1 |
♠7642
♥54
♦K962
♣AKQ
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣3 ♥4/3 ♠4 NT4/3 |
EW: 4♣ 3♥ 1♠ 3NT ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 3.50 0.50 3♥ W 3 2-Scanlin-Djavadi vs 3-Lusby-Back
140 3.50 0.50 3♥ W 3 3-Riggers-Riggers vs 5-Cowan-Ash
170 1.50 2.50 2♥ W 4 5-Leve-Leve vs 4-Wareham-Weiland
170 1.50 2.50 1♥ W 4 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 1-Parker-Robbins
500 0.00 4.00 4♦* N -3 4-Reinherz-Finkle vs 2-Hollander-Healy
|
2 |
♠T9643
♥JT42
♦T842
♣-
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♠ 1/-NT ♣3 ♦5/4 ♥4 NT7/6 |
EW: 4♣ 2♦ 3♥ ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
620 4.00 0.00 4♠ S 4 4-Reinherz-Finkle vs 2-Hollander-Healy
170 3.00 1.00 3♠ S 4 5-Leve-Leve vs 4-Wareham-Weiland
140 1.50 2.50 3♠ S 3 2-Scanlin-Djavadi vs 3-Lusby-Back
140 1.50 2.50 2♠ S 3 3-Riggers-Riggers vs 5-Cowan-Ash
100 0.00 4.00 4♠ S -1 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 1-Parker-Robbins
|
3 |
♠K42
♥JT983
♦AK7
♣K9
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 5♥ 2♠ 4/5NT ♣5 |
EW: 2♣ ♦4 ♥2 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
800 4.00 0.00 5♣* W -3 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 1-Parker-Robbins
420 2.50 1.50 4♥ N 4 2-Scanlin-Djavadi vs 3-Lusby-Back
420 2.50 1.50 4♥ N 4 3-Riggers-Riggers vs 5-Cowan-Ash
50 1.00 3.00 4♥ N -1 5-Leve-Leve vs 4-Wareham-Weiland
100 0.00 4.00 4♥* N -1 4-Reinherz-Finkle vs 2-Hollander-Healy
|
4 |
♠T7532
♥K6543
♦-
♣Q97
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦3 ♥3/4 ♠3 NT2 |
EW: 1/2♣ 4♦ 3♥ 4♠ 3/4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 4.00 0.00 3N E -2 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 1-Parker-Robbins
600 2.50 1.50 3N E 3 2-Scanlin-Djavadi vs 3-Lusby-Back
600 2.50 1.50 3N E 3 3-Riggers-Riggers vs 5-Cowan-Ash
630 1.00 3.00 3N E 4 4-Reinherz-Finkle vs 2-Hollander-Healy
660 0.00 4.00 3N E 5 5-Leve-Leve vs 4-Wareham-Weiland
|
5 |
♠AJ5
♥J72
♦AQT3
♣A64
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♥ 1♠ 3NT ♦6 |
EW: ♣3 ♦6 ♥4 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
600 4.00 0.00 3N N 3 3-Riggers-Riggers vs 5-Cowan-Ash
120 3.00 1.00 2N N 2 4-Reinherz-Finkle vs 2-Hollander-Healy
100 1.50 2.50 2N N -1 2-Scanlin-Djavadi vs 3-Lusby-Back
100 1.50 2.50 4♣ S -1 5-Leve-Leve vs 4-Wareham-Weiland
200 0.00 4.00 3N N -2 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 1-Parker-Robbins
|
6 |
♠KJ7652
♥AT8
♦A
♣KT6
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 6♠ 4NT ♦6 ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣5 ♦6 ♠1 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
480 4.00 0.00 4♠ S 6 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 5-Cowan-Ash
450 2.50 1.50 4♠ N 5 2-Scanlin-Djavadi vs 2-Hollander-Healy
450 2.50 1.50 4♠ N 5 3-Riggers-Riggers vs 4-Wareham-Weiland
230 1.00 3.00 3♠ N 6 5-Leve-Leve vs 3-Lusby-Back
200 0.00 4.00 2♠ N 5 4-Reinherz-Finkle vs 1-Parker-Robbins
|
7 |
♠J94
♥T862
♦Q984
♣AJ
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 4♥ 2NT ♣5 ♠6 |
EW: 2♣ ♦3 ♥2 ♠6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
