1 |
♠J9
♥Q862
♦43
♣K7532
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦3 ♥4/3 ♠5/4 NT5 |
EW: 4♦ 3♥ 2♠ 2NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 5.00 0.00 5♦ W -2 2-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 3-Hollander-O'Connell
90 4.00 1.00 2♣ N 2 6-Murray-Saperstein vs 6-Cowan-Ash
50 3.00 2.00 3♣ N -1 4-Finkle-Johansen vs 2-Hargest-Cosgrove
90 2.00 3.00 2♦ W 2 5-Back-Lusby vs 4-Parker-Robbins
110 1.00 4.00 2♦ W 3 3-Riggers-Riggers vs 5-Djavadi-Scanlin
130 0.00 5.00 2♦ W 4 1-Leve-Leve vs 1-Greenberg-Nadell
|
2 |
♠K954
♥K953
♦T5
♣A54
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦3 ♥3 ♠6 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 4♦ 4♥ -/1♠ 3NT ♠6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 4.50 0.50 4♥ W -1 2-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 3-Hollander-O'Connell
50 4.50 0.50 4♥ W -1 5-Back-Lusby vs 4-Parker-Robbins
110 3.00 2.00 2♥ W 2 6-Murray-Saperstein vs 6-Cowan-Ash
420 1.50 3.50 4♥ W 4 1-Leve-Leve vs 1-Greenberg-Nadell
420 1.50 3.50 4♥ W 4 4-Finkle-Johansen vs 2-Hargest-Cosgrove
450 0.00 5.00 4♥ W 5 3-Riggers-Riggers vs 5-Djavadi-Scanlin
|
3 |
♠K65
♥AQJ72
♦-
♣KQT74
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♥ 1♠ 3/4NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣3 ♥3/4 ♠5/6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
430 5.00 0.00 3N N 4 4-Finkle-Johansen vs 2-Hargest-Cosgrove
140 4.00 1.00 2♥ N 3 1-Leve-Leve vs 1-Greenberg-Nadell
130 3.00 2.00 3♣ N 4 3-Riggers-Riggers vs 5-Djavadi-Scanlin
110 1.50 3.50 2♥ N 2 2-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 3-Hollander-O'Connell
110 1.50 3.50 3♣ N 3 6-Murray-Saperstein vs 6-Cowan-Ash
50 0.00 5.00 3♥ N -1 5-Back-Lusby vs 4-Parker-Robbins
|
4 |
♠QJ92
♥JT432
♦Q9
♣K4
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣2 ♦2 ♠3 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 4♦ 4♠ 4NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
130 4.50 0.50 4♦ W 4 2-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 3-Hollander-O'Connell
130 4.50 0.50 2♦ W 4 6-Murray-Saperstein vs 6-Cowan-Ash
200 2.00 3.00 3♠ N -2 3-Riggers-Riggers vs 5-Djavadi-Scanlin
200 2.00 3.00 3♥ N -2 1-Leve-Leve vs 1-Greenberg-Nadell
200 2.00 3.00 3♥ N -2 5-Back-Lusby vs 4-Parker-Robbins
600 0.00 5.00 5♦ W 5 4-Finkle-Johansen vs 2-Hargest-Cosgrove
|
5 |
♠62
♥9843
♦Q86
♣KQT5
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣6 ♥2 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 4♥ 5♠ 4NT ♣6 ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 4.50 0.50 3♠ E 5 3-Riggers-Riggers vs 4-Parker-Robbins
200 4.50 0.50 2♠ E 5 4-Finkle-Johansen vs 1-Greenberg-Nadell
450 1.50 3.50 4♠ W 5 2-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 2-Hargest-Cosgrove
450 1.50 3.50 4♠ W 5 5-Back-Lusby vs 3-Hollander-O'Connell
450 1.50 3.50 4♠ E 5 1-Leve-Leve vs 6-Cowan-Ash
450 1.50 3.50 4♠ E 5 6-Murray-Saperstein vs 5-Djavadi-Scanlin
|
6 |
♠A4
♥AKQJ64
♦AT874
♣-
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ 6♥ 1♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦3 ♥0 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
510 5.00 0.00 5♥ N 7 6-Murray-Saperstein vs 5-Djavadi-Scanlin
480 3.50 1.50 4♥ N 6 1-Leve-Leve vs 6-Cowan-Ash
480 3.50 1.50 4♥ N 6 2-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 2-Hargest-Cosgrove
450 2.00 3.00 4♥ N 5 3-Riggers-Riggers vs 4-Parker-Robbins
420 0.50 4.50 4♥ N 4 4-Finkle-Johansen vs 1-Greenberg-Nadell
420 0.50 4.50 4♥ N 4 5-Back-Lusby vs 3-Hollander-O'Connell
