1 |
♠AJ5
♥J72
♦983
♣Q962
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦2 ♥2 ♠4 NT3 |
EW: 3/4♣ 4/5♦ 5♥ 1/3♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 4.00 0.00 3♦ W -1 4-Hargest-Pierce vs 2-Djavadi-Scanlin
170 3.00 1.00 2♥ W 4 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 1-Johansen-Finkle
200 2.00 2.00 3♥ W 5 3-Schwartz-Parker vs 5-Wareham-Weiland
230 1.00 3.00 2♥ W 6 5-O'Connell-Hollander vs 4-Ertman-Ertman
430 0.00 4.00 3N W 4 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 3-Lusby-Back
|
2 |
♠A4
♥4
♦AKQT842
♣K65
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 6♦ 2♥ 5NT ♠5 |
EW: 2♠ ♣0 ♦0 ♥3 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
630 4.00 0.00 3N N 4 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 1-Johansen-Finkle
190 3.00 1.00 3♦ N 7 3-Schwartz-Parker vs 5-Wareham-Weiland
150 2.00 2.00 3♦ N 5 5-O'Connell-Hollander vs 4-Ertman-Ertman
130 0.50 3.50 3♦ N 4 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 3-Lusby-Back
130 0.50 3.50 3♦ N 4 4-Hargest-Pierce vs 2-Djavadi-Scanlin
|
3 |
♠J53
♥AJ7
♦J875
♣QJ6
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ -/1♠ ♦6 ♥2 ♠6/7 NT4/6 |
EW: 1♦ 5♥ 1NT ♣5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.50 0.50 4♥ W -1 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 1-Johansen-Finkle
100 3.50 0.50 4♥ W -1 4-Hargest-Pierce vs 2-Djavadi-Scanlin
140 2.00 2.00 2♥ W 3 3-Schwartz-Parker vs 5-Wareham-Weiland
200 0.50 3.50 2♥ W 5 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 3-Lusby-Back
200 0.50 3.50 2♥ W 5 5-O'Connell-Hollander vs 4-Ertman-Ertman
|
4 |
♠Q87
♥54
♦J8742
♣Q98
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦4 ♥5 ♠2 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ 2♥ 5♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.50 0.50 3N E -1 3-Schwartz-Parker vs 5-Wareham-Weiland
100 3.50 0.50 4♠ E -1 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 3-Lusby-Back
140 2.00 2.00 3♠ E 3 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 1-Johansen-Finkle
200 1.00 3.00 3♠ W 5 4-Hargest-Pierce vs 2-Djavadi-Scanlin
620 0.00 4.00 4♠ E 4 5-O'Connell-Hollander vs 4-Ertman-Ertman
|
5 |
♠653
♥A72
♦AQ83
♣862
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 5/4♦ 1♠ 2NT ♥5 |
EW: 2♥ ♣3 ♦1 ♠6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 4.00 0.00 3♦ S 6 5-O'Connell-Hollander vs 4-Ertman-Ertman
150 3.00 1.00 2♦ N 5 4-Hargest-Pierce vs 2-Djavadi-Scanlin
130 2.00 2.00 4♣ S 4 3-Schwartz-Parker vs 5-Wareham-Weiland
90 0.50 3.50 1N N 1 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 1-Johansen-Finkle
90 0.50 3.50 2♦ N 2 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 3-Lusby-Back
|
6 |
♠T943
♥AJ85
♦Q
♣A984
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦4 ♥5 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 3♦ 1♥ 3♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
300 4.00 0.00 3N W -3 5-O'Connell-Hollander vs 3-Lusby-Back
100 3.00 1.00 4♦ E -1 3-Schwartz-Parker vs 4-Ertman-Ertman
140 1.00 3.00 3♠ W 3 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 5-Wareham-Weiland
140 1.00 3.00 2♠ W 3 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 2-Djavadi-Scanlin
140 1.00 3.00 2♠ W 3 4-Hargest-Pierce vs 1-Johansen-Finkle
|
7 |
♠JT865
♥K64
♦95
♣J96
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3/2 ♦2 ♥6 ♠4/5 NT5 |
EW: 4♣ 5♦ 1♥ 2♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 4.00 0.00 4♦ W -2 5-O'Connell-Hollander vs 3-Lusby-Back