620 3.00 1.00 4♥ S 4 2-Scanlin-Djavadi vs 2-Hollander-Healy
620 3.00 1.00 4♥ S 4 3-Riggers-Riggers vs 4-Wareham-Weiland
620 3.00 1.00 4♥ S 4 5-Leve-Leve vs 3-Lusby-Back
140 0.50 3.50 2♥ S 3 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 5-Cowan-Ash
140 0.50 3.50 2♥ S 3 4-Reinherz-Finkle vs 1-Parker-Robbins
|
8 |
♠KQ53
♥Q654
♦KT
♣652
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ 3♥ 5♠ 1NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦2 ♥4 ♠1 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 4.00 0.00 3♠ N 5 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 5-Cowan-Ash
170 3.00 1.00 3♠ S 4 3-Riggers-Riggers vs 4-Wareham-Weiland
140 2.00 2.00 3♠ N 3 5-Leve-Leve vs 3-Lusby-Back
50 1.00 3.00 3♣ W -1 4-Reinherz-Finkle vs 1-Parker-Robbins
300 0.00 4.00 3♥* N -2 2-Scanlin-Djavadi vs 2-Hollander-Healy
|
9 |
♠97
♥953
♦A52
♣JT832
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 4♥ 2♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦5/4 ♥3 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
420 4.00 0.00 4♥ S 4 4-Reinherz-Finkle vs 1-Parker-Robbins
400 3.00 1.00 3N S 3 5-Leve-Leve vs 3-Lusby-Back
50 2.00 2.00 2N S -1 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 5-Cowan-Ash
100 0.50 3.50 3N S -2 2-Scanlin-Djavadi vs 2-Hollander-Healy
100 0.50 3.50 3N S -2 3-Riggers-Riggers vs 4-Wareham-Weiland
|
10 |
♠AJ97
♥QJ8
♦A83
♣AK9
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 3♥ 3♠ 2NT ♣6 |
EW: ♣5/6 ♦2/3 ♥3/4 ♠4 NT4/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
630 4.00 0.00 3N N 4 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 5-Cowan-Ash
600 3.00 1.00 3N N 3 5-Leve-Leve vs 3-Lusby-Back
200 2.00 2.00 2♣ W -2 2-Scanlin-Djavadi vs 2-Hollander-Healy
140 1.00 3.00 1♠ N 3 3-Riggers-Riggers vs 4-Wareham-Weiland
90 0.00 4.00 2♦ S 2 4-Reinherz-Finkle vs 1-Parker-Robbins
|
11 |
♠J84
♥K
♦J7652
♣8763
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1♦ ♥3 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 3♥ ♣3 ♦5 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
400 4.00 0.00 5♣ S 5 4-Reinherz-Finkle vs 5-Cowan-Ash
300 3.00 1.00 4♥* W -2 2-Scanlin-Djavadi vs 1-Parker-Robbins
50 2.00 2.00 3♥ E -1 5-Leve-Leve vs 2-Hollander-Healy
140 1.00 3.00 3♥ W 3 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 4-Wareham-Weiland
420 0.00 4.00 4♥ W 4 3-Riggers-Riggers vs 3-Lusby-Back
|
12 |
♠KQ752
♥A
♦JT653
♣QT
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 4♦ 1♠ ♥5 NT6 |
EW: 2♥ ♣4 ♦2 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
130 4.00 0.00 4♦ N 4 3-Riggers-Riggers vs 3-Lusby-Back
50 3.00 1.00 4♥ W -1 4-Reinherz-Finkle vs 5-Cowan-Ash
100 1.50 2.50 3♠ N -1 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 4-Wareham-Weiland
100 1.50 2.50 3♠ N -1 2-Scanlin-Djavadi vs 1-Parker-Robbins
140 0.00 4.00 3♥ W 3 5-Leve-Leve vs 2-Hollander-Healy
|
13 |
♠9873
♥95
♦AJ964
♣32
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 1♥ ♣3 ♠3 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 3♠ 2NT ♦4 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 4.00 0.00 1♥ S -1 4-Reinherz-Finkle vs 5-Cowan-Ash
110 3.00 1.00 2♠ E 2 5-Leve-Leve vs 2-Hollander-Healy