|
7 |
♠T763
♥J4
♦T9652
♣52
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦5 ♥4 ♠3 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 1♦ 3♥ 3♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 4.50 0.50 3♦ W -2 6-Murray-Saperstein vs 5-Djavadi-Scanlin
200 4.50 0.50 2♦ W -2 1-Leve-Leve vs 6-Cowan-Ash
100 2.50 2.50 3N W -1 2-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 2-Hargest-Cosgrove
100 2.50 2.50 2♥ W -1 4-Finkle-Johansen vs 1-Greenberg-Nadell
130 1.00 4.00 3♣ E 4 5-Back-Lusby vs 3-Hollander-O'Connell
600 0.00 5.00 3N W 3 3-Riggers-Riggers vs 4-Parker-Robbins
|
8 |
♠4
♥A3
♦QJ987
♣J9752
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3/2♦ ♥4 ♠3 NT5 |
EW: 3♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣4 ♦4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 5.00 0.00 2N W -1 5-Back-Lusby vs 3-Hollander-O'Connell
50 4.00 1.00 3♦ S -1 2-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 2-Hargest-Cosgrove
90 2.00 3.00 1N W 1 3-Riggers-Riggers vs 4-Parker-Robbins
90 2.00 3.00 1N W 1 4-Finkle-Johansen vs 1-Greenberg-Nadell
90 2.00 3.00 1N W 1 6-Murray-Saperstein vs 5-Djavadi-Scanlin
150 0.00 5.00 1N W 3 1-Leve-Leve vs 6-Cowan-Ash
|
9 |
♠KQJ86
♥AQ3
♦AT2
♣J9
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 5♦ 3♥ 5♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦2 ♥3 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
430 4.50 0.50 3N N 4 4-Finkle-Johansen vs 6-Cowan-Ash
430 4.50 0.50 3N N 4 5-Back-Lusby vs 2-Hargest-Cosgrove
420 3.00 2.00 4♠ N 4 2-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 1-Greenberg-Nadell
400 2.00 3.00 3N N 3 1-Leve-Leve vs 5-Djavadi-Scanlin
170 1.00 4.00 3♠ N 4 3-Riggers-Riggers vs 3-Hollander-O'Connell
100 0.00 5.00 5♠ N -2 6-Murray-Saperstein vs 4-Parker-Robbins
|
10 |
♠KQ2
♥T653
♦A932
♣92
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ ♣4 ♥6 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 1♠ ♦5 ♥6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 5.00 0.00 2♦ S -1 4-Finkle-Johansen vs 6-Cowan-Ash
110 4.00 1.00 1♠ E 2 6-Murray-Saperstein vs 4-Parker-Robbins
130 2.50 2.50 3♣ E 4 2-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 1-Greenberg-Nadell
130 2.50 2.50 3♣ E 4 5-Back-Lusby vs 2-Hargest-Cosgrove
140 1.00 4.00 2♠ E 3 3-Riggers-Riggers vs 3-Hollander-O'Connell
150 0.00 5.00 2N W 3 1-Leve-Leve vs 5-Djavadi-Scanlin
|
11 |
♠AT6
♥AK876
♦Q86
♣QJ
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 3♥ 2♠ ♣5 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ ♦6 ♥4 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
420 4.00 1.00 4♥ N 4 2-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 1-Greenberg-Nadell
420 4.00 1.00 4♥ N 4 5-Back-Lusby vs 2-Hargest-Cosgrove
420 4.00 1.00 4♥ N 4 6-Murray-Saperstein vs 4-Parker-Robbins
400 2.00 3.00 3N S 3 4-Finkle-Johansen vs 6-Cowan-Ash
170 1.00 4.00 2♥ N 4 1-Leve-Leve vs 5-Djavadi-Scanlin
50 0.00 5.00 4♥ N -1 3-Riggers-Riggers vs 3-Hollander-O'Connell
|
12 |
♠862
♥QJ75
♦T
♣A9874
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦5 ♥6 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 2/1♦ 1♥ 2♠ 2NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 5.00 0.00 3♠ W -2 2-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 1-Greenberg-Nadell
80 4.00 1.00 1♠ W 1 6-Murray-Saperstein vs 4-Parker-Robbins
90 3.00 2.00 1N E 1 1-Leve-Leve vs 5-Djavadi-Scanlin
110 1.50 3.50 2♠ W 2 5-Back-Lusby vs 2-Hargest-Cosgrove
110 1.50 3.50 1♠ W 2 4-Finkle-Johansen vs 6-Cowan-Ash