100 3.00 1.00 2♥ S -1 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 2-Djavadi-Scanlin
130 1.50 2.50 3♦ W 4 3-Schwartz-Parker vs 4-Ertman-Ertman
130 1.50 2.50 2♦ W 4 4-Hargest-Pierce vs 1-Johansen-Finkle
300 0.00 4.00 3♥ S -3 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 5-Wareham-Weiland
|
8 |
♠82
♥A9872
♦QJ63
♣AT
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣1 ♦5 ♠1 NT6 |
EW: 6♣ 1/2♦ 6♠ 1NT ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 4.00 0.00 2♠ W 2 5-O'Connell-Hollander vs 3-Lusby-Back
200 3.00 1.00 2♠ W 5 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 2-Djavadi-Scanlin
420 2.00 2.00 5♣ W 6 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 5-Wareham-Weiland
450 1.00 3.00 4♠ W 5 4-Hargest-Pierce vs 1-Johansen-Finkle
480 0.00 4.00 4♠ E 6 3-Schwartz-Parker vs 4-Ertman-Ertman
|
9 |
♠KQ932
♥A
♦Q9864
♣96
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 5♠ 2NT ♣4 ♥5 |
EW: 1♣ 2♥ ♦4 ♠2 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
450 2.50 1.50 4♠ N 5 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 5-Wareham-Weiland
450 2.50 1.50 4♠ N 5 3-Schwartz-Parker vs 4-Ertman-Ertman
450 2.50 1.50 4♠ N 5 4-Hargest-Pierce vs 1-Johansen-Finkle
450 2.50 1.50 4♠ N 5 5-O'Connell-Hollander vs 3-Lusby-Back
420 0.00 4.00 4♠ N 4 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 2-Djavadi-Scanlin
|
10 |
♠A53
♥AT42
♦A64
♣AJ8
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 6♦ 5♥ 6♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦1 ♥2 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
1430 4.00 0.00 6♠ S 6 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 2-Djavadi-Scanlin
620 2.50 1.50 4♠ S 4 5-O'Connell-Hollander vs 3-Lusby-Back
620 2.50 1.50 4♠ N 4 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 5-Wareham-Weiland
100 1.00 3.00 6N N -1 3-Schwartz-Parker vs 4-Ertman-Ertman
500 0.00 4.00 6♥* N -2 4-Hargest-Pierce vs 1-Johansen-Finkle
|
11 |
♠8765
♥K76
♦AQ
♣JT43
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♥ 3♠ 2NT ♦5 |
EW: 1♦ ♣4 ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 4.00 0.00 1N S 3 3-Schwartz-Parker vs 3-Lusby-Back
50 3.00 1.00 3N S -1 5-O'Connell-Hollander vs 2-Djavadi-Scanlin
100 1.00 3.00 3N S -2 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 4-Ertman-Ertman
100 1.00 3.00 3N S -2 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 1-Johansen-Finkle
100 1.00 3.00 3N S -2 4-Hargest-Pierce vs 5-Wareham-Weiland
|
12 |
♠QJ5432
♥97
♦7642
♣Q
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣3 ♦4 ♥3 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 1♦ 4♥ 3NT ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 4.00 0.00 3♥ E -2 5-O'Connell-Hollander vs 2-Djavadi-Scanlin
140 3.00 1.00 2♥ W 3 4-Hargest-Pierce vs 5-Wareham-Weiland
200 2.00 2.00 3♠ N -2 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 4-Ertman-Ertman
420 1.00 3.00 4♥ E 4 3-Schwartz-Parker vs 3-Lusby-Back
430 0.00 4.00 3N W 4 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 1-Johansen-Finkle
|
13 |
♠K42
♥A872
♦JT95
♣Q8
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ 3/4♥ 2♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦5 ♥3 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
620 4.00 0.00 4♥ N 4 5-O'Connell-Hollander vs 2-Djavadi-Scanlin
140 3.00 1.00 3♥ N 3 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 4-Ertman-Ertman