140 2.00 2.00 2♠ E 3 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 4-Wareham-Weiland
200 1.00 3.00 2♠ E 5 2-Scanlin-Djavadi vs 1-Parker-Robbins
650 0.00 4.00 4♠ W 5 3-Riggers-Riggers vs 3-Lusby-Back
|
14 |
♠K874
♥K63
♦KT5
♣842
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ ♣6 ♥5 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 1/-♣ 1♥ 3♠ ♣7/6 ♦5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 4.00 0.00 3N W -1 4-Reinherz-Finkle vs 5-Cowan-Ash
130 3.00 1.00 3♦ E 4 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 4-Wareham-Weiland
140 2.00 2.00 2♠ W 3 2-Scanlin-Djavadi vs 1-Parker-Robbins
170 0.50 3.50 2♠ W 4 3-Riggers-Riggers vs 3-Lusby-Back
170 0.50 3.50 2♠ W 4 5-Leve-Leve vs 2-Hollander-Healy
|
15 |
♠AT3
♥Q54
♦Q6
♣QT985
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/1♣ 3♠ ♦3 ♥4/5 NT5 |
EW: 4♦ 2♥ -/2NT ♣5 ♠3 NT6/8 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
620 4.00 0.00 4♠ S 4 4-Reinherz-Finkle vs 5-Cowan-Ash
200 3.00 1.00 2♠ S 5 2-Scanlin-Djavadi vs 1-Parker-Robbins
100 2.00 2.00 4♠ S -1 3-Riggers-Riggers vs 3-Lusby-Back
170 1.00 3.00 2♠ W 4 5-Leve-Leve vs 2-Hollander-Healy
420 0.00 4.00 4♠ W 4 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 4-Wareham-Weiland
|
16 |
♠AQ5
♥A93
♦KJT98
♣T2
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ 2♥ 1NT ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣6 ♦5 ♥4/5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 4.00 0.00 2♦ N 3 5-Leve-Leve vs 1-Parker-Robbins
100 3.00 1.00 1N W -1 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 3-Lusby-Back
90 1.50 2.50 2♦ N 2 2-Scanlin-Djavadi vs 5-Cowan-Ash
90 1.50 2.50 2♦ N 2 3-Riggers-Riggers vs 2-Hollander-Healy
200 0.00 4.00 3♥ S -4 4-Reinherz-Finkle vs 4-Wareham-Weiland
|
17 |
♠A653
♥A74
♦8632
♣J5
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣3 ♦4 ♥4 NT6 |
EW: 4♣ 3♦ 3♥ 1NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 3.50 0.50 2♠ S 2 2-Scanlin-Djavadi vs 5-Cowan-Ash
110 3.50 0.50 2♠ S 2 5-Leve-Leve vs 1-Parker-Robbins
50 2.00 2.00 3♠ S -1 3-Riggers-Riggers vs 2-Hollander-Healy
110 1.00 3.00 3♦ E 3 4-Reinherz-Finkle vs 4-Wareham-Weiland
120 0.00 4.00 1N W 2 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 3-Lusby-Back
|
18 |
♠K94
♥T542
♦K3
♣J752
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 3♥ 1NT ♦3 ♠3 |
EW: 4♦ 4♠ ♣2 ♥3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
650 4.00 0.00 4♥ N 5 2-Scanlin-Djavadi vs 5-Cowan-Ash
150 3.00 1.00 4♣ S 5 5-Leve-Leve vs 1-Parker-Robbins
130 2.00 2.00 3♣ S 4 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 3-Lusby-Back
50 1.00 3.00 3♠ E -1 4-Reinherz-Finkle vs 4-Wareham-Weiland
100 0.00 4.00 5♣ S -1 3-Riggers-Riggers vs 2-Hollander-Healy
|
19 |
♠Q762
♥Q4
♦QJ85
♣A64
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♦ 5♥ 1♠ 2NT ♣4 |
EW: 3♣ ♦1 ♥1 ♠6 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
480 3.00 1.00 4♥ S 6 3-Riggers-Riggers vs 2-Hollander-Healy
480 3.00 1.00 4♥ S 6 4-Reinherz-Finkle vs 4-Wareham-Weiland
480 3.00 1.00 4♥ S 6 5-Leve-Leve vs 1-Parker-Robbins
450 1.00 3.00 5♥ S 5 2-Scanlin-Djavadi vs 5-Cowan-Ash