140 0.00 5.00 2♠ W 3 3-Riggers-Riggers vs 3-Hollander-O'Connell
|
13 |
♠QJ6
♥AQJ
♦AT54
♣AQ2
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 1♦ 5♥ 3♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦5 ♥2 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
630 5.00 0.00 3N N 4 6-Murray-Saperstein vs 3-Hollander-O'Connell
600 4.00 1.00 3N S 3 5-Back-Lusby vs 1-Greenberg-Nadell
150 3.00 2.00 2N N 3 2-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 6-Cowan-Ash
200 1.50 3.50 3N N -2 1-Leve-Leve vs 4-Parker-Robbins
200 1.50 3.50 3N N -2 3-Riggers-Riggers vs 2-Hargest-Cosgrove
300 0.00 5.00 3N S -3 4-Finkle-Johansen vs 5-Djavadi-Scanlin
|
14 |
♠KT8
♥AT87
♦QT
♣AT97
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣6 ♦5 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ ♥5 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 5.00 0.00 3♠ S 3 4-Finkle-Johansen vs 5-Djavadi-Scanlin
120 4.00 1.00 1N N 2 6-Murray-Saperstein vs 3-Hollander-O'Connell
110 3.00 2.00 2♠ S 2 5-Back-Lusby vs 1-Greenberg-Nadell
80 2.00 3.00 1♠ S 1 2-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 6-Cowan-Ash
50 0.50 4.50 1N N -1 3-Riggers-Riggers vs 2-Hargest-Cosgrove
50 0.50 4.50 2♠ S -1 1-Leve-Leve vs 4-Parker-Robbins
|
15 |
♠J5
♥J986
♦5432
♣T82
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦4 ♥3 ♠1 NT2 |
EW: 1♦ 4♥ 6♠ 4NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 5.00 0.00 3♣ S -1 2-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 6-Cowan-Ash
170 4.00 1.00 2♠ E 4 1-Leve-Leve vs 4-Parker-Robbins
230 3.00 2.00 3♠ E 6 4-Finkle-Johansen vs 5-Djavadi-Scanlin
450 1.00 4.00 4♠ E 5 3-Riggers-Riggers vs 2-Hargest-Cosgrove
450 1.00 4.00 4♠ E 5 5-Back-Lusby vs 1-Greenberg-Nadell
450 1.00 4.00 4♠ E 5 6-Murray-Saperstein vs 3-Hollander-O'Connell
|
16 |
♠KQJ64
♥93
♦J73
♣AKJ
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ 2♥ 5♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦5 ♥5 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
450 5.00 0.00 4♠ N 5 1-Leve-Leve vs 4-Parker-Robbins
420 4.00 1.00 4♠ N 4 5-Back-Lusby vs 1-Greenberg-Nadell
200 3.00 2.00 1♠ N 5 2-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 6-Cowan-Ash
170 2.00 3.00 2♠ N 4 6-Murray-Saperstein vs 3-Hollander-O'Connell
50 0.50 4.50 4♠ N -1 3-Riggers-Riggers vs 2-Hargest-Cosgrove
50 0.50 4.50 4♠ N -1 4-Finkle-Johansen vs 5-Djavadi-Scanlin
|
17 |
♠-
♥AK874
♦T72
♣AQ974
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♥ 2NT ♦6 ♠5 |
EW: -/1♦ 1♠ ♣3/4 ♦6/7 ♥1/2 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 5.00 0.00 4♠ W -3 5-Back-Lusby vs 6-Cowan-Ash
50 4.00 1.00 3♠ E -1 6-Murray-Saperstein vs 2-Hargest-Cosgrove
50 3.00 2.00 4♥ N -1 4-Finkle-Johansen vs 4-Parker-Robbins
100 2.00 3.00 4♥* N -1 2-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 5-Djavadi-Scanlin
110 1.00 4.00 2♠ W 2 1-Leve-Leve vs 3-Hollander-O'Connell
470 0.00 5.00 2♠* W 2 3-Riggers-Riggers vs 1-Greenberg-Nadell
|
18 |
♠984
♥8543
♦96
♣AJ85
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦4 ♥5 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 3♦ 1♥ 1♠ 1NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 4.00 1.00 3♦ E 3 3-Riggers-Riggers vs 1-Greenberg-Nadell
110 4.00 1.00 2♦ E 3 1-Leve-Leve vs 3-Hollander-O'Connell
110 4.00 1.00 2♦ E 3 2-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 5-Djavadi-Scanlin
200 2.00 3.00 3♣ N -2 5-Back-Lusby vs 6-Cowan-Ash
300 1.00 4.00 3♣ S -3 4-Finkle-Johansen vs 4-Parker-Robbins
400 0.00 5.00 3N W 3 6-Murray-Saperstein vs 2-Hargest-Cosgrove
|