120 2.00 2.00 2N S 2 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 1-Johansen-Finkle
100 0.50 3.50 3N N -1 4-Hargest-Pierce vs 5-Wareham-Weiland
100 0.50 3.50 3♥ S -1 3-Schwartz-Parker vs 3-Lusby-Back
|
14 |
♠32
♥-
♦AKQ94
♣AKJT97
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 6♦ 2♥ 1NT ♠3 |
EW: 2/3♠ ♣1 ♦1 ♥3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
1090 4.00 0.00 6♦* N 6 3-Schwartz-Parker vs 3-Lusby-Back
650 2.50 1.50 5♦* N 6 5-O'Connell-Hollander vs 2-Djavadi-Scanlin
650 2.50 1.50 5♣* N 6 4-Hargest-Pierce vs 5-Wareham-Weiland
400 1.00 3.00 5♣ N 5 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 4-Ertman-Ertman
50 0.00 4.00 5♠ E -1 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 1-Johansen-Finkle
|
15 |
♠JT6543
♥5
♦3
♣AKQ72
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ 1/-♥ 3♠ 3NT ♥7/6 |
EW: ♣3 ♦5 ♥6 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
630 3.50 0.50 3N S 4 3-Schwartz-Parker vs 3-Lusby-Back
630 3.50 0.50 3N S 4 4-Hargest-Pierce vs 5-Wareham-Weiland
600 1.50 2.50 3N S 3 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 1-Johansen-Finkle
600 1.50 2.50 3N N 3 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 4-Ertman-Ertman
100 0.00 4.00 4♣ N -1 5-O'Connell-Hollander vs 2-Djavadi-Scanlin
|
16 |
♠4
♥Q93
♦QT973
♣T975
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 3/2♥ ♣5 ♠3 NT6 |
EW: 4♠ ♣6 ♦5 ♥4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.50 0.50 4♠ W -1 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 5-Wareham-Weiland
100 3.50 0.50 4♠ W -1 5-O'Connell-Hollander vs 1-Johansen-Finkle
140 2.00 2.00 3♠ W 3 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 3-Lusby-Back
620 0.50 3.50 4♠ W 4 3-Schwartz-Parker vs 2-Djavadi-Scanlin
620 0.50 3.50 4♠ W 4 4-Hargest-Pierce vs 4-Ertman-Ertman
|
17 |
♠AT652
♥T73
♦T65
♣53
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦4 ♥2 ♠4 NT2 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 5♥ 2♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
450 2.50 1.50 5♥ E 5 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 5-Wareham-Weiland
450 2.50 1.50 5♥ E 5 3-Schwartz-Parker vs 2-Djavadi-Scanlin
450 2.50 1.50 4♥ W 5 5-O'Connell-Hollander vs 1-Johansen-Finkle
450 2.50 1.50 4♥ E 5 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 3-Lusby-Back
460 0.00 4.00 3N E 5 4-Hargest-Pierce vs 4-Ertman-Ertman
|
18 |
♠K94
♥Q94
♦J73
♣T754
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦2 ♥0 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 5♣ 5♦ 7♥ 6♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 4.00 0.00 6♥ E -1 3-Schwartz-Parker vs 2-Djavadi-Scanlin
400 3.00 1.00 3N E 3 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 3-Lusby-Back
430 2.00 2.00 3N E 4 5-O'Connell-Hollander vs 1-Johansen-Finkle
980 0.50 3.50 6♥ E 6 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 5-Wareham-Weiland
980 0.50 3.50 6♥ E 6 4-Hargest-Pierce vs 4-Ertman-Ertman
|
19 |
♠Q986
♥J2
♦J62
♣T943
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣5 ♦5 ♥5 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ 2♥ 1NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.50 0.50 3♣ W -1 4-Hargest-Pierce vs 4-Ertman-Ertman
100 3.50 0.50 2♣ W -1 5-O'Connell-Hollander vs 1-Johansen-Finkle
110 1.50 2.50 2♥ E 2 3-Schwartz-Parker vs 2-Djavadi-Scanlin
110 1.50 2.50 3♣ W 3 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 3-Lusby-Back
