♥4 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
660 4.00 0.00 3N S 5 3-Lusby-Culbert vs 5-Cowan-Ash
650 3.00 1.00 4♠ S 5 4-Robbins-Parker vs 2-Hollander-Austin
630 2.00 2.00 3N S 4 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 1-Pierce-Hargest
600 1.00 3.00 3N S 3 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 3-Weiland-Wareham
200 0.00 4.00 4♠ N -2 5-Graves-Graves vs 4-Reinherz-Finkle
|
3 |
♠-
♥JT74
♦A92
♣KJ7654
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ ♦3 ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 4♦ 2♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 3.50 0.50 4♠ E -2 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 1-Pierce-Hargest
200 3.50 0.50 3♥ E -2 5-Graves-Graves vs 4-Reinherz-Finkle
100 2.00 2.00 4♣ N -2 3-Lusby-Culbert vs 5-Cowan-Ash
130 1.00 3.00 3♦ E 4 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 3-Weiland-Wareham
630 0.00 4.00 3N W 4 4-Robbins-Parker vs 2-Hollander-Austin
|
4 |
♠K732
♥KT96
♦AK85
♣A
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 5♥ 3/4♠ 4NT ♣4 |
EW: 3♣ ♦2 ♥2 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
650 3.50 0.50 4♥ S 5 4-Robbins-Parker vs 2-Hollander-Austin
650 3.50 0.50 4♥ S 5 5-Graves-Graves vs 4-Reinherz-Finkle
620 2.00 2.00 4♥ S 4 3-Lusby-Culbert vs 5-Cowan-Ash
170 1.00 3.00 3♥ N 4 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 1-Pierce-Hargest
130 0.00 4.00 3♣ E 4 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 3-Weiland-Wareham
|
5 |
♠QJ
♥KQT3
♦52
♣Q8652
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♥ 1NT ♣6 ♦5 ♠6 |
EW: 2♦ 1♠ ♣6 ♥3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 4.00 0.00 3♥ S 4 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 3-Weiland-Wareham
140 2.50 1.50 3♥ S 3 4-Robbins-Parker vs 2-Hollander-Austin
140 2.50 1.50 3♥ N 3 3-Lusby-Culbert vs 5-Cowan-Ash
110 1.00 3.00 2♠ E 2 5-Graves-Graves vs 4-Reinherz-Finkle
200 0.00 4.00 4♥ S -2 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 1-Pierce-Hargest
|
6 |
♠T984
♥K82
♦AK4
♣A54
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ 1NT ♣6 ♦6 ♥5 |
EW: 1/-♦ 1♥ ♣6 ♦7/6 ♠6/5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 4.00 0.00 2♣ E -2 3-Lusby-Culbert vs 4-Reinherz-Finkle
100 2.50 1.50 1N E -1 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 2-Hollander-Austin
100 2.50 1.50 1♣ E -1 4-Robbins-Parker vs 1-Pierce-Hargest
90 0.50 3.50 1N S 1 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 5-Cowan-Ash
90 0.50 3.50 1N S 1 5-Graves-Graves vs 3-Weiland-Wareham
|
7 |
♠J3
♥AQJT92
♦J763
♣K
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♥ 3♠ ♣3 NT5 |
EW: 4♣ 2NT ♦5 ♥6 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 3.00 1.00 3♠ S 3 3-Lusby-Culbert vs 4-Reinherz-Finkle
140 3.00 1.00 3♠ S 3 5-Graves-Graves vs 3-Weiland-Wareham
140 3.00 1.00 2♠ S 3 4-Robbins-Parker vs 1-Pierce-Hargest
100 0.50 3.50 4♠ S -1 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 5-Cowan-Ash
100 0.50 3.50 3♥ N -1 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 2-Hollander-Austin
|
8 |
♠T87
♥985
♦AKJ973
♣3
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 3♠ ♣3 ♥4 NT6 |
EW: 4♣ 3♥ ♦3 ♠3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.50 0.50 5♣ W -2 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 5-Cowan-Ash
100 3.50 0.50 5♣* W -1 3-Lusby-Culbert vs 4-Reinherz-Finkle
50 2.00 2.00 5♣ W -1 4-Robbins-Parker vs 1-Pierce-Hargest
50 1.00 3.00 4♠ S -1 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 2-Hollander-Austin
130 0.00 4.00 4♣ W 4 5-Graves-Graves vs 3-Weiland-Wareham
|
9 |
♠7
♥6542
♦Q76
♣K8654
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦1 ♥1 ♠0 NT1 |
EW: 4♣ 5♦ 4♥ 7♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
180 4.00 0.00 2N W 4 3-Lusby-Culbert vs 4-Reinherz-Finkle
620 3.00 1.00 4♠ W 4 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 5-Cowan-Ash
680 2.00 2.00 4♠ W 6 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 2-Hollander-Austin
1430 1.00 3.00 6♠ W 6 4-Robbins-Parker vs 1-Pierce-Hargest
1460 0.00 4.00 6♠ W 7 5-Graves-Graves vs 3-Weiland-Wareham
|
10 |
♠QJ7
♥A7
♦AT9865
♣42
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣4 ♥3 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 3♥ 1NT ♦6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 3.50 0.50 3♥ W 4 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 2-Hollander-Austin