19 |
♠JT84
♥QJ42
♦T64
♣98
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦5 ♥4 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 2/1♣ 2/1♦ 3/2♥ 2♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 4.50 0.50 3N W -2 2-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 5-Djavadi-Scanlin
200 4.50 0.50 4♥ E -2 6-Murray-Saperstein vs 2-Hargest-Cosgrove
50 3.00 2.00 2♣ S -1 3-Riggers-Riggers vs 1-Greenberg-Nadell
100 2.00 3.00 1♦ S -2 5-Back-Lusby vs 6-Cowan-Ash
140 1.00 4.00 1♥ E 3 1-Leve-Leve vs 3-Hollander-O'Connell
150 0.00 5.00 2♣ S -3 4-Finkle-Johansen vs 4-Parker-Robbins
|
20 |
♠8
♥96
♦AKJT53
♣9542
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♦ ♥6 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 4♠ ♣5 ♦4 ♥6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 5.00 0.00 2♠ E 4 5-Back-Lusby vs 6-Cowan-Ash
200 4.00 1.00 3♠ E 5 1-Leve-Leve vs 3-Hollander-O'Connell
620 2.50 2.50 4♠ E 4 4-Finkle-Johansen vs 4-Parker-Robbins
620 2.50 2.50 4♠ E 4 6-Murray-Saperstein vs 2-Hargest-Cosgrove
650 0.50 4.50 4♠ E 5 2-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 5-Djavadi-Scanlin
650 0.50 4.50 4♠ E 5 3-Riggers-Riggers vs 1-Greenberg-Nadell
|
21 |
♠QT3
♥Q4
♦J953
♣KQ86
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1NT ♦6 ♥4 ♠3 |
EW: 3♥ 3♠ ♣5 ♦6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
120 5.00 0.00 1N N 2 5-Back-Lusby vs 5-Djavadi-Scanlin
110 3.50 1.50 3♣ S 3 1-Leve-Leve vs 2-Hargest-Cosgrove
110 3.50 1.50 2♣ S 3 3-Riggers-Riggers vs 6-Cowan-Ash
90 1.50 3.50 2♣ S 2 4-Finkle-Johansen vs 3-Hollander-O'Connell
90 1.50 3.50 2♣ S 2 6-Murray-Saperstein vs 1-Greenberg-Nadell
100 0.00 5.00 3♣ S -1 2-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 4-Parker-Robbins
|
22 |
♠AK53
♥Q
♦KJ72
♣AJ53
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2/3♦ 2♥ 5♠ 2/3NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦4 ♥4 ♠2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
400 5.00 0.00 3N N 3 1-Leve-Leve vs 2-Hargest-Cosgrove
150 3.50 1.50 2N N 3 2-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 4-Parker-Robbins
150 3.50 1.50 1N N 3 4-Finkle-Johansen vs 3-Hollander-O'Connell
110 2.00 3.00 2♠ N 2 3-Riggers-Riggers vs 6-Cowan-Ash
50 0.50 4.50 3N N -1 6-Murray-Saperstein vs 1-Greenberg-Nadell
50 0.50 4.50 3♠ S -1 5-Back-Lusby vs 5-Djavadi-Scanlin
|
23 |
♠K42
♥98732
♦Q97
♣K5
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/1♥ ♣4 ♦6 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ 2♠ ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 5.00 0.00 1N W -1 6-Murray-Saperstein vs 1-Greenberg-Nadell
100 3.50 1.50 2♥ N -1 2-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 4-Parker-Robbins
100 3.50 1.50 2♥ N -1 4-Finkle-Johansen vs 3-Hollander-O'Connell
120 2.00 3.00 2N E 2 3-Riggers-Riggers vs 6-Cowan-Ash
150 1.00 4.00 2♣ W 5 5-Back-Lusby vs 5-Djavadi-Scanlin
200 0.00 5.00 3♥* N -1 1-Leve-Leve vs 2-Hargest-Cosgrove
|
24 |
♠AK962
♥AJ98
♦Q4
♣J6
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 5♥ 5♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦5 ♥2 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
450 4.00 1.00 4♠ S 5 4-Finkle-Johansen vs 3-Hollander-O'Connell
450 4.00 1.00 4♠ N 5 2-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 4-Parker-Robbins
450 4.00 1.00 4♠ N 5 5-Back-Lusby vs 5-Djavadi-Scanlin
420 1.50 3.50 4♠ N 4 3-Riggers-Riggers vs 6-Cowan-Ash
420 1.50 3.50 4♠ N 4 6-Murray-Saperstein vs 1-Greenberg-Nadell
170 0.00 5.00 2♠ N 4 1-Leve-Leve vs 2-Hargest-Cosgrove
|