150 0.00 4.00 2N E 3 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 5-Wareham-Weiland
|
20 |
♠AJ93
♥K94
♦QT7
♣952
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: -/1♣ 4♦ 2♥ 1♠ 3NT ♣6/7 |
EW: ♣6 ♦3 ♥3/4 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 4.00 0.00 2♠ E -2 4-Hargest-Pierce vs 4-Ertman-Ertman
100 3.00 1.00 1N E -1 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 3-Lusby-Back
90 2.00 2.00 2♦ S 2 5-O'Connell-Hollander vs 1-Johansen-Finkle
100 1.00 3.00 2N N -1 3-Schwartz-Parker vs 2-Djavadi-Scanlin
300 0.00 4.00 3♦ S -3 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 5-Wareham-Weiland
|
21 |
♠T65
♥QT864
♦Q8
♣964
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦3 ♥5/6 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 4♦ 1♥ 5♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 4.00 0.00 4♠ W -1 3-Schwartz-Parker vs 1-Johansen-Finkle
400 2.00 2.00 3N W 3 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 4-Ertman-Ertman
400 2.00 2.00 3N W 3 4-Hargest-Pierce vs 3-Lusby-Back
400 2.00 2.00 3N W 3 5-O'Connell-Hollander vs 5-Wareham-Weiland
420 0.00 4.00 4♠ E 4 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 2-Djavadi-Scanlin
|
22 |
♠Q9432
♥K7543
♦K72
♣-
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♥ 5♠ ♦5 NT6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣6 ♥5 ♠2 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
450 4.00 0.00 4♠ N 5 3-Schwartz-Parker vs 1-Johansen-Finkle
420 3.00 1.00 4♠ S 4 4-Hargest-Pierce vs 3-Lusby-Back
200 2.00 2.00 2♠ N 5 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 4-Ertman-Ertman
170 1.00 3.00 3♠ N 4 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 2-Djavadi-Scanlin
PASS 0.00 4.00 Pass Out 5-O'Connell-Hollander vs 5-Wareham-Weiland
|
23 |
♠Q64
♥AK93
♦T84
♣A94
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♥ 1♠ 1NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣4 ♥4 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 4.00 0.00 1N E -2 3-Schwartz-Parker vs 1-Johansen-Finkle
120 3.00 1.00 1N S 2 5-O'Connell-Hollander vs 5-Wareham-Weiland
100 2.00 2.00 1N E -1 4-Hargest-Pierce vs 3-Lusby-Back
90 1.00 3.00 2♣ N 2 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 4-Ertman-Ertman
90 0.00 4.00 1N E 1 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 2-Djavadi-Scanlin
|
24 |
♠K9
♥KJT5
♦4
♣KQ8753
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 2♦ 4♥ 2NT ♠5 |
EW: 1♠ ♣2 ♦5 ♥3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
400 4.00 0.00 5♣ N 5 5-O'Connell-Hollander vs 5-Wareham-Weiland
150 3.00 1.00 4♣ N 5 3-Schwartz-Parker vs 1-Johansen-Finkle
130 2.00 2.00 3♣ N 4 4-Hargest-Pierce vs 3-Lusby-Back
50 1.00 3.00 3♦ S -1 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 2-Djavadi-Scanlin
140 0.00 4.00 2♠ E 3 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 4-Ertman-Ertman
|
25 |
♠32
♥A73
♦52
♣AT9762
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♠ ♦4 ♥4 NT5 |
EW: 3♦ 3♥ 1NT ♣6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
300 4.00 0.00 3♣ E -3 4-Hargest-Pierce vs 3-Lusby-Back
200 3.00 1.00 5♦* W -1 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 2-Djavadi-Scanlin
100 2.00 2.00 5♦ W -1 3-Schwartz-Parker vs 1-Johansen-Finkle
110 1.00 3.00 3♦ E 3 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 4-Ertman-Ertman
130 0.00 4.00 3♦ E 4 5-O'Connell-Hollander vs 5-Wareham-Weiland
|