170 3.50 0.50 3♥ W 4 5-Graves-Graves vs 3-Weiland-Wareham
620 1.50 2.50 4♥ W 4 3-Lusby-Culbert vs 4-Reinherz-Finkle
620 1.50 2.50 4♥ W 4 4-Robbins-Parker vs 1-Pierce-Hargest
650 0.00 4.00 4♥ W 5 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 5-Cowan-Ash
|
11 |
♠5
♥A932
♦J7542
♣JT3
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 3♥ ♣0 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 6♣ 6♠ ♦4 ♥4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 4.00 0.00 3♥ S 4 4-Robbins-Parker vs 5-Cowan-Ash
480 2.00 2.00 5♠ E 6 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 1-Pierce-Hargest
480 2.00 2.00 5♠ E 6 5-Graves-Graves vs 2-Hollander-Austin
480 2.00 2.00 4♠ E 6 3-Lusby-Culbert vs 3-Weiland-Wareham
750 0.00 4.00 5♠* E 6 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 4-Reinherz-Finkle
|
12 |
♠A543
♥K9
♦T963
♣KT3
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ -/1♠ ♣4 ♥4 ♠6/7 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 3♥ 2NT ♦5 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 3.50 0.50 4♥ E -1 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 4-Reinherz-Finkle
50 3.50 0.50 4♥ E -1 5-Graves-Graves vs 2-Hollander-Austin
170 2.00 2.00 3♥ W 4 4-Robbins-Parker vs 5-Cowan-Ash
200 1.00 3.00 3♥ W 5 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 1-Pierce-Hargest
420 0.00 4.00 4♥ W 4 3-Lusby-Culbert vs 3-Weiland-Wareham
|
13 |
♠QJ92
♥K98
♦Q965
♣J6
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 1♥ ♣5 ♠4/5 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 2♠ 1NT ♦5 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 3.50 0.50 3♦ N 3 3-Lusby-Culbert vs 3-Weiland-Wareham
110 3.50 0.50 2♦ S 3 4-Robbins-Parker vs 5-Cowan-Ash
80 2.00 2.00 1♠ E 1 5-Graves-Graves vs 2-Hollander-Austin
90 1.00 3.00 2♣ W 2 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 4-Reinherz-Finkle
100 0.00 4.00 4♦ S -1 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 1-Pierce-Hargest
|
14 |
♠Q74
♥J96
♦7652
♣873
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣5 ♦2 ♥2 NT3 |
EW: 2♣ 5♦ 5♥ 4NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
430 4.00 0.00 3N E 4 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 1-Pierce-Hargest
450 1.50 2.50 5♥ E 5 4-Robbins-Parker vs 5-Cowan-Ash
450 1.50 2.50 4♥ E 5 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 4-Reinherz-Finkle
450 1.50 2.50 4♥ E 5 3-Lusby-Culbert vs 3-Weiland-Wareham
450 1.50 2.50 4♥ E 5 5-Graves-Graves vs 2-Hollander-Austin
|
15 |
♠K65
♥T3
♦KQT962
♣72
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 3/2♠ 2/1NT ♣6 ♥5 |
EW: 1♣ 2♥ ♦3 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
660 4.00 0.00 3N S 5 5-Graves-Graves vs 2-Hollander-Austin
600 3.00 1.00 5♦ N 5 4-Robbins-Parker vs 5-Cowan-Ash
150 2.00 2.00 3♦ N 5 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 1-Pierce-Hargest
120 1.00 3.00 2N S 2 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 4-Reinherz-Finkle
200 0.00 4.00 3N S -2 3-Lusby-Culbert vs 3-Weiland-Wareham
|
16 |
♠JT96
♥AJ75
♦-
♣KQ982
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣6 ♦4 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 3♦ 2/3♠ 2NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
600 4.00 0.00 4♥ E -6 4-Robbins-Parker vs 4-Reinherz-Finkle
140 3.00 1.00 2♥ S 3 3-Lusby-Culbert vs 2-Hollander-Austin
110 1.50 2.50 2♠ W 2 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 3-Weiland-Wareham
110 1.50 2.50 2♠ W 2 5-Graves-Graves vs 1-Pierce-Hargest
170 0.00 4.00 3♠ W 4 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 5-Cowan-Ash
|
17 |
♠T43
♥JT82
♦742
♣T75
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣0 ♦0 ♥1 ♠3 NT0 |
EW: 7♣ 7♦ 6♥ 4♠ 7NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
430 4.00 0.00 3N E 4 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 3-Weiland-Wareham
460 3.00 1.00 3N E 5 4-Robbins-Parker vs 4-Reinherz-Finkle
480 2.00 2.00 4♥ W 6 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 5-Cowan-Ash
490 0.50 3.50 3N W 6 3-Lusby-Culbert vs 2-Hollander-Austin
490 0.50 3.50 3N E 6 5-Graves-Graves vs 1-Pierce-Hargest
|
18 |
♠8742
♥A5
♦J972
♣T63