400 0.00 4.00 3N N 3 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 3-Lusby-Back
|
20 |
♠AQ85
♥76
♦Q765
♣K82
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦5 ♥4 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 2♦ 2♥ 1♠ 1NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
PASS 2.50 1.50 Pass Out 2-Scanlin-Djavadi vs 5-Cowan-Ash
PASS 2.50 1.50 Pass Out 3-Riggers-Riggers vs 2-Hollander-Healy
PASS 2.50 1.50 Pass Out 4-Reinherz-Finkle vs 4-Wareham-Weiland
PASS 2.50 1.50 Pass Out 5-Leve-Leve vs 1-Parker-Robbins
100 0.00 4.00 2♠ N -1 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 3-Lusby-Back
|
21 |
♠Q
♥74
♦J8732
♣T9763
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♠ ♦5 ♥3 NT4 |
EW: 2♦ 3♥ 3NT ♣6/5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 3.00 1.00 4♥ E -1 2-Scanlin-Djavadi vs 4-Wareham-Weiland
50 3.00 1.00 4♥ E -1 3-Riggers-Riggers vs 1-Parker-Robbins
50 3.00 1.00 4♥ E -1 4-Reinherz-Finkle vs 3-Lusby-Back
400 1.00 3.00 3N E 3 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 2-Hollander-Healy
420 0.00 4.00 4♥ E 4 5-Leve-Leve vs 5-Cowan-Ash
|
22 |
♠Q764
♥K965
♦543
♣A8
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 1♥ 5♠ 2NT ♣5 |
EW: 2♣ ♦3/2 ♥6 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 3.50 0.50 2♠ S 5 5-Leve-Leve vs 5-Cowan-Ash
200 3.50 0.50 4♥ W -2 4-Reinherz-Finkle vs 3-Lusby-Back
140 1.50 2.50 3♠ S 3 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 2-Hollander-Healy
140 1.50 2.50 3♠ S 3 2-Scanlin-Djavadi vs 4-Wareham-Weiland
130 0.00 4.00 2♦ S 4 3-Riggers-Riggers vs 1-Parker-Robbins
|
23 |
♠KQ7
♥QT96
♦AJT5
♣QT
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ ♣3 ♦6 ♥4 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 1♥ ♦5 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 4.00 0.00 3♦ E -2 4-Reinherz-Finkle vs 3-Lusby-Back
100 3.00 1.00 3♣ W -1 5-Leve-Leve vs 5-Cowan-Ash
100 2.00 2.00 3♠ S -1 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 2-Hollander-Healy
110 1.00 3.00 2♣ W 3 3-Riggers-Riggers vs 1-Parker-Robbins
150 0.00 4.00 3♣ W 5 2-Scanlin-Djavadi vs 4-Wareham-Weiland
|
24 |
♠65
♥A952
♦KQ4
♣AT97
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♥ 3NT ♦6 ♠6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣3 ♥3 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
420 4.00 0.00 4♥ S 4 5-Leve-Leve vs 5-Cowan-Ash
170 3.00 1.00 2♥ S 4 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 2-Hollander-Healy
140 1.00 3.00 3♥ S 3 2-Scanlin-Djavadi vs 4-Wareham-Weiland
140 1.00 3.00 3♥ S 3 3-Riggers-Riggers vs 1-Parker-Robbins
140 1.00 3.00 2♥ S 3 4-Reinherz-Finkle vs 3-Lusby-Back
|
25 |
♠AT2
♥T9
♦JT754
♣K74
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦4 ♥5 ♠3 NT6 |
EW: 3♦ 2♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣6/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 4.00 0.00 2♠ W -1 5-Leve-Leve vs 5-Cowan-Ash
100 3.00 1.00 3♣ S -2 4-Reinherz-Finkle vs 3-Lusby-Back
140 2.00 2.00 2♠ W 3 2-Scanlin-Djavadi vs 4-Wareham-Weiland
200 0.50 3.50 2♠ W 5 1-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 2-Hollander-Healy
200 0.50 3.50 2♠ W 5 3-Riggers-Riggers vs 1-Parker-Robbins
|