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦6 ♥2 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 1♦ 5♥ 3♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 4.00 0.00 3N E -1 3-Lusby-Culbert vs 2-Hollander-Austin
170 3.00 1.00 2♥ W 4 4-Robbins-Parker vs 4-Reinherz-Finkle
420 2.00 2.00 4♥ W 4 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 5-Cowan-Ash
450 0.50 3.50 4♥ W 5 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 3-Weiland-Wareham
450 0.50 3.50 4♥ W 5 5-Graves-Graves vs 1-Pierce-Hargest
|
19 |
♠QT53
♥AK
♦JT5
♣AKJ2
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♦ 6/5♠ 6/5NT ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣2 ♦4 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
480 3.50 0.50 4♠ S 6 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 5-Cowan-Ash
480 3.50 0.50 4♠ S 6 4-Robbins-Parker vs 4-Reinherz-Finkle
450 1.50 2.50 5♠ S 5 3-Lusby-Culbert vs 2-Hollander-Austin
450 1.50 2.50 4♠ S 5 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 3-Weiland-Wareham
420 0.00 4.00 4♠ S 4 5-Graves-Graves vs 1-Pierce-Hargest
|
20 |
♠J654
♥953
♦T2
♣T543
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦3 ♥4 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 4♦ 2♥ 5♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
400 4.00 0.00 5♥ E -4 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 5-Cowan-Ash
200 3.00 1.00 4♠ W -2 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 3-Weiland-Wareham
130 2.00 2.00 2♦ W 4 3-Lusby-Culbert vs 2-Hollander-Austin
620 1.00 3.00 4♠ W 4 5-Graves-Graves vs 1-Pierce-Hargest
630 0.00 4.00 3N W 4 4-Robbins-Parker vs 4-Reinherz-Finkle
|
21 |
♠J7
♥T632
♦QJ82
♣JT8
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 3♥ ♣5 ♠4/5 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 2♠ 1NT ♦5/4 ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 4.00 0.00 3♥ S 4 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 4-Reinherz-Finkle
150 3.00 1.00 4♠ E -3 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 2-Hollander-Austin
140 2.00 2.00 2♥ S 3 5-Graves-Graves vs 5-Cowan-Ash
50 1.00 3.00 3♣ E -1 4-Robbins-Parker vs 3-Weiland-Wareham
180 0.00 4.00 1N E 4 3-Lusby-Culbert vs 1-Pierce-Hargest
|
22 |
♠JT742
♥T2
♦KT85
♣Q3
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ 4♥ 4♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦3 ♥3 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 4.00 0.00 2♥ S 4 3-Lusby-Culbert vs 1-Pierce-Hargest
110 2.50 1.50 1♠ N 2 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 4-Reinherz-Finkle
110 2.50 1.50 1♥ S 2 4-Robbins-Parker vs 3-Weiland-Wareham
50 0.50 3.50 3N S -1 5-Graves-Graves vs 5-Cowan-Ash
50 0.50 3.50 4♥ S -1 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 2-Hollander-Austin
|
23 |
♠4
♥T862
♦QT6
♣A9875
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ 2♥ ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 2♠ 1NT ♣4 ♦5 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 4.00 0.00 2♠ E -1 3-Lusby-Culbert vs 1-Pierce-Hargest
110 2.50 1.50 2♠ E 2 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 2-Hollander-Austin
110 2.50 1.50 1♠ E 2 5-Graves-Graves vs 5-Cowan-Ash
140 0.50 3.50 2♠ E 3 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 4-Reinherz-Finkle
140 0.50 3.50 2♠ E 3 4-Robbins-Parker vs 3-Weiland-Wareham
|
24 |
♠7
♥AT932
♦JT43
♣KJ2
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ 1♥ ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 2♠ 2/1NT ♣6 ♦4 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 4.00 0.00 4♠ E -2 5-Graves-Graves vs 5-Cowan-Ash
50 2.50 1.50 4♠ E -1 3-Lusby-Culbert vs 1-Pierce-Hargest
50 2.50 1.50 3♠ E -1 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 2-Hollander-Austin
140 1.00 3.00 3♠ E 3 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 4-Reinherz-Finkle
420 0.00 4.00 4♠ W 4 4-Robbins-Parker vs 3-Weiland-Wareham
|
25 |
♠K8
♥74
♦986
♣JT7643
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1NT ♦6 ♥4 ♠6 |
EW: 1♦ 3♥ 1♠ ♣4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
430 4.00 0.00 3N S 4 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 2-Hollander-Austin
200 3.00 1.00 2♠ W -2 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 4-Reinherz-Finkle
110 2.00 2.00 3♣ S 3 3-Lusby-Culbert vs 1-Pierce-Hargest
100 1.00 3.00 3N S -2 5-Graves-Graves vs 5-Cowan-Ash
110 0.00 4.00 2♥ W 2 4-Robbins-Parker vs 3-Weiland-Wareham
|